Do we move Bruce back?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 519 times

Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718243Post older saint »

Bruce really has been struggling for 2 seasons now and i realise it is round 3 but we appear a long way off. I know it didn't work initially with him but could he become a Jeremy Howe type hackman allowed to go for marks and attack the ball front on?

Brown looked really out of sorts last 2 weeks ( although not his fault last week as no pressure on the ball).
Bring Battle in and go with a more mobile forward line with 1 legit tall McCartin and Battle 2nd option with Acres floating forward.

Next week :

In : Battle, Steele, Weller
Out: Brown, Wright, Armitage

Carlisle plays on Hawkins, Bruce can cover a Stanley or the like . Menzel - Roberton.

B: Gaery, Carlisle, Webster
HB: Roberton , Bruce, Savage
C: Newness, Dunstan, Sinclair
HF: Acres, Battle, Billings
F: Gresham, McCartin, Weller
Fol: Marshall, Steven, Ross

Int: Coffield, Long, White, Steele


congorozides
Club Player
Posts: 1129
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004 5:32pm
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 30 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718249Post congorozides »

Not convinced Bruce will be any better or worse than Brown.
I'd rather bypass both and play Goddard or Austin.
If we want Battle in Id be pushing McCartin out.


older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 519 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718252Post older saint »

congorozides wrote:Not convinced Bruce will be any better or worse than Brown.
I'd rather bypass both and play Goddard or Austin.
If we want Battle in Id be pushing McCartin out.
Goddard and Austin need to earn a spot first , not be given it based on position. Agree would like them to be in there if their form warranted it but until then to me Bruce may be worth a try. Chances are he will see plenty off the ball next week if played back


portosaint
Club Player
Posts: 635
Joined: Sat 20 Apr 2013 10:51pm
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718254Post portosaint »

congorozides wrote:Not convinced Bruce will be any better or worse than Brown.
I'd rather bypass both and play Goddard or Austin.
If we want Battle in Id be pushing McCartin out.
Yep. Development wise for sure.

Could Battle play a Membrey type roll?


Ajantis
Club Player
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu 30 Oct 2008 12:31pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718255Post Ajantis »

I think we lack height and body mass in the back. I think bruce would be good down back and bring in battle.
We just dont have a forward who can find space and lead.


portosaint
Club Player
Posts: 635
Joined: Sat 20 Apr 2013 10:51pm
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718258Post portosaint »

Love to see Battle play. Hopefully if our ball use is sub standard and he barely gets a look, he is not crucified


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718264Post dragit »

older saint wrote:
congorozides wrote:Not convinced Bruce will be any better or worse than Brown.
I'd rather bypass both and play Goddard or Austin.
If we want Battle in Id be pushing McCartin out.
Goddard and Austin need to earn a spot first , not be given it based on position. Agree would like them to be in there if their form warranted it but until then to me Bruce may be worth a try. Chances are he will see plenty off the ball next week if played back
Bruce doesn't deserve a game any more than Goddard or Austin right now… he is barely contributing.

Plus he was absolutely terrible as a backman, people seem to forget this was the catalyst of trying him forward.

Bruce to the 2's… and let's have a look at the 3 key backs we have playing at sandy.


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5928
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
Has thanked: 857 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718270Post samuraisaint »

older saint wrote:Bruce really has been struggling for 2 seasons now and i realise it is round 3 but we appear a long way off. I know it didn't work initially with him but could he become a Jeremy Howe type hackman allowed to go for marks and attack the ball front on?

Brown looked really out of sorts last 2 weeks ( although not his fault last week as no pressure on the ball).
Bring Battle in and go with a more mobile forward line with 1 legit tall McCartin and Battle 2nd option with Acres floating forward.

Next week :

In : Battle, Steele, Weller
Out: Brown, Wright, Armitage

Carlisle plays on Hawkins, Bruce can cover a Stanley or the like . Menzel - Roberton.

B: Gaery, Carlisle, Webster
HB: Roberton , Bruce, Savage
C: Newness, Dunstan, Sinclair
HF: Acres, Battle, Billings
F: Gresham, McCartin, Weller
Fol: Marshall, Steven, Ross

Int: Coffield, Long, White, Steele
Some good ins. Isn't Weller injured though?

But we need a second ruckman against Geelong. I'd go with Hickey after his showing for Sandy yesterday.
Last edited by samuraisaint on Sun 08 Apr 2018 1:32pm, edited 1 time in total.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
Royston
Club Player
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon 15 Dec 2008 6:19pm
Has thanked: 27 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718272Post Royston »

Bruce is a dumbsass...this is the reason he was moved from the backline to forward line originally.

He was recruited from GWS to play centre half back but due to his inability to grasp set-plays, think
quick enough, show initiative and play in a smart team oriented manner he was moved from the back half
into the forward line.

