Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
do we insist on rookie listing every player we or any other club delist? if it was up to some people, we would have a playing list of 30 and rookie list of 204
n1ck wrote:7 clearances against West Coast at Subi in his first game. Yeah thats soft innit.
Small and skinny - yes - but tough as nails.
Yep.
16 possessions, and 5 tackles in his debut as a 19 year old (weighing about 70kg), which happened to be against West Coast at Subi.
He was played as an attacking inside midfielder and that is how it should have stayed.
He was too small in 2005 but had great endurance. In 2006 he tried to bulk up too quickly and lost his endurance. This year he was played as a tagger and lost all confidence in himself.
If Mini was just given a few years to bulk up at a steady pace (with a few tastes of senior footy) then he would have ended up being a quality midfielder in the Andrew Thompson mould. Ball-magnet, tackling-machine, wins clearances and has reliable skills.
Hopefully we re-draft him and give him another year to get his body in the right shape for AFL before we see what he can really do.
fonz_#15 wrote:do we insist on rookie listing every player we or any other club delist? if it was up to some people, we would have a playing list of 30 and rookie list of 204
Sometimes a highly rated junior like Mini was might get their act together on a last chance scenario.
I find it hard to believe someone so highly rated has no hope....
The expectation of 'ready-made footballer' at 17years old is what is killing these kids.
People seriously expect first or second year draftees to be up to afl standard the minute they come onto a list. IT DOESNT WORK LIKE THAT.
Not everyone is a Chris Judd or a Justin Koschitzke or a Joel Selwood and star in their first year. In fact, players like these are in the minority. That is why they are called STARS.
These kids need a good 3 years in the system. Pre-seasons, training, match conditions and then if they STILL are too skinny, or not fit enough then thats a problem.
Mini has had his training regimes chopped and changed according to who's coaching the side, so he can fill whatever holes there are. For people to expect a 19yr old to do that is unbelievable.
Same thing happened with Goddard. His first few years he was played in a number of positions. 2006 he came into his own when he was let loose across half back and allowed to train for, and play ONE POSITION. Sure he could pinch hit in the middle or rest up forward for a few minutes for rotations sake but we all knew he was a half back, and most importantly he knew his own role in the team.
I dont think Mini ever got the chance to find his own role in the side.
Gotta admit he did dramatically lose touch this year after a serviceable yet promising first two years. More of a confidence issue than anything imo. I would have rather delisted Ferguson, who has been on the list in five years and hasn't really shown anything at all since 2003 when he did play a few good games. I also cant really understand the love affair with Ferguson that is seemingly apparent amongst these forums.
Trust the Midas Touch
"My heart is at St.Kilda, I've been here seven years, I only wanted to play for them." (Fraser Gehrig, 27/11/2007)
Too small too slow can't kick the ball over 40 mts.
Plenty of endeavour but that is it!
The biggest disappointment is we wasted a valuable first round pick on an undersized slow midfielder.
This example highlights how our drafting has been very ordinary since we lost the luxury of the prized picks our ineptitude afforded us in the drafts of 2000, 2001 & 2002.
Somone may rookie him, but I doubt they'd use a pick on him.
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
Why stop at delisting them?? Lets get Ackland back for the ruck...Troy for FB....McGough for the centre....
Lets just accept that some players get their chance but are not good enough.......they may or may come good later but did not take their opportunity....for whatever the reason.
AFL is a ruthless and competitive business and we can only havea very limited number of players on our list....players need to be tried and tested...and if found wanting moved on.....so that others can be tried and tested.
"Such is life"....as Ben might say!!
This is both good for them....and good for the Saints.
Mini and Brooks both being delisted may give them a chance at another club....they were going no where at the Saints. a new environment and coach....and ATTITUDE and DESIRe may seem them prosper.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Dan Warna wrote:ok but why keep CJ, who in the seniors would have to be on the least skilled 23 year old in the league.
As little as I like the decision I imagine it's because with CJ, you know that if he can improve, he will, he's hungry. With Mini, we'd still be hankering after potential.
Given what I've seen of Jones, I'd have hankered after the potential for another 12 months, but given where I see them on the list, regard the choice as unimportant unless Mini turns it on at another club, which I can't say I think is all that likely.
"Everything comes to he who hustles while he waits"
- Henry Ford
n1ck wrote:The expectation of 'ready-made footballer' at 17years old is what is killing these kids.
People seriously expect first or second year draftees to be up to afl standard the minute they come onto a list. IT DOESNT WORK LIKE THAT.
Not everyone is a Chris Judd or a Justin Koschitzke or a Joel Selwood and star in their first year. In fact, players like these are in the minority. That is why they are called STARS.
These kids need a good 3 years in the system. Pre-seasons, training, match conditions and then if they STILL are too skinny, or not fit enough then thats a problem.
Mini has had his training regimes chopped and changed according to who's coaching the side, so he can fill whatever holes there are. For people to expect a 19yr old to do that is unbelievable.
Same thing happened with Goddard. His first few years he was played in a number of positions. 2006 he came into his own when he was let loose across half back and allowed to train for, and play ONE POSITION. Sure he could pinch hit in the middle or rest up forward for a few minutes for rotations sake but we all knew he was a half back, and most importantly he knew his own role in the team.
I dont think Mini ever got the chance to find his own role in the side.
thats spot on mate.
Mini went backwards in 2007, but I think his confidence was very very low and that hurt him due to his role getting changed around a bit.
Was a bit small, but I always thought he showed slightly more at AFL level then VFL level....(some may argue).
Thommo we must remember wasn't a ready made top line footballer until he was 24 or 25.
RL wants pace. Simple. Get it???
Feguson is OK. He is a steady player. CJ has only one side to his game. CAnt kick on his other side. Does U turns. Maqualter I belive is still on list die to contract, Can anyone confirm he has been delisted? He is an in and under player and deserves more of a chance.
As sopmeone said before, RL knows what it takes to win a flag. Who would of thought Sydney would win it in 05??