Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

nostalgicsaint
Club Player
Posts: 947
Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 289 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024849Post nostalgicsaint »

Scollop wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 10:04pm
nostalgicsaint wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 9:48pm
Scollop wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 9:17pm
nostalgicsaint wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 8:29pm
Scollop wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 8:01pm
nostalgicsaint wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 7:19pm Smashed in clearances.

Ross > Clark in clearances

Clark worst performed mid in that area.





I don't necessarily agree with the decision but this is the only logic that makes sense to me.
If you're going to make statements like 'worst performed mid' in clearances, it's best to at least have a bit of an understanding of pure whole numbers versus effectiveness for percentage of times a mid actually attends a stoppage

If you don't understand what I'm talking about, then don't stress, you're no different to the usual nuff nuff that posts on here

Ah potato cakes.

Here we go again.

1. Try reading. I'm not happy about Clark being dropped, simply trying to understand what the rationale might have been.

2. Attendance at stoppages is a stat I don't have access to however we do have access to a good proxy. Center bounce attendances.

For your reference.

Crouch 18 for 2 center clearances
Steele 16 for 1
Owens 14 for 1
Clark 11 for 0
Sinclair 4 for 1


Based on the above worst performed in that area.

Our other option is time on ground vs total clearance

Crouch 86% and 7 clearances
Steele 75% and 1
Owens 80% and 3
Clark. 67% and 1
Sinclair 86% and 1


This looks a bit better but when you consider all the others spend some time forward and back it is less impactful. I suspect part of the reason Clark has lower TOG % is because he is viewed as a pure mid option.

To finish the logic for you. Ross has been brought in to strengthen our midfield, Lyon likes his structures and the players bend around that. It would seem they deemed Clark the worst performed.
I responded to your first post nostalgic nuff nuff

You said
Ross > Clark in clearances
I agree that the inclusion of Seb in the team is good, however he had been poor at clearances for the year. You were comparing Clark with Seb, so the only way to do that is with yearly figures because Sebby didn't play last week.

You made a statement which implied that Ross is better at clearances. Where is the proof?

Now that you have access to the centre clearance and centre bounce attendance stats, let me know if your statement is true (even including Clark's poor effort against Carlton)
You a bit fried mate. No problem I'll give you that context as well.

H Clark 2023 averages.
Center clearances 1
Stoppage 1.9
Total 2.9
Clangers 3.6
Meters gained 262.

S Ross
Center 1.6
Stoppage 2.2
Total 3.8
Clangers 2.9
Meters gained 331


Again- I'm a massive Clark fan, hope he is the sub but this is the logic I can see for the change made to the side.
Stop manufacturing something to justify your nuff nuff opinion.

Averages do not equate to effectiveness.

You do understand what percentage and efficiency is, versus a pure whole number don't you?

Unfortunately the cba and TOG averages aren't provided.

Perhaps you should provide some data to refute my statement? I'm responding with what I have access to.

I've mounted a reasonable case to back my theory based on the resources at my disposal.

That's before we even consider that there may be a reason Clark hasn't been afforded the opportunity to contribute to his whole number through more time on ground and attendance at stoppages which also factors into the decision. (E.g. fitness and/or position flexibility)

I wouldn't say getting into a battle of wits with you is a battle with an unarmed man- you clearly know enough to believe you are more intelligent than you are. Frustrating.


Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7607
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 439 times
Been thanked: 205 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024851Post bobmurray »

nostalgicsaint wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 10:33pm
Scollop wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 10:04pm
nostalgicsaint wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 9:48pm
Scollop wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 9:17pm
nostalgicsaint wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 8:29pm
Scollop wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 8:01pm
nostalgicsaint wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 7:19pm Smashed in clearances.

Ross > Clark in clearances

Clark worst performed mid in that area.





I don't necessarily agree with the decision but this is the only logic that makes sense to me.
If you're going to make statements like 'worst performed mid' in clearances, it's best to at least have a bit of an understanding of pure whole numbers versus effectiveness for percentage of times a mid actually attends a stoppage

If you don't understand what I'm talking about, then don't stress, you're no different to the usual nuff nuff that posts on here

Ah potato cakes.

