AFLW Standard

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Gershwin
Club Player
Posts: 1558
Joined: Tue 06 Apr 2004 2:05pm
Location: NE Victoria
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 283 times

AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937176Post Gershwin »

I really don't want this to get ugly, but I am wondering what level people think AFLW is at compared to the men/boys. I'm sure any Victorian under 18 NAB league team (eg, Sandringham Dragons) would give them a hiding.
Would they beat Dingley Football Club ? or Dingley reserves ? Or VAFA Division 4 ?


summertime and the living is easy ........
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23139
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9080 times
Been thanked: 3942 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937178Post saynta »

Gershwin wrote: Sat 15 Jan 2022 6:49pm I really don't want this to get ugly, but I am wondering what level people think AFLW is at compared to the men/boys. I'm sure any Victorian under 18 NAB league team (eg, Sandringham Dragons) would give them a hiding.
Would they beat Dingley Football Club ? or Dingley reserves ? Or VAFA Division 4 ?
I have two sons and 5 male grandkids so have watched heaps of under age football. I would put the girls at under 14 or 15 level.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10457
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1329 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937186Post CURLY »

Terrible standard no other word for it.

The best Under 18 girl in Victoria trained with a local a local Under 17’s team and was in the bottom few.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
roskilde
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2409
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 7:32pm
Location: Canberra
Has thanked: 265 times
Been thanked: 336 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937187Post roskilde »

I played state soccer as a kid and we'd play the Matildas in warm ups for the Nationals and we flogged them every game. This was U/15 level.

I'm guessing if you threw any state U/16 side into the AFLW they'd probably beat every team 100 to 0.


This was my father's belief
And this is also mine:
Let the corn be all one sheaf--
And the grapes be all one vine,
Ere our children's teeth are set on edge
By bitter bread and wine.
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17028
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3647 times
Been thanked: 2918 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937190Post skeptic »

This isn't new ground so to speak. Standards between men and women in most sport simply aren't comparable. Am not knocking the athletes but it's simply not.

If you took the 5 worst players in the NBA and put them up against the 5 greatest ever female basketball players worldwide, it'd be a massacre.

Physical attributes not withstanding, in most sports it's a selection pool thing for starters. I daresay there's thousands more male players playing across goodness knows how many more leagues with however many more specialist programs, pathways etc


mr six o'clock
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4325
Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
Has thanked: 56 times
Been thanked: 244 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937191Post mr six o'clock »

When they started up in WVFL under Searle years ago I watched many of their matches . ( free games , yep ....I'm a tight arse ! )
They seemed to be progressing nicely but I knew they'd need improvement on joining the AFLW .
First year they did what I expected they were good against the other newer teams but where outclassed against the established teams.
Then covid hit
And we now look and appear to play worse than we did when we first started .


In red white and black from 73
User avatar
Munga
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5287
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:00am
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937194Post Munga »

A bit silly trying to compare pubescent, testosterone fueled males vs women (forgetting all the other genders etc.). Rugby would be worse, the best female team in the world would be crushed by some of those beefcake teens going around. Physical comparisons are stupid, it's not like table tennis. It's a womens league, don't compare it to men.

If you compare the saints womens team to an under 18 womens team or similar, that would make sense!


Gehrig emerged from scans yesterday saying he was "as sweet as a bun"
Gershwin
Club Player
Posts: 1558
Joined: Tue 06 Apr 2004 2:05pm
Location: NE Victoria
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 283 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937196Post Gershwin »

roskilde wrote: Sat 15 Jan 2022 8:27pm I played state soccer as a kid and we'd play the Matildas in warm ups for the Nationals and we flogged them every game. This was U/15 level.

I'm guessing if you threw any state U/16 side into the AFLW they'd probably beat every team 100 to 0.
I quite like watching the Matildas play but I cannot for the life of me watch more than 10 minutes of AFLW.


summertime and the living is easy ........
Laurie
Club Player
Posts: 525
Joined: Tue 21 Feb 2012 1:59pm
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 108 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937202Post Laurie »

I would rather watch paint dry than AFLW.
BOOM BOOM


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12046
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3683 times
Been thanked: 2568 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937210Post Scollop »

A lot of the best VFL players in the game were paid as if it was a full time job probably from the 60’s and especially in the 70’s

I think it’s too harsh to compare the mens game when you have a semi-professional and fulltime professional competition that has been going for over 50 years (and all the history of over 100 years before that).

