Will Mini be the new Ball??

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30069
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1223 times

Will Mini be the new Ball??

Post: # 870840Post saintsRrising »

While Armo is Ball's obvious replacement....will Mini surprise by taking over his spot instead

Armo would seem to have the edge in class and ability. But Mini is that bit older and wiser...

Steven to be sniffing about too, along with Geary.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
quidnunc
Club Player
Posts: 243
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 11:29am
Location: Merimbula
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 870842Post quidnunc »

NO!


Was there on the outer wing as a youngster flying the flag in '66 - still loyal, still passionate!
User avatar
Eastern
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14357
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
Location: 3132
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 870846Post Eastern »

Although I would like to think that every player on the list would want to carve his own piece of history, Jaryn Geary is the one who is set to take the next step IMHO !!


NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!

Image
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 870847Post plugger66 »

Out of the young potential midfielders only Steven to me seems to have the class to be a top liner. Armo lacks kicking ability and is lazy defensively and Mini, Eddy and Geary seem like workhorses to me.


iwantmeseats
SS Life Member
Posts: 3303
Joined: Tue 23 May 2006 6:14pm
Location: East Oakleigh
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 40 times

Post: # 870851Post iwantmeseats »

Either one is not going to go through next year entirely injury and/or suspension free. The more that can fill that role the better. Id like 3 options.


Sainterman
Club Player
Posts: 1497
Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am

Post: # 870853Post Sainterman »

plugger66 wrote:Out of the young potential midfielders only Steven to me seems to have the class to be a top liner. Armo lacks kicking ability and is lazy defensively and Mini, Eddy and Geary seem like workhorses to me.
Agree re Steven, although not sure I agree about Armo being lazy defensively. From what I have seen he goes hard at the man, tackles well and has second and third efforts when needed. I see where you are coming from though, but is it perhaps more about his tank?

I don't envisage Geary playing a Ball like role, mainly because I think he is that little bit more attacking and I'd like to see him become a goal kicking mid (we could certainly use one or two!), I think he has the tools.

Mini could perhaps fill this role, he is similar in some ways. It will be interesting to see how he is used this year. He was pretty important up forward, and I did love that goal he slotted against Collingwood in the finals series!

I do think both can potentially rotate through the midfield though and add something to the rotations which Lyon like to use.


User avatar
Armoooo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7281
Joined: Sun 26 Nov 2006 2:28pm
Location: The Great South East
Contact:

Post: # 870855Post Armoooo »

No, I think McQualter ir too important in the forward line, he applies that all important frontal pressure and is one of our surest goal kickers (GF excluded).

I think Armitage is the obvious replacement and will be the replacement. IMO Steven will be more of an attacking player and if he were to replace anyone I feel it would be the role that we had Lovett pencilled in for.

Geary is an interesting one, I really don't know what position he should be played in, I worry that he might become a jack of all trades but master of none. I'd like this year to be his last experimental year, give him a go as a running wingman, a half back flanker, a forward flanker and a genuine inside midfielder then decide where we go from there.


ROBERT HARVEY A.K.A The Great Man, Banger, Harves, Ol' Man River...
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
thirty-seven!?
Club Player
Posts: 741
Joined: Tue 16 Dec 2008 10:20pm
Location: Melbourne

Post: # 870856Post thirty-seven!? »

Mini definitely stepped up last year, and it could happen again as he gets older, stronger and wiser. He is apparently quite a vocal leader on the field, so that is definitely a plus. However, i do see becoming stronger playing as a defensive forward as he did this year - continuing to work on the plethora of things he surely learnt about his role in 2009.

I do agree with Plugger regarding Steven - he looks to have the ability to play both inside and outside with ease, but would likely play more as a flanker - the role which Schneids played really well is the last several rounds of the season. He seems robust, clean and can kick a good goal as we saw in Tassy. I really hope we get to see more of him this year.

Armo we all know should step up - if he can match Ball in the clearances (or at least get close-ish), his kicking skills are already going to be cleaner and more penetrating! Gears to me seems more of an outside player or third/fourth defender. He likes the run and carry, but he gets outmuscled too easily for an inside-mid as be saw in round 14 against Geelong.

I'm still not sold on Eddy - i would prefer any of the others in the squad... the only thing i can tell that he brings to the team is determination... and that only gets you so far!


