Team v Port

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

minneapolis
Club Player
Posts: 1423
Joined: Thu 22 Apr 2004 5:35am
Location: Done with MN. Happily retired in Vic.
Has thanked: 1310 times
Been thanked: 239 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897860Post minneapolis »

B.M wrote: Sat 24 Apr 2021 11:36pm Told you Bytel was going to get omitted
You were correct. Why did you think he was going to get dropped?


Nothing better than a good Dad Joke.
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10937
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3376 times
Been thanked: 2344 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897862Post Scollop »

magnifisaint wrote: Sat 24 Apr 2021 9:29pm How does Long stay in? :roll:
He's been awful.
??? No he's on track as a good young player. He hasn't been awful :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

What game did you watch last week? He was the sub in the game vs Richmond. He came in AFTER jimmy got injured

Check out his disposal efficiency versus his team mates

He played half a game and got more effective possessions than a third of our players (most of them played the whole game)


cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4219
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1383 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897864Post cwrcyn »

Why did Bytel get dropped?

Four possessions in a full game playing as a midfielder. Pretty simple.


Gershwin
Club Player
Posts: 1558
Joined: Tue 06 Apr 2004 2:05pm
Location: NE Victoria
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 283 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897873Post Gershwin »

cwrcyn wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 7:38am Why did Bytel get dropped?

Four possessions in a full game playing as a midfielder. Pretty simple.
He had 10 disposals (4 kicks, 6 handballs).
Hill had 10 disposals (7 kicks, 3 handballs).

Why does Bytel get dropped?


summertime and the living is easy ........
Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6264
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 833 times
Been thanked: 981 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897874Post Vortex »

Gershwin wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:44am
cwrcyn wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 7:38am Why did Bytel get dropped?

Four possessions in a full game playing as a midfielder. Pretty simple.
He had 10 disposals (4 kicks, 6 handballs).
Hill had 10 disposals (7 kicks, 3 handballs).

Why does Bytel get dropped?
There would be players asking the same question possibly. He's clearly the Rock Star in the team getting special treatment. I get he has more credit in the bank and it's a really hard decision for selectors but how much more credit does he have is the question. I didn't like that he chose to go to Perth this week and I reckon there would be players feeling resentful about that also esepcially considering it would have been challenging at training this week.

#selectionintegrity


User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897875Post Joffa Burns »

Scollop wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 3:59am
magnifisaint wrote: Sat 24 Apr 2021 9:29pm How does Long stay in? :roll:
He's been awful.
??? No he's on track as a good young player. He hasn't been awful :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

What game did you watch last week? He was the sub in the game vs Richmond. He came in AFTER jimmy got injured

Check out his disposal efficiency versus his team mates

He played half a game and got more effective possessions than a third of our players (most of them played the whole game)
And he puts his body on the line.


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
User avatar
shanegrambeau
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5958
Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
Has thanked: 327 times
Been thanked: 710 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897888Post shanegrambeau »

Vortex wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 10:03am
Gershwin wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:44am
cwrcyn wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 7:38am Why did Bytel get dropped?

Four possessions in a full game playing as a midfielder. Pretty simple.
He had 10 disposals (4 kicks, 6 handballs).
Hill had 10 disposals (7 kicks, 3 handballs).

Why does Bytel get dropped?
There would be players asking the same question possibly. He's clearly the Rock Star in the team getting special treatment. I get he has more credit in the bank and it's a really hard decision for selectors but how much more credit does he have is the question. I didn't like that he chose to go to Perth this week and I reckon there would be players feeling resentful about that also esepcially considering it would have been challenging at training this week.

#selectionintegrity
I often wonder about these things and try to check myself. Surely most players, at a pretty early stage, learn not to harbour resentment.

Why do players like Kent and McKenzie get a contract while other players have to walk on egg shells week-to-week or face extinction?
Why does a player like Douglas Howard get to tell the Saints that he’ll only come over if he plays as a backman?
Why do players like Hannebery have the great paycheck, never play and get commended for their leadership?

