Moorabbin

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Saints94
SS Life Member
Posts: 3443
Joined: Wed 31 Jan 2007 10:47am
Location: NSW
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Post: # 724281Post Saints94 »

Loyal wrote:i reckon the vibe is that we are stayin' at Moorabbin.
Believe what you want mate.............. where still moving to Seaford :wink:


User avatar
Loyal
Club Player
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu 12 Mar 2009 10:31am

Post: # 724286Post Loyal »

the closer the demolition is to completed the further away frankston is.


Stephen Theodore
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2154
Joined: Mon 06 Aug 2007 1:53pm
Location: SE Queensland
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Post: # 724287Post Stephen Theodore »

Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasnt the deal been signed, sealed and delivered. (Sainter)


User avatar
Loyal
Club Player
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu 12 Mar 2009 10:31am

Post: # 724288Post Loyal »

Moorabbin


FortiusQuoFidelius
Club Player
Posts: 640
Joined: Fri 19 Sep 2008 2:19pm
Been thanked: 8 times

Post: # 724332Post FortiusQuoFidelius »

Loyal wrote:Moorabbin
TOSSER


User avatar
ausfatcat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6517
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Post: # 724335Post ausfatcat »

Loyal wrote:the closer the demolition is to completed the further away frankston is.

Yep sure is, tenders have gone out plan's approved for seaford. At this stage it's not changing and very unlikely to due kingston council ect ect.

Like it or not it's gone too far now seaford is it get over it and movve on it's not changing.


saint66au
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17003
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:03pm
Contact:

Post: # 724464Post saint66au »

Go Sainters Go wrote:Loyal, why don't you get onto Kingston Council and sought them out, instill some commonsense into them. All the experts couldn't get those idiots to do something for the benefit of the community. This matter, incidently has been flogged to death, but Loyal, you might be smarter than all the experts.
Spellcheck is no substitute for paying attention during English :roll:


Image

THE BUBBLE HAS BURST

2011 player sponsor
jonesy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4655
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
Location: Melb
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Post: # 724473Post jonesy »

Credit to you Loyal.
I don't think a troll has been undetected for 254 posts before


Bring back the Lockett era
User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11228
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 135 times

Post: # 724483Post Bernard Shakey »

Love your passion Loyal.

I also feel all is not lost at Moorabbin.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
casey scorp
Club Player
Posts: 1617
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
Been thanked: 7 times

Post: # 724488Post casey scorp »

Well well well.

I couldn't believe it when I stumbled across this little thread.

Lots of support for staying at Moorabbin, and very little crap from the pro-Seaforders. But eventually they woke up too, and they've gone for the good old assassinations rather than deal on merit (which isn't surprising as Seaford has no merit).

I posted and posted, and got belted and belted. Welcome, pro-Moorabbin redevelopment supporters.

I hope that the sentiment being expressed in favour of Moorabbin has some solid backing.

It is by far the best option available for the Saints.

Stephen Theodore wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasnt the deal been signed, sealed and delivered. (Sainter)
I don’t recall the celebratory media release saying it’s all signed off with the Frankston Council. Lots of spin, but no real substance so far.

ausfatcat wrote:……tenders have gone out plan's approved for seaford. At this stage it's not changing and very unlikely to due kingston council ect ect.

Like it or not it's gone too far now seaford is it get over it and movve on it's not changing.
All the working drawings have been completed, and tenders called only about a month after the planning permit was finalised?

Possible……if they took the gamble and raced on ahead of knowing whether there would be appeals and what the VCAT outcome would be. I doubt they would be so foolish as to invest in working drawings needed for tendering, prior to the certainty that the project had jumped all hurdles.

BTW, is the lease signed off yet at Belvedere Park (which is sort of essential to have in order to be able to award a tender to a builder isn't it)?


User avatar
Loyal
Club Player
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu 12 Mar 2009 10:31am

Post: # 724565Post Loyal »

looking at it from all angles one would be very surprised if we now moved away from moorabbin.
a moorabbin re-development represents the most potential for growth of our club.
with a re-development of the site at linton street we get an elite facility in an elite location.
moorabbin needs to be re-developed into a waverley-style arrangement.
there is a groundswell of support for linton street to be re-developed into an elite facility.
i live in frankston and believe that the project was handled poorly by frankston council. we should have been given frankston park regardless of cost.
i believe there was a conspiracy from frankston council regarding the general manager of the frankston dolphins that stopped the move to frankston park.
the only available realistic opportunity for growth of our club rests with re-developing linton street.


GrumpyOne

Post: # 724608Post GrumpyOne »

Loyal wrote:looking at it from all angles one would be very surprised if we now moved away from moorabbin.
a moorabbin re-development represents the most potential for growth of our club.
with a re-development of the site at linton street we get an elite facility in an elite location.
moorabbin needs to be re-developed into a waverley-style arrangement.
there is a groundswell of support for linton street to be re-developed into an elite facility.
i live in frankston and believe that the project was handled poorly by frankston council. we should have been given frankston park regardless of cost.
i believe there was a conspiracy from frankston council regarding the general manager of the frankston dolphins that stopped the move to frankston park.
the only available realistic opportunity for growth of our club rests with re-developing linton street.
Are all your previous 256 posts as hopeless as this one?


saint66au
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17003
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:03pm
Contact:

Post: # 724610Post saint66au »

Hey Loyal...why dont you pose the question to Michael Nettlefold on SaintsCentral?

He can give you the definative answer and perhaps put all your conspiracy theories to rest eh?


