Does Stephen King's contract forbid him from tackling?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Does Stephen King's contract forbid him from tackling?
King makes good contributions in the ruck.
And around the ground he is not afraid to present for a mark.
But once the ball hits the deck he ambles around at half pace and never commits to agressive tackles.
There were a number of times today when he just trotted past a contested situation when if he had committed himself he could have been the extra body in the contest to win a turn over.
With Gardiner playing so well I feel we would be better off blooding McEvoy.
Least he looks committed.
And around the ground he is not afraid to present for a mark.
But once the ball hits the deck he ambles around at half pace and never commits to agressive tackles.
There were a number of times today when he just trotted past a contested situation when if he had committed himself he could have been the extra body in the contest to win a turn over.
With Gardiner playing so well I feel we would be better off blooding McEvoy.
Least he looks committed.
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7040
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
I'm no longer convinced we need King in the side. He is just ok in the hitouts and does little around the ground. Gardiner has stepped up and right now is in the top 5 rucks in the competition. It could be a premature call but I wouldn't mind seeing McEvoy play as the second ruck. He was reasonable in the ruck contests and while not particularly quick, he's a smart, skillful player and can take some big grabs. King is useless overhead and doesn't get in dangerous positions.
But, it is probably best to see how we go against other elite ruckmen before making a call like that.
But, it is probably best to see how we go against other elite ruckmen before making a call like that.
I swear after reading this forum that I must have been seeing a different game at Etihad today.
McEvoy in this stage of his career is no where near as good as King. Get some perspective for FFS. We cannot win by 80+ points every week. We won and we are 9-0. You don't go making wholesale changes because we didn't win by 80+.
McEvoy in this stage of his career is no where near as good as King. Get some perspective for FFS. We cannot win by 80+ points every week. We won and we are 9-0. You don't go making wholesale changes because we didn't win by 80+.
It's fair to say that he is not at the same level as he was last year but a lot of that has been because he has become second fiddle to Gards. Yet, for me, it is still to early to swap him for McEvoy as he is still quite serviceable and another year mostly in the VFL won't do McEvoy any harm.
With regards to his tackling and pressure, it is definately down on last year, but last year it was very good so he still has the ability to lift in that area and hopefully he will. An important thing he adds is a physical presence against the other ruckmen which will become much more important once we go up against the better ruck combinations such as Geelongs. I bet they would look to exploit McEvoy if he were to be our second ruck. Plus, with both King and Gardiner as a tandem we can really grind down the other ruckmen which would probably be a bit harder with McEvoy.
Nevertheless, beyond this year there probably won't be room for both King and Gardiner. Until then, he can keep developing in the VFL, however, he may still get some chances playing up forward or in the ruck.
With regards to his tackling and pressure, it is definately down on last year, but last year it was very good so he still has the ability to lift in that area and hopefully he will. An important thing he adds is a physical presence against the other ruckmen which will become much more important once we go up against the better ruck combinations such as Geelongs. I bet they would look to exploit McEvoy if he were to be our second ruck. Plus, with both King and Gardiner as a tandem we can really grind down the other ruckmen which would probably be a bit harder with McEvoy.
Nevertheless, beyond this year there probably won't be room for both King and Gardiner. Until then, he can keep developing in the VFL, however, he may still get some chances playing up forward or in the ruck.
King is still a long way ahead of McEvoy. Experience counts.
Feature article: KFC's "Double Down" burger!
TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview
Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview
Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
interestingly they rucked kosi and gardiner for most of the final quarter, went shorter down back and forward. This allowed them to rest both dawson and king. Ross seemed to be upset about his match up's at three quarter time and being to tall could be the reason.
Thought went through my mind that perhaps macca could give us a little more flexibility.
Thought went through my mind that perhaps macca could give us a little more flexibility.
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
- SaintWodonga
- Club Player
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Wed 04 Jul 2007 12:01am
- Location: Wodonga
- Contact:
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 162 times
Gardiner's got two tackles for the year, King has 8.
I'm not sure why some people feel the need to take a crack at King. Yesterday was his second week back from an injury and, as far as I could tell from my seat, he went just fine again. Gardiner's getting more TOG and a bit more of the ball. King's been much better with his taps though. Both Gardiner and King had 7 hitouts to advantage yesterday. Mitch Clark had one. We dominated the ruck and the stoppages. It's a nice change having a good ruck combo given the last five years or so.
I'm not sure why some people feel the need to take a crack at King. Yesterday was his second week back from an injury and, as far as I could tell from my seat, he went just fine again. Gardiner's getting more TOG and a bit more of the ball. King's been much better with his taps though. Both Gardiner and King had 7 hitouts to advantage yesterday. Mitch Clark had one. We dominated the ruck and the stoppages. It's a nice change having a good ruck combo given the last five years or so.
Yeah nah pleasing positive
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
- Hurricane
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4038
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:24pm
- Location: The isle of Besaid, Spira
King is a ruckman FFS why does everyone expect to see him tackle and chase like a midfielder? He does his job which is too win the taps and give our runners first use
IMHO as long as he wins his share of hitouts and presents for marks in packs I dont have a problem with him.
BANG BANG
IMHO as long as he wins his share of hitouts and presents for marks in packs I dont have a problem with him.
BANG BANG
Mitsuharu Misawa 1962 - 2009.
I am vengeance....I am the night...I....AM.....BATMAN
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass and im all out of bubblegum
I am vengeance....I am the night...I....AM.....BATMAN
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass and im all out of bubblegum
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8992
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 59 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Mon 05 Apr 2004 1:49pm
- Been thanked: 3 times
Whilst I wouldn't drop either of King or Gardiner from the team perhaps this week against Melbourne is an opportunity to rest one of them and get big mac a game?
