30-14

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1891949Post Joffa Burns »

saynta wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 7:08pm
StPeter wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 6:25pm In addition to the unbalanced and unfair free kick count, Eleni paid 3 very doubtful marks to GWS which were never held for sufficient time.

My absolute nightmare game would be one in which Eleni and Nick Foot are umpiring together against us.
Plus that "mark"of the round given to that little s*** Green was clearly touched by Hunter. No mark, play on. f*** me. :roll:
Fair call, and I agree Hunter probably as many fingers on it as uncle creepy with the wandering hands on the dance floor, but I don't have an issue with that decision. If they didn't pay that they'd never pay a pack mark.

If the ball was touched off the boot it's play on but whoever comes down with a pack mark usually gets it regardless of how many touch it first.

I thought Elani was pathetic across the board and without doubt her decisions significantly favored the Giants across the course of the game, however she was also very poor in our favor. The Membrey hold was clearly there but it was soft as he was out of the contest regardless of being held or not, and IMO the Butler call was wrong as he was not tackled or retarded in a tackle.

To me if you don't notice an umpire they have done a good job, Elani absolutely over officiated and imposes herself on the game as opposed to paying the absolutely obvious frees and letting the game flow.

The new rule is surprisingly improving the spectical and scoring, now I'd like to see the AFL reel the umpires in and have them focus on the absolute frees not the soft ones.


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13522
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1308 times
Been thanked: 2012 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1891956Post The_Dud »

saynta wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 7:08pm
StPeter wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 6:25pm In addition to the unbalanced and unfair free kick count, Eleni paid 3 very doubtful marks to GWS which were never held for sufficient time.

My absolute nightmare game would be one in which Eleni and Nick Foot are umpiring together against us.
Plus that "mark"of the round given to that little s*** Green was clearly touched by Hunter. No mark, play on. f*** me. :roll:
They’ve only paid that exact same mark 100% of the time over the 100+ years football has been around... but Saynta doesn’t like the bloke, so play on! :lol:


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22739
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8648 times
Been thanked: 3789 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1891957Post saynta »

The_Dud wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 8:18pm
saynta wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 7:08pm
StPeter wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 6:25pm In addition to the unbalanced and unfair free kick count, Eleni paid 3 very doubtful marks to GWS which were never held for sufficient time.

My absolute nightmare game would be one in which Eleni and Nick Foot are umpiring together against us.
Plus that "mark"of the round given to that little s*** Green was clearly touched by Hunter. No mark, play on. f*** me. :roll:
They’ve only paid that exact same mark 100% of the time over the 100+ years football has been around... but Saynta doesn’t like the bloke, so play on! :lol:
🖕🖕🖕🖕🤏🤏🤏🤏


saint6709
Club Player
Posts: 1423
Joined: Tue 22 Sep 2009 8:23am
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1891967Post saint6709 »

Joffa Burns wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 7:34pm
saynta wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 7:08pm
StPeter wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 6:25pm In addition to the unbalanced and unfair free kick count, Eleni paid 3 very doubtful marks to GWS which were never held for sufficient time.

My absolute nightmare game would be one in which Eleni and Nick Foot are umpiring together against us.
Plus that "mark"of the round given to that little s*** Green was clearly touched by Hunter. No mark, play on. f*** me. :roll:
Fair call, and I agree Hunter probably as many fingers on it as uncle creepy with the wandering hands on the dance floor, but I don't have an issue with that decision. If they didn't pay that they'd never pay a pack mark.

If the ball was touched off the boot it's play on but whoever comes down with a pack mark usually gets it regardless of how many touch it first.

I thought Elani was pathetic across the board and without doubt her decisions significantly favored the Giants across the course of the game, however she was also very poor in our favor. The Membrey hold was clearly there but it was soft as he was out of the contest regardless of being held or not, and IMO the Butler call was wrong as he was not tackled or retarded in a tackle.

To me if you don't notice an umpire they have done a good job, Elani absolutely over officiated and imposes herself on the game as opposed to paying the absolutely obvious frees and letting the game flow.