Image

THE BUBBLE HAS BURST

2011 player sponsor
User avatar
Saints94
SS Life Member
Posts: 3443
Joined: Wed 31 Jan 2007 10:47am
Location: NSW
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Post: # 724611Post Saints94 »

saint66au wrote:Hey Loyal...why dont you pose the question to Michael Nettlefold on SaintsCentral?

He can give you the definative answer and perhaps put all your conspiracy theories to rest eh?
Exactly or start a petion or something?................


User avatar
ausfatcat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6517
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Post: # 724675Post ausfatcat »

It's not that loyal wants it to stay at Moorrabbin it's that he thinks it will.

There is no chance that the saints will redevelop linen house it done no chance for a revival

Seaford is pretty much locked in (not 100% thou) but even if that deal falls through the saints will go else. Moorabbin is not a option wether or like it not it's not happening.


Duggie1
Club Player
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon 11 Aug 2008 3:22pm
Location: Labrador Qld

Post: # 724676Post Duggie1 »

The great Robert Harvey leaves no doubt in his book where his heart lay (lies) and many others too. :lol:


Always a Saint
User avatar
ausfatcat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6517
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Post: # 724679Post ausfatcat »

Duggie1 wrote:The great Robert Harvey leaves no doubt in his book where his heart lay (lies) and many others too. :lol:

So wont change the fact's kingston council doesn't want the saints and we can't afford to stay there, I am sure the players felt that way also in 65 when they moved there from junction oval.


Marcus1232
Club Player
Posts: 358
Joined: Thu 25 Sep 2008 11:19pm

Post: # 724680Post Marcus1232 »

Yes his heart lies with the team and his heart will go wherever the team goes :lol: :lol:


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11228
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 135 times

Post: # 724757Post Bernard Shakey »

ausfatcat wrote:
Duggie1 wrote:The great Robert Harvey leaves no doubt in his book where his heart lay (lies) and many others too. :lol:

So wont change the fact's kingston council doesn't want the saints and we can't afford to stay there, I am sure the players felt that way also in 65 when they moved there from junction oval.
Players were very happy to move in '65. Don't here any support from the playing group this time.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
User avatar
ausfatcat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6517
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Post: # 724761Post ausfatcat »

Bernard Shakey wrote:Players were very happy to move in '65. Don't here any support from the playing group this time.
Selective hearing, reading players have said numerous times they are excited about the new training facilities at seaford


User avatar
Loyal
Club Player
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu 12 Mar 2009 10:31am

Post: # 724833Post Loyal »

Bernard Shakey wrote:Love your passion Loyal.

I also feel all is not lost at Moorabbin.
you weren't going to post in my threads mate that was the deal... :x :)


User avatar
Loyal
Club Player
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu 12 Mar 2009 10:31am

Post: # 724834Post Loyal »

ausfatcat wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:Players were very happy to move in '65. Don't here any support from the playing group this time.
Selective hearing, reading players have said numerous times they are excited about the new training facilities at seaford
money is better spent at moorabbin


User avatar
Loyal
Club Player
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu 12 Mar 2009 10:31am

Post: # 724836Post Loyal »

GrumpyOne wrote:
Loyal wrote:looking at it from all angles one would be very surprised if we now moved away from moorabbin.
a moorabbin re-development represents the most potential for growth of our club.
with a re-development of the site at linton street we get an elite facility in an elite location.
moorabbin needs to be re-developed into a waverley-style arrangement.
there is a groundswell of support for linton street to be re-developed into an elite facility.
i live in frankston and believe that the project was handled poorly by frankston council. we should have been given frankston park regardless of cost.
i believe there was a conspiracy from frankston council regarding the general manager of the frankston dolphins that stopped the move to frankston park.
the only available realistic opportunity for growth of our club rests with re-developing linton street.
Are all your previous 256 posts as hopeless as this one?
are you being genuinely sarcastic?


User avatar
Saints94
SS Life Member
Posts: 3443
Joined: Wed 31 Jan 2007 10:47am
Location: NSW
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Post: # 724838Post Saints94 »

Loyal wrote:
GrumpyOne wrote:
Loyal wrote:looking at it from all angles one would be very surprised if we now moved away from moorabbin.
a moorabbin re-development represents the most potential for growth of our club.
with a re-development of the site at linton street we get an elite facility in an elite location.
moorabbin needs to be re-developed into a waverley-style arrangement.
there is a groundswell of support for linton street to be re-developed into an elite facility.
i live in frankston and believe that the project was handled poorly by frankston council. we should have been given frankston park regardless of cost.
i believe there was a conspiracy from frankston council regarding the general manager of the frankston dolphins that stopped the move to frankston park.
the only available realistic opportunity for growth of our club rests with re-developing linton street.
Are all your previous 256 posts as hopeless as this one?
are you being genuinely sarcastic?
No he is serious :wink:


User avatar
Loyal
Club Player
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu 12 Mar 2009 10:31am

Post: # 724839Post Loyal »

saint66au wrote:Hey Loyal...why dont you pose the question to Michael Nettlefold on SaintsCentral?

He can give you the definative answer and perhaps put all your conspiracy theories to rest eh?
been a while since i was on saints central now that i have an excuse.

i understand that there was a political collision between frankston council and the GM of the dolphins, brian mase. by conspiracy i simply meant that to have been an agenda-setting breakdown.

brian had said to me that "as a stand-alone VFL club they all want to put s**t on you". meaning: he was very much against the saints moving to frankston park and forcing him out. he stood firm and the council suggested an alternative. the alternative being belvedere park. the cost blowout was a line.


Post Reply