Luke Stanton

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
snippa
Club Player
Posts: 581
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 2:09pm

Luke Stanton

Post: # 849543Post snippa »

Noticed Luke has been delisted

192cm, 84kg midfielder. Was lazy early on but has worked really hard on his fitness and endurance and is a very strong overhead mark. Has not played a senior game.

Cousin of NDS.

In a so called shallow draft could be a good third or fourth round selection as he has already had a year in the system.


I am the king of the divan
User avatar
ausfatcat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6516
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Re: Luke Stanton

Post: # 849550Post ausfatcat »

snippa wrote:In a so called shallow draft could be a good third or fourth round selection as he has already had a year in the system.

Why? If he's not up to grade then he's not up to the grade regardless of how long in the system, espeacially if a club dumps him after one season into a 2 season contract says something.


User avatar
sax
Club Player
Posts: 976
Joined: Tue 29 Nov 2005 10:19pm
Location: Barossa Valley
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Luke Stanton

Post: # 849552Post sax »

ausfatcat wrote:
snippa wrote:In a so called shallow draft could be a good third or fourth round selection as he has already had a year in the system.

Why? If he's not up to grade then he's not up to the grade regardless of how long in the system, espeacially if a club dumps him after one season into a 2 season contract says something.
He didn't have a 2 year deal, he was on the rookie list!


User avatar
ausfatcat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6516
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Post: # 849553Post ausfatcat »

Even worse then


Seriously a delisted rookies now?


User avatar
sax
Club Player
Posts: 976
Joined: Tue 29 Nov 2005 10:19pm
Location: Barossa Valley
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 849556Post sax »

ausfatcat wrote:Even worse then


Seriously a delisted rookies now?
Stephen Milne was a delisted rookie!


jonesy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4655
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
Location: Melb
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Post: # 849557Post jonesy »

sax wrote:
ausfatcat wrote:Even worse then


Seriously a delisted rookies now?
Stephen Milne was a delisted rookie!
Who cost us a second flag...


Bring back the Lockett era
User avatar
sax
Club Player
Posts: 976
Joined: Tue 29 Nov 2005 10:19pm
Location: Barossa Valley
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 849558Post sax »

jonesy wrote:
sax wrote:
ausfatcat wrote:Even worse then


Seriously a delisted rookies now?
Stephen Milne was a delisted rookie!
Who cost us a second flag...
How did Milne, BY HIMSELF, cost us a second flag?
Schneider missed 2 easy goals, McQualtar missed an easy goal, the goal umpire called a shot hitting the post a goal, after Zac played on in the goal square for some stupid reason, Raph was run down from behind in the 1st 3 minutes which cost us a goal, Roo and Koz missed very gettable shots, etc, etc!

But hey, it was probably just Milnes fault we lost the Grand Final! :?


User avatar
snippa
Club Player
Posts: 581
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 2:09pm

Post: # 849566Post snippa »

....what an angry place this is turning out be....

Think I will just come back in March.

FWIW I know quite a bit about Luke and he can play. He did'nt get an opportunity at the Blues but it doesn't necessarily mean he is no good.

Just a suggestion for a look is all given the quality in this years draft and the fact he is 19 with a mature body.


I am the king of the divan
User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10708
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 809 times

Post: # 849581Post ace »

sax wrote:
ausfatcat wrote:Even worse then


Seriously a delisted rookies now?
Stephen Milne was a delisted rookie!

Milne was NOT a delisted rookie.

Milne played for Essendon reserves.
He was never an Essendon listed senior player or rookie.

Collingwood still has a team in the VFL competition.
Some of the players are Collingwood senior listed players, some Collingwood rookies but the remainder are VFL players.

These VFL players are no different to Sandringham players.
These Sandringham players are NOT St Kilda players.
They can be drafted by any club out from under our noses.

St Kilda rookie drafted Milne out from under Essendon's nose, because he was an Essendon reserves player, never an Essendon AFL player.

Milne averages 2 goals a game as a small forward, fighting with everyone for scraps at the feet of marking forwards.
2 goals a game small forwards are rarer than hen's teeth.

For comparison Koschitzke got 45 goals in 20 games this season, Milne 44 from 20 games.
Marking full forwards kicking 2 goals a game are a dime a dozen.
Milne sets blocks so marking forwards can lead, harasses and chases defenders into the arms of tacklers.
How often do you see Kosi do that.

Milne may have been a rookie but he does more than a National Draft No 2 pick.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
User avatar
MCG-Unit
SS Life Member
Posts: 3136
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 4:04pm
Location: Land of the Giants
Has thanked: 479 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Post: # 849602Post MCG-Unit »

sax wrote:
ausfatcat wrote:Even worse then


Seriously a delisted rookies now?
Stephen Milne was a delisted rookie!
Milne was never Rookie listed - he was on Essendon's Supplementary list. Supp list players were never tied to clubs and could be drafted by anyone

Supp list were to top-up the reserves - before the AFL stuffed up the Reserves comp :shock:

Mumford started off as a top-up to Geelong's reserves


Hold your ground :shock:
Post Reply