Ben King

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Sanctorum
Club Player
Posts: 1831
Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2014 10:08pm
Has thanked: 1447 times
Been thanked: 969 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911407Post Sanctorum »

Vortex wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 11:18pm
BackFromUSA wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 10:50pm
Vortex wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 10:42pm Ben King won't be leaving the GCS for at least 3 to 5 years.
happy to wait until then and get him as a restricted free agent or even wait until he is a free agent.

Marshall, Ming and Membrey until then.
Something tells me we need a stop gap before then. I'm guessing the club will be targeting a key tall forward at this year's trade table as the stop gap. I doubt we can become a top 4 contender until we fix our structural issue up forward and I don't think the development of this list can wait in hope for Ben King to be our guy.
While I would be delighted to see Bing come to St Kilda I'm not sure that will be crucial to success in the next 2-3 years.

The obvious stop gap may well be to secure another experienced ruckman to partner Paddy so that Marshall can become that tall forward to support Ming - in the meantime the Saints have the latest recruit Max Heath (204 cm 94 kg) learning the ropes from Ryder, I have a good feeling about the young "Ditterich Clone" playing in the seniors in 2022 and if that happens Bing can wait....


"To do good is noble. To tell others to do good is even nobler and much less trouble.."

Mark Twain (1835 - 1910) American writer and humorist
Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6267
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 834 times
Been thanked: 981 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911408Post Vortex »

Sanctorum wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:10pm
Vortex wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 11:18pm
BackFromUSA wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 10:50pm
Vortex wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 10:42pm Ben King won't be leaving the GCS for at least 3 to 5 years.
happy to wait until then and get him as a restricted free agent or even wait until he is a free agent.

Marshall, Ming and Membrey until then.
Something tells me we need a stop gap before then. I'm guessing the club will be targeting a key tall forward at this year's trade table as the stop gap. I doubt we can become a top 4 contender until we fix our structural issue up forward and I don't think the development of this list can wait in hope for Ben King to be our guy.
While I would be delighted to see Bing come to St Kilda I'm not sure that will be crucial to success in the next 2-3 years.

The obvious stop gap may well be to secure another experienced ruckman to partner Paddy so that Marshall can become that tall forward to support Ming - in the meantime the Saints have the latest recruit Max Heath (204 cm 94 kg) learning the ropes from Ryder, I have a good feeling about the young "Ditterich Clone" playing in the seniors in 2022 and if that happens Bing can wait....
We definitely will also need a Paddy replacement as early as 2023 depending on how much longer Paddy has left in him. You'd have to think a ready made AFL capable ruckman is almost an equal priority as a key tall forward for our recruiters. Ideally a ruck/forward type. We don't have the luxury of time to develop our own. Don't be surprised if Mason Cox is being looked at as a potential stop gap.


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6267
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 834 times
Been thanked: 981 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911409Post Vortex »

Saintmatt wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 11:48am
Vortex wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 9:05am
Teflon wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 11:54pm
Vortex wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 10:42pm Ben King won't be leaving the GCS for at least 3 to 5 years.
I wouldn’t be so sure on that and I don’t think he’s the only one right now who might want out..
I know strange things do happen but there are a couple of things that conspire against it happening, the main thing is the financial stress that both clubs are under so that will restrict both clubs doing deals that require payouts.

The other issue is Cochrane will not let him go easily and so if it does turn out he does want to go this season the cost to do a deal will be out of reach for us.

The deal we could do with the GC is trade for their pick 3 using some players they need and they are officially on the record as stating they will be in the market for experienced players who can provide onfield leadership to their young list and theirin lies the problem for us to do that type of deal. As we know we don’t really have those type of players to trade. Billings is the obvious one however we would need to throw in another player you would think as a sweetener, maybe Dunsstan but they still won't be getting any onfield leadership so another club might beat our hand.

If we could get their pick 3, and I think it's a long shot, we could then look to bring in a tall key forward from another club using pick 3 and at the moment Melbourne has a couple in surplus, Weiderman and McDonald.

Our best shot at getting Max some urgent support.

