Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

MickThomas
Club Player
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon 21 Aug 2017 1:23am
Location: Doncaster, Victoria
Has thanked: 77 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896760Post MickThomas »

Enrico_Misso wrote: Fri 16 Apr 2021 1:11am
1965 Saint wrote: Fri 16 Apr 2021 12:03am
IluvHarvey wrote: Thu 15 Apr 2021 11:18pm Not playing well but don’t know how it’s obvious the players don’t want him in the team.
In the first quarter he was creating space and calling for the ball and the players were, every time, purposely avoiding him even if it meant turning it over. I would have thought blind freddy could have seen that
Agree, there was several times when Hill was screaming for it and our players preferred to avoid him even if there was no other loose player.
After the Injectors' game, Ratts said the guys aren't giving it to Hill, they're not using his pace.

It's still obvious, hey.
Are they all dirty on him getting an exemption to tackle and chase because he's 'cough' the 'silk' or the 'cream'?

Everyone in a team has to do the hard things.
He can get knotted, as far as I'm concerned


2020 was an aberration, when we travelled twice to Adelaide and won both, beat Tigers early, beat our bogey Swans. 2021 we've returned to our old ways. Damn
chook23
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7260
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 136 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896769Post chook23 »

The_Dud wrote: Thu 15 Apr 2021 11:53pm
skeptic wrote: Thu 15 Apr 2021 11:40pm Personally think the criticism is overblown because of salary

Hill was all over the ground and works hard. He’s not a tough player and is found wanting too often in contests but that’s to be expected

If we shovel the ball out to him, he’s a killer
Why is it to be expected?

I would have thought not ducking your head in marking contests and laying basic tackles would be expected for every player on the list.
Yep...


saint4life
Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1331 times
Been thanked: 1338 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896805Post Yorkeys »

Ever noticed how in gridiron the Quarterback will throw the ball away or surrender in a tackle if he can't get a clear pass away and the defence is pressing. Why. Because although they are typically extremely big men they are not there to tackle and be sacked they are there to deliver the ball. Apparently they still get paid a lot for their skills. Now in mixed martial arts a different set of tactics applies. So that charming title; there is no place for a reference to that horrible disease in denigrating one of our players, particularly in a fan forum. Presently we are a poor team. Accept it. Team not an individual. Cruelled by injuries and an outbreak of poor form amongst previously good players. Several KPP short, not a good forward set up. Too small. We could easily be 0 for 5. Terrible percentage. The team will slowly work its way through the terrible run of unfortunality that has happened since that final win. Reflect on the sublime passes Brad has given Max in the last couple of weeks, his goal on the run against GWS, artful swerving runs. Last night is not down to Brad Hill that's for sure and Ratts has said he will not be dropped before plenty of others. We were creamed, absolutely descmated in the clearances - possibly that's something to look out before crucifying individuals. Damned skilled ones who seem to present all game regardless, not like some others.


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10937
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3376 times
Been thanked: 2344 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896808Post Scollop »

Yorkeys wrote: Fri 16 Apr 2021 9:23am Ever noticed how in gridiron the Quarterback will throw the ball away or surrender in a tackle if he can't get a clear pass away and the defence is pressing. Why. Because although they are typically extremely big men they are not there to tackle and be sacked they are there to deliver the ball. Apparently they still get paid a lot for their skills. Now in mixed martial arts a different set of tactics applies. So that charming title; there is no place for a reference to that horrible disease in denigrating one of our players, particularly in a fan forum. Presently we are a poor team. Accept it. Team not an individual. Cruelled by injuries and an outbreak of poor form amongst previously good players. Several KPP short, not a good forward set up. Too small. We could easily be 0 for 5. Terrible percentage. The team will slowly work its way through the terrible run of unfortunality that has happened since that final win. Reflect on the sublime passes Brad has given Max in the last couple of weeks, his goal on the run against GWS, artful swerving runs. Last night is not down to Brad Hill that's for sure and Ratts has said he will not be dropped before plenty of others. We were creamed, absolutely descmated in the clearances - possibly that's something to look out before crucifying individuals. Damned skilled ones who seem to present all game regardless, not like some others.
You sound sober


User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1323 times
Been thanked: 932 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896811Post asiu »

and smarter than your average bear


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13522
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1308 times
Been thanked: 2012 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896820Post The_Dud »

