Clayton Oliver's goal
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 12:18am
- Location: Perth,WA
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 29 times
Clayton Oliver's goal
Great goal, but does Anyone else think that this hit the post? On the slo mo it actually looks like it brushed the first goal post and then deflected off the second. Weird. Is it just an optical illusion? It looked like the Melbourne players celebrated quickly to influence the goal umpire's call.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30096
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1234 times
Re: Clayton Oliver's goal
From the description it sounds like the goal that Lou Richards talked about when he kicked it from such a tight angle that the ball got stuck between both goal posts.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10781
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 828 times
Re: Clayton Oliver's goal
I'll drink to that.saint64 wrote:Was it a Claytons goal?
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Re: Clayton Oliver's goal
There were a couple of other goal decisions that looked worthy of a review.
One of our shots was called touched on the line and one of their shots touched near the line was called a goal. Both looked to be close calls but neither was reviewed to check.
I understand goals are checked upstairs before the ball is bounced in the middle, but the point was kicked in almost immediately.
One of our shots was called touched on the line and one of their shots touched near the line was called a goal. Both looked to be close calls but neither was reviewed to check.
I understand goals are checked upstairs before the ball is bounced in the middle, but the point was kicked in almost immediately.
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19099
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1603 times
- Been thanked: 2018 times
Re: Clayton Oliver's goal
Isn't that we're you should be posting?citywest wrote:Please move to opposition forum.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8380
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1907 times
- Been thanked: 883 times
Re: Clayton Oliver's goal
That one of ours that was called touch,Enrico_Misso wrote:There were a couple of other goal decisions that looked worthy of a review.
One of our shots was called touched on the line and one of their shots touched near the line was called a goal. Both looked to be close calls but neither was reviewed to check.
I understand goals are checked upstairs before the ball is bounced in the middle, but the point was kicked in almost immediately.
the TV replay showed the BlueBagger had both hands around the pill by the time it reached the line, and the ump got it right.
It wasn't like a deflection, it was actually in his hands!
We won the game. Move on
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Clayton Oliver's goal
SaintPav wrote:Isn't that we're you should be posting?citywest wrote:Please move to opposition forum.
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Sat 13 Dec 2014 3:06pm
Re: Clayton Oliver's goal
I may be wrong but there may be a net just behind the goals that gave the said illusion.saint64 wrote:Great goal, but does Anyone else think that this hit the post? On the slo mo it actually looks like it brushed the first goal post and then deflected off the second. Weird. Is it just an optical illusion? It looked like the Melbourne players celebrated quickly to influence the goal umpire's call.
Re: Clayton Oliver's goal
Gret comment White Winmar.White Winmar wrote:SaintPav wrote:Isn't that we're you should be posting?citywest wrote:Please move to opposition forum.
- BackFromUSA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
- Has thanked: 51 times
- Been thanked: 508 times
Re: Clayton Oliver's goal
looks like it hit both posts to me
AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19099
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1603 times
- Been thanked: 2018 times
Re: Clayton Oliver's goal
Correct.BackFromUSA wrote:looks like it hit both posts to me
And I only saw it on the news without a reply.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Clayton Oliver's goal
What is a gret comment? Is it like Shane Savage being the best kick in the COMPETION? Or NZ making us the greatest club in Australia? Or we'll get 15000 NZ members, when we can't get a few thousand of them to pay to get into a game. You're really clutching at straws, aren't you? Is that the best you've got? Sorry, I shouldn't even pose the question. That clearly is the best you've got. It wasn't a comment, either. Like the rest of the forum, I'm laughing at you, not with you. I've never seen someone embarrass themselves so much every time they post. Never bring a knife to a gun fight, sonny.citywest wrote:Gret comment White Winmar.White Winmar wrote:SaintPav wrote:Isn't that we're you should be posting?citywest wrote:Please move to opposition forum.
