Too many players with no impact

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
bangaulegend
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2490
Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 546 times

Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920357Post bangaulegend »

Good effort but too much left to too few . So different to last week when we had a even spread & that makes all the difference IMO. I could single out players but at this stage of the season I can't see the point roll on 2022


User avatar
evertonfc
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7261
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 267 times
Contact:

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920360Post evertonfc »

13 players with 11 disposals or less. Only two players with more than 20 disposals.

Incredible. It was excruciating to witness so few players make the effort required when Geelong's players worked so hard to make space, keep the ball and always run to position so an easy kick could relieve the pressure.

They used their work rate to expose our game plan and after getting caught early, put on a masterclass.


Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.

Image
bangaulegend
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2490
Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 546 times

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920362Post bangaulegend »

evertonfc wrote: Sat 14 Aug 2021 11:16pm 13 players with 11 disposals or less. Only two players with more than 20 disposals.

Incredible. It was excruciating to witness.
I rest my case :(


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11487
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2499 times

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920364Post B.M »

They starved us of possessions with uncontested marks

We continued to zone, they dominated possession

They’ve beaten us with this tactic 3 times in a row now

Sam Menegola must love playing us!!!


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920375Post Wayne42 »

Clear example of a top 4 team playing against a bottom 8 team, once they got going they were too good where it counted.

The Scotts definitely dominated the clearances after quarter time.

Hawkins should get 2 weeks for his dog act on Joyce but he'll probably get off with a financial smack.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
Moods
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4830
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
Has thanked: 313 times
Been thanked: 439 times

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920377Post Moods »

B.M wrote: Sat 14 Aug 2021 11:27pm They starved us of possessions with uncontested marks

We continued to zone, they dominated possession

They’ve beaten us with this tactic 3 times in a row now

Sam Menegola must love playing us!!!
That's not the way I saw it at all. They dominated contested possession. We got smashed at the centre clearances and around the packs. Once Danger and Menegola got on top we got very little supply that was quality. And our backs are too small. Missing either Frawley and Carlisle. I reckon they only started their chipping game with about 5 minutes to go, otherwise the game was played at a reasonable tempo


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22739
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8648 times
Been thanked: 3788 times

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920409Post saynta »

Wayne42 wrote: Sat 14 Aug 2021 11:58pm Clear example of a top 4 team playing against a bottom 8 team, once they got going they were too good where it counted.

The Scotts definitely dominated the clearances after quarter time.

Hawkins should get 2 weeks for his dog act on Joyce but he'll probably get off with a financial smack.
Agree on Hawkins but those deadshits are a protected species,


Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4625
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1329 times
Been thanked: 1338 times

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920416Post Yorkeys »

Two comments re above.

Mid group not particularly good as a whole. Needs early attention, As we probably well know. Cannot compete with class and strength. I'd say only Steele and Dunstan must keeps (as mids) from last evening. Don't care if Hannebery ever plays again, notwithstanding Ratts comments.

Hawkins strangely opposed eyes and boof head what me expression is a get out of jail free card. MRO and Tribunals think this guy is so big & clumsy so couldn't have meant to hurt. Call Steven May as a character witness. Be astounded if he got any meaningful penalty. Opposite of Toby G and Mumford's sterotyping.

Cats have a pretty good protection racket going from free agency to umpire bias to going unpenalised for violent fouls, and good on them, shame we are the suckers so often.


User avatar
Impatient Sainter
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4089
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
Has thanked: 2622 times
Been thanked: 1077 times

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920445Post Impatient Sainter »

bangaulegend wrote: Sat 14 Aug 2021 11:01pm Good effort but too much left to too few . So different to last week when we had a even spread & that makes all the difference IMO. I could single out players but at this stage of the season I can't see the point roll on 2022
Thats what happens when you allow the opposition to maintain possession of the ball! Some of the dumbest coaching I have ever seen yesterday...


Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4625
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1329 times
Been thanked: 1338 times

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920471Post Yorkeys »

This could be paraphrased too many fumble under pressure & lack composure in possession.

Need to weed them out. Destroys system & gives comfort to the enemy.

Sides know if they stick at it we fumble when it counts.

Stuff the standing jump sprint metrics if you have poor hand skills.


minneapolis
Club Player
Posts: 1423
Joined: Thu 22 Apr 2004 5:35am
Location: Done with MN. Happily retired in Vic.
Has thanked: 1310 times
Been thanked: 239 times

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920570Post minneapolis »

I thought it was a very good effort.

We were playing the flag favorites on their home ground for a top 4 spot.

We had our top 6 players out.

Ratts had them fired up and used what he had a best he could. If you think he can't coach then assess the way we played after the bye.

Sharman's legs were cooked after the first quarter. Hannebery first game back. Joyce has no offensive power. Marshall split with their rucks. Our prime goalkicker only played one quarter. Dunstan et al gave the ball back to them.

However to win Dangerfield had to play a 3-Brownlow votes game. And the Umps gave them the better side of the frees.

So I am not too disappointed. At least they fought like jackals.


Nothing better than a good Dad Joke.
spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8999
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 416 times

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920577Post spert »

Our inconsistent play is killing us. I struggled to find an effective Saints player- I thought Sincs was our best overall player, though Steele got votes but went missing for parts of the game which was disappointing. Just too many half-hearted efforts all night- same as the Carlton game a couple of weeks ago.