Ben is 3 to 5 years away...we can't wait that long.
Sheesh, the Dees would want to throw a bit back at us if we were to give up pick 3 for Weideman or McDonald. I think they're way more like to keep Sam and try and punt Ben Brown (his style just doesn't suit their system).

I thought Ben was another short contract at GCS away from us but I'm not so sure now. They're a rabble. Chairman is a buffoon, Dew seems like a nice guy but clearly doesn't have the support around him. Playing group is either 18-21yo babies or 28yo from other clubs up there to pouch some super. It's a bad, bad list profile and the whole environment is just holiday central.

I can see Adelaide coming really hard for Jack L and Rankine. If that happens - what's Ben really got left to stay for? That said - you're 100% correct on them wanting the earth (which we don't have) for Ben.
Sure the GCS are having a poor season but they are in the phase of a rebuild that doesn't require a head coach of any skill other than to be young, empathetic and full of cuddles. For the GC it's all about getting size, conditioning and games into the core of their list and so when I listen to Cochrane I think he knows he doesn't need to jump at shadows just yet. They know what they need and they have the trade currency to get it, experienced players who can provide onfield leadership and coaching. We don't have any of that type to trade in a single player but a twofer deal MIGHT work, I reckon they will do a deal with someone like the Tiges though for their high draft picks. The tiges could be in a mini rebuild come seasons end and they will have a few Hodge types who the GCS might feel are the better fit than say a Billings and Dunstan.

Our recruiters would be derelict in their duties if they haven't already had a chat to Weiderman or McDonald's managers.

If we don't get a chopout for Maxy in 2022 then we will be bottom 8 again.


User avatar
Impatient Sainter
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4089
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
Has thanked: 2622 times
Been thanked: 1077 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911410Post Impatient Sainter »

Vortex wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:22pm
Sanctorum wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:10pm
Vortex wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 11:18pm
BackFromUSA wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 10:50pm
Vortex wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 10:42pm Ben King won't be leaving the GCS for at least 3 to 5 years.
happy to wait until then and get him as a restricted free agent or even wait until he is a free agent.

Marshall, Ming and Membrey until then.
Something tells me we need a stop gap before then. I'm guessing the club will be targeting a key tall forward at this year's trade table as the stop gap. I doubt we can become a top 4 contender until we fix our structural issue up forward and I don't think the development of this list can wait in hope for Ben King to be our guy.
While I would be delighted to see Bing come to St Kilda I'm not sure that will be crucial to success in the next 2-3 years.

The obvious stop gap may well be to secure another experienced ruckman to partner Paddy so that Marshall can become that tall forward to support Ming - in the meantime the Saints have the latest recruit Max Heath (204 cm 94 kg) learning the ropes from Ryder, I have a good feeling about the young "Ditterich Clone" playing in the seniors in 2022 and if that happens Bing can wait....
We definitely will also need a Paddy replacement as early as 2023 depending on how much longer Paddy has left in him. You'd have to think a ready made AFL capable ruckman is almost an equal priority as a key tall forward for our recruiters. Ideally a ruck/forward type. We don't have the luxury of time to develop our own. Don't be surprised if Mason Cox is being looked at as a potential stop gap.
The issue with Cox is although his contract expires this year he has been getting well paid at Collingwood. I dont think we can afford to be paying 400-500k for a back up 28/29 yo ruckman. Hunter is not AFL standard the club has learnt that, but if there are no other cheaper options about I would rather grab another kid like Liam Podhaski from Vic Metro.


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6267
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 834 times
Been thanked: 981 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911411Post Vortex »

Impatient Sainter wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:37pm
Vortex wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:22pm
Sanctorum wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:10pm
Vortex wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 11:18pm
BackFromUSA wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 10:50pm
Vortex wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 10:42pm Ben King won't be leaving the GCS for at least 3 to 5 years.
happy to wait until then and get him as a restricted free agent or even wait until he is a free agent.