Batnoe

Post: # 870858Post Batnoe »

plugger66 wrote:Out of the young potential midfielders only Steven to me seems to have the class to be a top liner. Armo lacks kicking ability and is lazy defensively and Mini, Eddy and Geary seem like workhorses to me.
lazy defensively?

i dont get you sometimes, sometimes you come out with something i totally agree with and others i just want to tell you how much you dont know about footy


User avatar
Eastern
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14357
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
Location: 3132
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 870859Post Eastern »

Batnoe wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Out of the young potential midfielders only Steven to me seems to have the class to be a top liner. Armo lacks kicking ability and is lazy defensively and Mini, Eddy and Geary seem like workhorses to me.
lazy defensively?

i dont get you sometimes, sometimes you come out with something i totally agree with and others i just want to tell you how much you dont know about footy
Guys, Guys, Guys !!

Lets NOT allow this thread to go down the "personal attack" path that many other threads have gone down of late. Plugger's opinion is just that "AN OPINION". Remember, an opinion is neither right nor wrong.

This is a great place to express our opinions but we should also allow others to express theirs too !!


NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!

Image
User avatar
Milton66
SS Life Member
Posts: 3521
Joined: Tue 19 May 2009 9:53pm
Location: None of your goddam business

Post: # 870862Post Milton66 »

Yes, why not? If you're lookign for a direct like v like replacemnt, then yes.

But it will come down to 2 things... who replaces him up fwd, and what role does the coach have in mind for Ball's replacement?

Maybe he'll be happy with another clearance king.


Hotel De Los Muertos: Your room is ready... Care to step inside?
PJ
SS Life Member
Posts: 2974
Joined: Sun 14 Dec 2008 10:31am
Location: Adelaide

Post: # 870864Post PJ »

Mini - shows some real class in flashes and seems to be the favourite of many commentators. It may be a question of his core strength which compromises his in and under work - he needs to be able to hold his ground better. A definite improver and could do this role part time.

Armo - has the right aggression and skills, will be a great deal better if he can play week in and week out. Goal kicking ability is good - gets more in play than from set shots but in the midfoeld role this is not a problem. Armo has potential for as far as the eye can see but needs a mature and consistent approach.

Steven - (this guy is my long term term pick of best mid for the saints) he looks the closest in style to Bally and does some pretty special things - he just needs the game time and encouragement.

Geary - for mine could eventually replace CJ as a tagger if he gains the body strength. At present I can't see why he generates the excitment in people but each to their own.


I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
User avatar
CeilidhSaint
Club Player
Posts: 562
Joined: Mon 18 Sep 2006 11:00pm
Location: The Ironically Named Victory Room

Post: # 870866Post CeilidhSaint »

Mini won't be. Whilst he does his job well as a defensive HFF that is a long way off an extraction in and under midfielder, AA, club captain, leader that Ball is/was.
More power to McQ but lets not get excited.
BTW, the rumours were that Lyon wasn't impressed with 20 "going the other way".


TB 1 - The Brightest Light on the Darkest Night - we miss you.
Think Globally, Act Sainterly
I have Phil Narkle's helmet
User avatar
Milton66
SS Life Member
Posts: 3521
Joined: Tue 19 May 2009 9:53pm
Location: None of your goddam business

Post: # 870867Post Milton66 »

Ball WAS AA, when? How long ago?

I doubt that anyone is expecting someone to just step in and be what Ball was.

Like I say, it wil lall depend on what "role" is expected from the player.


Hotel De Los Muertos: Your room is ready... Care to step inside?
Milan Faletic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6090
Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm

Post: # 870870Post Milan Faletic »

No replacements.

The next player must be better, until we win the premiership.

Each player has a different name, and has the ability to create their own history.

While I understand the rationale of the OP, If one player simply replaces another, there will be no progress.

Sure I'm playing semantics, but it is such a fine line between defeat and victory, it is important that we get at least 10% improvement this year. I want to be able to sit back at 3/4 time in this year's GF and be 7 goals up. Then we can really celebrate. Just pause, close your eyes and imagine that scenario. Wow!!!


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11229
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 136 times

Post: # 870879Post Bernard Shakey »

Mini already has his role and has been doing it admirably.

