We develop talent poorly. Just when he was showing good signs we made him the sub 3 weeks in a row.
Steele does a collarbone and there was no like for like replacement. We played senior guys who were out of form while guys like Jack played VFL
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
We develop talent poorly. Just when he was showing good signs we made him the sub 3 weeks in a row.
I don’t think many ppl thought that Gresh was s*** - consistency has always been the issue. Has been decent for the bombers but his performances don’t look to me like he’s improved out of sight.
Hind this season is below average for disposals, marks, tackles, goals, clearances, effective disposals, disposal efficiency, meters gained, contested possessions, and pressure acts.
I didn’t watch the game but it looks like he was sub initially, came on for 7 touches… maybe finished the game off?
Probably the type of player that is reasonable to have on the list as a good depth playernefron55 wrote: ↑Sun 12 May 2024 11:12pmHind this season is below average for disposals, marks, tackles, goals, clearances, effective disposals, disposal efficiency, meters gained, contested possessions, and pressure acts.
Not sure this position suits him either apparently. Just a deficient player sadly.
Started as the sub, came on in Q2, got concussed. Played 46% game time
Bulldust
Not so much a bad move…Brunswicksainter wrote: ↑Mon 13 May 2024 7:34pm Does anyone on this forum seriously think getting rid of Hind was a bad move? He’s probably been worse at Essendon than when he was with us. Biggest whipping boy at the bombers and for good reason. Spud.