Marshall, Ming and Membrey until then.
Something tells me we need a stop gap before then. I'm guessing the club will be targeting a key tall forward at this year's trade table as the stop gap. I doubt we can become a top 4 contender until we fix our structural issue up forward and I don't think the development of this list can wait in hope for Ben King to be our guy.
While I would be delighted to see Bing come to St Kilda I'm not sure that will be crucial to success in the next 2-3 years.

The obvious stop gap may well be to secure another experienced ruckman to partner Paddy so that Marshall can become that tall forward to support Ming - in the meantime the Saints have the latest recruit Max Heath (204 cm 94 kg) learning the ropes from Ryder, I have a good feeling about the young "Ditterich Clone" playing in the seniors in 2022 and if that happens Bing can wait....
We definitely will also need a Paddy replacement as early as 2023 depending on how much longer Paddy has left in him. You'd have to think a ready made AFL capable ruckman is almost an equal priority as a key tall forward for our recruiters. Ideally a ruck/forward type. We don't have the luxury of time to develop our own. Don't be surprised if Mason Cox is being looked at as a potential stop gap.
The issue with Cox is although his contract expires this year he has been getting well paid at Collingwood. I dont think we can afford to be paying 400-500k for a back up 28/29 yo ruckman. Hunter is not AFL standard the club has learnt that, but if there are no other cheaper options about I would rather grab another kid like Liam Podhaski from Vic Metro.
I think if Mason wants to extend his AFL career beyond 2020 he will know he has to take a serious haircut on his salary. I think he'd be gettable at 350k with performance triggers.


Saintmatt
SS Life Member
Posts: 2559
Joined: Fri 20 Jan 2012 4:57pm
Has thanked: 2029 times
Been thanked: 1148 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911413Post Saintmatt »

Vortex wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:35pm
Saintmatt wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 11:48am
Vortex wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 9:05am
Teflon wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 11:54pm
Vortex wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 10:42pm Ben King won't be leaving the GCS for at least 3 to 5 years.
I wouldn’t be so sure on that and I don’t think he’s the only one right now who might want out..
I know strange things do happen but there are a couple of things that conspire against it happening, the main thing is the financial stress that both clubs are under so that will restrict both clubs doing deals that require payouts.

The other issue is Cochrane will not let him go easily and so if it does turn out he does want to go this season the cost to do a deal will be out of reach for us.

The deal we could do with the GC is trade for their pick 3 using some players they need and they are officially on the record as stating they will be in the market for experienced players who can provide onfield leadership to their young list and theirin lies the problem for us to do that type of deal. As we know we don’t really have those type of players to trade. Billings is the obvious one however we would need to throw in another player you would think as a sweetener, maybe Dunsstan but they still won't be getting any onfield leadership so another club might beat our hand.

If we could get their pick 3, and I think it's a long shot, we could then look to bring in a tall key forward from another club using pick 3 and at the moment Melbourne has a couple in surplus, Weiderman and McDonald.

Our best shot at getting Max some urgent support.

Ben is 3 to 5 years away...we can't wait that long.
Sheesh, the Dees would want to throw a bit back at us if we were to give up pick 3 for Weideman or McDonald. I think they're way more like to keep Sam and try and punt Ben Brown (his style just doesn't suit their system).

I thought Ben was another short contract at GCS away from us but I'm not so sure now. They're a rabble. Chairman is a buffoon, Dew seems like a nice guy but clearly doesn't have the support around him. Playing group is either 18-21yo babies or 28yo from other clubs up there to pouch some super. It's a bad, bad list profile and the whole environment is just holiday central.

I can see Adelaide coming really hard for Jack L and Rankine. If that happens - what's Ben really got left to stay for? That said - you're 100% correct on them wanting the earth (which we don't have) for Ben.
Sure the GCS are having a poor season but they are in the phase of a rebuild that doesn't require a head coach of any skill other than to be young, empathetic and full of cuddles. For the GC it's all about getting size, conditioning and games into the core of their list and so when I listen to Cochrane I think he knows he doesn't need to jump at shadows just yet. They know what they need and they have the trade currency to get it, experienced players who can provide onfield leadership and coaching. We don't have any of that type to trade in a single player but a twofer deal MIGHT work, I reckon they will do a deal with someone like the Tiges though for their high draft picks. The tiges could be in a mini rebuild come seasons end and they will have a few Hodge types who the GCS might feel are the better fit than say a Billings and Dunstan.