Here we go again.

1. Try reading. I'm not happy about Clark being dropped, simply trying to understand what the rationale might have been.

2. Attendance at stoppages is a stat I don't have access to however we do have access to a good proxy. Center bounce attendances.

For your reference.

Crouch 18 for 2 center clearances
Steele 16 for 1
Owens 14 for 1
Clark 11 for 0
Sinclair 4 for 1


Based on the above worst performed in that area.

Our other option is time on ground vs total clearance

Crouch 86% and 7 clearances
Steele 75% and 1
Owens 80% and 3
Clark. 67% and 1
Sinclair 86% and 1


This looks a bit better but when you consider all the others spend some time forward and back it is less impactful. I suspect part of the reason Clark has lower TOG % is because he is viewed as a pure mid option.

To finish the logic for you. Ross has been brought in to strengthen our midfield, Lyon likes his structures and the players bend around that. It would seem they deemed Clark the worst performed.
I responded to your first post nostalgic nuff nuff

You said
Ross > Clark in clearances
I agree that the inclusion of Seb in the team is good, however he had been poor at clearances for the year. You were comparing Clark with Seb, so the only way to do that is with yearly figures because Sebby didn't play last week.

You made a statement which implied that Ross is better at clearances. Where is the proof?

Now that you have access to the centre clearance and centre bounce attendance stats, let me know if your statement is true (even including Clark's poor effort against Carlton)
You a bit fried mate. No problem I'll give you that context as well.

H Clark 2023 averages.
Center clearances 1
Stoppage 1.9
Total 2.9
Clangers 3.6
Meters gained 262.

S Ross
Center 1.6
Stoppage 2.2
Total 3.8
Clangers 2.9
Meters gained 331


Again- I'm a massive Clark fan, hope he is the sub but this is the logic I can see for the change made to the side.
Stop manufacturing something to justify your nuff nuff opinion.

Averages do not equate to effectiveness.

You do understand what percentage and efficiency is, versus a pure whole number don't you?

Unfortunately the cba and TOG averages aren't provided.

Perhaps you should provide some data to refute my statement? I'm responding with what I have access to.

I've mounted a reasonable case to back my theory based on the resources at my disposal.

That's before we even consider that there may be a reason Clark hasn't been afforded the opportunity to contribute to his whole number through more time on ground and attendance at stoppages which also factors into the decision. (E.g. fitness and/or position flexibility)

I wouldn't say getting into a battle of wits with you is a battle with an unarmed man- you clearly know enough to believe you are more intelligent than you are. Frustrating.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Saints looking like a bottom 4 team in 2024.
nostalgicsaint
Club Player
Posts: 947
Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 289 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024852Post nostalgicsaint »

I asked chatgpt to summarise this conversation in simple terms for you cheesy potatoes.

See below

ChatGPT
Nostalgicsaint's opinion is that while they may not entirely agree with the decision to drop Clark from the team, they believe it might have been based on his performance in clearances. They mention that Ross has been brought in to strengthen the midfield and that the coaches seem to value certain structures. They compare center bounce attendances and time on ground percentages, suggesting that Clark's lower time on ground could be a factor in the decision. They also mention that Ross has better average stats in terms of clearances, clangers, and meters gained, which they believe contributes to the decision. Overall, nostalgicsaint appears to use available statistics to support their perspective on the change in the team lineup.


Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10306
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1323 times
Been thanked: 932 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024855Post asiu »

:D

classic

chatgpting to adjudicate on premise

why didn't i think of that !!


gaz impressed


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10954
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3380 times
Been thanked: 2351 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024865Post Scollop »

nostalgicsaint wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 10:33pm
Unfortunately the cba and TOG averages aren't provided.
Thank you

Even though you don't have evidence you made this initial statement
Ross > Clark in clearances
The evidence is available and for this year Ross and Clark are neck and neck on centre bounce attendance efficiency ( i.e percentage clearance per attendance)
Last edited by Scollop on Sat 12 Aug 2023 12:58am, edited 1 time in total.


nostalgicsaint
Club Player
Posts: 947
Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 289 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024867Post nostalgicsaint »

Fish fingers!