User avatar
samoht
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5765
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
Has thanked: 586 times
Been thanked: 436 times
Contact:

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920581Post samoht »

We have a soft underbelly - and we have a couple of way overpaid players who are setting a very low bar for everyone else (their disproportionately hefty pay packets are weighing them down?)
Some abdominal/core-strength training and I reckon we bring back Richo to get back that mental toughness and never-give-up attitude and work rate our side exhibited (despite lacking the cattle and despite all the wholesale injuries to the said deficient cattle that Richo had the misfortune to be lumbered with). :wink:

We change coaches and recruit big name players (and pamper them) - and are constantly taking shortcuts, throwing money at everything - trying to reach an unattainable dream - when what we really need are some hard-nosed and down-to-earth realists/pragmatists in charge who will lead by example and won't shirk at putting in the hard work and demanding the same from others (our recruiters, coaches, etc..), who will change the ethos of the place - so that everyone willingly puts in the work and supports each other (and can see the big picture and the point of it all).


User avatar
lewdogs
Club Player
Posts: 641
Joined: Tue 17 Jun 2008 2:11pm
Has thanked: 107 times
Been thanked: 179 times

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920590Post lewdogs »

We need more from Jones and Crouch regularly. They are two of our better players but they're really inconsistent. Regularly very good and regularly very poor.


Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4625
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1329 times
Been thanked: 1338 times

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920595Post Yorkeys »

Look we accept players doing the minimum. Until there is an uncompromising approach to discipline in roles, making a contest and valuing possession it will be same same.

When the book comes out I will be interested in why (to quote Samoht) Brad has been "pampered". He has been generally ok, nowhere near value for money, but a number of his clangers have been soul destroying game losers. But the selection message is never mind. We accept rubbish and an unspoken hierarchy of individual players in a team game so can not aspire to be a really top professional team.

Drives me mad that we don't have a driven single minded professional running the joint - but yes hard to find. Oh list depth precludes change? Well then that's another horror story. Endless loop of excuses.


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13520
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1308 times
Been thanked: 2012 times

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920596Post The_Dud »

Yorkeys wrote: Mon 16 Aug 2021 12:02pm Look we accept players doing the minimum. Until there is an uncompromising approach to discipline in roles, making a contest and valuing possession it will be same same.

When the book comes out I will be interested in why (to quote Samoht) Brad has been "pampered". He has been generally ok, nowhere near value for money, but a number of his clangers have been soul destroying game losers. But the selection message is never mind. We accept rubbish and an unspoken hierarchy of individual players in a team game so can not aspire to be a really top professional team.

Drives me mad that we don't have a driven single minded professional running the joint - but yes hard to find. Oh list depth precludes change? Well then that's another horror story. Endless loop of excuses.
Hill is the worst 'elite' kick i've ever seen. Too many hospital passes or direct turnovers. He should be breaking the lines off half back (apparently he's quick?) and spearing deliveries to forwards inside 50, or even better slotting goals from 55 on the run himself. He needs to watch someone like Saad or Hind to see how he should be playing.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
repta
Club Player
Posts: 663
Joined: Thu 06 Dec 2007 3:14pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 103 times

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920606Post repta »

When we go into defensive mode things fall apart.

We get sucked too far up the ground, defend well, however if a team cant clear the ball out they get scored against eventually.
Without the run out we cant score. It doesnt help that we continually butcher the ball or have short passes to static players.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9624
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 1225 times

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920608Post CURLY »

The comparison between Hill and Hind keeps getting raised by one poster who loves to kick the club. They are completely different players. Hind runs around like a headless chook then kicks the ball sideways 15 meters 80% of the time, this is broken up with the occasional run and bounce.

Hill is continually moving when we have the ball teams are forced to run to defend as he takes off on more often than not unrewarded runs. He has been really good other than Saturday but he was still ok.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10936
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3375 times
Been thanked: 2344 times

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920609Post Scollop »

It’ll be fn hilarious if they drop Hill for the last game of the year. More of the same clusterfaark type decision making from Lethlean and Ratten which is pointless and too late to achieve anything.

Hill will be rapt that he won’t have to face his old team. He’ll be excited knowing he won’t have any corkies or bruises that he has to deal with. He can plan his holidays freely with the knowledge that he will be injury free and ready to play again in 2022 and just cruise at minimum required output for maximum $$$ potential


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9624
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 1225 times

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920610Post CURLY »

Scollop wrote: Mon 16 Aug 2021 1:26pm It’ll be fn hilarious if they drop Hill for the last game of the year. More of the same clusterfaark type decision making from Lethlean and Ratten which is pointless and too late to achieve anything.

Hill will be rapt that he won’t have to face his old team. He’ll be excited knowing he won’t have any corkies or bruises that he has to deal with. He can plan his holidays freely with the knowledge that he will be injury free and ready to play again in 2022 and just cruise at minimum required output for maximum $$$ potential
You been asleep for a few months have you?


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10936
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3375 times
Been thanked: 2344 times

Re: Too many players with no impact

Post: # 1920614Post Scollop »

CURLY wrote: Mon 16 Aug 2021 1:33pm
Scollop wrote: Mon 16 Aug 2021 1:26pm It’ll be fn hilarious if they drop Hill for the last game of the year. More of the same clusterfaark type decision making from Lethlean and Ratten which is pointless and too late to achieve anything.

Hill will be rapt that he won’t have to face his old team. He’ll be excited knowing he won’t have any corkies or bruises that he has to deal with. He can plan his holidays freely with the knowledge that he will be injury free and ready to play again in 2022 and just cruise at minimum required output for maximum $$$ potential
You been asleep for a few months have you?
I’m not saying he deserves to be dropped now

I actually agree with you that he’s been really good for the most part in the last few months…

All I’m syaing is that it will be fn hilarious if the Saints hierarchy drop him now when he should have been DROPPED earlier in the year!!


Post Reply