Our recruiters would be derelict in their duties if they haven't already had a chat to Weiderman or McDonald's managers.

If we don't get a chopout for Maxy in 2022 then we will be bottom 8 again.
I agree that Cochrane knows what he needs; but I'm not sure he'll be able to get it. He needs a few more Brandon Ellis types AND he also needs to keep his younger players at the same time. As another posted noted - Bing and JackL were re-signed with huge whacks of AFL Ambassador $ ... but that's all gone. They just have footy contracts now.

I see the GCS problem as being if they can't retain their young talent - then all the Brandon Ellis' in the world won't help - that'll just create a mid age list. I'd love to have Bing but, we'll have to AGAIN trade away our future to get him. I think I'd rather get a Paddy replacement (of similar quality) so that Marshall can play more forward/ruck. He's the natural chop out for Ming and we already have him. McDonald or Weideman would be great but, I don't know what we'd have to pay to get one.

Above all else - for the love of God - just draft the best true/genuine/bona fide midfielder that we can with our first pick.


Go you red, black & white warriors
Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6267
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 834 times
Been thanked: 981 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911415Post Vortex »

Saintmatt wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 1:05pm
Vortex wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:35pm
Saintmatt wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 11:48am
Vortex wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 9:05am
Teflon wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 11:54pm
Vortex wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 10:42pm Ben King won't be leaving the GCS for at least 3 to 5 years.
I wouldn’t be so sure on that and I don’t think he’s the only one right now who might want out..
I know strange things do happen but there are a couple of things that conspire against it happening, the main thing is the financial stress that both clubs are under so that will restrict both clubs doing deals that require payouts.

The other issue is Cochrane will not let him go easily and so if it does turn out he does want to go this season the cost to do a deal will be out of reach for us.

The deal we could do with the GC is trade for their pick 3 using some players they need and they are officially on the record as stating they will be in the market for experienced players who can provide onfield leadership to their young list and theirin lies the problem for us to do that type of deal. As we know we don’t really have those type of players to trade. Billings is the obvious one however we would need to throw in another player you would think as a sweetener, maybe Dunsstan but they still won't be getting any onfield leadership so another club might beat our hand.

If we could get their pick 3, and I think it's a long shot, we could then look to bring in a tall key forward from another club using pick 3 and at the moment Melbourne has a couple in surplus, Weiderman and McDonald.

Our best shot at getting Max some urgent support.

Ben is 3 to 5 years away...we can't wait that long.
Sheesh, the Dees would want to throw a bit back at us if we were to give up pick 3 for Weideman or McDonald. I think they're way more like to keep Sam and try and punt Ben Brown (his style just doesn't suit their system).

I thought Ben was another short contract at GCS away from us but I'm not so sure now. They're a rabble. Chairman is a buffoon, Dew seems like a nice guy but clearly doesn't have the support around him. Playing group is either 18-21yo babies or 28yo from other clubs up there to pouch some super. It's a bad, bad list profile and the whole environment is just holiday central.

I can see Adelaide coming really hard for Jack L and Rankine. If that happens - what's Ben really got left to stay for? That said - you're 100% correct on them wanting the earth (which we don't have) for Ben.
Sure the GCS are having a poor season but they are in the phase of a rebuild that doesn't require a head coach of any skill other than to be young, empathetic and full of cuddles. For the GC it's all about getting size, conditioning and games into the core of their list and so when I listen to Cochrane I think he knows he doesn't need to jump at shadows just yet. They know what they need and they have the trade currency to get it, experienced players who can provide onfield leadership and coaching. We don't have any of that type to trade in a single player but a twofer deal MIGHT work, I reckon they will do a deal with someone like the Tiges though for their high draft picks. The tiges could be in a mini rebuild come seasons end and they will have a few Hodge types who the GCS might feel are the better fit than say a Billings and Dunstan.