We had a lot of men playing back in the day and most of the players were part-timers and the quality was poor. I see the women's game in a similar position with the administrators and the people involved transitioning from being part time and basically just a hobby to treating it as a profession.

Before corporate sponsorship of the VFL and before the huge money from tv broadcast rights I don’t think all VFL matches and VFL reserves footy was high quality either

It’s like the investments made in expanding the game to the Northern States. We need to give the AFLW time. And another thing that people forget is that it is NOT the same product as the men AND they don’t need to capture exactly the same audience as the men
Last edited by Scollop on Sat 15 Jan 2022 11:01pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Impatient Sainter
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4089
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
Has thanked: 2622 times
Been thanked: 1078 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937211Post Impatient Sainter »

The endeavour is there they just cant score or hold the ball in the F50. Interest and supporters will drop off very quickly when they cant score a goal until the last quarter. Its another half arsed attempt by the club. If they arent going to properly resource the team they would be better off using the money elsewhere.


User avatar
ausfatcat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6533
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 100 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937214Post ausfatcat »

Watching the teams not just St Kilda to me it appears they are not quite comfortable with handling (kicking, handballing ect) a footy it's like watching watch a team of Irish recruits running around good skills and they can be effective just don't quite have a handle on the ball. I think it might come from most of people not playing football as a primary sport growing up from 5 (see the drive to recruit all the basketballers and netballers with natural talent) until late into their teen years and it shows.

Saying that if the AFLW rises in popularity so will the girls start playing AFL as their primary sport at the younger ages rather than soccer, netball ect and the quality will improve greatly over the next 5 to 10 years.


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14011
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1314 times
Been thanked: 2092 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937215Post The_Dud »

Investing in the future. There will be a big difference in 10 years time.

Also, the greats of the past would struggle to get a game in 2022, these kind of comparisons are dumb.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23139
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9080 times
Been thanked: 3942 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937232Post saynta »

I think I was a bit too generous to our girls. Under 13 boys level first half but both the filth and them under 14s second half.


remboy
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2133
Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
Location: Rockville
Has thanked: 587 times
Been thanked: 178 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937238Post remboy »

The_Dud wrote: Sun 16 Jan 2022 12:03am Investing in the future. There will be a big difference in 10 years time.

Also, the greats of the past would struggle to get a game in 2022, these kind of comparisons are dumb.
Agree. In ten years all of the AFLW players will have been playing footy since they could walk (as is the case in the AFL). It will make a massive difference to the standard.


Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937265Post Wayne42 »

The women's comp will improve over time, they may even kick bigger scores, one day.

The Saints women's team are, arguably, as close to winnng a flag as the men's team are. :lol: :lol:


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
Saintmatt
SS Life Member
Posts: 2592
Joined: Fri 20 Jan 2012 4:57pm
Has thanked: 2043 times
Been thanked: 1163 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937270Post Saintmatt »

saynta wrote: Sat 15 Jan 2022 6:53pm
Gershwin wrote: Sat 15 Jan 2022 6:49pm I really don't want this to get ugly, but I am wondering what level people think AFLW is at compared to the men/boys. I'm sure any Victorian under 18 NAB league team (eg, Sandringham Dragons) would give them a hiding.
Would they beat Dingley Football Club ? or Dingley reserves ? Or VAFA Division 4 ?
I have two sons and 5 male grandkids so have watched heaps of under age football. I would put the girls at under 14 or 15 level.
Yep - that's about on the money (bar to odd exception like the naturally skilled/talented ones like Pearce, Patrikios etc). But, I'd say that AFLW Is about U/14 or U/15 level Sunday morning suburban comp level ... it's still a mile off being U/14 or U/15 elite rep team level.

In 5 years time - when the comp is full of girls who grew up playing footy instead of the proliferation of cross/coders - it'll be heaps better.