The new rule is surprisingly improving the spectical and scoring, now I'd like to see the AFL reel the umpires in and have them focus on the absolute frees not the soft ones.
I was at the game and agree with nearly everything you say Joffa - and can say the Saints crowd ( admittedly biased towards the Saints) were absolutely appalled by some of the umpiring

What I don’t agree with is re the Butler tackle - the context of the tackling was that the umps had been hot on dropping the ball/ incorrect disposal all day - although seemed to miss a few for us

But with the tackle itself Ward was running with ball in hand - Butler hit him - front on - with his arms going around ward who dropped the ball

Some are saying it was a bump - only guys who like hospital food bump front on - you bump with your hip and shoulder.

There is no doubt it was the force of the impact that caused the ball to be dropped rather than any type of rag dolling by the hands/arms - but I don’t think the rule asks for a shake from side to side for a tackle to be recognized

But the way I see it is - Ward (player 1 )has the ball and is running and is impacted by an opposition player who hits him (player 1)front on with force and simultaneously has his arms go around him (player -1) and it’s at this point that he drops the ball - simple decision - free Butler


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9625
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 1225 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1891969Post CURLY »

The_Dud wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 8:18pm
saynta wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 7:08pm
StPeter wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 6:25pm In addition to the unbalanced and unfair free kick count, Eleni paid 3 very doubtful marks to GWS which were never held for sufficient time.

My absolute nightmare game would be one in which Eleni and Nick Foot are umpiring together against us.
Plus that "mark"of the round given to that little s*** Green was clearly touched by Hunter. No mark, play on. f*** me. :roll:
They’ve only paid that exact same mark 100% of the time over the 100+ years football has been around... but Saynta doesn’t like the bloke, so play on! :lol:
100% of the time they pay marks when the ball is clearly touched before hand is it. Your taking the piss.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
saint6709
Club Player
Posts: 1423
Joined: Tue 22 Sep 2009 8:23am
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1891972Post saint6709 »

CURLY wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 8:58pm
The_Dud wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 8:18pm
saynta wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 7:08pm
StPeter wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 6:25pm In addition to the unbalanced and unfair free kick count, Eleni paid 3 very doubtful marks to GWS which were never held for sufficient time.

My absolute nightmare game would be one in which Eleni and Nick Foot are umpiring together against us.
Plus that "mark"of the round given to that little s*** Green was clearly touched by Hunter. No mark, play on. f*** me. :roll:
They’ve only paid that exact same mark 100% of the time over the 100+ years football has been around... but Saynta doesn’t like the bloke, so play on! :lol:
100% of the time they pay marks when the ball is clearly touched before hand is it. Your taking the piss.
I want to go to the footy and see marks like that paid - maybe Hunter touched it if you slow the vision and check snicko - but that was a big pack mark that I want to see get paid


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9625
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 1225 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1891974Post CURLY »

saint6709 wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 9:04pm
CURLY wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 8:58pm
The_Dud wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 8:18pm
saynta wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 7:08pm
StPeter wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 6:25pm In addition to the unbalanced and unfair free kick count, Eleni paid 3 very doubtful marks to GWS which were never held for sufficient time.

My absolute nightmare game would be one in which Eleni and Nick Foot are umpiring together against us.
Plus that "mark"of the round given to that little s*** Green was clearly touched by Hunter. No mark, play on. f*** me. :roll:
They’ve only paid that exact same mark 100% of the time over the 100+ years football has been around... but Saynta doesn’t like the bloke, so play on! :lol:
100% of the time they pay marks when the ball is clearly touched before hand is it. Your taking the piss.
I want to go to the footy and see marks like that paid - maybe Hunter touched it if you slow the vision and check snicko - but that was a big pack mark that I want to see get paid
May as well pay touched goals if it’s a exciting bit of play.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13522
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1308 times
Been thanked: 2012 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1891975Post The_Dud »

saint6709 wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 9:04pm
CURLY wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 8:58pm
The_Dud wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 8:18pm
saynta wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 7:08pm
StPeter wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 6:25pm In addition to the unbalanced and unfair free kick count, Eleni paid 3 very doubtful marks to GWS which were never held for sufficient time.