Our recruiters would be derelict in their duties if they haven't already had a chat to Weiderman or McDonald's managers.

If we don't get a chopout for Maxy in 2022 then we will be bottom 8 again.
I agree that Cochrane knows what he needs; but I'm not sure he'll be able to get it. He needs a few more Brandon Ellis types AND he also needs to keep his younger players at the same time. As another posted noted - Bing and JackL were re-signed with huge whacks of AFL Ambassador $ ... but that's all gone. They just have footy contracts now.

I see the GCS problem as being if they can't retain their young talent - then all the Brandon Ellis' in the world won't help - that'll just create a mid age list. I'd love to have Bing but, we'll have to AGAIN trade away our future to get him. I think I'd rather get a Paddy replacement (of similar quality) so that Marshall can play more forward/ruck. He's the natural chop out for Ming and we already have him. McDonald or Weideman would be great but, I don't know what we'd have to pay to get one.

Above all else - for the love of God - just draft the best true/genuine/bona fide midfielder that we can with our first pick.
Totally agree re a Paddy replacement although I reckon we have possibly one more good season left in Paddy so we have 2 trade periods to secure the Padddy replacement. Who is gettable is the question. Can Maxy weight until 2023 for a chopout though. Would you take Mason Cox as a stop gap?



And also agree on another mid.


terry smith rules
SS Life Member
Posts: 2512
Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
Location: Abiding
Has thanked: 169 times
Been thanked: 369 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911418Post terry smith rules »

Vortex wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:51pm
Impatient Sainter wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:37pm
Vortex wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:22pm
Sanctorum wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:10pm
Vortex wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 11:18pm
BackFromUSA wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 10:50pm
Vortex wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 10:42pm Ben King won't be leaving the GCS for at least 3 to 5 years.
happy to wait until then and get him as a restricted free agent or even wait until he is a free agent.

Marshall, Ming and Membrey until then.
Something tells me we need a stop gap before then. I'm guessing the club will be targeting a key tall forward at this year's trade table as the stop gap. I doubt we can become a top 4 contender until we fix our structural issue up forward and I don't think the development of this list can wait in hope for Ben King to be our guy.
While I would be delighted to see Bing come to St Kilda I'm not sure that will be crucial to success in the next 2-3 years.

The obvious stop gap may well be to secure another experienced ruckman to partner Paddy so that Marshall can become that tall forward to support Ming - in the meantime the Saints have the latest recruit Max Heath (204 cm 94 kg) learning the ropes from Ryder, I have a good feeling about the young "Ditterich Clone" playing in the seniors in 2022 and if that happens Bing can wait....
We definitely will also need a Paddy replacement as early as 2023 depending on how much longer Paddy has left in him. You'd have to think a ready made AFL capable ruckman is almost an equal priority as a key tall forward for our recruiters. Ideally a ruck/forward type. We don't have the luxury of time to develop our own. Don't be surprised if Mason Cox is being looked at as a potential stop gap.
The issue with Cox is although his contract expires this year he has been getting well paid at Collingwood. I dont think we can afford to be paying 400-500k for a back up 28/29 yo ruckman. Hunter is not AFL standard the club has learnt that, but if there are no other cheaper options about I would rather grab another kid like Liam Podhaski from Vic Metro.
I think if Mason wants to extend his AFL career beyond 2020 he will know he has to take a serious haircut on his salary. I think he'd be gettable at 350k with performance triggers.
Only issue with Mason is HE CAN’T PLAY

Huge question marks over Weidemann too, very ordinary this year

Why not look at Jake Waterman at the Eagles, can’t get a regular game and has a crack

Compare his figures to Weidemann or Cox, know who I would be after


" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."

— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911419Post Ghost Like »

I wanted Tom McDonald during the trade period last year, that ship has sailed unfortunately. Melbourne were very lucky no one grabbed him.

Weidmann would be nice but sense he'd cost as much as Ben so I'd rather Ben. I also do not think Melbourne will off load him. I agree with Saintmatt, they will try to jettison Ben Brown.

While we are dreaming about who is gettable, providing we have currency. Is Cerra gettable?