Yorkeys wrote: Fri 16 Apr 2021 9:23am Ever noticed how in gridiron the Quarterback will throw the ball away or surrender in a tackle if he can't get a clear pass away and the defence is pressing. Why. Because although they are typically extremely big men they are not there to tackle and be sacked they are there to deliver the ball. Apparently they still get paid a lot for their skills. Now in mixed martial arts a different set of tactics applies. So that charming title; there is no place for a reference to that horrible disease in denigrating one of our players, particularly in a fan forum. Presently we are a poor team. Accept it. Team not an individual. Cruelled by injuries and an outbreak of poor form amongst previously good players. Several KPP short, not a good forward set up. Too small. We could easily be 0 for 5. Terrible percentage. The team will slowly work its way through the terrible run of unfortunality that has happened since that final win. Reflect on the sublime passes Brad has given Max in the last couple of weeks, his goal on the run against GWS, artful swerving runs. Last night is not down to Brad Hill that's for sure and Ratts has said he will not be dropped before plenty of others. We were creamed, absolutely descmated in the clearances - possibly that's something to look out before crucifying individuals. Damned skilled ones who seem to present all game regardless, not like some others.
One of the worst analogies I've ever heard!

Quarterbacks keep their eyes downfield while half a dozen giants are only meters away trying to kill them, taking hits regularly to make sure they get the perfect pass off.

Hill dropped an uncontested chest mark because 80kg Pickett was roaming in the vicinity...

Softest player I've ever seen, and that's no hyperbole.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10937
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3376 times
Been thanked: 2344 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896825Post Scollop »

The_Dud wrote: Fri 16 Apr 2021 9:59am
Yorkeys wrote: Fri 16 Apr 2021 9:23am Ever noticed how in gridiron the Quarterback will throw the ball away or surrender in a tackle if he can't get a clear pass away and the defence is pressing. Why. Because although they are typically extremely big men they are not there to tackle and be sacked they are there to deliver the ball. Apparently they still get paid a lot for their skills. Now in mixed martial arts a different set of tactics applies. So that charming title; there is no place for a reference to that horrible disease in denigrating one of our players, particularly in a fan forum. Presently we are a poor team. Accept it. Team not an individual. Cruelled by injuries and an outbreak of poor form amongst previously good players. Several KPP short, not a good forward set up. Too small. We could easily be 0 for 5. Terrible percentage. The team will slowly work its way through the terrible run of unfortunality that has happened since that final win. Reflect on the sublime passes Brad has given Max in the last couple of weeks, his goal on the run against GWS, artful swerving runs. Last night is not down to Brad Hill that's for sure and Ratts has said he will not be dropped before plenty of others. We were creamed, absolutely descmated in the clearances - possibly that's something to look out before crucifying individuals. Damned skilled ones who seem to present all game regardless, not like some others.
One of the worst analogies I've ever heard!

Quarterbacks keep their eyes downfield while half a dozen giants are only meters away trying to kill them, taking hits regularly to make sure they get the perfect pass off.

Hill dropped an uncontested chest mark because 80kg Pickett was roaming in the vicinity...

Softest player I've ever seen, and that's no hyperbole.
You still can’t blame the loss on one player. I think you don’t have to agree with Yorkeys analogy, but the rest makes a lot of sense


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13522
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1308 times
Been thanked: 2012 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896829Post The_Dud »

Scollop wrote: Fri 16 Apr 2021 10:05am
The_Dud wrote: Fri 16 Apr 2021 9:59am
Yorkeys wrote: Fri 16 Apr 2021 9:23am Ever noticed how in gridiron the Quarterback will throw the ball away or surrender in a tackle if he can't get a clear pass away and the defence is pressing. Why. Because although they are typically extremely big men they are not there to tackle and be sacked they are there to deliver the ball. Apparently they still get paid a lot for their skills. Now in mixed martial arts a different set of tactics applies. So that charming title; there is no place for a reference to that horrible disease in denigrating one of our players, particularly in a fan forum. Presently we are a poor team. Accept it. Team not an individual. Cruelled by injuries and an outbreak of poor form amongst previously good players. Several KPP short, not a good forward set up. Too small. We could easily be 0 for 5. Terrible percentage. The team will slowly work its way through the terrible run of unfortunality that has happened since that final win. Reflect on the sublime passes Brad has given Max in the last couple of weeks, his goal on the run against GWS, artful swerving runs. Last night is not down to Brad Hill that's for sure and Ratts has said he will not be dropped before plenty of others. We were creamed, absolutely descmated in the clearances - possibly that's something to look out before crucifying individuals. Damned skilled ones who seem to present all game regardless, not like some others.
One of the worst analogies I've ever heard!

