Long suspension suss

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Winmore
Club Player
Posts: 346
Joined: Mon 02 Apr 2018 10:26am
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 58 times

Long suspension suss

Post: # 1852678Post Winmore »

I understand why the league is trying to stop head high contact, but the club’s meek guilty plea must have been inspired by the meek effort of the players in last weeks game.
I accept that it was a careless act but the club surely could have grown some for a change.


User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8279
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 1151 times

Re: Long suspension suss

Post: # 1852679Post Devilhead »

He was hung drawn and quartered by the Media


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12919
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 533 times
Been thanked: 1818 times

Re: Long suspension suss

Post: # 1852680Post The Fireman »

3 weeks is bull$hite

got ripped off here


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Long suspension suss

Post: # 1852681Post Ghost Like »

Very true, out of all the head high contact, his was the only one where the offending player didn't charge in with the opportunity to tackle, he got himself to where the ball was going & stood his ground in the way all footballers should be taught as they attack the football.

I think it's a cop out by the club.


True Blue Sainter
Club Player
Posts: 1906
Joined: Fri 19 Mar 2004 5:47pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Long suspension suss

Post: # 1852682Post True Blue Sainter »

In terms of legality of the action itself - Ebert's was worse. Made a beeline straight for the player met him head high whilst up in the air.

This crap about the result dictating the suspension is bull.


The Saints are coming!
Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4641
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1332 times
Been thanked: 1342 times

Re: Long suspension suss

Post: # 1852683Post Yorkeys »

I imagine the Club legal rep was warned in informal preliminary discussions by the AFL about the risk of a lot longer if it fought hard. Its name shows it is the AFL's Tribunal; so prudence rather than meekness (?). However if Shiel gets off or penalty reduced then we know the dice is loaded.


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Long suspension suss

Post: # 1852684Post Ghost Like »

Yorkeys wrote: Tue 14 Jul 2020 8:59pm I imagine the Club legal rep was warned in informal preliminary discussions by the AFL about the risk of a lot longer if it fought hard. Its name shows it is the AFL's Tribunal; so prudence rather than meekness (?). However if Shiel gets off or penalty reduced then we know the dice is loaded.
I'm hearing what you say, in some ways I wish our legal system was run like that but understand why it's not when a decision can be made along these lines.


User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8498
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 183 times
Been thanked: 599 times

Re: Long suspension suss

Post: # 1852691Post Otiman »

Regardless of Ben's intent, the consequence was that a bloke got seriously concussed.

This is something that causes permanent injury even after football and should be prevented at all costs, if it mean Ben spends 3 weeks on the beach at Noosa so be it.

I hope for consistency, the bans can only get longer from here.


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Long suspension suss

Post: # 1852693Post Ghost Like »

Otiman wrote: Tue 14 Jul 2020 10:12pm Regardless of Ben's intent, the consequence was that a bloke got seriously concussed.

This is something that causes permanent injury even after football and should be prevented at all costs, if it mean Ben spends 3 weeks on the beach at Noosa so be it.

I hope for consistency, the bans can only get longer from here.
I do see what you're saying Otiman & appreciate that. This is however a contact sport so intent and best practice should be taken into account. There would be 50 times as many people in jail if we were to remove intent from the points of proof.

Best practice is to keep your feet, turn your body and keep your head out of danger. Ben Long did this. He did not fall on the ground, fumbling and scrambling head first.

Take this to the other thread where we try to understand interpretation, intent and prior opportunity. This game is riddled with inconsistencies and trying to make up for the cheap shots of the past by punishing the actions of today doesn't wash. To me anyway.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9645
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 1233 times

Re: Long suspension suss

Post: # 1852694Post CURLY »

Otiman wrote: Tue 14 Jul 2020 10:12pm Regardless of Ben's intent, the consequence was that a bloke got seriously concussed.

This is something that causes permanent injury even after football and should be prevented at all costs, if it mean Ben spends 3 weeks on the beach at Noosa so be it.

I hope for consistency, the bans can only get longer from here.

StKilda get teamed twice here. Longs excessive Eberts to short so he plays us. Typical AFL bulls***.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Post Reply