He is a good athlete and has good size but you can see some of his decisions while forward beggars belief.
Thankfully being forward means his errors don't directly 'leak' on the scoreboard.

If he had worked as a back it is most likely Carlisle, our one A-Grader in my opinion, wouldn't have been on our radar.

His good season where he kicked over 50 was based on being 2nd banana to Roo and the opposition
not putting any time into him....so he was the surprise factor.

We have massive structural problems with only Carlisle being a quality 'tall' capable of holding and winning his position.

Compare us to Melb (who we were being compared with 18mths ago)....Gun ruckman, gun big forward in Hogan, gun back
in Lever and a great mix of different style mid-fielders...

We are so far away that I am starting to worry we will become irrelevant to all and sundry....as witnessed by an inability to land
a gun free agency...why would you come to us....oh, we are back at Moorabbin !!


older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 519 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718277Post older saint »

samuraisaint wrote:
older saint wrote:Bruce really has been struggling for 2 seasons now and i realise it is round 3 but we appear a long way off. I know it didn't work initially with him but could he become a Jeremy Howe type hackman allowed to go for marks and attack the ball front on?

Brown looked really out of sorts last 2 weeks ( although not his fault last week as no pressure on the ball).
Bring Battle in and go with a more mobile forward line with 1 legit tall McCartin and Battle 2nd option with Acres floating forward.

Next week :

In : Battle, Steele, Weller
Out: Brown, Wright, Armitage

Carlisle plays on Hawkins, Bruce can cover a Stanley or the like . Menzel - Roberton.

B: Gaery, Carlisle, Webster
HB: Roberton , Bruce, Savage
C: Newness, Dunstan, Sinclair
HF: Acres, Battle, Billings
F: Gresham, McCartin, Weller
Fol: Marshall, Steven, Ross

Int: Coffield, Long, White, Steele
Some good ins. Isn't Weller injured though?

But we need a second ruckman against Geelong. I'd go with Hickey after his showing for Sandy yesterday.
If Weller hurt bringing Gilbert and play as utility /second ruck


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718287Post Wayne42 »

The best place for Bruce is Sandy.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Linton Lodger
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2467
Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 256 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718291Post Linton Lodger »

Wayne42 wrote:The best place for Bruce is Sandy.
Agreed.


User avatar
barneyboyz
Club Player
Posts: 1133
Joined: Thu 08 Mar 2007 10:13pm
Has thanked: 177 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718292Post barneyboyz »

Royston wrote:Bruce is a dumbsass...this is the reason he was moved from the backline to forward line originally.

He was recruited from GWS to play centre half back but due to his inability to grasp set-plays, think
quick enough, show initiative and play in a smart team oriented manner he was moved from the back half
into the forward line.

He is a good athlete and has good size but you can see some of his decisions while forward beggars belief.
Thankfully being forward means his errors don't directly 'leak' on the scoreboard.

If he had worked as a back it is most likely Carlisle, our one A-Grader in my opinion, wouldn't have been on our radar.

His good season where he kicked over 50 was based on being 2nd banana to Roo and the opposition
not putting any time into him....so he was the surprise factor.

We have massive structural problems with only Carlisle being a quality 'tall' capable of holding and winning his position.

Compare us to Melb (who we were being compared with 18mths ago)....Gun ruckman, gun big forward in Hogan, gun back
in Lever and a great mix of different style mid-fielders...

We are so far away that I am starting to worry we will become irrelevant to all and sundry....as witnessed by an inability to land
a gun free agency...why would you come to us....oh, we are back at Moorabbin !!
But it is starting to cost us going th other way. We had the crows in a bit of trouble and had we kept that pressure going there was looking like an upset.

This has been the problem for 3 years where without Roo the forwards have not worked, except for skunk. McCartin, well we have to suck that up for a while and hopefully he comes good. But a big fit monster that owns the front half hasn’t been at the saints for years. Kosi should have been it, but couldn’t keep on the park. I would even give Goddard a crack


St. Kilda Football Club. Going strong, since 1960 :wink:
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17028
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3647 times
Been thanked: 2918 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718324Post skeptic »

I think the backlines holding up ok...

the role for Bruce seems to be to lead up the ground and be a link player. It's what he doing best.


User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718336Post degruch »

skeptic wrote:I think the backlines holding up ok...

the role for Bruce seems to be to lead up the ground and be a link player. It's what he doing best.
Totally agree. Needs more time up the ground where he has the tank to run his opponent off, and hopefully deliver better by foot than he traditionally kicks at goal. I couldn't think of anything worse than putting him down back...he was so good a defender a developing franchise club disposed of him for a pick they didn't even bother using.

Sandy. Battle seems worth a punt, leave Marshall as a ruck/forward with Gilbert providing relief while he's resting in the forward line.