Quarterbacks keep their eyes downfield while half a dozen giants are only meters away trying to kill them, taking hits regularly to make sure they get the perfect pass off.

Hill dropped an uncontested chest mark because 80kg Pickett was roaming in the vicinity...

Softest player I've ever seen, and that's no hyperbole.
You still can’t blame the loss on one player. I think you don’t have to agree with Yorkeys analogy, but the rest makes a lot of sense
I'm not blaming it all on one player, but I think it shows a deeper problem at the club.

Some players seem more equal than others. Some are untouchable and will never be dropped, while others who bleed for the club seem to be constantly on the chopping block.

What kind of tension does that equate to in the locker room?


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
sks023
Club Player
Posts: 444
Joined: Tue 08 May 2018 3:43pm
Has thanked: 365 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896830Post sks023 »

About time for some tough love
HIll out next week and play him in the thick of it in the seconds


Look out kids, they keep it all hid
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16621
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3492 times
Been thanked: 2762 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896831Post skeptic »

I don’t know... he still seems like an easy target to me

He works hard, gets to a lot of contests, his disposal is decent most of the time and he tends to shine more when our other mids are doing the grunt work and delivering decent supply

Yes his contest work is wanting and he’s been exposed a few times but to me he is FAR FAR from the problem.

Hill to me is not in the conversation to be dropped... there was an absolute myriad of players that didn’t bring it last night and were less present and didn’t work as hard as Hill did

Why is Hill worse then Billings or Ross for example
Dunstan, Dmac, Butler, Membrey etc

This attention his getting doesn’t seem to completely match his output
Whether it’s his salary or something else... he’s getting an awful lot of attention as being the worst when he’s clearly not.

And he’s clearly not lazy or doing the bare minimum
Last edited by skeptic on Fri 16 Apr 2021 10:33am, edited 2 times in total.


User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1323 times
Been thanked: 932 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896832Post asiu »

where’s the ‘tension’ in being called a cancer ?

c’mon

get real


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8999
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 416 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896833Post spert »

How much are we paying Hill to do the bare minimum? ..if that. We delisted Phillips who would at least have a crack and probably contribute more for us on a wing than Hill has ever done


User avatar
Impatient Sainter
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4089
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
Has thanked: 2622 times
Been thanked: 1077 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896835Post Impatient Sainter »

Agree with the OP, but throw Hannebrey into that equation also. The two highest paid players at out club and both are have proven to be major recruiting failures.

Is it any wonder the rest of the list are not showing up!


Milne
Club Player
Posts: 1392
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 5:15pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 27 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896836Post Milne »

skeptic wrote: Fri 16 Apr 2021 10:28am I don’t know... he still seems like an easy target to me

He works hard, gets to a lot of contests, his disposal is decent most of the time and he tends to shine more when our other mids are doing the grunt work and delivering decent supply

Yes his contest work is wanting and he’s been exposed a few times but to me he is FAR FAR from the problem.
Agreed that he is not the only problem, but a guy being paid $900,000 p.a. should be working a lot harder than he did last night.

10 possessions is unforgivable.


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12912
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 529 times
Been thanked: 1815 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896838Post The Fireman »

We all need a scapegoat.


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13522
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1308 times
Been thanked: 2012 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896842Post The_Dud »

skeptic wrote: Fri 16 Apr 2021 10:28am I don’t know... he still seems like an easy target to me

He works hard, gets to a lot of contests, his disposal is decent most of the time and he tends to shine more when our other mids are doing the grunt work and delivering decent supply

Yes his contest work is wanting and he’s been exposed a few times but to me he is FAR FAR from the problem.

Hill to me is not in the conversation to be dropped... there was an absolute myriad of players that didn’t bring it last night and were less present and didn’t work as hard as Hill did

Why is Hill worse then Billings or Ross for example
Dunstan, Dmac, Butler, Membrey etc

This attention his getting doesn’t seem to completely match his output
Whether it’s his salary or something else... he’s getting an awful lot of attention as being the worst when he’s clearly not.

And he’s clearly not lazy or doing the bare minimum
Billings and Membrey have had a great year so far, would be in the top 3 along with Steele I'd think.

Those other blokes you mentioned didn't have a great night either, but still were better than Hill.

3 players didn't have a tackle for us last night, 2 were big forwards and I'll let you guess who the other was.