Melbourne are struggling in the ruck and as a team so its not really a big risk and the experience will be vital for Mac if one of the ruckmen go down.
I too haven't enjoyed Kings last two weeks, think he has offered very little outside of the ruck duel (where granted he excels) but I'd be inclined to back him in or rest him (as in bring him back after a week off) rather than drop him.
Melbourne are struggling in the ruck and as a team so its not really a big risk and the experience will be vital for Mac if one of the ruckmen go down.
I too haven't enjoyed Kings last two weeks, think he has offered very little outside of the ruck duel (where granted he excels) but I'd be inclined to back him in or rest him (as in bring him back after a week off) rather than drop him.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 162 times
King had 8 disposals from 45% TOG against Essendon and 9 disposals from 47% TOG against Brisbane. That's a fair return from a ruckman. Gardiner's had 10 each of the last two weeks (55% TOG against Essendon, 57% against Brisbane with some time spent up forward in both games). Kings had 37 hitouts the last two weeks, 16 to advantage. Gardiner's had 46 hitouts, 10 to advantage.james rose wrote:I too haven't enjoyed Kings last two weeks, think he has offered very little outside of the ruck duel (where granted he excels) but I'd be inclined to back him in or rest him (as in bring him back after a week off) rather than drop him.
I don't see a need to rest either with a week off coming up soon.
Yeah nah pleasing positive
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2119
- Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004 7:43pm
- Location: Gippsland
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
From what I can glean the gist of the OP was because King "let" an opposition player or two run past him without tackling or chasing. I also saw that; my take on it was that Kingy just isn't quick enough to catch them, and after his little hammy injury probably isn't too keen to risk it again in a futile chase.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Mon 05 Apr 2004 1:49pm
- Been thanked: 3 times
vacuous space wrote:King had 8 disposals from 45% TOG against Essendon and 9 disposals from 47% TOG against Brisbane. That's a fair return from a ruckman. Gardiner's had 10 each of the last two weeks (55% TOG against Essendon, 57% against Brisbane with some time spent up forward in both games). Kings had 37 hitouts the last two weeks, 16 to advantage. Gardiner's had 46 hitouts, 10 to advantage.james rose wrote:I too haven't enjoyed Kings last two weeks, think he has offered very little outside of the ruck duel (where granted he excels) but I'd be inclined to back him in or rest him (as in bring him back after a week off) rather than drop him.
I don't see a need to rest either with a week off coming up soon.
I suppose my view of resting them is more to do with the opportunity to give mac a game rather than their bad form.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 162 times
I can understand wanting to see McEvoy again. I thought his game against Collingwood was really good. I really don't see Lyon moving away from the Gardiner/King combo though, unless forced to by injury.james rose wrote:I suppose my view of resting them is more to do with the opportunity to give mac a game rather than their bad form.
Yeah nah pleasing positive
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Mon 05 Apr 2004 1:49pm
- Been thanked: 3 times
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Having gone out of his way to (correctly) address the rucking deficiency that cost us so much until his arrival at the club, I do not see Lyon telling either Gardiner or King he is going to rest them to give a 19 year old apprentice an opportunity.
No matter the potential that apprentice may have.
The only walk up starts to this team are Gram and Hudgden.
The remainder, including Dempster if he returns, will need to do what the Coach says and "bang the door down" week in and week out to earn an opportunity.
There is form loss and there are injuries.
So opportunity will come.
The good thing about good teams is that, when a mate is down a bit, others compensate.
The presence of Gram and Hudgden means a couple will not be afforded repeated opportunities if they under perform - and they will have to go back and "bang the door down".
Hudgden plays exclusively deep in defence, on both talls and smalls. Does not win a lot of the ball but is honest and is difficult to win a possession on. Keeps most forwards under very tight control.
Gram is a running, attacking mid-fielder.
They are the tasks they will be called on to perform upon their return.
No matter the potential that apprentice may have.
The only walk up starts to this team are Gram and Hudgden.
The remainder, including Dempster if he returns, will need to do what the Coach says and "bang the door down" week in and week out to earn an opportunity.
There is form loss and there are injuries.
So opportunity will come.
The good thing about good teams is that, when a mate is down a bit, others compensate.
The presence of Gram and Hudgden means a couple will not be afforded repeated opportunities if they under perform - and they will have to go back and "bang the door down".
Hudgden plays exclusively deep in defence, on both talls and smalls. Does not win a lot of the ball but is honest and is difficult to win a possession on. Keeps most forwards under very tight control.
Gram is a running, attacking mid-fielder.
They are the tasks they will be called on to perform upon their return.
I have a feeling he may be provoked into action, he is no longer our dominant ruckman after all...vacuous space wrote:I can understand wanting to see McEvoy again. I thought his game against Collingwood was really good. I really don't see Lyon moving away from the Gardiner/King combo though, unless forced to by injury.james rose wrote:I suppose my view of resting them is more to do with the opportunity to give mac a game rather than their bad form.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1900
- Joined: Mon 04 Aug 2008 11:35am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
To the top, you are clearly very well educated and a critical thinking about the game ... one pet hate of mine is when player's names are spelt incorrectly.
Maxie's name is spelt "Hudghton".
Totally agree with the content of your post though.
King and Gardiner are not going anywhere unless it is through injury.
Maxie's name is spelt "Hudghton".
Totally agree with the content of your post though.
King and Gardiner are not going anywhere unless it is through injury.