Match Review Panel Shock
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8991
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 59 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
Match Review Panel Shock
They must have lost the tapes for our game since there are no Saints players cited.
The full list here:
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx
The full list here:
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
I am suprised that the softc@cks at the MRP didn't cite Lenny for going in hard at the ball when he took out Johnstone.
Really too hard at it for the "good of football" and he should get at least ten weeks for it![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Really too hard at it for the "good of football" and he should get at least ten weeks for it
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
The difference is that the MRP have the discretion to use the coverall "rough play" for any single incident of body contact.mordi wrote:I saw the Corey incident, to me not much different to Zacs?
Can some one explain the difference?
You see the rough charge coverall for any contignecy is apparently more of an offence than striking, even if you dont strike and, by the letter of the rough play law, you have acted within the ambigious rules.
I am suprised they didn't pull it out of their arse for Lenny.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
Fair dinkum, Jordan Lewis must have incriminating photos of someoneContact between Hawthorn’s Jordan Lewis and the Geelong Cats’ Joel Selwood from the fourth quarter of Saturday’s match was assessed. The impact was below that required to constitute a reportable offence
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Image](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v131/littlemiter/66sig.jpg)
THE BUBBLE HAS BURST
2011 player sponsor
- The Saintsational Man
- Club Player
- Posts: 1475
- Joined: Mon 09 Jul 2007 12:04pm