I thought you'd like that.joffaboy wrote:page 7 and a .LIAR has appeared.
Oh yeah...........
what a true to form thread![]()
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Wonderful.rodgerfox wrote:I thought you'd like that.joffaboy wrote:page 7 and a .LIAR has appeared.
Oh yeah...........
what a true to form thread![]()
... as sure as the sun rises in the west... sir Babbalot the Knoght in shining armour felt compelled to ride in and defend GT's legacy...
gazrat wrote:
but its all good , as long as the 'lynchmob' doesnt rear its empty head again
In fairness to the previous administration and GT (this is not designed to incite)
rodgerfox wrote:Is everyone in agreeance that injuries are what cost us a flag under GT?
Wow, that's a turnaround.
Liar liar... pants on fire.rodgerfox wrote:You are a liar.Milton66 wrote:Yup, I'm a liar.rodgerfox wrote:Is everyone in agreeance that injuries are what cost us a flag under GT?
Wow, that's a turnaround.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Don't really care Gazrat.
I didn't introduce GT into this thread at all you liar.
I'll start to respect chips vs French fries as a topic when it can produce a 53 page thread in GF week. And not before.......Dr Spaceman wrote:I know there’s not much going on at the mo but there must be something we can talk about other than Grant Thomas - perhaps whether we prefer french fries or crinkle cut chips!
For what it's worth I happened to like GT when he was coaching us and believe he did leave us with a legacy, particularly in regards to leadership & loyalty. Like most I didn’t see his sacking coming. I was shocked but fairly quickly came to realise it was the correct decision. He simply wasn’t going to take us forward.
Is RL better than GT? Who cares, RL has got the gig and only a fool would suggest he hasn’t done a good job thus far.
GT is gone and will never coach us again. If we’re gonna talk about him we may as well talk about Blight, Watson, Alves, Sheldon etc etc.
Anyway, back to those chips..................
At least I know how to get a sustainable thread happening/// unlike your feeble attempts.meher baba wrote:I'll start to respect chips vs French fries as a topic when it can produce a 53 page thread in GF week. And not before.......Dr Spaceman wrote:I know there’s not much going on at the mo but there must be something we can talk about other than Grant Thomas - perhaps whether we prefer french fries or crinkle cut chips!
For what it's worth I happened to like GT when he was coaching us and believe he did leave us with a legacy, particularly in regards to leadership & loyalty. Like most I didn’t see his sacking coming. I was shocked but fairly quickly came to realise it was the correct decision. He simply wasn’t going to take us forward.
Is RL better than GT? Who cares, RL has got the gig and only a fool would suggest he hasn’t done a good job thus far.
GT is gone and will never coach us again. If we’re gonna talk about him we may as well talk about Blight, Watson, Alves, Sheldon etc etc.
Anyway, back to those chips..................
Actually I have found a reference to GT in the OP.Mr Magic wrote:rodgerfox wrote:Is everyone in agreeance that injuries are what cost us a flag under GT?
Wow, that's a turnaround.
He may well have been alluded to, but I believe this was the first post that actually named 'GT' in this thread.
My understanding of the thread was that WhiteWinmar was posting that Misson's work at the Club was a positive.
Meher Baba posted that he was yet to be convinced that Misson's work was the sole contributory factor.
Then this gem appeared.
Technically, you are the liarMr Magic wrote:Actually I have found a reference to GT in the OP.Mr Magic wrote:rodgerfox wrote:Is everyone in agreeance that injuries are what cost us a flag under GT?
Wow, that's a turnaround.
He may well have been alluded to, but I believe this was the first post that actually named 'GT' in this thread.
My understanding of the thread was that WhiteWinmar was posting that Misson's work at the Club was a positive.
Meher Baba posted that he was yet to be convinced that Misson's work was the sole contributory factor.
Then this gem appeared.
So therefore I am wrong in stating that rodger was the first to mention the name 'GT'
I still believe his post was nothing more than another attempt to 'troll/bait, but others choose to view his motives differently.
I also note with interest that he has not bothered to attempt to address the deliberate misspelling (IMO) of 'Violent' so that he can later deny he ever denied it.
But hey, each to his own I suppose.
Poor old Mr Magic.Mr Magic wrote:
Actually I have found a reference to GT in the OP.
So therefore I am wrong in stating that rodger was the first to mention the name 'GT'
I still believe his post was nothing more than another attempt to 'troll/bait, but others choose to view his motives differently.
I also note with interest that he has not bothered to attempt to address the deliberate misspelling (IMO) of 'Violent' so that he can later deny he ever denied it.
But hey, each to his own I suppose.
Why isn't he a .LIAR RF?rodgerfox wrote:Poor old Mr Magic.Mr Magic wrote:
Actually I have found a reference to GT in the OP.
So therefore I am wrong in stating that rodger was the first to mention the name 'GT'
I still believe his post was nothing more than another attempt to 'troll/bait, but others choose to view his motives differently.
I also note with interest that he has not bothered to attempt to address the deliberate misspelling (IMO) of 'Violent' so that he can later deny he ever denied it.
But hey, each to his own I suppose.
I guess we should apologise to RF.Mr Magic wrote:rodgerfox wrote:Is everyone in agreeance that injuries are what cost us a flag under GT?
Wow, that's a turnaround.
He may well have been alluded to, but I believe this was the first post that actually named 'GT' in this thread.
My understanding of the thread was that WhiteWinmar was posting that Misson's work at the Club was a positive.
Meher Baba posted that he was yet to be convinced that Misson's work was the sole contributory factor.
Then this gem appeared.
Oh, thx to Mr Magic, I see your point Stoolman / stool Pidgeon.rodgerfox wrote:It's not an accusation.Milton66 wrote:
Ooooh, I am mortally wounded by your sharp tounge and cutting accusations.
You, once again, have lied.
It's a weak trait that I despise. And you do it very often.
No. We were never in a position to win a flag under GT.rodgerfox wrote:Is everyone in agreeance that injuries are what cost us a flag under GT?