I agree with plugger66, Jack Steven is a great prospect for the midfield this year. He really impressed me with his endeavour at Sandy last year and with another pre season under his belt should be ready to go this year.

Armo, Geary and Eddy will all be in the mix as well.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Post: # 870883Post Dr Spaceman »

Milan Faletic wrote:No replacements.

The next player must be better, until we win the premiership.

Each player has a different name, and has the ability to create their own history.

While I understand the rationale of the OP, If one player simply replaces another, there will be no progress.

Sure I'm playing semantics, but it is such a fine line between defeat and victory, it is important that we get at least 10% improvement this year. I want to be able to sit back at 3/4 time in this year's GF and be 7 goals up. Then we can really celebrate. Just pause, close your eyes and imagine that scenario. Wow!!!
Agree, plus I'm not real sure which Ball we're talking about. If it's the one that just departed then I'm not sure I want a new one! I'd much prefer a new midfielder who can run (quickly) and kick the ball (over a distance) as well as laying a tackle!


User avatar
rodgerfox
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 327 times

Post: # 870885Post rodgerfox »

Simply, THE most stupid question ever, ever posed on a football forum. Ever.


Fair dinkum.


Fair, fair dinkum.


No.


User avatar
rodgerfox
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 327 times

Post: # 870886Post rodgerfox »

Milan Faletic wrote:No replacements.

The next player must be better, until we win the premiership.

Or the same, and just get a bit more time on the ground.


User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7610
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 442 times
Been thanked: 205 times

Post: # 870895Post bobmurray »

plugger66 wrote:Out of the young potential midfielders only Steven to me seems to have the class to be a top liner. Armo lacks kicking ability and is lazy defensively and Mini, Eddy and Geary seem like workhorses to me.
Steven is unproven....could be anything...could be nothing...he's part of the same raffle as the rest of them....


fair dinkum...how does one mans shite become gospel... :roll: :roll: :roll:


Saints looking like a bottom 4 team in 2024.
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30069
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1223 times

Post: # 870898Post saintsRrising »

rodgerfox wrote:Simply, THE most stupid question ever, ever posed on a football forum. Ever.


Fair dinkum.


Fair, fair dinkum.


No.
The purpose of the OP was to get some football discussion going rather than the personal attacks and repeated Lovett threads.

It has so far worked with most..but some can't help themselves of course.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30069
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1223 times

Post: # 870899Post saintsRrising »

Dr Spaceman wrote:

Agree, plus I'm not real sure which Ball we're talking about.
I am referring to replacing the 2009 Ball...not the 2005 Ball.
Dr Spaceman wrote:


If it's the one that just departed then I'm not sure I want a new one! I'd much prefer a new midfielder who can run (quickly) and kick the ball (over a distance) as well as laying a tackle!
Armo and Steven call do all...or at least are quicker than the 2009 Ball.
Right hear and now I think Armo would nake the better tackler and clearance player.
Last edited by saintsRrising on Sun 10 Jan 2010 3:05am, edited 1 time in total.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30069
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1223 times

Post: # 870900Post saintsRrising »

One reason I raise Mini is that Lyon has flagged that he wants more pace in the team.

So I can envisage for example see Peake coming into the 22.

If so then someone needs to spell Lenny and Dal for the on the ball clearance work.

With Peake in, I could see Mini being asked to take some more rotations along with say BJ.

That is just one senario of course. Armo is another...as is Steven...


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Milan Faletic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6090
Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm

Post: # 870902Post Milan Faletic »

rodgerfox wrote:
Milan Faletic wrote:No replacements.

The next player must be better, until we win the premiership.

Or the same, and just get a bit more time on the ground.
If he can kick more than 30 metres than he will be better than Ball. Same didn't do the job.


Milan Faletic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6090
Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm

Post: # 870903Post Milan Faletic »

rodgerfox wrote:Simply, THE most stupid question ever, ever posed on a football forum. Ever.


Fair dinkum.


Fair, fair dinkum.


No.
You are a very nasty person RF. Do you have a vocabulary that can be a little less bombastic than shooting down the OP and making them feel stupid. Why don't you try posting something that evokes discussion rather than branding a post as the most stupid post ever. Another generalisation and extreme comment from you. Please find some tact and diplomacy.


Post Reply