Read the below again.

"I don't necessarily agree with the decision but this is the only logic that makes sense to me."

Stop being slower than Ollie Robinson on a road.


Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10954
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3380 times
Been thanked: 2351 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024869Post Scollop »

f*** off turd. Why don't you admit you shot your mouth off without knowing wtf you're talking about


nostalgicsaint
Club Player
Posts: 947
Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 289 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024870Post nostalgicsaint »

I've also provided multiple forms of evidence.

Identifying a more accurate potential methodology which isn't possible to produce actually doesn't diminish the evidence provided until such time the more accurate methodology can be executed.

What is important is to acknowledge the limitation but it doesn't preclude a conclusion based on the information we have at hand.


Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
nostalgicsaint
Club Player
Posts: 947
Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 289 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024871Post nostalgicsaint »

Scollop wrote: Sat 12 Aug 2023 12:59am f*** off turd. Why don't you admit you shot your mouth off without knowing wtf you're talking about
I'll admit that I posited a potential explanation of a selection decision made by others.

And

That I run rings around you when it comes to debating, pretty much anything.

But you won't get me to admit to anything more.


Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10954
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3380 times
Been thanked: 2351 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024874Post Scollop »

Yeah...yeah....yeah

You shot your mouth off and searched for evidence afterward

Clark played the first 11 games of the year until he got injured.

Before his injury, Hunter Clark was third in effectiveness after Owens and Sinclair for centre bounce clearances (i.e Clearances as a percentage of centre bounce attendance).

Gresh also had better figures than our 3 amigos including Seb

Hunter has not been as effective in the last 3 games since he returned to the seniors.


nostalgicsaint
Club Player
Posts: 947
Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 289 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024875Post nostalgicsaint »

I stated a theory as to why the decision was made.

I was challenged on the theory and asked to provide evidence so I did.

I personally think Clark is a great player and we missed him immensely when he was injured.

I am surprised to see him dropped but based on recent form- particularly around clearances my theory stacks up as well as any I have seen?!?

Whats really happened here is you shot your mouth off and have been embarrassed.


Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10954
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3380 times
Been thanked: 2351 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024877Post Scollop »

If I f*** up I’ll admit it

Over to you

cc/cba 11.9 for Hunter Clark this year

cc/cba is 11.5 for him over his career

https://www.wheeloratings.com/afl_playe ... ID=1407818

Seb Ross cc/cba for this year is 11.4. Over Seb’s career it’s 10.9

https://www.wheeloratings.com/afl_playe ... ?ID=230056

There's a link to the same website for these sort of stats in my post on 23rd May.

I posted about the effectiveness of our mids (especially centre clearance) back in round 11

viewtopic.php?p=2010284&hilit=Owens+cha ... e#p2010284


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23139
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 728 times
Been thanked: 1762 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024878Post Teflon »

Scollop wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 10:23pm
Teflon wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 10:05pm
Scollop wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 8:10pm B.M

Who the fvck are you directing that to?
😂 absolutely golden
nuff nuffs chatting away ….to nobody…
Is that you god? You listening?
🤣
He was probably asking you if you're happy about Seb and Tim back in the team. You're one of the posters who's bagged both Tim Membrey and Seb Ross

Why don't you answer him
😂 I’ll leave it to you two love birds…


“Yeah….nah””
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10954
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3380 times
Been thanked: 2351 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024880Post Scollop »

Teflon wrote: Sat 12 Aug 2023 1:32am
Scollop wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 10:23pm
Teflon wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 10:05pm
Scollop wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 8:10pm B.M

Who the fvck are you directing that to?
😂 absolutely golden
nuff nuffs chatting away ….to nobody…
Is that you god? You listening?
🤣
He was probably asking you if you're happy about Seb and Tim back in the team. You're one of the posters who's bagged both Tim Membrey and Seb Ross

Why don't you answer him
😂 I’ll leave it to you two love birds…
Sure …righty oh. Well done. Good post


nostalgicsaint
Club Player
Posts: 947
Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 289 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024881Post nostalgicsaint »

That's a great website. You could have saved us all some time by sharing those stats earlier instead of questioning my ability to undetstand statistics.

