Belvedere Park Planning Application Lodged
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
- Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
- Been thanked: 7 times
Belvedere Park Planning Application Lodged
According to the City of Frankston web-based planning register, application no 623/2008/P was lodged yesterday by St Kilda FC c/- Contour Consultants.
The application is for:
Buildings and works for the construction of a building to be used for the purpose of a minor sports and recreation facility with an ancillary administration function.
The status of the application is "public notification".
The application is for:
Buildings and works for the construction of a building to be used for the purpose of a minor sports and recreation facility with an ancillary administration function.
The status of the application is "public notification".
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
and what do you object to, may I ask???saintspremiers wrote:So I assume there is a laminated notice up at the site?
Is the notice open for 2 weeks for objections??
That Frankston are putting in $3 Million, and that is more than what the AFL is putting in...
CLUE....
State your reasons for the objections or for F*** sake shut up
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
I think he is talking about the "legalities" of the planning process, nothing more, nothing less. But then again, I may have read this wrong, I have before !!St Fidelius wrote:and what do you object to, may I ask???saintspremiers wrote:So I assume there is a laminated notice up at the site?
Is the notice open for 2 weeks for objections??
That Frankston are putting in $3 Million, and that is more than what the AFL is putting in...
CLUE....
State your reasons for the objections or for F*** sake shut up
Re: Belvedere Park Planning Application Lodged
Minor Sports?????casey scorp wrote:According to the City of Frankston web-based planning register, application no 623/2008/P was lodged yesterday by St Kilda FC c/- Contour Consultants.
The application is for:
Buildings and works for the construction of a building to be used for the purpose of a minor sports and recreation facility with an ancillary administration function.
The status of the application is "public notification".
I'll rip their testicles off.
That's St Kilda they're talking about.
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Belvedere Park Planning Application Lodged
They're the council. Are you a micro-surgeon? !!GrumpyOne wrote:Minor Sports?????casey scorp wrote:According to the City of Frankston web-based planning register, application no 623/2008/P was lodged yesterday by St Kilda FC c/- Contour Consultants.
The application is for:
Buildings and works for the construction of a building to be used for the purpose of a minor sports and recreation facility with an ancillary administration function.
The status of the application is "public notification".
I'll rip their testicles off.
That's St Kilda they're talking about.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Fri 19 Sep 2008 2:19pm
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: Belvedere Park Planning Application Lodged
You got more chance of that at Frankston than at Kingston Grumpy... Kingston councillors have NO BALLS AT ALL!!GrumpyOne wrote:Minor Sports?????casey scorp wrote:According to the City of Frankston web-based planning register, application no 623/2008/P was lodged yesterday by St Kilda FC c/- Contour Consultants.
The application is for:
Buildings and works for the construction of a building to be used for the purpose of a minor sports and recreation facility with an ancillary administration function.
The status of the application is "public notification".
I'll rip their testicles off.
That's St Kilda they're talking about.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
- Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
- Been thanked: 7 times
"They" are actually St Kilda FC - the applicants in this case. They have decided what they want a permit for.Eastern wrote:They're the council. Are you a micro-surgeon? !!
Minor sports and recreation facility is “Land used for leisure, recreation, or sport, without substantial provision for spectators, and which is usually open to non-paying spectators.â€
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Correct Eastern, nothing more, nothing less.Eastern wrote:I think he is talking about the "legalities" of the planning process, nothing more, nothing less. But then again, I may have read this wrong, I have before !!St Fidelius wrote:and what do you object to, may I ask???saintspremiers wrote:So I assume there is a laminated notice up at the site?
Is the notice open for 2 weeks for objections??
That Frankston are putting in $3 Million, and that is more than what the AFL is putting in...
CLUE....
State your reasons for the objections or for F*** sake shut up
....mind you, I don't mind people firing up and flaming me if they see the need
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
- Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
- Been thanked: 7 times
saintspremiers wrote:So I assume there is a laminated notice up at the site?
Is the notice open for 2 weeks for objections??
Yes, there’s a sign up on the site advising that:
• the application has been lodged
• it is available for inspection at Frankston Council offices
• objections are to be lodged with the Council
• the Council will not make a decision before 22 December.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
22 December = end of January, due to standard Xmas holiday period IMO.casey scorp wrote:saintspremiers wrote:So I assume there is a laminated notice up at the site?
Is the notice open for 2 weeks for objections??
Yes, there’s a sign up on the site advising that:
• the application has been lodged
• it is available for inspection at Frankston Council offices
• objections are to be lodged with the Council
• the Council will not make a decision before 22 December.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11240
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
22 December is a Monday.
Christmas Day the 25th is the Thursday after that Monday.
Are you insinuating saintspremiers (I must say I find your user name quite amusing, unless it relates to the NAB Cup), that local government shuts down about a week before Christmas and does not begin until the end of January?
Are they all schoolteachers?
Christmas Day the 25th is the Thursday after that Monday.