He gets the attention because of his name, and because on the big stage he shirked multiple contests and didn't really do anything else, so it stands out like dogs balls.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22739
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8648 times
Been thanked: 3789 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896848Post saynta »

oboe wrote: Thu 15 Apr 2021 11:20pm Ratten needs to make a statement and Hill needs to be dropped. No effort means no play.
Ratts said in his presser that Hill will NOT be dropped.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22739
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8648 times
Been thanked: 3789 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896850Post saynta »

1965 Saint wrote: Thu 15 Apr 2021 11:15pm When the game was up for grabs Hills pathetic efforts cost us goals and the team dropped their heads. The players obviously don’t want him in the team it’s obvious from 3000;km away in Perth. f him off and tell King to kick goals when it matters and we might be OK.
Absolute f****** disgusting headline and that's the nicest thing the missus had to say about that crap. :roll: :roll: :roll:


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10937
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3376 times
Been thanked: 2344 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896887Post Scollop »

saynta wrote: Fri 16 Apr 2021 11:13am
1965 Saint wrote: Thu 15 Apr 2021 11:15pm When the game was up for grabs Hills pathetic efforts cost us goals and the team dropped their heads. The players obviously don’t want him in the team it’s obvious from 3000;km away in Perth. f him off and tell King to kick goals when it matters and we might be OK.
Absolute f****** disgusting headline and that's the nicest thing the missus had to say about that crap. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Her name’s notJenny is it?


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22739
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8648 times
Been thanked: 3789 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896943Post saynta »

Scollop wrote: Fri 16 Apr 2021 12:28pm
saynta wrote: Fri 16 Apr 2021 11:13am
1965 Saint wrote: Thu 15 Apr 2021 11:15pm When the game was up for grabs Hills pathetic efforts cost us goals and the team dropped their heads. The players obviously don’t want him in the team it’s obvious from 3000;km away in Perth. f him off and tell King to kick goals when it matters and we might be OK.
Absolute f****** disgusting headline and that's the nicest thing the missus had to say about that crap. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Her name’s notJenny is it?
I don't know anyone called notJenny, sorry.


User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12720
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 736 times
Been thanked: 404 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896955Post Mr Magic »

Over the years I've seen some terrible Thread Titles and this one is right up there as one of the worst.
IMHO it's just disgusting and the OP should remove it and hang his/her head in shame.
You can be critical of player(s) without stooping to this level.
And some of the commentary within this thread brings this forum to a new low, IMHO
To compare a player to a deadly disease that has likely robbed many of the posters on this forum of a loved one or good friend is, IMHO, despicable.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16621
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3492 times
Been thanked: 2762 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896957Post skeptic »

Mr Magic wrote: Fri 16 Apr 2021 4:41pm Over the years I've seen some terrible Thread Titles and this one is right up there as one of the worst.
IMHO it's just disgusting and the OP should remove it and hang his/her head in shame.
You can be critical of player(s) without stooping to this level.
And some of the commentary within this thread brings this forum to a new low, IMHO
To compare a player to a deadly disease that has likely robbed many of the posters on this forum of a loved one or good friend is, IMHO, despicable.
Yeah I agree. I get that the OP is using a hyperbole to emphasise their point but even disregarding the bad taste of it... there’s an emotional overreaction here that I’m finding quite challenging

He’s bad for the club
He’s not trying
He’s not working hard
Cut his contract

It’s quite uncomfortable


outside66
Club Player
Posts: 616
Joined: Tue 09 May 2017 5:39pm
Has thanked: 199 times
Been thanked: 248 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896959Post outside66 »

What a disgusting thread.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11489
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2500 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896960Post B.M »

I think the use of the word Cancer relates to his attitude and effort spreads throughout the team.

I don’t agree with the OP at all, but calling someone a cancer, just means their negative behaviour spreads.

No need to get bent out of shape about it.

I always thought Spider was a cancer when he was at his petulant best. Good when he was up and running, but had attitudinal issues.


lefty
Club Player
Posts: 1297
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004 8:11pm
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: Brad Hill iis a Cancer that needs excising

Post: # 1896964Post lefty »

The problem I see with Hill is, he keeps getting the ball in positions that don't matter, like the back pocket. What we all want him to do is obtain the ball just past the wing and deliver it to King on a string or at least be that player that a defender can kick the ball too, and then play on.
That's pretty much it.

I think our game plan needs to change and it needs to be play on at all costs. The kicks out sideways to the boundaries are not working. We looked fast last year, this year we don't and we rely on King winning a pack mark against 3 opponents.


Post Reply