Go you red, black & white warriors
User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13311
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 669 times
Been thanked: 1957 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937271Post The Fireman »

Couldn’t be more disinterested


Trev from the Bush
SS Life Member
Posts: 2841
Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:24pm
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 774 times
Been thanked: 871 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937273Post Trev from the Bush »

I am unsure which is worse, the standard of the football or the hype, propaganda and media commentary that all demonstrate it is taboo to say anything negative (or honest) about the competition. Remember, the participants are well paid yet play only a handfull of games that comprise a season. Many push for higher-valued contracts based on what is paid to AFL players yet fail to mention the black hole of skill levels, general public interest and the extent that "crowds" will drop-off should they need to pay for admission.

It is a sideshow to the real game. AFL money and effort would be much better spent restoring country and suburban competitions and clubs that have been devestated by COVID. Football in many smaller communities is the only social outlet for many and should not be left to die at the expense of a sideshow that believes its bigger than Barnum and Bailey.


Saint supporter since '62
User avatar
Impatient Sainter
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4089
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
Has thanked: 2622 times
Been thanked: 1078 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937277Post Impatient Sainter »

Trev from the Bush wrote: Mon 17 Jan 2022 9:49am I am unsure which is worse, the standard of the football or the hype, propaganda and media commentary that all demonstrate it is taboo to say anything negative (or honest) about the competition. Remember, the participants are well paid yet play only a handfull of games that comprise a season. Many push for higher-valued contracts based on what is paid to AFL players yet fail to mention the black hole of skill levels, general public interest and the extent that "crowds" will drop-off should they need to pay for admission.

It is a sideshow to the real game. AFL money and effort would be much better spent restoring country and suburban competitions and clubs that have been devestated by COVID. Football in many smaller communities is the only social outlet for many and should not be left to die at the expense of a sideshow that believes its bigger than Barnum and Bailey.
Well said Trev - they have even erected a statue for a girl who has kicked about 20 goals for her career. Im all for equal opportunities, but not at the expense of grass roots footy & country leagues being supported.


outside66
Club Player
Posts: 616
Joined: Tue 09 May 2017 5:39pm
Has thanked: 199 times
Been thanked: 248 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937278Post outside66 »

Trev from the Bush wrote: Mon 17 Jan 2022 9:49am I am unsure which is worse, the standard of the football or the hype, propaganda and media commentary that all demonstrate it is taboo to say anything negative (or honest) about the competition. Remember, the participants are well paid yet play only a handfull of games that comprise a season. Many push for higher-valued contracts based on what is paid to AFL players yet fail to mention the black hole of skill levels, general public interest and the extent that "crowds" will drop-off should they need to pay for admission.

It is a sideshow to the real game. AFL money and effort would be much better spent restoring country and suburban competitions and clubs that have been devestated by COVID. Football in many smaller communities is the only social outlet for many and should not be left to die at the expense of a sideshow that believes its bigger than Barnum and Bailey.
What I reckon is worse than all of the above is that it seems there are a lot of fragile males out there who don't want to see women playing football and go out of their way to shitcan it at every opportunity (as evidenced in this thread from folks claiming to be as disinterested as you can be yet are still interested enough to declare their disinterest). Because if they did want to see women playing football, then they would understand that establishing a brand new competition/pathway will take time to mature. AFL is the fastest growing sport in Australia amongst females therefore it won't be too long before all players have grown up playing footy which will obviously increase the standard. With increased standards will come the greater public interest, sponsorship, broadcasting etc. In 5-10 years time the sport will be unrecognizable to what it is currently which will then leave 3 groups of footy supporters IMO 1) folks who have embraced AFLW from the get-go and can proudly state they have supported their mob since they were established 2) folks who disliked AFLW initially but got on board once the product reaped the inevitable from it's massive investment 3) folks who don't think women should be playing footy at all and are still completely disinterested. I know what side of history I'd like to be on... As a father-to-be with a baby girl on the way, I'm genuinely stoked that they will have the option of pursuing football from auskick right up to the big league (with my sporting genetics, fat chance I'm afraid) - an opportunity that would have been impossible without the AFLW competition being implemented by the AFL.


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14011
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1314 times
Been thanked: 2092 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937280Post The_Dud »

Impatient Sainter wrote: Mon 17 Jan 2022 11:51am
Trev from the Bush wrote: Mon 17 Jan 2022 9:49am I am unsure which is worse, the standard of the football or the hype, propaganda and media commentary that all demonstrate it is taboo to say anything negative (or honest) about the competition. Remember, the participants are well paid yet play only a handfull of games that comprise a season. Many push for higher-valued contracts based on what is paid to AFL players yet fail to mention the black hole of skill levels, general public interest and the extent that "crowds" will drop-off should they need to pay for admission.

It is a sideshow to the real game. AFL money and effort would be much better spent restoring country and suburban competitions and clubs that have been devestated by COVID. Football in many smaller communities is the only social outlet for many and should not be left to die at the expense of a sideshow that believes its bigger than Barnum and Bailey.
Well said Trev - they have even erected a statue for a girl who has kicked about 20 goals for her career. Im all for equal opportunities, but not at the expense of grass roots footy & country leagues being supported.
The AFL didn’t erect any statue, a bank commissioned an art piece.

If you’re going to search for things as an excuse to sh*t on AFLW, at least make them legitimate.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
Winmar7
Club Player
Posts: 230
Joined: Fri 23 Apr 2004 5:42pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937281Post Winmar7 »

What are we into, year 4? So is the standard any better of worse than the VFL of 1899?


User avatar
Life Long Saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5533
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 483 times
Contact:

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937282Post Life Long Saint »

Winmar7 wrote: Mon 17 Jan 2022 3:22pm What are we into, year 4? So is the standard any better of worse than the VFL of 1899?
First AFLW season was 2017. So this would be season 6.

Skills aside, the thing that was always puzzled me is the attempts from the AFL media to equate it to the men's game.
It's not even in the same solar system. It has a place and is a great initiative but it clearly needs time for a player base to develop so the competition can become better.
The women are not going to be full time professional footballers in the sixth season. It'll take at least 15 years for that to happen.

The AFLW competitors have a red hot go when they play, but so do junior footballers.
I want more than that when I watch footy. I want the high marking, long kicking, and exquisite skills. Otherwise, I'd just go and watch local footy.


User avatar
Impatient Sainter
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4089
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
Has thanked: 2622 times
Been thanked: 1078 times

Re: AFLW Standard

Post: # 1937283Post Impatient Sainter »

The_Dud wrote: Mon 17 Jan 2022 2:29pm
Impatient Sainter wrote: Mon 17 Jan 2022 11:51am
Trev from the Bush wrote: Mon 17 Jan 2022 9:49am I am unsure which is worse, the standard of the football or the hype, propaganda and media commentary that all demonstrate it is taboo to say anything negative (or honest) about the competition. Remember, the participants are well paid yet play only a handfull of games that comprise a season. Many push for higher-valued contracts based on what is paid to AFL players yet fail to mention the black hole of skill levels, general public interest and the extent that "crowds" will drop-off should they need to pay for admission.

It is a sideshow to the real game. AFL money and effort would be much better spent restoring country and suburban competitions and clubs that have been devestated by COVID. Football in many smaller communities is the only social outlet for many and should not be left to die at the expense of a sideshow that believes its bigger than Barnum and Bailey.
Well said Trev - they have even erected a statue for a girl who has kicked about 20 goals for her career. Im all for equal opportunities, but not at the expense of grass roots footy & country leagues being supported.
The AFL didn’t erect any statue, a bank commissioned an art piece.

If you’re going to search for things as an excuse to sh*t on AFLW, at least make them legitimate.
Does it matter who erected it? In my era statues were meant to symbolise individuals who have made a significant contribution to their sport? I wasnt putting sh*t on the AFLW, just questioning where there resources go? But now you have raised it, I understand the AFL wants to have 18 AFLW teams. If we are honest there is not yet enough real talent to support 4 teams. Then they get full AFL TV coverage, the average supporter would much rather have the opportunity to watch their VFL team play each week. Thats nothing against the AFLW its just the reality and nothing to do with equality.


Post Reply