Based on the information you shared I still cant think of a reason for dropping clark outside of recent clearance form and Sebs ability to spend more time on ground whilst providing the same level of clearance efficiency.


Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23139
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 728 times
Been thanked: 1762 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024885Post Teflon »

nostalgicsaint wrote: Sat 12 Aug 2023 1:36am That's a great website. You could have saved us all some time by sharing those stats earlier instead of questioning my ability to undetstand statistics.

Based on the information you shared I still cant think of a reason for dropping clark outside of recent clearance form and Sebs ability to spend more time on ground whilst providing the same level of clearance efficiency.
Seb also offers more run I think …not a total liability with ball on outside
I think Clark is gone too


“Yeah….nah””
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10954
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3380 times
Been thanked: 2351 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024887Post Scollop »

nostalgicsaint wrote: Sat 12 Aug 2023 1:36am That's a great website. You could have saved us all some time by sharing those stats earlier instead of questioning my ability to undetstand statistics.

Based on the information you shared I still cant think of a reason for dropping clark outside of recent clearance form and Sebs ability to spend more time on ground whilst providing the same level of clearance efficiency.
You’re welcome

Seb has had time to hone his craft. I honestly believe if Hunter had as many opportunities as Seb, he probably would have gotten better at his clearance work the last 3-4 years. His injury interruptions haven’t helped

The other thing to note with clearance stats (imo) is that Seb was a beneficiary to both Billy Longer’s tap work for a couple of years and Paddy Ryder’s tap work for a couple of years. For all of Billy’s deficiencies, Billy was elite at tapping the ball to advantage.

At this time of year, when a few Richmond players are sore and sorry, I think Seb will have an advantage coming in fresh

I think we both agree that Clark has been a good contributor to the team wins this year and hopefully he’ll be sub and play a role Sunday as well. I also agree that Seb Ross will be invaluable for his run and we agree he is a better endurance athlete


nostalgicsaint
Club Player
Posts: 947
Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 289 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024888Post nostalgicsaint »

Agreed 🥳


Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
saintbob
SS Life Member
Posts: 3542
Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
Location: Tassie
Has thanked: 459 times
Been thanked: 294 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024889Post saintbob »

Ghost Like wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 9:40pm
saintbob wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 8:49pm
Ghost Like wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 6:28pm
saintbob wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 10:13am
Ghost Like wrote: Thu 10 Aug 2023 8:45pm
saintbob wrote: Thu 10 Aug 2023 7:51pm WTAF, Paton added to the squad surely Lyon has seen enough of him
Really? It sounds like you think he was on Breust. I prefer my defenders to be able to defend.
I prefer my defenders to be able to think for themselves, not freeze under pressure and actually use the ball. He’s NFG and he won’t be at the club next year, where as the bloke who played on Breust will be.
Breust will be happy and a lot of other small forwards. Oh, and you bob. What pressure does Paton freeze under bob? It is certainly not the pressure of locking down a small forward.
Do you seriously think he’d have spent so long in the magoos this year, if he was so damn good at locking down small forwards??? 🤷🏻‍♂️
Read how this started bob. You had a wobbly that he had got picked in the squad. He obviously went back to Sandy and has worked hard in that time so deserves the credit of selection. Paton overtook Webster for the small lockdown backman until Roughead wanted to relive his Glory days. I feel for the kid.

You are celebrating a bloke who allowed Breust to kick a career high, in his twilight years, on the basis his kicks appear sharp, when they are just as panicked as Paton's are when no one runs to space.

