Votes v crows
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6321
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 262 times
- Been thanked: 1120 times
Re: Votes v crows
Bump
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2752
- Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
- Has thanked: 698 times
- Been thanked: 781 times
Re: Votes v crows
Tough to find votes
3. Clark
3. Higgins
3. Wood
1. Stocker
1. Sinclair
3. Clark
3. Higgins
3. Wood
1. Stocker
1. Sinclair
The Artist formerly known as Fugazi
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8069
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 226 times
- Been thanked: 602 times
Re: Votes v crows
5. Higgjns
4. Clark
3...........
2...........
1...........
-5. Howard
4. Clark
3...........
2...........
1...........
-5. Howard
Posting 20 years of holey crap!
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10425
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 713 times
Re: Votes v crows
not quite as poor as the rest
marshall
wood
crouch
clark
higgins
one mistake cost cami some points, so bad was it.
marshall
wood
crouch
clark
higgins
one mistake cost cami some points, so bad was it.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12279
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2647 times
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16965
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3612 times
- Been thanked: 2886 times
Re: Votes v crows
Angry natives it seems
Perhaps the forum would be better served with a round of bottom 5 votes adding a minus to everyone’s scores
Perhaps the forum would be better served with a round of bottom 5 votes adding a minus to everyone’s scores
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8326
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1889 times
- Been thanked: 878 times
Re: Votes v crows
No votes from me.
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3374
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 171 times
- Been thanked: 519 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23068
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9001 times
- Been thanked: 3913 times
Re: Votes v crows
Not really in the mood to give votes for what was really a piss poor effort but here goes nothing:
5. Marshall
4.Clark
3. Higgins
2. Owens
1.Crouch
5. Marshall
4.Clark
3. Higgins
2. Owens
1.Crouch
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11834
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3621 times
- Been thanked: 2525 times
Re: Votes v crows
Clark
Steele
Higgins
Sinclair
Wood
Up until Jack Steele came off the ground it was clearly between him and Hunter Clark for best Saints player. Clark was one of the few Saints who kicked well yesterday. Clark and Steele went at 76% disposal efficiency.
Hunter kept contributing in that last quarter and kept finding his team mates with some beautiful kicking inside 50.
Crouch had 30 but half his touches cost the team instead of helping us. In the last quarter DalSanto on Foxfooty and Dermot talked about it. He had 7 clearances and 4 went to Adelaide players. He had a total of 10 clangers
Steele
Higgins
Sinclair
Wood
Up until Jack Steele came off the ground it was clearly between him and Hunter Clark for best Saints player. Clark was one of the few Saints who kicked well yesterday. Clark and Steele went at 76% disposal efficiency.
Hunter kept contributing in that last quarter and kept finding his team mates with some beautiful kicking inside 50.
Crouch had 30 but half his touches cost the team instead of helping us. In the last quarter DalSanto on Foxfooty and Dermot talked about it. He had 7 clearances and 4 went to Adelaide players. He had a total of 10 clangers
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6321
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 262 times
- Been thanked: 1120 times
Re: Votes v crows
32 Clark
30 Higgins
26 Marshall
20 Crouch
15 Wood
8 Steele
7 Stocker
3 Sinclair
2 Owens
Therefore:
5 Clark
4 Higgins
3 Marshall
2 Crouch
1 Wood
30 Higgins
26 Marshall
20 Crouch
15 Wood
8 Steele
7 Stocker
3 Sinclair
2 Owens
Therefore:
5 Clark
4 Higgins
3 Marshall
2 Crouch
1 Wood
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1831
- Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 5:54pm
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 382 times
Re: Votes v crows
Haven't seen the match, but it sounds from your description that B. Crouch was playing for Adelaide again. Yet he was voted 4th best Saint on here and best Saint on AFL site. Go figure.Scollop wrote: ↑Tue 16 May 2023 10:00am Clark
Steele
Higgins
Sinclair
Wood
Up until Jack Steele came off the ground it was clearly between him and Hunter Clark for best Saints player. Clark was one of the few Saints who kicked well yesterday. Clark and Steele went at 76% disposal efficiency.
