22under22 Clark, Coffield and King

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6267
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 834 times
Been thanked: 981 times

Re: 22under22 Clark, Coffield and King

Post: # 1871834Post Vortex »

Scollop wrote: Wed 23 Sep 2020 1:23am
Vortex wrote: Tue 22 Sep 2020 3:05pm Farg me! Here we go again. Another tedious and petty thread about past coaches.

Septic and Pollop, you have to let it go, you are stuck in an angry loop and it's not healthy.

Before we know it we'll be going into great detail about how it was wrong RL didn't play Armo in a grand final over 10 years ago.

It's not healthy boys. Lets discuss anything else but your hatred for past coaches. It ruins this site.
Shut your latrine mouth Mr Lavatory Vortex

We were replying to others who started the "Credit to Richo bs"

How about you stick to the thread topic and don't bother with the name calling, twisting of the truth, hatred, righteousness and the I'm better than you attitude...you can leave that up to us unhealthy minded lot
My apologies Pollop. Fester away you straightener of truth.


SuperDuper
Club Player
Posts: 1307
Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Re: 22under22 Clark, Coffield and King

Post: # 1871855Post SuperDuper »

Good to have 3 in the team and Paton and Battle also good players who were eligible.

Grab Caldwell and we have a very good group of 6 who will all improve again next year


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16621
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3493 times
Been thanked: 2763 times

Re: 22under22 Clark, Coffield and King

Post: # 1871858Post skeptic »

Don’t know what the controversy is...
I’m pro-Richo here. This is one of the few utter f&?/ ups that he wasn’t responsible for


freely
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2041
Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 339 times

Re: 22under22 Clark, Coffield and King

Post: # 1871886Post freely »

skeptic wrote: Wed 23 Sep 2020 10:32am Don’t know what the controversy is...
I’m pro-Richo here. This is one of the few utter f&?/ ups that he wasn’t responsible for
didn't mean to make a thing of it - i was only really trying to agree that they were good gets!


Post Reply