Same old same old from Patrick

plumtire · Post: # 469532Post **plumtire** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 11:10am

Has anyone else been listening to Patrick Smith and Kevin Bartlett on SEN?
The only thing that is annoying Mr. Smith is the fact that the Saints have not embarked on a civil war, but have instead achieved a dignified and united transition in changing the administration at Moorabbin.
(unlike a number of other AFL clubs not too far from here!!!)

savatage · Post: # 469535Post **savatage** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 11:15am

I generally don't pay attention to what morons have to say. That guy is truly a clown!

chook23 · Post: # 469536Post **chook23** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 11:15am

Whilst not a supporter of Smith

he did make some valid points

re how/why some voted for SFF

plumtire · Post: # 469537Post **plumtire** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 11:16am

WHO? Smith or me?

Dan Warna · Post: # 469538Post **Dan Warna** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 11:16am

oh dear phatpryck has gone from having 'one' friend to 'no' friends.

I'm pretty sure now that the saints are moving on, any friends that phatpryck may have had will evapourate and he will dissapear back into being a hopeless fourth rate editorial writer.

when was the last time outside the st kilda board change that the giant turd man broke a story?

really he's just a paid outsider who gets to lob rocks at people and clubs.

Oh When the Saints · Thu 04 Oct 2007 11:18am

chook23 wrote:Whilst not a supporter of Smith

he did make some valid points

re how/why some voted for SFF

The voice of reason! As always ...

plumtire · Post: # 469542Post **plumtire** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 11:20am

Apparently the guy is held in very high regard within journalistic circles. I think he's far too opinionated to provide objective comments. Ivy Moyle gave us a laugh though! "He's the reason why I dont buy the Age"

rodgerfox · Post: # 469547Post **rodgerfox** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 11:23am

Oh When the Saints wrote:
chook23 wrote:Whilst not a supporter of Smith

he did make some valid points

re how/why some voted for SFF
The voice of reason! As always ...

Does he know why people voted, or is he speculating? Guessing? Assuming?

Clearly, the football - and alot of our own supporters, expected this to be the implosion they've been waiting for for the past 8 years. But it didn't happen - again.

Sorry Mr Smith, get used to it.

Sorry old-school Saints fans, get used to it.

There is not going to be an implosion.

You've been expecting, waiting, hoping for it for 8 years and it hasn't happened. We've played finals, missed finals, sacked a coach, sacked players, sacked a Board yet the club hasn't imploded - this isn't how the script was meant to go!

Get used to it.

Dan Warna · Post: # 469551Post **Dan Warna** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 11:25am

he got sacked from the age years ago and writes from teh rustralian.

you'll find that the Age wasn't big enough to carry two incompetent journalists like caro and phatpryck. the difference was sometimes caro's Bullshyte was true.

Caro has mates at clubs and probably has teh wood over some of them and occassionally gets an inside story.

of course shes be exposed as a bullshyte artist on some of those stories, but her strike rate is much higher than a mere editorialiser.

savatage · Post: # 469554Post **savatage** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 11:27am

plumtire wrote:Apparently the guy is held in very high regard within journalistic circles. I think he's far too opinionated to provide objective comments. Ivy Moyle gave us a laugh though! "He's the reason why I dont buy the Age"

He should keep his "journalistic" talents to little league games. Even then he'd struggle. The guy is a joke.

He's like Robert Walls, opinions change just to suit the arguement of the day. A walking, talking contradiction.

chook23 · Post: # 469555Post **chook23** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 11:29am

bit of assuming

by Smith and Rodgerfox

to be fair.

Not just one.

bigmicka · Post: # 469560Post **bigmicka** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 11:33am

he is the bombers fan who was supporting the ousting of the president and ceo of essendon after the handling of the sheedy affair.

what happened with that one? oh right only 10% of their members actually agreed with the statement. the current board and ceo are still there with greater support.

he is a whale in a cheap suit. a man who's narrowspread* opinion is lower than dung beetle crap.

mic

*(he writes for the australian so im not going to say widespread)

evertonfc · Post: # 469562Post **evertonfc** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 11:33am

plumtire wrote:Apparently the guy is held in very high regard within journalistic circles.

Elaborate.

Edit: Be interested to know where you heard this.

rodgerfox · Post: # 469564Post **rodgerfox** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 11:35am

evertonfc wrote:
plumtire wrote:Apparently the guy is held in very high regard within journalistic circles.
Elaborate.

I know a couple of journo's who have and still do work with Smith.

He's not held in high regard to my knowledge, but is considered to 'well informed'.

evertonfc · Post: # 469583Post **evertonfc** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 11:51am

rodgerfox wrote:He's not held in high regard to my knowledge, but is considered to 'well informed'.