My absolute nightmare game would be one in which Eleni and Nick Foot are umpiring together against us.
Plus that "mark"of the round given to that little s*** Green was clearly touched by Hunter. No mark, play on. f*** me. :roll:
They’ve only paid that exact same mark 100% of the time over the 100+ years football has been around... but Saynta doesn’t like the bloke, so play on! :lol:
100% of the time they pay marks when the ball is clearly touched before hand is it. Your taking the piss.
I want to go to the footy and see marks like that paid - maybe Hunter touched it if you slow the vision and check snicko - but that was a big pack mark that I want to see get paid
Yep, put the super slow-mo camera on and it brushes the blokes fingers a millisecond before Greene takes an absolute hanger. If Curley and Saynta had their way then half the pack marks / speccies taken over footy history would be erased (depending on what colour shirt they’re wearing of course!).

Some people just don’t have a feel for the game!


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9625
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 1225 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1891976Post CURLY »

The Dud your such a protector of the umpires now your excusing mistakes as long as it’s exciting.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22739
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8648 times
Been thanked: 3789 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1891977Post saynta »

The_Dud wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 9:09pm
saint6709 wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 9:04pm
CURLY wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 8:58pm
The_Dud wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 8:18pm
saynta wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 7:08pm
StPeter wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 6:25pm In addition to the unbalanced and unfair free kick count, Eleni paid 3 very doubtful marks to GWS which were never held for sufficient time.

My absolute nightmare game would be one in which Eleni and Nick Foot are umpiring together against us.
Plus that "mark"of the round given to that little s*** Green was clearly touched by Hunter. No mark, play on. f*** me. :roll:
They’ve only paid that exact same mark 100% of the time over the 100+ years football has been around... but Saynta doesn’t like the bloke, so play on! :lol:
100% of the time they pay marks when the ball is clearly touched before hand is it. Your taking the piss.
I want to go to the footy and see marks like that paid - maybe Hunter touched it if you slow the vision and check snicko - but that was a big pack mark that I want to see get paid
Yep, put the super slow-mo camera on and it brushes the blokes fingers a millisecond before Greene takes an absolute hanger. If Curley and Saynta had their way then half the pack marks / speccies taken over footy history would be erased (depending on what colour shirt they’re wearing of course!).

Some people just don’t have a feel for the game!
Never have you spoken a truer word. You certainly don't have a feel for the game. That's tucking obvious.


User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8277
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 1151 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1891978Post Devilhead »

No oroblem with the Greene mark

No problem with the Butler tackle

For ump to see the Greene mark was touched he had to have superhero vision

From where Eleni was standing (other side of Ward) she would have seen both of Butler's arms go around Ward which compromises a tackle even as a split second event

We got some horrible ones paid against us - it happens

But it was the ones we didnt get - the blatant in the backs, dropping the balls and holds that are the issue

30-14 free kick count against is ridiculous in a game we won and that was tight all day

That said we have work to do ...... as do the umpiring fraternity


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22739
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8648 times
Been thanked: 3789 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1891979Post saynta »

CURLY wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 9:25pm The Dud your such a protector of the umpires now your excusing mistakes as long as it’s exciting.
👍🏻👍🏻


sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1891984Post sunsaint »

Devilhead wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 9:31pm
30-14 free kick count against is ridiculous in a game we won and that was tight all day
Not sure if anyone else has bothered but from a brief look at all the results and stats only one side who won on the weekend was on the positive end of free kicks
Professional players suck it up and move on
Chew on that how you will


Seeya
*************
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13522
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1308 times
Been thanked: 2012 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1891985Post The_Dud »

saynta wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 9:32pm
CURLY wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 9:25pm The Dud your such a protector of the umpires now your excusing mistakes as long as it’s exciting.
👍🏻👍🏻
You’d think if you two put your one-eyes together you might be able to see and understand the game like most of the rest of us!

:lol:


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1323 times
Been thanked: 932 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1891988Post asiu »

are the sides making less tackles
(than their opponent)
being given more frees
(than their opponent) ?


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13522
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1308 times
Been thanked: 2012 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1891989Post The_Dud »



I think I see some fingertips brushed, play on?
High contact??

