2nd Tier Key Defenders

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Statsman
Club Player
Posts: 1775
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:46pm
Location: Aisle 37, Level 1, Telstra Dome

2nd Tier Key Defenders

Post: # 560719Post Statsman »

It looks like we may be without both Hudghton (hamstring) and Maguire (foot) for our next game. Who is going to replace these two as key defenders?

Fisher and Goddard are the two most likely candidates, but both play far better as the 3rd tall defender where they can use their ability to read the play to spoil, clean up and rebound with freedom. We lose lots of run from our defence when Fisher and Goddard are forced to lock in on an opponent.

From there we start looking at the likes of Jason Blake, Raphael Clarke and James Gwilt. Not exactly the kind of guys that are going to strike fear into a key forward.

Is it too late to re-invent Gehrig as a full back again?


"Ask not what your teammates can do for you. Ask what you can do for your teammates." - Earvin 'Magic' Johnson
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: 2nd Tier Key Defenders

Post: # 560720Post plugger66 »

Statsman wrote:It looks like we may be without both Hudghton (hamstring) and Maguire (foot) for our next game. Who is going to replace these two as key defenders?

Fisher and Goddard are the two most likely candidates, but both play far better as the 3rd tall defender where they can use their ability to read the play to spoil, clean up and rebound with freedom. We lose lots of run from our defence when Fisher and Goddard are forced to lock in on an opponent.

From there we start looking at the likes of Jason Blake, Raphael Clarke and James Gwilt. Not exactly the kind of guys that are going to strike fear into a key forward.

Is it too late to re-invent Gehrig as a full back again?
Yes.


saint64
Club Player
Posts: 601
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 12:18am
Location: Perth,WA
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 29 times

Post: # 560724Post saint64 »

We can do a lot worse than Blake and Raph as replacements IMO


User avatar
Statsman
Club Player
Posts: 1775
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:46pm
Location: Aisle 37, Level 1, Telstra Dome

Post: # 560725Post Statsman »

Thought so. :wink:

Then I guess we either sacrifice Fisher and/or Goddard or place our trust in guys like Blake, Clarke and Gwilt. :(


"Ask not what your teammates can do for you. Ask what you can do for your teammates." - Earvin 'Magic' Johnson
User avatar
Statsman
Club Player
Posts: 1775
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:46pm
Location: Aisle 37, Level 1, Telstra Dome

Post: # 560726Post Statsman »

saint64 wrote:We can do a lot worse than Blake and Raph as replacements IMO
As key defenders or Rocca and Cloke or Brown and Bradshaw? :shock:


"Ask not what your teammates can do for you. Ask what you can do for your teammates." - Earvin 'Magic' Johnson
User avatar
SaintBot
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5368
Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 7:06am
Location: RUCK-ROVER

Post: # 560767Post SaintBot »

saint64 wrote:We can do a lot worse than Blake and Raph as replacements IMO
I would've thought thats as bad as it gets


Zippy
Club Player
Posts: 751
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:37am

Post: # 560775Post Zippy »

Rix could be an OK matchup for someone like Rocca.

Ferguson would be another option.

Add Blake/Clarke/Gwilt and we have a fair lot of second-string defenders, but no first-line stoppers

But I think our defence will have trouble if they're both out, so we might have to . . . ermmm . . . flood a bit. Which mightn't make that much difference . . . :lol:


Blindly delusional optimist. Fan of the Blake.

"If anyone disagrees with anything I say, I am quite prepared not only to retract it, but also to deny under oath that I ever said itâ€
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30068
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1222 times

Post: # 560951Post saintsRrising »

On Rocca...I don' t think the Pies are that keen on playing him at present...for essentialy the same reasons we are wrestling with playing the GTrain or not.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13520
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1308 times
Been thanked: 2012 times

Post: # 561016Post The_Dud »

Goddard is NOT a key defender, he would get killed, plus his talents would go to waste

Rix, Blake and even Raph would be better defensive options


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
groupie1
Club Player
Posts: 1271
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 4:21am
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Post: # 561083Post groupie1 »

For Rocka and Cloke, i guess you're talking, we'd go with Fisher on R and Gwilt on Cloke - Gwilt worked hard when replacing Max last year.

We stil retain Fisher's run, because, Rocca can't

G as a defender? ha ha ha ha ha - that's funny dude


Gordon Fode couldda been Plugga
User avatar
mad saint guy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7038
Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 348 times

Post: # 561089Post mad saint guy »

Gwilt did a fair job at full back last year when we had similar injuries.

B: R.Clarke, Gwilt, Geary
HB: Gram, S.Fisher, Goddard

Doesn't look too bad. Blake and Ferguson other options. People may suggest Dempster but he is out-bodied far too easily to be a key defender.


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30068
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1222 times

Post: # 561132Post saintsRrising »

From the players not in the 22 against the Tigers, Geary, Gwilt, Ferguson, Blake, L Fisher are all candidates to come into the team in defence.


