Nate Brown
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Nate Brown
Was a colossus all night.
46 inside 50s meant Kennedy was always going to get on the end of a couple.
But Brown was strong in the contest and usually took decent options to get rid of the ball.
Was my hero for tonight.
46 inside 50s meant Kennedy was always going to get on the end of a couple.
But Brown was strong in the contest and usually took decent options to get rid of the ball.
Was my hero for tonight.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3856
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 2:41pm
- Has thanked: 419 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2016 11:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 269 times
Re: Nate Brown
Agree Brown was great tonight. Did his job and did it well. Like everyone else knows it was our terrible kicking again that let us down again. Richo get the boys in front of goals this week and practice kicking goals. We could have, no, should have won tonight and won easily
Re: Nate Brown
He was a Full Back
Why he was recruited... and did it well
Carlisle, well... I think they need to think about his role
Why he was recruited... and did it well
Carlisle, well... I think they need to think about his role
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2189
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2015 7:09pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 201 times
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Nate Brown
Brown has continuity in his game, Carlisle doesn't.BigMart wrote:He was a Full Back
Why he was recruited... and did it well
Carlisle, well... I think they need to think about his role
Being on a Building site for a year doesn't improve your football ability.
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11340
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1332 times
- Been thanked: 456 times
Re: Nate Brown
Yes. He was much, much better tonight. Hope this spurs something on.
Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Re: Nate Brown
Was good for three and a half quarters.
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Nate Brown
Yeah but they were all over us in the last.Enrico_Misso wrote:Was good for three and a half quarters.
Dam wall had broken.
Kennedy was always going to get some cheapies late. It is the eagles way over there. Was almost impossible to defend. Our mids had stopped dead.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5062
- Joined: Sun 27 Feb 2005 2:30am
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 125 times
Re: Nate Brown
Now, Marto, you're a massive fan of Jack Darling, right? And, not so much of a Jake Carlisle fan.BigMart wrote:Defending your opponent occasionally could be a starting point
They whacked up Darling's stats on the telly late in the 2nd - he'd had 8 or 9. He finished with 11. Did he do any damage after 1/2 time?
Carlisle had 12 and, from what I saw, did some useful work and got better as the game went on - a hand in here, a touch there, a tap on when required.
Neither Brown nor Carlisle were the problem.
Consider some of those around them. Webster made significant errors (mainly before half time - the out of air kick when deep - spare me), Newnes is struggling, Savage has more deficiencies than strengths (particularly when he coughs it up by foot), Geary makes errors a habit, Roberton comes and goes and tends to be straight ahead.
The back half lacks adventurous run. Too motononpacio.
D. McKenzie plays for mine.
'I have no new illusions, and I have no old illusions' - Vladimir Putin, Geneva, June 2021
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Nate Brown
Tend to agree. Normally Darling and Kennedy kills us.The OtherThommo wrote:Now, Marto, you're a massive fan of Jack Darling, right? And, not so much of a Jake Carlisle fan.BigMart wrote:Defending your opponent occasionally could be a starting point
They whacked up Darling's stats on the telly late in the 2nd - he'd had 8 or 9. He finished with 11. Did he do any damage after 1/2 time?
Carlisle had 12 and, from what I saw, did some useful work and got better as the game went on - a hand in here, a touch there, a tap on when required.
Neither Brown nor Carlisle were the problem.
Consider some of those around them. Webster made significant errors (mainly before half time - the out of air kick when deep - spare me), Newnes is struggling, Savage has more deficiencies than strengths (particularly when he coughs it up by foot), Geary makes errors a habit, Roberton comes and goes and tends to be straight ahead.
The back half lacks adventurous run. Too motononpacio.
D. McKenzie plays for mine.
Tonight they were barely sighted until the very end. Carlisle muted Darling.
But Webster was atrocious and Newnes probably played the worst game of his entire career. Both terribly off their tucker.
Id like to see much more DMac and more B White please.