I do know that Paton has never had 5 (6) kicked on him. Yes, I do value defenders who can lock down. Paton actually makes the lives of Webster and Sinclair better by covering off for them. I think he's a selfless, determined player and hope he remains a Saint because he's disciplined and can actually defend.
[/quote


Yes Webster had 6 kicked on him, but clearly blind Freddy could see half of the goals were whilst Breust was cheating out the back and others were meant to be covering hence why RTB never blamed or dropped Webster.
Webster will finish top 10 in the B&F this year again, Paton might get 10 votes


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2024908Post Ghost Like »

Yes bob, a small forward cheating out the back is not new and certainly not an excuse for a defender being lit up. It's their craft to do that, a defender's craft is to stop that materialising into 6 goals.

Another who can have all their B&F votes, I want a flag contending team. I don't want to be sooking about a small defender being named in a squad. A player who had nothing to do with our capitualtion to Carlton.

Fingers crossed for this week, so we can play finals, where hopefully our small forwards can cheat out the back often enough and accurately enough to kick a winning score.


User avatar
D.B.Cooper
Club Player
Posts: 1741
Joined: Sun 24 Oct 2021 5:50pm
Has thanked: 672 times
Been thanked: 630 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2025480Post D.B.Cooper »

CURLY wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 7:23pm Be interesting to see if Clark’s sub if not I’d suggest he’s got a small injury concern.


DB Copper is that Byrnes that has been dropped? I hope Lyon didn’t mention any flaws in his game.
Yep word is RTB sat down with Byrnes and told him he is:

1/ the worst player in the AFL
2/ a total liability
3/ to just get out - ffs
4/ no more, just no more
5/ s***
6/ etc, etc, etc repetitively

Young Byrnes left the meeting understanding exactly what he had to work on in his game to improve due the RTB’s constructive criticism and positive reinforcement. 👍


There's only one rule in the jungle! When the LYON's hungry, he eats!
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9645
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 1233 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2025484Post CURLY »

D.B.Cooper wrote: Mon 14 Aug 2023 12:53pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 7:23pm Be interesting to see if Clark’s sub if not I’d suggest he’s got a small injury concern.


DB Copper is that Byrnes that has been dropped? I hope Lyon didn’t mention any flaws in his game.
Yep word is RTB sat down with Byrnes and told him he is:

1/ the worst player in the AFL
2/ a total liability
3/ to just get out - ffs
4/ no more, just no more
5/ s***
6/ etc, etc, etc repetitively

Young Byrnes left the meeting understanding exactly what he had to work on in his game to improve due the RTB’s constructive criticism and positive reinforcement. 👍

Well he has a heap to work on then. Doubt he ever becomes a regular with his poor disposal and desision making.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
D.B.Cooper
Club Player
Posts: 1741
Joined: Sun 24 Oct 2021 5:50pm
Has thanked: 672 times
Been thanked: 630 times

Re: Ross, Membrey in. Clark, Byrnes and Caminiti out.

Post: # 2025494Post D.B.Cooper »

CURLY wrote: Mon 14 Aug 2023 1:06pm
D.B.Cooper wrote: Mon 14 Aug 2023 12:53pm
CURLY wrote: Fri 11 Aug 2023 7:23pm Be interesting to see if Clark’s sub if not I’d suggest he’s got a small injury concern.


DB Copper is that Byrnes that has been dropped? I hope Lyon didn’t mention any flaws in his game.
Yep word is RTB sat down with Byrnes and told him he is:

1/ the worst player in the AFL
2/ a total liability
3/ to just get out - ffs
4/ no more, just no more
5/ s***
6/ etc, etc, etc repetitively

Young Byrnes left the meeting understanding exactly what he had to work on in his game to improve due the RTB’s constructive criticism and positive reinforcement. 👍

Well he has a heap to work on then. Doubt he ever becomes a regular with his poor disposal and desision making.
I wouldn’t argue that Byrnes may not make it past 50-60 games, similar to Lonie and would most likely be a depth player or in the 22-30 bracket on the playing list, whilst he remains.


There's only one rule in the jungle! When the LYON's hungry, he eats!
Post Reply