Reckons the maggots robbed the hawks of a win with the free paid to Lonie late in the game. High pants agreed with the flog.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Barrett isn't enjoying our start to the season he would have had hours of verbal diarrhea prepared to push for Richos sacking. Clear free and had to be paid. Hawkes were stiff as usually that type of free gets ignored our way.saynta wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 2:27pm https://www.afl.com.au/?ref=Net-Header2-AFL
Reckons the maggots robbed the hawks of a win with the free paid to Lonie late in the game. High pants agreed with the flog.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Very true mate.CURLY wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 2:36pmBarrett isn't enjoying our start to the season he would have had hours of verbal diarrhea prepared to push for Richos sacking. Clear free and had to be paid. Hawkes were stiff as usually that type of free gets ignored our way.saynta wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 2:27pm https://www.afl.com.au/?ref=Net-Header2-AFL
Reckons the maggots robbed the hawks of a win with the free paid to Lonie late in the game. High pants agreed with the flog.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Barrett is very bad him, Dermott King and Dwayne Russel are massive StKilda bashers.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 2:47pm I don't understand the comments on this site in regard to <insert official/ journalist/ ex-player/ commentator> hates the saints thus makes negative comments.
It was a contentious free kick and we were very lucky to get it and in the end it impacted the result.
Alternatively we should have got a very obviously deliberate out of bounds in the last 1/4.
Swings and roundabouts IMO.
Are all the commentators and journalists who commented on the non Collingwood blocking free kick in the GF last year that allowed Sheed to goal WCE haters?
There was a shocker in the last 1/4, agreed.
Yep. Gifted the hawks a goal. for the second time.kosifantutti wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 3:10pm There was still over five minutes to go. Worst case the ball is still in our forward line. The reason the Hawks lost is they didn't score a goal from half way through the third quarter.
I thought the worst decision against us was the 50 against Brown. Yeah I reckon he went a metre over the mark but there was so much of that happening particularly by Hawthorn and they always just pulled it back or ignored it.
There could've been another quarter and Hawthorn still wouldn't have kicked another goal.kosifantutti wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 3:10pm There was still over five minutes to go. Worst case the ball is still in our forward line. The reason the Hawks lost is they didn't score a goal from half way through the third quarter.
I thought the worst decision against us was the 50 against Brown. Yeah I reckon he went a metre over the mark but there was so much of that happening particularly by Hawthorn and they always just pulled it back or ignored it.
Well said.
Sicily pushed that Doggies player with only a few minutes to go,Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 2:47pm I don't understand the comments on this site in regard to <insert official/ journalist/ ex-player/ commentator> hates the saints thus makes negative comments.
It was a contentious free kick and we were very lucky to get it and in the end it impacted the result.
media always highlight late frees that influence results.
We were also pretty lucky to get a goal from the Parker tackle as the Hawks player didn't look like he stepped off the mark (on TV) so I think we have a decent run.
Swings and roundabouts IMO.
Are all the commentators and journalists who commented on the non Collingwood blocking free kick in the GF last year that allowed Sheed to goal WCE haters?
What about the umps Curly, don't forget the umpiresCURLY wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 2:51pmBarrett is very bad him, Dermott King and Dwayne Russel are massive StKilda bashers.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 2:47pm I don't understand the comments on this site in regard to <insert official/ journalist/ ex-player/ commentator> hates the saints thus makes negative comments.
It was a contentious free kick and we were very lucky to get it and in the end it impacted the result.
Alternatively we should have got a very obviously deliberate out of bounds in the last 1/4.
Swings and roundabouts IMO.
Are all the commentators and journalists who commented on the non Collingwood blocking free kick in the GF last year that allowed Sheed to goal WCE haters?
How good is it to finally get one our way. Who remembers that night game v Collingwood when they pinned Milne 7 times including a free that was a mistake that cost the match winning goal.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 4:49pmWhat about the umps Curly, don't forget the umpiresCURLY wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 2:51pmBarrett is very bad him, Dermott King and Dwayne Russel are massive StKilda bashers.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 2:47pm I don't understand the comments on this site in regard to <insert official/ journalist/ ex-player/ commentator> hates the saints thus makes negative comments.
It was a contentious free kick and we were very lucky to get it and in the end it impacted the result.
Alternatively we should have got a very obviously deliberate out of bounds in the last 1/4.
Swings and roundabouts IMO.
Are all the commentators and journalists who commented on the non Collingwood blocking free kick in the GF last year that allowed Sheed to goal WCE haters?![]()
CURLY wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 4:55pmHow good is it to finally get one our way. Who remembers that night game v Collingwood when they pinned Milne 7 times including a free that was a mistake that cost the match winning goal.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 4:49pmWhat about the umps Curly, don't forget the umpiresCURLY wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 2:51pmBarrett is very bad him, Dermott King and Dwayne Russel are massive StKilda bashers.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 2:47pm I don't understand the comments on this site in regard to <insert official/ journalist/ ex-player/ commentator> hates the saints thus makes negative comments.
It was a contentious free kick and we were very lucky to get it and in the end it impacted the result.
Alternatively we should have got a very obviously deliberate out of bounds in the last 1/4.
Swings and roundabouts IMO.
Are all the commentators and journalists who commented on the non Collingwood blocking free kick in the GF last year that allowed Sheed to goal WCE haters?![]()
Yorkeys wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 6:13pm It was a very good decision (watch close up replay carefully). Usually in similar scenarios there is typically a ball up as the officiator is either not as skilful as the chap yesterday and/ or take the easy route, or it would go against us. But if a decision is surprisingly correct the surprise or unusual nature of it does not make it voidable. Commentators who claim a specific incident is responsible for a result are fools - there are so many fickle bounces, mishandles, chaos contests and value judgements. It is the cumulative effect that matters. Thank goodness they are not in a profession where intelligent objective analysis and facts based decisions are crucial. Of course they are no where near smart enough to actually be important in one of those.
They sure do, and I think some of them place advanced orders for kerosene.