IF we still have Sam Fisher AND Max...then I a quite comfortable with how our defence can be structured up.

But without Max.......you would have to say that you want our mids to be flying.

Gwilt did ok last year when called on....but reports of his Casey form have been patchy.

Could he take Bradshaw in 2 games time????


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Richter
SS Life Member
Posts: 3914
Joined: Wed 30 Nov 2005 1:18pm
Location: Elwood

Post: # 561147Post Richter »

mad saint guy wrote:Gwilt did a fair job at full back last year when we had similar injuries.

B: R.Clarke, Gwilt, Geary
HB: Gram, S.Fisher, Goddard

Doesn't look too bad. Blake and Ferguson other options. People may suggest Dempster but he is out-bodied far too easily to be a key defender.
A bit raw in the full back line for mine - would prefer Blake for Raph if Max does not come up. I like Raph, but prefer him on a midfield flank or on HF line.


Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
james rose
Club Player
Posts: 1733
Joined: Mon 05 Apr 2004 1:49pm
Been thanked: 3 times

Post: # 561152Post james rose »

how does allen go in defense?

for the mosters bring in rix

kosi can always go back if that doesn't work

fisher
bj
blake
raph
gwilt

can all take certain match ups

and what about gram he has played on the tall forward before.... and should allow him some latitude from his opponent... because atm the small fowards he plays on are sticking close with him.


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30068
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1222 times

Post: # 561158Post saintsRrising »

james rose wrote:
for the mosters bring in rix
No...you are better off putting some on them that can run off them and really hurt the opostion with rebound.

Certainly not Rix. He would not negate enough....nor would he create drive.

Others may lack in negating skils...but at least we can gain some benefit from rebound.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
bergsone
SS Life Member
Posts: 2905
Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2008 4:56pm
Location: victoria
Has thanked: 260 times
Been thanked: 116 times

Post: # 561217Post bergsone »

Kosi to CHB King Gardner to ruck maybe ,means we need a big game out of G train up foward with no Roo,opens a spot for Allen


User avatar
spiral2
Club Player
Posts: 488
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005 1:08pm
Location: underground

Post: # 561253Post spiral2 »

sorry, a bit off topic but seeing as Grammy has been down on form in defense, does anyone see any potential in him as a forward?
has he ever had a run down there?
he's got pace to get out on a lead and is a long kick so maybe there's something to work with there...just a thought...

I'd also like to see BJ down forward in some games, but it's not likely with Max and Goose out I suppose.


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8999
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 416 times

Post: # 561352Post spert »

Our mids and onballers just have to play their guts out so we can take the pressure off the backs, and the forwards really have to work harder to keep the ball in our forward line, as Milne won't kick 7 every week, and no other forwards look threatening.


User avatar
mad saint guy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7038
Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 348 times

Post: # 561555Post mad saint guy »

spiral2 wrote:sorry, a bit off topic but seeing as Grammy has been down on form in defense, does anyone see any potential in him as a forward?
has he ever had a run down there?
he's got pace to get out on a lead and is a long kick so maybe there's something to work with there...just a thought...
Nope. As a forward you have to win your own footy under pressure. Gram is probably the biggest receiver in the competition. He's ok when he just runs past for the handball, but put an opponent within 10m of him and he's useless.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 561557Post plugger66 »

mad saint guy wrote:
spiral2 wrote:sorry, a bit off topic but seeing as Grammy has been down on form in defense, does anyone see any potential in him as a forward?
has he ever had a run down there?
he's got pace to get out on a lead and is a long kick so maybe there's something to work with there...just a thought...
Nope. As a forward you have to win your own footy under pressure. Gram is probably the biggest receiver in the competition. He's ok when he just runs past for the handball, but put an opponent within 10m of him and he's useless.
Biggest receiver in the competition. Now that is a bit rough. He is an outside player and when in form is very much needed. And useless. I hope you thought that way the last 2 years as well.


User avatar
mad saint guy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7038
Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 348 times

Post: # 561558Post mad saint guy »

plugger66 wrote:Biggest receiver in the competition. Now that is a bit rough. He is an outside player and when in form is very much needed. And useless. I hope you thought that way the last 2 years as well.
He can be a quality outside rebounder, but I can't think of anyone with a worse inside game than Gram.


User avatar
borderbarry
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6676
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
Location: Wodonga

Post: # 561564Post borderbarry »

Ferguson did quite well a few seasons ago when called on the fill CHB. Only 187 but is a strong overhead mark. I would like to see Raph fill X's role, with Allan on the forward line. Play Geary, I dont know why he was dropped in the first place. Is Dempster available or not?


boneless23
Club Player
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat 13 Nov 2004 11:13pm

Post: # 561622Post boneless23 »

Ferguson didnt do well as a CHB.....he has played about 3 or 4 games in the last 4 years and has been towelled up numerous times, Ken Mcgregor in the 05 Qualifying final being the most notable.

James Gwilt has lost a lot of weight since last year in an attempt to improve his running. He is not the key back option that he was 12 months ago


Post Reply