Hunter kept contributing in that last quarter and kept finding his team mates with some beautiful kicking inside 50.
Crouch had 30 but half his touches cost the team instead of helping us. In the last quarter DalSanto on Foxfooty and Dermot talked about it. He had 7 clearances and 4 went to Adelaide players. He had a total of 10 clangers
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11834
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3621 times
- Been thanked: 2525 times
Re: Votes v crows
Voting is subjective and I don't have a huge issue with who people vote for. I just like to express my thoughts and hopefully get people thinking a bit deeper about who we reward. There is no doubt that Crouch gives great effort
4 weeks ago when Crouch was getting 30 touches most on here were ridiculing my thoughts and saying he was best on ground or equal best ...at least now some people are not even giving him 1 vote
Not all people who vote try to assess the worth and the value of each disposal
Some people look at stats and just give Crouch 5 votes. It doesn't necessarily mean they understand footy. I know it's hard to ignore 30 touches (and some journos lazily look at stats rather than making a judgement call on impact)
Who knows if they even watched the game!! Who knows if player agents come on here and vote?!?
I haven't seen you participate that often.
Anyhow...if Robert Klomp can win a tv for best on ground, I suppose anyone can
4 weeks ago when Crouch was getting 30 touches most on here were ridiculing my thoughts and saying he was best on ground or equal best ...at least now some people are not even giving him 1 vote
Not all people who vote try to assess the worth and the value of each disposal
Some people look at stats and just give Crouch 5 votes. It doesn't necessarily mean they understand footy. I know it's hard to ignore 30 touches (and some journos lazily look at stats rather than making a judgement call on impact)
Who knows if they even watched the game!! Who knows if player agents come on here and vote?!?
I haven't seen you participate that often.
Anyhow...if Robert Klomp can win a tv for best on ground, I suppose anyone can
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1831
- Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 5:54pm
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 382 times
Re: Votes v crows
Yes, voting is subjective, which also makes it susceptible to bias. You try to get people to think a bit deeper about who we reward? Interesting. I don't think too many posters look at every Crouch possession and think - what would Bytel have done with that possession?Scollop wrote: ↑Wed 17 May 2023 7:34pm Voting is subjective and I don't have a huge issue with who people vote for. I just like to express my thoughts and hopefully get people thinking a bit deeper about who we reward. There is no doubt that Crouch gives great effort
4 weeks ago when Crouch was getting 30 touches most on here were ridiculing my thoughts and saying he was best on ground or equal best ...at least now some people are not even giving him 1 vote
Not all people who vote try to assess the worth and the value of each disposal
Some people look at stats and just give Crouch 5 votes. It doesn't necessarily mean they understand footy. I know it's hard to ignore 30 touches (and some journos lazily look at stats rather than making a judgement call on impact)
Who knows if they even watched the game!! Who knows if player agents come on here and vote?!?
I haven't seen you participate that often.
Anyhow...if Robert Klomp can win a tv for best on ground, I suppose anyone can
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11834
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3621 times
- Been thanked: 2525 times
Re: Votes v crows
That's it! Having a personal dig at me is what you're good at
It comes down to one thing and 1 thing Only when I criticise a player or rate a player the club has brought in (instead of developing and giving opportunity to the talent already on your list)
Has the midfield performed better since Crouch was recruited? He came at the end of 2020
We knew Clark had talent, but he just had a bad run with injury. Same with Gresh. We knew Seb would give consistent effort and I don't need to mention Jack Steele. His trajectory was determined prior to Crouch arriving. The only guy we weren't sure about was a guy who needed games experience and some time to gell with his team mates.
Has our team's performance improved in 2021 and 2022 with Crouch present at every stoppage?
Has the midfield unit improved and has Brad helped to elevate those around him? I don't think so.