I'd suggest that's not entirely correct. He's lost a lot of contacts in recent years...he's just lost a few more down at St Kilda, too.

Not exactly what you'd call or a popular or terribly highly respected member of the sporting press, either.

He is highly rated, however, by the anti-sport group movement at the MEAA, who seem to think renaming someone Xavier Tanner makes for creative genius.

thejiggingsaint · Thu 04 Oct 2007 12:01pm

A good reason NOT to read the "Aus" I believe!
The bloke still has the knack of getting up our collective nose though!
SEE! even the Jigster!

saintly · Post: # 469592Post **saintly** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 12:03pm

rodgerfox wrote:
Oh When the Saints wrote:
chook23 wrote:Whilst not a supporter of Smith

he did make some valid points

re how/why some voted for SFF
The voice of reason! As always ...
Does he know why people voted, or is he speculating? Guessing? Assuming?

Clearly, the football - and alot of our own supporters, expected this to be the implosion they've been waiting for for the past 8 years. But it didn't happen - again.

Sorry Mr Smith, get used to it.

Sorry old-school Saints fans, get used to it.

There is not going to be an implosion.

You've been expecting, waiting, hoping for it for 8 years and it hasn't happened. We've played finals, missed finals, sacked a coach, sacked players, sacked a Board yet the club hasn't imploded - this isn't how the script was meant to go!

Get used to it.

I like what you've said.

and true as well.

what a change that the saints have not imploded.

stinger · Post: # 469710Post **stinger** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 2:26pm

the fatprick is just peeved that the saints have a new board...whom he failed to back...and he won't be welcome down at moorabbin...not that he was when he kept calling thomas cornflakes.....

Behind Play · Thu 04 Oct 2007 2:58pm

I refuse to listen to KB when PS is on. He actually should be worried about the instability at his own club.

Bloody Jerk

joffaboy · Post: # 469741Post **joffaboy** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 3:14pm

stinger wrote:the fatprick is just peeved that the saints have a new board...whom he failed to back...and he won't be welcome down at moorabbin....

this is spot on.

has been positioning himself so as to be able to slag off at the new board for some time.

Started his praise of Butterss around July when Bedwetter announced his challenge.

Now the SFF is in he will go after Westaway with his usual vitriol.

Dan Warna · Post: # 469749Post **Dan Warna** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 3:24pm

Behind Play wrote:I refuse to listen to KB when PS is on. He actually should be worried about the instability at his own club.

Bloody Jerk

absolutely

the membership is divided over the sheedy sacking, the rebels couldn't organise a wet tissue tearing competition and faith in the new coach is ZERO.

matty knights was a fine player for richmond but i think the only hard ball he ever got was clearing out the pockets after a game of pool.

while there was no love for Ayres, packing dean wallis off has also angered a fair few members.

the essendon board also leaks worse than russian nuclear submarine.

by and large for all their mistakes the st kilda board did an awful lot right, and the transfer of power was relatively seemless.

I'd be 99% sure RB and co wont be returning calls from phatpryck now the dust has settled so phatpryck can go back to working from home and whatever he does there.

GrumpyOne · Post: # 469775Post **GrumpyOne** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 3:52pm

Dan Warna wrote:
Behind Play wrote:I refuse to listen to KB when PS is on. He actually should be worried about the instability at his own club.

Bloody Jerk
absolutely

the membership is divided over the sheedy sacking, the rebels couldn't organise a wet tissue tearing competition and faith in the new coach is ZERO.

matty knights was a fine player for richmond but i think the only hard ball he ever got was clearing out the pockets after a game of pool.

while there was no love for Ayres, packing dean wallis off has also angered a fair few members.

the essendon board also leaks worse than russian nuclear submarine.

by and large for all their mistakes the st kilda board did an awful lot right, and the transfer of power was relatively seemless.

I'd be 99% sure RB and co wont be returning calls from phatpryck now the dust has settled so phatpryck can go back to working from home and whatever he does there.

When did phatpryck play for Essendon?

Or was he on the Board?

saint patrick · Thu 04 Oct 2007 4:02pm

Thought to myself...who have I upset this time

But compared to the talking shyte namesake I am just an amateur

The scary thing is that he is actually serious and actually believes the crap that comes out his mouth

Well I guess I and a few others here have that in common with the fat ba$tard

barks4eva · Post: # 469849Post **barks4eva** » Thu 04 Oct 2007 5:16pm

Oh When the Saints wrote:
chook23 wrote:Whilst not a supporter of Smith

he did make some valid points

re how/why some voted for SFF
The voice of reason! As always ...

agree OWTS

chook is probably the most reasoned and pragmatic poster on this site

always the voice of reason, always, respect his opinion immensely

Behind Play · Thu 04 Oct 2007 5:29pm

Grumpy, eesendon is the team he barracks for.