I suppose it is part of the gig they try to accept.

I say to myself that all players are remarkably successful in their own right, just for making it that far, and although they may also have their demons, also have a degree of self-belief and acceptance of the general situation..the context of the the remarkable ironies, good and bad fortunes (look at injury for instance- can see your whole carrier go down the tubes width a twist of an ankle) the passions of the fans, the cheap opportunism of the media, and the crooked pay ledger courtesy of the contract system.


You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
User avatar
Impatient Sainter
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4089
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
Has thanked: 2622 times
Been thanked: 1077 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897891Post Impatient Sainter »

Gershwin wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:44am
cwrcyn wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 7:38am Why did Bytel get dropped?

Four possessions in a full game playing as a midfielder. Pretty simple.
He had 10 disposals (4 kicks, 6 handballs).
Hill had 10 disposals (7 kicks, 3 handballs).

Why does Bytel get dropped?
Agree it sends are really poor message. Ratts has created an unproductive situation stating he wont drop Hill IMO!
Last edited by Impatient Sainter on Sun 25 Apr 2021 12:44pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13522
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1308 times
Been thanked: 2012 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897892Post The_Dud »

Gershwin wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:44am
cwrcyn wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 7:38am Why did Bytel get dropped?

Four possessions in a full game playing as a midfielder. Pretty simple.
He had 10 disposals (4 kicks, 6 handballs).
Hill had 10 disposals (7 kicks, 3 handballs).

Why does Bytel get dropped?
Bytel also had 4 tackles (equal 3rd for the team) and I’ll let you guess how many Hill had...

Some blokes just seem to get dropped constantly (Long, Bytel, Dunstan, Acres in past years) while others (Hill, Ross, Geary, Newnes in past years) get auto picked every week no matter how badly they’re playing.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16621
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3492 times
Been thanked: 2762 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897903Post skeptic »

shanegrambeau wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 12:27pm
Vortex wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 10:03am
Gershwin wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:44am
cwrcyn wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 7:38am Why did Bytel get dropped?

Four possessions in a full game playing as a midfielder. Pretty simple.
He had 10 disposals (4 kicks, 6 handballs).
Hill had 10 disposals (7 kicks, 3 handballs).

Why does Bytel get dropped?
There would be players asking the same question possibly. He's clearly the Rock Star in the team getting special treatment. I get he has more credit in the bank and it's a really hard decision for selectors but how much more credit does he have is the question. I didn't like that he chose to go to Perth this week and I reckon there would be players feeling resentful about that also esepcially considering it would have been challenging at training this week.

#selectionintegrity
I often wonder about these things and try to check myself. Surely most players, at a pretty early stage, learn not to harbour resentment.

Why do players like Kent and McKenzie get a contract while other players have to walk on egg shells week-to-week or face extinction?
Why does a player like Douglas Howard get to tell the Saints that he’ll only come over if he plays as a backman?
Why do players like Hannebery have the great paycheck, never play and get commended for their leadership?

I suppose it is part of the gig they try to accept.

I say to myself that all players are remarkably successful in their own right, just for making it that far, and although they may also have their demons, also have a degree of self-belief and acceptance of the general situation..the context of the the remarkable ironies, good and bad fortunes (look at injury for instance- can see your whole carrier go down the tubes width a twist of an ankle) the passions of the fans, the cheap opportunism of the media, and the crooked pay ledger courtesy of the contract system.
I think it’s one of those scenarios that ultimately just sits with the coach and what they’re trying to do.

Ratten like Richo before him and everyone else before that has to decide which good players with bad traits (like a Carlisle) they want to persevere with/cut out and which promising developing players that aren’t entirely ready (like a Bytel) they want to shower with opportunity

Ultimately IMO... coaches live and die on that judgment.

For example, Kent is a player I absolutely don’t rate... very limited skill set, not overly effective, not much chance of improvement... but, last year he was was selected with consistency well past the point that made sense to me.