Let's see what unfolds in 2023
It comes down to one thing and 1 thing Only when I criticise a player or rate a player the club has brought in (instead of developing and giving opportunity to the talent already on your list)
Has the midfield performed better since Crouch was recruited? He came at the end of 2020
We knew Clark had talent, but he just had a bad run with injury. Same with Gresh. We knew Seb would give consistent effort and I don't need to mention Jack Steele. His trajectory was determined prior to Crouch arriving. The only guy we weren't sure about was a guy who needed games experience and some time to gell with his team mates.
Has our team's performance improved in 2021 and 2022 with Crouch present at every stoppage?
Has the midfield unit improved and has Brad helped to elevate those around him? I don't think so.
Let's see what unfolds in 2023
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1831
- Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 5:54pm
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 382 times
Re: Votes v crows
Thanks for confirming your bias. Of course Crouch is no Oliver or Neale, but, yes I believe Crouch contributes substantially to the midfield. 5th in 2021 and 6th in 2022 in BNF, and at least that level so far this year proves that doesn't it?Scollop wrote: ↑Thu 18 May 2023 9:39am That's it! Having a personal dig at me is what you're good at
It comes down to one thing and 1 thing Only when I criticise a player or rate a player the club has brought in (instead of developing and giving opportunity to the talent already on your list)
Has the midfield performed better since Crouch was recruited? He came at the end of 2020
We knew Clark had talent, but he just had a bad run with injury. Same with Gresh. We knew Seb would give consistent effort and I don't need to mention Jack Steele. His trajectory was determined prior to Crouch arriving. The only guy we weren't sure about was a guy who needed games experience and some time to gell with his team mates.
Has our team's performance improved in 2021 and 2022 with Crouch present at every stoppage?
Has the midfield unit improved and has Brad helped to elevate those around him? I don't think so.
Let's see what unfolds in 2023
It is true Bytel has had injuries, but he has also been available for plenty of games, yet has missed out, or been sub. There has been no hesitation in playing Pou for every game, so if Bytel was rated highly enough surely he wouldn't just be named as sub?
Maybe he might get a good run at it this year, if he does hopefully he makes the most of it. Probably a few not in the 22 ahead of him though. Otherwise, out of contract this year, and it's off to North next year for a 3rd rounder.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23068
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9001 times
- Been thanked: 3913 times
Re: Votes v crows
I am pretty sure Brett Raten will take any disenfranchised Saint he can but he was never a Bytel fan.takeaway wrote: ↑Thu 18 May 2023 10:27amThanks for confirming your bias. Of course Crouch is no Oliver or Neale, but, yes I believe Crouch contributes substantially to the midfield. 5th in 2021 and 6th in 2022 in BNF, and at least that level so far this year proves that doesn't it?Scollop wrote: ↑Thu 18 May 2023 9:39am That's it! Having a personal dig at me is what you're good at
It comes down to one thing and 1 thing Only when I criticise a player or rate a player the club has brought in (instead of developing and giving opportunity to the talent already on your list)
Has the midfield performed better since Crouch was recruited? He came at the end of 2020
We knew Clark had talent, but he just had a bad run with injury. Same with Gresh. We knew Seb would give consistent effort and I don't need to mention Jack Steele. His trajectory was determined prior to Crouch arriving. The only guy we weren't sure about was a guy who needed games experience and some time to gell with his team mates.
Has our team's performance improved in 2021 and 2022 with Crouch present at every stoppage?
Has the midfield unit improved and has Brad helped to elevate those around him? I don't think so.
Let's see what unfolds in 2023
It is true Bytel has had injuries, but he has also been available for plenty of games, yet has missed out, or been sub. There has been no hesitation in playing Pou for every game, so if Bytel was rated highly enough surely he wouldn't just be named as sub?
Maybe he might get a good run at it this year, if he does hopefully he makes the most of it. Probably a few not in the 22 ahead of him though. Otherwise, out of contract this year, and it's off to North next year for a 3rd rounder.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11834
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3621 times
- Been thanked: 2525 times
Re: Votes v crows
Bytel looks leaner this year but needs to improve his tank if he wants a long AFL career
I'm sure it's an area he's working on
Jack needs to engage that fellow that Jobe Watson worked with
I'm sure it's an area he's working on
Jack needs to engage that fellow that Jobe Watson worked with