Are you insinuating saintspremiers (I must say I find your user name quite amusing, unless it relates to the NAB Cup), that local government shuts down about a week before Christmas and does not begin until the end of January?
Are they all schoolteachers?
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
Dunno abou the end of Jan, but you can bet your life that Fri 19th is the last working day for the year for a gazillion people..and there'd be a few Local Govt depts among themBernard Shakey wrote:22 December is a Monday.
Christmas Day the 25th is the Thursday after that Monday.
Are you insinuating saintspremiers (I must say I find your user name quite amusing, unless it relates to the NAB Cup), that local government shuts down about a week before Christmas and does not begin until the end of January?
Are they all schoolteachers?
THE BUBBLE HAS BURST
2011 player sponsor
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
- Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
- Been thanked: 7 times
I would be very surprised if the wheels of Frankston Council bureaucracy were not absolutely oiled in this case.
The application was received on 2 December, and by a day later it had progressed through registration and initial checking to "public notification".
Trust me, it's absolutely flying.
Provided there are no objections, I would think a permit would be issued on Monday 22 December.
They won't want to risk any objections delaying the project, and if they can issue a permit at 9am on 22 December (ie they have received no objections by that time) then I bet the permit will be popping out of the system.
It's a bit hard to see there being no objections, but who knows?
The application was received on 2 December, and by a day later it had progressed through registration and initial checking to "public notification".
Trust me, it's absolutely flying.
Provided there are no objections, I would think a permit would be issued on Monday 22 December.
They won't want to risk any objections delaying the project, and if they can issue a permit at 9am on 22 December (ie they have received no objections by that time) then I bet the permit will be popping out of the system.
It's a bit hard to see there being no objections, but who knows?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
- Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
- Been thanked: 7 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Fri 19 Sep 2008 2:19pm
- Been thanked: 8 times
This is incorrect. The old Seaford Swamp is to the west of Belvedere Park between the freeway and Railway Parade and north of Austin Rd, and is now a wetlands and bird sanctuary.casey scorp wrote:The land was part of the old Seaford Swamp.
This was copied & pasted from http://www.frankston.vic.gov.au/Service ... index.aspxIn 1985 the Ecology and Management of Seaford Swamp report was produced, which recommended the creation of more lagoons, substantial tree planting and improved public facilities. A master plan was subsequently proposed and implemented by City of Frankston and Melbourne Water in a management partnership using funds from the Melbourne Parks and Waterways Grants Program.
If you read on to the last paragraph you will see that it states:
The Seaford Wetlands are bounded in the south by Austin Road, in the north by Eel Race Drain, to the east by Wells Road, and to the west by urban development. There is a walking/cycling track, which runs south from Eel Race Drain to Armstrongs Road. All roads that abut the Wetlands have access to the track.
You really should get your facts straight before you post! You should also take off your blinkers and look at ALL the facts not just those which suit your own agenda!!
- Saints Premiers 2008
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 11:21pm
- Location: Brisbane
- WayneJudson42
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon 07 Jul 2008 9:53pm
- Location: I'm a victim of circumstance
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 471
- Joined: Sun 10 Aug 2008 7:42pm
- Has thanked: 76 times
- Been thanked: 108 times
I object at the lame name.
I will again post my suggestions for the name.
Denyer Park?
Door Frame Fields?
Bleak Paddocks?
Ganglands?
Faraway fields?
Wastelands?
Missing Girl Meadows?
Dangerous After Dark Park?
Oh Dear Oval?
Mistakelands?
Aluminium Window Oval?
Rarely Visited Oval?
Isolation Fields?
The Void?
Your Kidding Me Park?
The Perplexxus Center?
The Beat?
Rapelands?
Muggers Paddocks?
Creepy fields?
Disgracelands?
Archies Hole?
Inspiration Point?
Rapers Reserve?
Any others??
I will again post my suggestions for the name.
Denyer Park?
Door Frame Fields?
Bleak Paddocks?
Ganglands?
Faraway fields?
Wastelands?
Missing Girl Meadows?
Dangerous After Dark Park?
Oh Dear Oval?
Mistakelands?
Aluminium Window Oval?
Rarely Visited Oval?
Isolation Fields?
The Void?
Your Kidding Me Park?
The Perplexxus Center?
The Beat?
Rapelands?
Muggers Paddocks?
Creepy fields?
Disgracelands?
Archies Hole?
Inspiration Point?
Rapers Reserve?
Any others??
Look again it's the Flash!!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Sat 16 Jun 2007 1:05am
You mean you are OBJECTIONABLE dont you?barks4eva wrote:I OBJECT!
Club has lodged this at this time on purpose. Will go to the last council meeting before Xmas when everyone is distracted.
Anything in planning at councils get pushed through at this time. An age old council tactic. Make no mistake, the council and the club have been working in cahoots to get the best outcome and the timing is no co-incidence.
It will be passed and that, my friends, will be that.
LIVE WITH IT.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)