So looking at it from Ratten’s POV, why would that by?

My assessment of him may be overly harsh... pbly truth to that.

Ratten may see him as a player that:
- Has a higher immediate ceiling than the other options
- Could improve out of sight with more opportunity
- Works hard and is well liked hence reward sends a positive message
- His leadership onfield sees others ply better
- Other reasons

Whether I personally agree or not is of course irrelevant as is the opinion of everyone here... but as stated above, it’s Ratten’s call to persevere or not with the talent he wants/needs to and ultimately, he will live or die by those decisions.

Personally... I’m not entirely sold on his judgment though I like his personality, leadership and mannerisms

I think he’s quite erratic and inconsistent with structure

His judgment with players leans too heavily on past performance/form as an indicator of what could be opposed what form has been over an extended period

And I’m not convinced that he learns really well from his mistakes

That said... one completely has recognise that on his first crack, he exceeded all expectations and led us to our best result in 10years so he obviously knows a few things.


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897907Post Wayne42 »

Maybe the club has a Paul Cronin type who has told Ratten, Hill will not be dropped.

Can't think of any other reason.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 816 times
Been thanked: 765 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897908Post samuraisaint »

Personally I believe that when you are playing interstate in a night game, and up against highly experienced, big bodied players like Robbie Gray, Ollie Wines, and Travis Boak, you don't drop your 27-29 year old proven performers.
Sure our team have not been consistent, but if we drop guys like Hill and Ross in a match against underachievers like Port Adelaide (who, btw, have only won one final since 2015 the same as us), you leave yourself exposed to the sort of sh1tp0t antics we saw when we played them in China in 2019. We were literally shanghaied in that match.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18649
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1544 times
Been thanked: 1901 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897919Post SaintPav »

100 point loss coming up.

Get ready for it.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10937
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3376 times
Been thanked: 2344 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897921Post Scollop »

SaintPav wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 3:52pm 100 point loss coming up.

Get ready for it.
What's your track record like when predicting 100 pt losses?
Should we load up on the Saints 😊


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22739
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8648 times
Been thanked: 3789 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897922Post saynta »

King reckons Patton, Byrnes and Bytel were the coaches favorites, so I'm betting that Ratts is just easing Bytel into the side. Will be a regular before long.along with Byrnes.

https://www.saints.com.au/news/918353/- ... ing-injury


SAINT-LEE
Club Player
Posts: 1148
Joined: Fri 22 Mar 2019 10:46pm
Has thanked: 507 times
Been thanked: 369 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897924Post SAINT-LEE »

saynta wrote: Sat 24 Apr 2021 7:41pm Love Joyce as an in, hate Bytel as an out.

ps; And some keyboard experts here who shall remain unnamed to prevent embarrassment were calling for him to be delisted as season end.
They wanted Bytel or Joyce delisted?

I reckon both have upside but we have definitely not seen 1 entire solid game from either, yet.


Zed
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2174
Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:59pm
Location: by the seaside..
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 181 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897925Post Zed »

Scollop wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 3:57pm
SaintPav wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 3:52pm 100 point loss coming up.

Get ready for it.
What's your track record like when predicting 100 pt losses?
Should we load up on the Saints 😊
God I hope not. I’m going to the game tonight.
Don’t think we can win, but hoping for some kind of minor miracle. No shame in losing to a better team if we’ve played to the best of our abilities. I’m just hoping that we see something close to our best from the available cattle and no more injuries.


