barks4eva wrote:
As regards how important Beveridge's decision is, it depends on how much independance he has.
For example Raph Clarke was 100% Thomas's decision, Beveridge had no say whatsoever in this decision.
krabb wrote:
Beveridge had no say whatsoever? I find that hard to believe.
Why then do i recall GT saying that Beveridge was in charge of recruiting and he was leaving it all up to him.
Or...
Was it that because we got Xavier...it was a given that we would draft Raph?
That is a 100% FACT
Thomas told Beveridge that the pick was off limits and we would be drafting R.Clarke
btw, fwiw, imho, I thought this was the right call at the time
Thomas says one thing and does another, depends on who he is talking to and what agenda he has, but you already know that, surely
Thomas also said in response to a question of mine on radio about our recruiting and FIRST ROUND DRAFT SELECTIONS> "I had nothing to do with any of that, IN FACT, I didn't even want to know"
So the guy running the football department claims he didn't want to know who we were going to use our first round draft selections on.
If anyone believe's that then they're extremely gullible.
I happen to know that this was not the case.
Thomas lied, which he has a habit of doing.
If the guy running the football department doesn't want to know who we are using our first round draft selections on ( which wasn't the case, I might add ) then he should be sacked.
Not all selections were on the table, for Beveridge to have the call on.
Obviously this is the case most of the time, but not 100% of the time.
DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.