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19099
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1603 times
- Been thanked: 2018 times
Re: Clayton Oliver's goal
LolWhite Winmar wrote:What is a gret comment? Is it like Shane Savage being the best kick in the COMPETION? Or NZ making us the greatest club in Australia? Or we'll get 15000 NZ members, when we can't get a few thousand of them to pay to get into a game. You're really clutching at straws, aren't you? Is that the best you've got? Sorry, I shouldn't even pose the question. That clearly is the best you've got. It wasn't a comment, either. Like the rest of the forum, I'm laughing at you, not with you. I've never seen someone embarrass themselves so much every time they post. Never bring a knife to a gun fight, sonny.citywest wrote:Gret comment White Winmar.White Winmar wrote:SaintPav wrote:Isn't that we're you should be posting?citywest wrote:Please move to opposition forum.
+1
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Re: Clayton Oliver's goal
Good pickup.SaintPav wrote:Correct.BackFromUSA wrote:looks like it hit both posts to me
And I only saw it on the news without a reply.
Reminded me of the old pinball machines!
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
Re: Clayton Oliver's goal
No need to apologise WW.White Winmar wrote:What is a gret comment? Is it like Shane Savage being the best kick in the COMPETION? Or NZ making us the greatest club in Australia? Or we'll get 15000 NZ members, when we can't get a few thousand of them to pay to get into a game. You're really clutching at straws, aren't you? Is that the best you've got? Sorry, I shouldn't even pose the question. That clearly is the best you've got. It wasn't a comment, either. Like the rest of the forum, I'm laughing at you, not with you. I've never seen someone embarrass themselves so much every time they post. Never bring a knife to a gun fight, sonny.citywest wrote:Gret comment White Winmar.White Winmar wrote:SaintPav wrote:Isn't that we're you should be posting?citywest wrote:Please move to opposition forum.
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8140
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 228 times
- Been thanked: 610 times
Re: Clayton Oliver's goal
Can't understand why it wasn't reviewed. Clearly hit both posts
Posting 20 years of holey crap!
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8380
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1907 times
- Been thanked: 883 times
Re: Clayton Oliver's goal
I watched it about a dozen times,
and it actually hit the first post, and accelerated,
hit the other post, and the spin direction changed.
On my first viewing, I saw the acceleration,
but kept repeating to confirm that I hadn't imagined it.
The goal ump was moving quickly towards the ball as it came through, so he wouldn't have noticed the touch on the post.
It's like a cricketer, batting, who must keep their head as still as possible while watching the ball.
and it actually hit the first post, and accelerated,
hit the other post, and the spin direction changed.
On my first viewing, I saw the acceleration,
but kept repeating to confirm that I hadn't imagined it.
The goal ump was moving quickly towards the ball as it came through, so he wouldn't have noticed the touch on the post.
It's like a cricketer, batting, who must keep their head as still as possible while watching the ball.
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 12:18am
- Location: Perth,WA
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 29 times
Re: Clayton Oliver's goal
I think the technician must have changed the slow mo speed after it hit the first post for some reason (which suggests to me that that same technician probably noticed the ball hitting the posts). I can't see how the ball could have actually accelerated if it only flicked the first post, but I'm no expert. Weird.WellardSaint wrote:I watched it about a dozen times,
and it actually hit the first post, and accelerated,
hit the other post, and the spin direction changed.
On my first viewing, I saw the acceleration,
but kept repeating to confirm that I hadn't imagined it.
The goal ump was moving quickly towards the ball as it came through, so he wouldn't have noticed the touch on the post.
It's like a cricketer, batting, who must keep their head as still as possible while watching the ball.
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8380
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1907 times
- Been thanked: 883 times
Re: Clayton Oliver's goal
A spinning football striking a post will accelerate because the energy of the spin is transferred to the ball's speed.saint64 wrote:I think the technician must have changed the slow mo speed after it hit the first post for some reason (which suggests to me that that same technician probably noticed the ball hitting the posts). I can't see how the ball could have actually accelerated if it only flicked the first post, but I'm no expert. Weird.WellardSaint wrote:I watched it about a dozen times,
and it actually hit the first post, and accelerated,
hit the other post, and the spin direction changed.
On my first viewing, I saw the acceleration,
but kept repeating to confirm that I hadn't imagined it.
The goal ump was moving quickly towards the ball as it came through, so he wouldn't have noticed the touch on the post.
It's like a cricketer, batting, who must keep their head as still as possible while watching the ball.
The impact increases the speed.
Like a cricket ball spinning at high rpm, hitting a spot on a pitch, will accelerate.
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee