King and Caminiti
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18607
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1950 times
- Been thanked: 854 times
Re: King and Caminiti
Caminiti is more key position size. Ultimately we need someone who can provide a counter to King. Someone of key position size and strength. Caminiti may fit the bill. It’s too early to say.
Sharman I see as more of a Membrey type. Good third forward/goal-kicker, Perhaps not quite strong enough to hold his own in a pack situation.
Sharman I see as more of a Membrey type. Good third forward/goal-kicker, Perhaps not quite strong enough to hold his own in a pack situation.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 739
- Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2022 3:22pm
- Has thanked: 82 times
- Been thanked: 135 times
Re: King and Caminiti
6, 26 or 56, doesn't matter. He had no influence on the game.Vortex wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 4:34pmI think Tom Stewart had 26 disposal in that game, I'd be happy if players in our backline get dominated that much.The G Train Legacy wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 3:00pmHe completely nullified Stewart who had no influence on the game, in fact he aerially dominated Stewart. This had the effect of removing Geelong's brickwall defence and allowing King to dominate.Vortex wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 11:36amThat's a considerable exaggeration, some of Sharman's contests on Stewart in that game were overblown a little too, Stewarts stats were still in the mid 20s. It also neglects the performances from some other lesser knowns in the team that no one saw coming, and especially Geelong didn't see coming, namely the game from Windy.The G Train Legacy wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 11:18amLast year Sharman played some good games in defence and there's the small matter of him winning us the game against Geelong. In that game he beat Tom Stewart hands down. Although he may still have things to learn, he can play.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6075
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1563 times
Re: King and Caminiti
His influence was muted by his opponents.The G Train Legacy wrote: ↑Thu 09 Mar 2023 9:23pm6, 26 or 56, doesn't matter. He had no influence on the game.Vortex wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 4:34pmI think Tom Stewart had 26 disposal in that game, I'd be happy if players in our backline get dominated that much.The G Train Legacy wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 3:00pmHe completely nullified Stewart who had no influence on the game, in fact he aerially dominated Stewart. This had the effect of removing Geelong's brickwall defence and allowing King to dominate.Vortex wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 11:36amThat's a considerable exaggeration, some of Sharman's contests on Stewart in that game were overblown a little too, Stewarts stats were still in the mid 20s. It also neglects the performances from some other lesser knowns in the team that no one saw coming, and especially Geelong didn't see coming, namely the game from Windy.The G Train Legacy wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 11:18amLast year Sharman played some good games in defence and there's the small matter of him winning us the game against Geelong. In that game he beat Tom Stewart hands down. Although he may still have things to learn, he can play.
Sharman didnt fall into the trap of playing defensively, he attacked the ball in the air and won it.
Now, his ground work doesn't matter if he keeps marking the ball and kicking it straight.
If Geelongs midfield sets up long enough, they get numbers back while their defence attacks.
But if you put the ball into dangerous spots and get your hands firmly around it, Geelong will speed up their attack and open up the game.
Geelong like to control the tempo of the game and kill you with clean marking and disposal. They just don't expect us to be clean with marking and possession.
That is all about to change. We have Wood and Crouch in great shape and form, we half flankers and wings who can attack, make play and defend at both ends.
We just need a leaping ruckman who can dominate centre clearances, cause Steele, Crouch and Windhager can even up stoppage clearances, but the really tall rucks hurt us in the middle.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1025 times
Re: King and Caminiti
Players performances are obviously always assessed by the coach through the lens of the game plan and the player role and how well the player executed within that so just at a guess Cooper probably got a tick from Ratts in a great win but objectively he only won the ball in the air 4 times and Ratts would have reviewed those 4 marks against the game plan. But 9 disposals and 1 goal was his stats and then being dropped the following week suggests he struggled to execute, and clearly still is. Meaning you need more than mark and kick in AFL.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Thu 09 Mar 2023 11:40pmHis influence was muted by his opponents.The G Train Legacy wrote: ↑Thu 09 Mar 2023 9:23pm6, 26 or 56, doesn't matter. He had no influence on the game.Vortex wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 4:34pmI think Tom Stewart had 26 disposal in that game, I'd be happy if players in our backline get dominated that much.The G Train Legacy wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 3:00pmHe completely nullified Stewart who had no influence on the game, in fact he aerially dominated Stewart. This had the effect of removing Geelong's brickwall defence and allowing King to dominate.Vortex wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 11:36amThat's a considerable exaggeration, some of Sharman's contests on Stewart in that game were overblown a little too, Stewarts stats were still in the mid 20s. It also neglects the performances from some other lesser knowns in the team that no one saw coming, and especially Geelong didn't see coming, namely the game from Windy.The G Train Legacy wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 11:18amLast year Sharman played some good games in defence and there's the small matter of him winning us the game against Geelong. In that game he beat Tom Stewart hands down. Although he may still have things to learn, he can play.
Sharman didnt fall into the trap of playing defensively, he attacked the ball in the air and won it.
Now, his ground work doesn't matter if he keeps marking the ball and kicking it straight.
If Geelongs midfield sets up long enough, they get numbers back while their defence attacks.
But if you put the ball into dangerous spots and get your hands firmly around it, Geelong will speed up their attack and open up the game.
Geelong like to control the tempo of the game and kill you with clean marking and disposal. They just don't expect us to be clean with marking and possession.
That is all about to change. We have Wood and Crouch in great shape and form, we half flankers and wings who can attack, make play and defend at both ends.
We just need a leaping ruckman who can dominate centre clearances, cause Steele, Crouch and Windhager can even up stoppage clearances, but the really tall rucks hurt us in the middle.
If I'm guessing it's because creating a game plan around aerial dominance is a very low percentage play unless you are the second coming of Wayne Carey and in AFL a missed mark by Cooper usually results in a goal to the opposition.
2 of his attempted marks in that game probably got him dropped alone.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6075
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1563 times
Re: King and Caminiti
The best defences often dominate with aerial prowess.
I'll argue, that a lead up forward, who can take a grab and kick straight is what it takes to beat these teams. You move their focus and unsettle their system.
They double team the keys and seem to be able to get away with constantly breaking and playing on the edge of the rules.
The reference to Carey, in the modern era was shallow. Mobility, endurance and height is the new prototype. Wayne Carey however, was 192cm, Hird, Lockett, Dunstall, etc.
Im assuming lots of these guys wouldn't cut it as key forwards today. They'd be handy third talls though.
I'll argue, that a lead up forward, who can take a grab and kick straight is what it takes to beat these teams. You move their focus and unsettle their system.
They double team the keys and seem to be able to get away with constantly breaking and playing on the edge of the rules.
The reference to Carey, in the modern era was shallow. Mobility, endurance and height is the new prototype. Wayne Carey however, was 192cm, Hird, Lockett, Dunstall, etc.
Im assuming lots of these guys wouldn't cut it as key forwards today. They'd be handy third talls though.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1025 times
Re: King and Caminiti
I think we are in general agreement except for I think Sharman is way off the pace as that player.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Fri 10 Mar 2023 2:00pm The best defences often dominate with aerial prowess.
I'll argue, that a lead up forward, who can take a grab and kick straight is what it takes to beat these teams. You move their focus and unsettle their system.
They double team the keys and seem to be able to get away with constantly breaking and playing on the edge of the rules.
The reference to Carey, in the modern era was shallow. Mobility, endurance and height is the new prototype. Wayne Carey however, was 192cm, Hird, Lockett, Dunstall, etc.
Im assuming lots of these guys wouldn't cut it as key forwards today. They'd be handy third talls though.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6075
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1563 times
Re: King and Caminiti
Just a little trivia. After the Geelong win in R9, Cooper had 4 marks, 9 disposals and 1 goal in a R10 win against Adelaide too, then 7 disposals and 1 goal in round 11, then Ratten dropped him and got a contract extension.Vortex wrote: ↑Fri 10 Mar 2023 8:58amPlayers performances are obviously always assessed by the coach through the lens of the game plan and the player role and how well the player executed within that so just at a guess Cooper probably got a tick from Ratts in a great win but objectively he only won the ball in the air 4 times and Ratts would have reviewed those 4 marks against the game plan. But 9 disposals and 1 goal was his stats and then being dropped the following week suggests he struggled to execute, and clearly still is. Meaning you need more than mark and kick in AFL.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Thu 09 Mar 2023 11:40pmHis influence was muted by his opponents.The G Train Legacy wrote: ↑Thu 09 Mar 2023 9:23pm6, 26 or 56, doesn't matter. He had no influence on the game.Vortex wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 4:34pmI think Tom Stewart had 26 disposal in that game, I'd be happy if players in our backline get dominated that much.The G Train Legacy wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 3:00pmHe completely nullified Stewart who had no influence on the game, in fact he aerially dominated Stewart. This had the effect of removing Geelong's brickwall defence and allowing King to dominate.Vortex wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 11:36amThat's a considerable exaggeration, some of Sharman's contests on Stewart in that game were overblown a little too, Stewarts stats were still in the mid 20s. It also neglects the performances from some other lesser knowns in the team that no one saw coming, and especially Geelong didn't see coming, namely the game from Windy.The G Train Legacy wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 11:18amLast year Sharman played some good games in defence and there's the small matter of him winning us the game against Geelong. In that game he beat Tom Stewart hands down. Although he may still have things to learn, he can play.
Sharman didnt fall into the trap of playing defensively, he attacked the ball in the air and won it.
Now, his ground work doesn't matter if he keeps marking the ball and kicking it straight.
If Geelongs midfield sets up long enough, they get numbers back while their defence attacks.
But if you put the ball into dangerous spots and get your hands firmly around it, Geelong will speed up their attack and open up the game.
Geelong like to control the tempo of the game and kill you with clean marking and disposal. They just don't expect us to be clean with marking and possession.
That is all about to change. We have Wood and Crouch in great shape and form, we half flankers and wings who can attack, make play and defend at both ends.
We just need a leaping ruckman who can dominate centre clearances, cause Steele, Crouch and Windhager can even up stoppage clearances, but the really tall rucks hurt us in the middle.
If I'm guessing it's because creating a game plan around aerial dominance is a very low percentage play unless you are the second coming of Wayne Carey and in AFL a missed mark by Cooper usually results in a goal to the opposition.
2 of his attempted marks in that game probably got him dropped alone.
At that stage Coops had played 7 games, averaged 1.8 goals and 9.8 disposals, oops, I forgot the 4 marks and we were at the top of the ladder. Just think about that. It's great that Membrey goes and helps down back but it saves games, not wins them.
We won 3 more games for the season, Cooper went to learn something in the VFL and came back and played in defence. Ratten aged 15 years, hit the plonk and faded back off into obscurity.
Sharman is still there and just had his first real pre-season, put on 5 kg and came from the back of the pack to the middle of the endurance runners in the team. He is 22.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6075
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1563 times
Re: King and Caminiti
I think some reject small forward from Melbourne got gifted a few games over Sharman, because our mids didn't know how to track a midfield that revolves with defensive runners. We were going to bomb it over their heads and hope King spilled a mark and the 4 crumbers could pick it up. Who knew King would start holding marks and kicking goals?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6075
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1563 times
Re: King and Caminiti
Currently, after 11 seasons in the system Membrey is an established 3rd tall.
He averages 12.8 possessions, 6 marks and 1.7 goals.
He started at St.kilda with 2 key forwards around him and flourished.
After 15 matches, at 22, he was taking 6 marks, getting 12 disposals and was averaging 2.6 goals in a mid ladder list.
Sharman came from 3rds local via SANFL reserves and after 7 Games, had
4 marks, 1.8 goals and 9.8 disposals.
3 kicks and 2 marks average splitting 10 years of development on 2 blokes with obvious skill to kick and mark the ball. Cooper started cause everyone was injured and we have 1 apprentice full forward, who started leading, marking and kicking straight after Sharman was dropped in round 12, 2022.
I'm startled at the insights expressed about Sharman. Bewildered even.
However I'm not concerned that Owens, Phillipou, Hayes and Sharman are all competing at once and have all been here less than 2 seasons, add King and Higgins and we are going places.
He averages 12.8 possessions, 6 marks and 1.7 goals.
He started at St.kilda with 2 key forwards around him and flourished.
After 15 matches, at 22, he was taking 6 marks, getting 12 disposals and was averaging 2.6 goals in a mid ladder list.
Sharman came from 3rds local via SANFL reserves and after 7 Games, had
4 marks, 1.8 goals and 9.8 disposals.
3 kicks and 2 marks average splitting 10 years of development on 2 blokes with obvious skill to kick and mark the ball. Cooper started cause everyone was injured and we have 1 apprentice full forward, who started leading, marking and kicking straight after Sharman was dropped in round 12, 2022.
I'm startled at the insights expressed about Sharman. Bewildered even.
However I'm not concerned that Owens, Phillipou, Hayes and Sharman are all competing at once and have all been here less than 2 seasons, add King and Higgins and we are going places.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1025 times
Re: King and Caminiti
Well as they say in cricket if there is grass on the pitch "then let's play", the opportunity is there for his taking.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Fri 10 Mar 2023 2:35pmJust a little trivia. After the Geelong win in R9, Cooper had 4 marks, 9 disposals and 1 goal in a R10 win against Adelaide too, then 7 disposals and 1 goal in round 11, then Ratten dropped him and got a contract extension.Vortex wrote: ↑Fri 10 Mar 2023 8:58amPlayers performances are obviously always assessed by the coach through the lens of the game plan and the player role and how well the player executed within that so just at a guess Cooper probably got a tick from Ratts in a great win but objectively he only won the ball in the air 4 times and Ratts would have reviewed those 4 marks against the game plan. But 9 disposals and 1 goal was his stats and then being dropped the following week suggests he struggled to execute, and clearly still is. Meaning you need more than mark and kick in AFL.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Thu 09 Mar 2023 11:40pmHis influence was muted by his opponents.The G Train Legacy wrote: ↑Thu 09 Mar 2023 9:23pm6, 26 or 56, doesn't matter. He had no influence on the game.Vortex wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 4:34pmI think Tom Stewart had 26 disposal in that game, I'd be happy if players in our backline get dominated that much.The G Train Legacy wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 3:00pmHe completely nullified Stewart who had no influence on the game, in fact he aerially dominated Stewart. This had the effect of removing Geelong's brickwall defence and allowing King to dominate.Vortex wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 11:36amThat's a considerable exaggeration, some of Sharman's contests on Stewart in that game were overblown a little too, Stewarts stats were still in the mid 20s. It also neglects the performances from some other lesser knowns in the team that no one saw coming, and especially Geelong didn't see coming, namely the game from Windy.The G Train Legacy wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 11:18amLast year Sharman played some good games in defence and there's the small matter of him winning us the game against Geelong. In that game he beat Tom Stewart hands down. Although he may still have things to learn, he can play.
Sharman didnt fall into the trap of playing defensively, he attacked the ball in the air and won it.
Now, his ground work doesn't matter if he keeps marking the ball and kicking it straight.
If Geelongs midfield sets up long enough, they get numbers back while their defence attacks.
But if you put the ball into dangerous spots and get your hands firmly around it, Geelong will speed up their attack and open up the game.
Geelong like to control the tempo of the game and kill you with clean marking and disposal. They just don't expect us to be clean with marking and possession.
That is all about to change. We have Wood and Crouch in great shape and form, we half flankers and wings who can attack, make play and defend at both ends.
We just need a leaping ruckman who can dominate centre clearances, cause Steele, Crouch and Windhager can even up stoppage clearances, but the really tall rucks hurt us in the middle.
If I'm guessing it's because creating a game plan around aerial dominance is a very low percentage play unless you are the second coming of Wayne Carey and in AFL a missed mark by Cooper usually results in a goal to the opposition.
2 of his attempted marks in that game probably got him dropped alone.
At that stage Coops had played 7 games, averaged 1.8 goals and 9.8 disposals, oops, I forgot the 4 marks and we were at the top of the ladder. Just think about that. It's great that Membrey goes and helps down back but it saves games, not wins them.
We won 3 more games for the season, Cooper went to learn something in the VFL and came back and played in defence. Ratten aged 15 years, hit the plonk and faded back off into obscurity.
Sharman is still there and just had his first real pre-season, put on 5 kg and came from the back of the pack to the middle of the endurance runners in the team. He is 22.
But on the Ratts hitting the plonk thing, that's pretty low.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6075
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1563 times
Re: King and Caminiti
At least it was accurate.Vortex wrote: ↑Fri 10 Mar 2023 8:10pmWell as they say in cricket if there is grass on the pitch "then let's play", the opportunity is there for his taking.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Fri 10 Mar 2023 2:35pmJust a little trivia. After the Geelong win in R9, Cooper had 4 marks, 9 disposals and 1 goal in a R10 win against Adelaide too, then 7 disposals and 1 goal in round 11, then Ratten dropped him and got a contract extension.Vortex wrote: ↑Fri 10 Mar 2023 8:58amPlayers performances are obviously always assessed by the coach through the lens of the game plan and the player role and how well the player executed within that so just at a guess Cooper probably got a tick from Ratts in a great win but objectively he only won the ball in the air 4 times and Ratts would have reviewed those 4 marks against the game plan. But 9 disposals and 1 goal was his stats and then being dropped the following week suggests he struggled to execute, and clearly still is. Meaning you need more than mark and kick in AFL.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Thu 09 Mar 2023 11:40pmHis influence was muted by his opponents.The G Train Legacy wrote: ↑Thu 09 Mar 2023 9:23pm6, 26 or 56, doesn't matter. He had no influence on the game.Vortex wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 4:34pmI think Tom Stewart had 26 disposal in that game, I'd be happy if players in our backline get dominated that much.The G Train Legacy wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 3:00pmHe completely nullified Stewart who had no influence on the game, in fact he aerially dominated Stewart. This had the effect of removing Geelong's brickwall defence and allowing King to dominate.Vortex wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 11:36amThat's a considerable exaggeration, some of Sharman's contests on Stewart in that game were overblown a little too, Stewarts stats were still in the mid 20s. It also neglects the performances from some other lesser knowns in the team that no one saw coming, and especially Geelong didn't see coming, namely the game from Windy.The G Train Legacy wrote: ↑Wed 08 Mar 2023 11:18amLast year Sharman played some good games in defence and there's the small matter of him winning us the game against Geelong. In that game he beat Tom Stewart hands down. Although he may still have things to learn, he can play.
Sharman didnt fall into the trap of playing defensively, he attacked the ball in the air and won it.
Now, his ground work doesn't matter if he keeps marking the ball and kicking it straight.
If Geelongs midfield sets up long enough, they get numbers back while their defence attacks.
But if you put the ball into dangerous spots and get your hands firmly around it, Geelong will speed up their attack and open up the game.
Geelong like to control the tempo of the game and kill you with clean marking and disposal. They just don't expect us to be clean with marking and possession.
That is all about to change. We have Wood and Crouch in great shape and form, we half flankers and wings who can attack, make play and defend at both ends.
We just need a leaping ruckman who can dominate centre clearances, cause Steele, Crouch and Windhager can even up stoppage clearances, but the really tall rucks hurt us in the middle.
If I'm guessing it's because creating a game plan around aerial dominance is a very low percentage play unless you are the second coming of Wayne Carey and in AFL a missed mark by Cooper usually results in a goal to the opposition.
2 of his attempted marks in that game probably got him dropped alone.
At that stage Coops had played 7 games, averaged 1.8 goals and 9.8 disposals, oops, I forgot the 4 marks and we were at the top of the ladder. Just think about that. It's great that Membrey goes and helps down back but it saves games, not wins them.
We won 3 more games for the season, Cooper went to learn something in the VFL and came back and played in defence. Ratten aged 15 years, hit the plonk and faded back off into obscurity.
Sharman is still there and just had his first real pre-season, put on 5 kg and came from the back of the pack to the middle of the endurance runners in the team. He is 22.
But on the Ratts hitting the plonk thing, that's pretty low.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1025 times
Re: King and Caminiti
How so and even if it is, is it necessar? Or is there a less hateful way to strengthen your argument!
If it is true, I wouldn't blame the guy for having addiction issues based on the significant suffering he experienced prior to taking the coaching role.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6075
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1563 times
Re: King and Caminiti
Now now Vortex, don't get distracted because I checked your colorful claims on why Sharman was dropped.
Brett will be ok. There are more serious issues for him to focus on, rather than the success of St.Kilda.
Let's take the focus off Cooper Ratten and put it back on Cooper Sharman.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1025 times
Re: King and Caminiti
All good CQ, Cooper is one of many fascinating sub plots for 2023 with regards to list development under Ross.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 11 Mar 2023 9:56amNow now Vortex, don't get distracted because I checked your colorful claims on why Sharman was dropped.
Brett will be ok. There are more serious issues for him to focus on, rather than the success of St.Kilda.
Let's take the focus off Cooper Ratten and put it back on Cooper Sharman.
I'll be ecstatic if the young fella if he makes the grade but right at this very point my view is he's way off the pace.
The positive is he's got a two year contract to make the most of his opportunity.
- King Max
- Club Player
- Posts: 657
- Joined: Fri 28 Dec 2018 11:37am
- Has thanked: 114 times
- Been thanked: 236 times
Re: King and Caminiti
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/aft ... 5crdv.html
St Kilda are considering naming rookie Anthony Caminiti for a round one debut against Fremantle, just a month after he joined the Saints during the pre-season supplementary selection period.
With Max King and Jack Hayes out and Tim Membrey highly unlikely to play against the Dockers at Marvel Stadium, spots have opened up inside forward 50 and Saints sources said Caminiti was in the frame, having made a huge impression in his month of training.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6471
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 1025 times
Re: King and Caminiti
If this happens then it really signals what Ross thinks of the other talls on the list he could possibly pick ahead of Caminiti in the midst of an injury crisis.King Max wrote: ↑Sun 12 Mar 2023 4:32pm https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/aft ... 5crdv.html
St Kilda are considering naming rookie Anthony Caminiti for a round one debut against Fremantle, just a month after he joined the Saints during the pre-season supplementary selection period.
With Max King and Jack Hayes out and Tim Membrey highly unlikely to play against the Dockers at Marvel Stadium, spots have opened up inside forward 50 and Saints sources said Caminiti was in the frame, having made a huge impression in his month of training.
He looks hard and cut, let's hope he's got a bit of peacock about him.