In terms of rucks, yes we need a back up for Paddy. Although I'm hoping he has two more years in him. A no for me in regards to Mason Cox. Even Collingwood preferred a kid over him when Grundy was out. Grab another beanpole ruck / fwd at this years drafts, national or rookie. Goodbye Hunter, goodbye Alabakis, goodbye McKernan.


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6267
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 834 times
Been thanked: 981 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911421Post Vortex »

terry smith rules wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 2:11pm
Vortex wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:51pm

I think if Mason wants to extend his AFL career beyond 2020 he will know he has to take a serious haircut on his salary. I think he'd be gettable at 350k with performance triggers.
Only issue with Mason is HE CAN’T PLAY

Huge question marks over Weidemann too, very ordinary this year

Why not look at Jake Waterman at the Eagles, can’t get a regular game and has a crack

Compare his figures to Weidemann or Cox, know who I would be after
What are the chaces of luring Waterman out of Perth, probably no chance I'm guessing. And I think the WCE forward line will get a makeover in the off season so more opportunity may be coming his way real soon.


Weideman and Waterman compare very evenly. Weideman has been battling injury issues including a hip complaint so I'd expect him to be capable of recapturing his 2018 finals form when he single handedly tore Geelong a new one.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22759
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8672 times
Been thanked: 3793 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911422Post saynta »

terry smith rules wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 2:11pm
Vortex wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:51pm
Impatient Sainter wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:37pm
Vortex wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:22pm
Sanctorum wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:10pm
Vortex wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 11:18pm
BackFromUSA wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 10:50pm
Vortex wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 10:42pm Ben King won't be leaving the GCS for at least 3 to 5 years.
happy to wait until then and get him as a restricted free agent or even wait until he is a free agent.

Marshall, Ming and Membrey until then.
Something tells me we need a stop gap before then. I'm guessing the club will be targeting a key tall forward at this year's trade table as the stop gap. I doubt we can become a top 4 contender until we fix our structural issue up forward and I don't think the development of this list can wait in hope for Ben King to be our guy.
While I would be delighted to see Bing come to St Kilda I'm not sure that will be crucial to success in the next 2-3 years.

The obvious stop gap may well be to secure another experienced ruckman to partner Paddy so that Marshall can become that tall forward to support Ming - in the meantime the Saints have the latest recruit Max Heath (204 cm 94 kg) learning the ropes from Ryder, I have a good feeling about the young "Ditterich Clone" playing in the seniors in 2022 and if that happens Bing can wait....
We definitely will also need a Paddy replacement as early as 2023 depending on how much longer Paddy has left in him. You'd have to think a ready made AFL capable ruckman is almost an equal priority as a key tall forward for our recruiters. Ideally a ruck/forward type. We don't have the luxury of time to develop our own. Don't be surprised if Mason Cox is being looked at as a potential stop gap.
The issue with Cox is although his contract expires this year he has been getting well paid at Collingwood. I dont think we can afford to be paying 400-500k for a back up 28/29 yo ruckman. Hunter is not AFL standard the club has learnt that, but if there are no other cheaper options about I would rather grab another kid like Liam Podhaski from Vic Metro.
I think if Mason wants to extend his AFL career beyond 2020 he will know he has to take a serious haircut on his salary. I think he'd be gettable at 350k with performance triggers.
Only issue with Mason is HE CAN’T PLAY

Huge question marks over Weidemann too, very ordinary this year

Why not look at Jake Waterman at the Eagles, can’t get a regular game and has a crack

Compare his figures to Weidemann or Cox, know who I would be after
Mason Cox is not a footballer's arsehole FFS. Someone joking are they? We certainly don't need the filth's rubbish.