Some people just don’t have a feel for the game :)


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8277
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 1151 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1891994Post Devilhead »

sunsaint wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 9:58pm
Devilhead wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 9:31pm
30-14 free kick count against is ridiculous in a game we won and that was tight all day
Not sure if anyone else has bothered but from a brief look at all the results and stats only one side who won on the weekend was on the positive end of free kicks
Professional players suck it up and move on
Chew on that how you will
Very interesting and I agree good sides just get on with it (can we take off the lid yet????) .... but it is near on impossible to turn a blind cheek to a 30-14 lopsided free kick count where many were missed our way and quite a few were wrongly adjudicated


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1892012Post Enrico_Misso »

The Billings Method wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 7:20pm Eleni is an example of how tokenism doesn't work. She is not up to AFL standard and makes a mockery of umpires in general. To rub salt into the wounds, she received an Australia Day honour. An Order of Australia for her services to umpiring. What services is the first question that comes to mind. The mediocrity of activism at its worst.
It's the Taylor Harris syndrome.
Put up a statue to a female footballer in a sub-standard (though rapidly improving) competition who is seldom listed in her teams best players much less the best in the competition.

I dont have an issue in honouring great female champions like Betty Cuthbert, Cathy Freeman, Margaret Court, Shane Gould etc.
But Eleni and Taylor's recognition is purely box ticking.


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1892014Post Enrico_Misso »

Is there a breakdown of the 30-14 between the three officiating umpires?
That could provide great insight!


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13522
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1308 times
Been thanked: 2012 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1892022Post The_Dud »

Enrico_Misso wrote: Tue 23 Mar 2021 7:48am
The Billings Method wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 7:20pm Eleni is an example of how tokenism doesn't work. She is not up to AFL standard and makes a mockery of umpires in general. To rub salt into the wounds, she received an Australia Day honour. An Order of Australia for her services to umpiring. What services is the first question that comes to mind. The mediocrity of activism at its worst.
It's the Taylor Harris syndrome.
Put up a statue to a female footballer in a sub-standard (though rapidly improving) competition who is seldom listed in her teams best players much less the best in the competition.

I dont have an issue in honouring great female champions like Betty Cuthbert, Cathy Freeman, Margaret Court, Shane Gould etc.
But Eleni and Taylor's recognition is purely box ticking.
A bank paid an artist to make a statue.

Maybe if you and your like didn't troll her so hard in the first place they wouldn't have felt the need to?


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8991
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 343 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1892024Post perfectionist »

Enrico_Misso wrote: Tue 23 Mar 2021 7:52am Is there a breakdown of the 30-14 between the three officiating umpires?
That could provide great insight!
Yes. The male umpires paid 23 of the 30 to GWS and the female umpire paid 6 of the 14 to St Kilda (including two that led to goals).


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9625
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 1225 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1892026Post CURLY »

The_Dud wrote: Tue 23 Mar 2021 8:58am
Enrico_Misso wrote: Tue 23 Mar 2021 7:48am
The Billings Method wrote: Mon 22 Mar 2021 7:20pm Eleni is an example of how tokenism doesn't work. She is not up to AFL standard and makes a mockery of umpires in general. To rub salt into the wounds, she received an Australia Day honour. An Order of Australia for her services to umpiring. What services is the first question that comes to mind. The mediocrity of activism at its worst.
It's the Taylor Harris syndrome.
Put up a statue to a female footballer in a sub-standard (though rapidly improving) competition who is seldom listed in her teams best players much less the best in the competition.

I dont have an issue in honouring great female champions like Betty Cuthbert, Cathy Freeman, Margaret Court, Shane Gould etc.
But Eleni and Taylor's recognition is purely box ticking.
A bank paid an artist to make a statue.

Maybe if you and your like didn't troll her so hard in the first place they wouldn't have felt the need to?
What the hell is wrong with you?


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
StPeter
Club Player
Posts: 1246
Joined: Thu 22 Jun 2006 4:03pm
Location: StKilda East
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 221 times
Contact:

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1892363Post StPeter »

Prepare for the worst with the umpiring again this week.

Nick Foot officiating Saints v Melb.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9625
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 1225 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1892364Post CURLY »

StPeter wrote: Thu 25 Mar 2021 9:42pm Prepare for the worst with the umpiring again this week.

Nick Foot officiating Saints v Melb.
Four to five goal start to Melbourne.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8574
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 1526 times

Re: 30-14

Post: # 1892373Post kosifantutti »

I know this is a bit radical, but I’ll wait until the end of the game to form an opinion on how the umpires performed.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
Post Reply