User avatar
Drake Huggins
Club Player
Posts: 906
Joined: Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:28pm
Location: The G.G. Huggins Stand
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718337Post Drake Huggins »

portosaint wrote:
congorozides wrote:Not convinced Bruce will be any better or worse than Brown.
I'd rather bypass both and play Goddard or Austin.
If we want Battle in Id be pushing McCartin out.
Yep. Development wise for sure.

Could Battle play a Membrey type roll?
This. He'll probably get flogged early, but is worth a shot.


"Is this the right room for an argument?"
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
User avatar
Drake Huggins
Club Player
Posts: 906
Joined: Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:28pm
Location: The G.G. Huggins Stand
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718339Post Drake Huggins »

Royston wrote:Bruce is a dumbsass...this is the reason he was moved from the backline to forward line originally.

He was recruited from GWS to play centre half back but due to his inability to grasp set-plays, think
quick enough, show initiative and play in a smart team oriented manner he was moved from the back half
into the forward line.

He is a good athlete and has good size but you can see some of his decisions while forward beggars belief.
Thankfully being forward means his errors don't directly 'leak' on the scoreboard.

If he had worked as a back it is most likely Carlisle, our one A-Grader in my opinion, wouldn't have been on our radar.

His good season where he kicked over 50 was based on being 2nd banana to Roo and the opposition
not putting any time into him....so he was the surprise factor.

We have massive structural problems with only Carlisle being a quality 'tall' capable of holding and winning his position.

Compare us to Melb (who we were being compared with 18mths ago)....Gun ruckman, gun big forward in Hogan, gun back
in Lever and a great mix of different style mid-fielders...

We are so far away that I am starting to worry we will become irrelevant to all and sundry....as witnessed by an inability to land
a gun free agency...why would you come to us....oh, we are back at Moorabbin !!
Another poster who grasps the reality of our current situation. Join our challenge to the current board, Royston.


"Is this the right room for an argument?"
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718341Post sunsaint »

sometimes players do get their confidence back in marking contests by moving into the backline but I certainly dont want to risk it
could it be a possible solution to give him two weeks to sort his game out by using him as the tall option link man on the wing?
expose him - and see what he does
Bring Battle in this week give him a go in the forward line or play Marshall as a forward/ruck

Any thoughts that AR has of being final 8 contenders need to be put to bed and we have to start blooding and establishing these highly rated youngsters


Seeya
*************
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718342Post dragit »

skeptic wrote:I think the backlines holding up ok...

the role for Bruce seems to be to lead up the ground and be a link player. It's what he doing best.
Bruce just isn't good enough to be a link player… he's averaging 4 kicks and 4 marks per match this year, that's one link per quarter.


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9142
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 437 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718343Post spert »

We have all identified the problems, we know what needs to be done, and now just need the board to take swift action to at least address one issue and we'll go from there.


sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718354Post sunsaint »

dragit wrote:
skeptic wrote:I think the backlines holding up ok...

the role for Bruce seems to be to lead up the ground and be a link player. It's what he doing best.
Bruce just isn't good enough to be a link player… he's averaging 4 kicks and 4 marks per match this year, that's one link per quarter.
agreed - but thats why I mentioned two weeks blow torch time


Seeya
*************
User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718359Post degruch »

dragit wrote:
skeptic wrote:I think the backlines holding up ok...

the role for Bruce seems to be to lead up the ground and be a link player. It's what he doing best.
Bruce just isn't good enough to be a link player… he's averaging 4 kicks and 4 marks per match this year, that's one link per quarter.
That's deep in the F50 though...although he did play further up the ground last Crows v Saints game I saw in Adelaide, but just couldn't stick a contested mark.


saint6709
Club Player
Posts: 1429
Joined: Tue 22 Sep 2009 8:23am
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718364Post saint6709 »

I think we are already into a development year - and I don't think Bruce is the problem - it hasn't been going his way but he CAN RUN - I would be looking at trying to play 2 mobile rucks who can rest forward - hickey played well yesterday apparently- and Marshall is obviously the other guy - battle can also play AND RUN - so Battle Bruce Membrey - hickey/ Marshall as ruck / forwards ----as mentioned as already think its a development year as of yesterday - so sorry n brown but Goddard/Austin play ----- and sorry paddy/billy - but trade them next year FOR WHTEVER we can get - - put in a new coach and sorry Gears - you've forged a fantastic career from sheer determination BUT get a new captain - unfortunately I don't have a nominee ???
Ps sorry Armo but never again do I think you should get a game over Steele


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18635
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1979 times
Been thanked: 865 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718375Post bigcarl »

Bruce to backline may shore up a defence that has looked all at sea the past fortnight.

Has the club said anything about Membrey?

To me he’s the only walk-up-start tallish forward. Up to Paddy to see if he can keep Battle out.


chook23
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7345
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 147 times

Re: Do we move Bruce back?

Post: # 1718381Post chook23 »

Yes.........to 2nds


saint4life
Post Reply