User avatar
Impatient Sainter
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4089
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
Has thanked: 2622 times
Been thanked: 1077 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911424Post Impatient Sainter »

If we dont pick up Ben King perhaps the club should look at Elliott Himmelberg from the Crows. A tall forward who can pinch hit in the ruck and being over looked because of Tilthorpe.


terry smith rules
SS Life Member
Posts: 2512
Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
Location: Abiding
Has thanked: 169 times
Been thanked: 369 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911428Post terry smith rules »

Vortex wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 2:39pm
terry smith rules wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 2:11pm
Vortex wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:51pm

I think if Mason wants to extend his AFL career beyond 2020 he will know he has to take a serious haircut on his salary. I think he'd be gettable at 350k with performance triggers.
Only issue with Mason is HE CAN’T PLAY

Huge question marks over Weidemann too, very ordinary this year

Why not look at Jake Waterman at the Eagles, can’t get a regular game and has a crack

Compare his figures to Weidemann or Cox, know who I would be after
What are the chaces of luring Waterman out of Perth, probably no chance I'm guessing. And I think the WCE forward line will get a makeover in the off season so more opportunity may be coming his way real soon.


Weideman and Waterman compare very evenly. Weideman has been battling injury issues including a hip complaint so I'd expect him to be capable of recapturing his 2018 finals form when he single handedly tore Geelong a new one.
Essendon got the Waterman brother so …..maybe


" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."

— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6267
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 834 times
Been thanked: 981 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911469Post Vortex »

terry smith rules wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 5:24pm
Vortex wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 2:39pm
terry smith rules wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 2:11pm
Vortex wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 12:51pm

I think if Mason wants to extend his AFL career beyond 2020 he will know he has to take a serious haircut on his salary. I think he'd be gettable at 350k with performance triggers.
Only issue with Mason is HE CAN’T PLAY

Huge question marks over Weidemann too, very ordinary this year

Why not look at Jake Waterman at the Eagles, can’t get a regular game and has a crack

Compare his figures to Weidemann or Cox, know who I would be after
What are the chaces of luring Waterman out of Perth, probably no chance I'm guessing. And I think the WCE forward line will get a makeover in the off season so more opportunity may be coming his way real soon.


Weideman and Waterman compare very evenly. Weideman has been battling injury issues including a hip complaint so I'd expect him to be capable of recapturing his 2018 finals form when he single handedly tore Geelong a new one.
Essendon got the Waterman brother so …..maybe
Well there ya go. After knowing that I now think it's possible. Let's hope the brothers wanna rock it up in Melbourne.


Toy Saint
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2203
Joined: Wed 19 Aug 2009 10:32pm
Location: Del Mar, California
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911474Post Toy Saint »

Watching Ben King it's hard not not to think he's Max and barrack for him to do well.


User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8082
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1771 times
Been thanked: 822 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911478Post WellardSaint »

Toy Saint wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 9:58pm Watching Ben King it's hard not not to think he's Max and barrack for him to do well.
It's even easier to barrack for him when he's playing against those thugs


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
PADDLEPOP1001
Club Player
Posts: 1223
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 1:18pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 570 times
Been thanked: 109 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911479Post PADDLEPOP1001 »

Will not be at the saints after that game!


PADDLEPOP1000
User avatar
The Recruit
Club Player
Posts: 912
Joined: Tue 12 May 2015 12:50am
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 118 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911480Post The Recruit »

One game doesn’t make living and playing on the gold coast away from family and friends any better.

Bottom line
Max has signed a big contract
Ben has held off negotiating an extension.
If he was staying he would have signed on for two more years after 2022 by now

If anything
Playing and living in Melb for the next three weeks might make Ben realise how much he wants to come home


Banger9798
SS Life Member
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
Has thanked: 688 times
Been thanked: 766 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911481Post Banger9798 »

Get him


The Artist formerly known as Fugazi
SaintJohno
Club Player
Posts: 332
Joined: Mon 27 Jan 2020 10:05pm
Has thanked: 208 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911482Post SaintJohno »

Banger9798 wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 11:43pmGet him
I agree, once these guys get their bodies bigger and their confidence right they're going to be scary for opposition to deal with x 2.


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23139
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 728 times
Been thanked: 1762 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911483Post Teflon »

Yep to Bing and if reports are right he may even have an early exit clause in that latest contract he signed...
Either way will be interesting off-season and we’ll know early one way or another ....he either re-signs with GC (you can imagine they’ll want it done ASAP and not let him go into 2022 in his last year..) IF he doesn’t do that extension by end this season I think it’s on.


