Runners

[jill]

Twice in 1st half Rich runner impeded play to detriment of StKilda-1 resulted in goal. Why did NO umpire take action - thought this meant a free kick. The 2nd time virtually meant saints player shepherded from play - think it was X or Raph.

[suss]

This will be spoken about during the week - no doubt about it. I coudn't work out whether it was their runner or ours but it almost resulted in a smashed TV at our place. If it was ours he needs a kick in the pants, if it was theirs a clear cut case of shepparding was going on.

[Armoooo]

Hmmm, didn't notice that, I will look out for it whenever i get around to watching the replay...

[saintsRrising]

Twice in 1st half Rich runner impeded play to detriment of StKilda-1 resulted in goal. Why did NO umpire take action - thought this meant a free kick. The 2nd time virtually meant saints player shepherded from play - think it was X or Raph.

At the game I certainly noticed on one occassion where the Richmond runner was in the way....and effecticely blocked the ability of one Saint to pass to another saint.

I know he was a Richmond runner as I watched who he ran to afterwards..

[saintDal]

Twice in 1st half Rich runner impeded play to detriment of StKilda-1 resulted in goal. Why did NO umpire take action - thought this meant a free kick. The 2nd time virtually meant saints player shepherded from play - think it was X or Raph.

At the game I certainly noticed on one occassion where the Richmond runner was in the way....and effecticely blocked the ability of one Saint to pass to another saint.

I know he was a Richmond runner as I watched who he ran to afterwards..

Yeah saw this on TV. Commentators didn't even mention it.

Didn't know whether to be mad or not because I wasn't sure if it was our runner.