Life is never more fun than when you're the underdog competing against the giants.
User avatar
shanegrambeau
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5958
Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
Has thanked: 327 times
Been thanked: 710 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897926Post shanegrambeau »

I am happy Joyce is back in. Just wish it wasn't these kinds of circumstances. I hope he has a thick skin! And that he is not scapegoated.
No, Dougal Howard is no Max Houghton. Maxy could run out, reach over and get a fist over the shoulder of a forward leading. I think Howard is two meters behind. But footy has changed. Leads used to be 20 - 30 meters. Now they are three meter lunges and a forward just needs to spring forward and dash a few meters. (This is my blinkered view of it) I really don't know, and I really, really don't know if Joyce can stop a Dixon..or if he will have to. I am just happy that he gets a run. I am not convinced by our backline. Wasn't even convinced last year. I hope Clav is watching carefully on the telly at the Beach Oval, where all the Sandy boys kick back with tinnies and a BBQ on Sundays no doubt. lol

I hope we are competitive. I dread the worst loss..the most dull, horrible ones...like 31 points or 34 points. Not big enough to call a thrashing so that we can vent and unload. Not close enough to call it a 'fair crack'. Not super close enough to blame the umpires.

Just those losses where you are still in it with ten or fifteen to go, say 26 down, then a coupla late goals to them to rub it in.

Come on Saints, engineer a miracle. Somehow.


You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18649
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1544 times
Been thanked: 1901 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897936Post SaintPav »

Scollop wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 3:57pm
SaintPav wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 3:52pm 100 point loss coming up.

Get ready for it.
What's your track record like when predicting 100 pt losses?
Should we load up on the Saints 😊
Your call.

My track record speaks for itself. 🙌


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
MickThomas
Club Player
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon 21 Aug 2017 1:23am
Location: Doncaster, Victoria
Has thanked: 77 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897940Post MickThomas »

shanegrambeau wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 4:16pm I am happy Joyce is back in. Just wish it wasn't these kinds of circumstances. I hope he has a thick skin! And that he is not scapegoated.
No, Dougal Howard is no Max Houghton. Maxy could run out, reach over and get a fist over the shoulder of a forward leading. I think Howard is two meters behind. But footy has changed. Leads used to be 20 - 30 meters. Now they are three meter lunges and a forward just needs to spring forward and dash a few meters. (This is my blinkered view of it) I really don't know, and I really, really don't know if Joyce can stop a Dixon..or if he will have to. I am just happy that he gets a run. I am not convinced by our backline. Wasn't even convinced last year. I hope Clav is watching carefully on the telly at the Beach Oval, where all the Sandy boys kick back with tinnies and a BBQ on Sundays no doubt. lol

I hope we are competitive. I dread the worst loss..the most dull, horrible ones...like 31 points or 34 points. Not big enough to call a thrashing so that we can vent and unload. Not close enough to call it a 'fair crack'. Not super close enough to blame the umpires.

Just those losses where you are still in it with ten or fifteen to go, say 26 down, then a coupla late goals to them to rub it in.

Come on Saints, engineer a miracle. Somehow.
Dougal Howard.
Yes, he gets led to the ball far too often- he has a curious habit of staying 15m behind his fwd and can never bridge the gap.
Then points n yells at team-mates for some reason after.
The only reason he gets 22 kicks is because he takes the kick-ins. He doesn't fool me.
Just watch today when they show replays of his opponents' goals, using the vision from behind the goals. He stands there like a bloody witches hat


2020 was an aberration, when we travelled twice to Adelaide and won both, beat Tigers early, beat our bogey Swans. 2021 we've returned to our old ways. Damn
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13522
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1308 times
Been thanked: 2012 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897942Post The_Dud »

Howard is a great third man up, but terrible one-on-one


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
MickThomas
Club Player
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon 21 Aug 2017 1:23am
Location: Doncaster, Victoria
Has thanked: 77 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Re: Team v Port

Post: # 1897945Post MickThomas »

The_Dud wrote: Sun 25 Apr 2021 6:43pm Howard is a great third man up, but terrible one-on-one
Howard takes those 'team marks' cos the backmen rehearse it at training.
In the pack is Wilkie, Coff, or Long nudging the pack under the ball.
It's a learned technique


2020 was an aberration, when we travelled twice to Adelaide and won both, beat Tigers early, beat our bogey Swans. 2021 we've returned to our old ways. Damn
Post Reply