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16621
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3493 times
Been thanked: 2763 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911484Post skeptic »

Geeez I bet Max would love that delivery. Reckon he’s the better contested mark at this stage but Ben is better at finding space


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12919
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 533 times
Been thanked: 1818 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911487Post The Fireman »

Welcome to the Saints Ben


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23139
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 728 times
Been thanked: 1762 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911489Post Teflon »

skeptic wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 12:03am Geeez I bet Max would love that delivery. Reckon he’s the better contested mark at this stage but Ben is better at finding space
And you would be right - saw the below post on BF thought it interesting (been banned lately so had lots more Tim to peruse) ...interesting reading but to me...Ben clearly plays the lead up role better ...,Max far better contested ....point is play 1 at roaming CHF/Link player and other out of square .....we’d be a nightmare (still grab mid with this years pick and pray to god we get an academy steal too...)

******************************

The main differences are
- Ben has kicked straight while Max has not. Ben had 55 shots on goal in his 14 games this year and converting at 61.8% while Max has had 48 shots from his 13 games and converting at 37.5%.

- While Ben has 6 more marks inside 50 this year, Max has significantly more contested marks.

- Ben has had 4 GA this year compared to Max's 9, which could be explained by each sides forward set up or Ben backing himself more to kick the goal but the difference in that number just stood out in comparison to how similar all their other numbers are.

And when you look at their one-on-one win rate, Max is in the top bracket alongside Hawkins having a 44% win rate in those contests while only losing 16%. While Ben struggles in one-on-ones with his win rate at 25% while his loss rate is at 39% which puts him 2nd to Josh Bruce for having the worst win-loss differential. This might have more to do with how Gold Coast set up their forward line or move the ball, but also shows the impact of Max's contested marking ability up forward compared to Ben who does better getting that separation from defender to get the uncontested mark.

All this to say, Max isn't really behind his brother in terms of quality. He just has the yips.


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30069
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1223 times

Re: Ben King

Post: # 1911491Post saintsRrising »

Teflon wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 12:36am
skeptic wrote: Fri 02 Jul 2021 12:03am Geeez I bet Max would love that delivery. Reckon he’s the better contested mark at this stage but Ben is better at finding space
And you would be right - saw the below post on BF thought it interesting (been banned lately so had lots more Tim to peruse) ...interesting reading but to me...Ben clearly plays the lead up role better ...,Max far better contested ....point is play 1 at roaming CHF/Link player and other out of square .....we’d be a nightmare (still grab mid with this years pick and pray to god we get an academy steal too...)

******************************

The main differences are
- Ben has kicked straight while Max has not. Ben had 55 shots on goal in his 14 games this year and converting at 61.8% while Max has had 48 shots from his 13 games and converting at 37.5%.

- While Ben has 6 more marks inside 50 this year, Max has significantly more contested marks.

- Ben has had 4 GA this year compared to Max's 9, which could be explained by each sides forward set up or Ben backing himself more to kick the goal but the difference in that number just stood out in comparison to how similar all their other numbers are.

And when you look at their one-on-one win rate, Max is in the top bracket alongside Hawkins having a 44% win rate in those contests while only losing 16%. While Ben struggles in one-on-ones with his win rate at 25% while his loss rate is at 39% which puts him 2nd to Josh Bruce for having the worst win-loss differential. This might have more to do with how Gold Coast set up their forward line or move the ball, but also shows the impact of Max's contested marking ability up forward compared to Ben who does better getting that separation from defender to get the uncontested mark.

All this to say, Max isn't really behind his brother in terms of quality. He just has the yips.

That plus the ACL and all the lost recovery time. Ben effectively has a year head start on Max.

Ben has had more experience at the highest level, and more of a run to build his body and tank.

Ben is at 46 games and Max at 31. Typically many players start to really fond their feet after 50 odd games. Big forwards probably longer than that.


With both players they will certainly get a lot, lot better yet.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Post Reply