Yes expect where there is a control freak at the reigns...Sainterman wrote:
Fairly normal procedure across many corporations and business across the world I would have thought.
Roo interview this morning on MMM
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30069
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 707 times
- Been thanked: 1223 times
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
What does this have to with GT??saintsRrising wrote:LOL you are funny.rodgerfox wrote:It seems I am naive.Sainterman wrote:
What a naive point of view to think the coach would not be involved in any way. Do you think the list manager might perhaps seek the input of the head coach when making decisions about said list? I'd be surprised and disappointed if it didn't happen that way.
So who made the call to suspend Lovett?
I'm reading on here that Lyon made the call. Does that sound right to you?
Consensus is obviously a foreign concept to you.
You are so so wedded to the GT way of one person always having to make the call.
I personally would imagine that with something as important as this that some members of the Board, their legal experts (who may be the lawyer on the Board) and Lyon would have had meeting and reached consensus about what should be done.
I'm asking questions about how our footy dept. runs because I keep reading conflicting reports about how it works.
No one, especially yourself, seems to be able to give me a straight answer.
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
Well why would he?Sainterman wrote:What is the difference whether he does or doesn't? I fail to see why that would have any relevance.rodgerfox wrote:But does he?Sainterman wrote:
The people at the table usually have a list where they have ranked the players they would like to draft. This would be determined by many people at the club including recruiting staff, list management and the coaching staff. Doesn't mean RL has to sit there on the day...
And if he did? Why?
It's not his business. We have recruiters and a List Manager - why would the coach even be there?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am
In reality many people will have input on a variety of decisions that would all vary in overall importance. Perhaps the word delegation is unfamiliar to you, but it is a concept that allows the "boss" to empower others to make decisions. I am not sure this equates to a democracy, which is more a term referring to a type of political system a country operates under.rodgerfox wrote:Not in reality.Sainterman wrote:IMO, like most areas, RL would have had input. I am sure it is not a call he made alone though, he would have participated in a meeting which I reckon would have had all relevant people involved. Together they would have reached a decision. Fairly normal procedure across many corporations and business across the world I would have thought.rodgerfox wrote:It seems I am naive.Sainterman wrote:
What a naive point of view to think the coach would not be involved in any way. Do you think the list manager might perhaps seek the input of the head coach when making decisions about said list? I'd be surprised and disappointed if it didn't happen that way.
So who made the call to suspend Lovett?
I'm reading on here that Lyon made the call. Does that sound right to you?
In reality, the 'boss' makes the call as it's his/her head on the line.
They will of course gather input, but then make the call themselves.
Unless of course we're now saying we have a democracy in place in the Footy Dept.?
So who overrides Ross Lyon on a List Management call?
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
rodgerfox wrote:The extent of it?Dr Spaceman wrote:
Dear God, make it stop! Of course RL has some input into it - all coaches do. It's the extent of the input that GT had that caused concern for some people. You really do stretch things beyond belief
What does that mean?
Sounds like Lyon has a fair bit of input, based on what I'm reading.
I'm just a bit confused about how modern football departments work.
Having some input into what players are worth (RL and 15 other current coaches) and acting like some demented Donald Trump on crack and personally drawing up all the contracts (GT) are two different things.
Anyway RF, It’s clear you keep putting questions that have no answers. No wonder these things go on for pages and pages which is no doubt your intent. But I only put my comment there coz I was keen to get my 100th post up. Now that I’ve done that, feel free to babble on without my input.
I have a feeling we are all guessing as this is fan forum and that is what you do. If you are really concerned write a letter to club to get a full explanation on how it runs. i am sure they will write back.rodgerfox wrote:What does this have to with GT??saintsRrising wrote:LOL you are funny.rodgerfox wrote:It seems I am naive.Sainterman wrote:
What a naive point of view to think the coach would not be involved in any way. Do you think the list manager might perhaps seek the input of the head coach when making decisions about said list? I'd be surprised and disappointed if it didn't happen that way.
So who made the call to suspend Lovett?
I'm reading on here that Lyon made the call. Does that sound right to you?
Consensus is obviously a foreign concept to you.
You are so so wedded to the GT way of one person always having to make the call.
I personally would imagine that with something as important as this that some members of the Board, their legal experts (who may be the lawyer on the Board) and Lyon would have had meeting and reached consensus about what should be done.
I'm asking questions about how our footy dept. runs because I keep reading conflicting reports about how it works.
No one, especially yourself, seems to be able to give me a straight answer.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30069
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 707 times
- Been thanked: 1223 times
Everything and you are fishing with your agenda...which is transparent to most.rodgerfox wrote:
What does this have to with GT??
I'm asking questions about how our footy dept. runs because I keep reading conflicting reports about how it works.
No one, especially yourself, seems to be able to give me a straight answer.
And there is no conflict as to how it works.
Naturally no one on this firm knows exactly what occurs as Westaway, Lyon, Drain etc quite rightly don't waste their time reporting to members and the public with minute details.
But how it generally works is obvious to most.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
Hang on, hang on.Sainterman wrote:In reality many people will have input on a variety of decisions that would all vary in overall importance. Perhaps the word delegation is unfamiliar to you, but it is a concept that allows the "boss" to empower others to make decisions. I am not sure this equates to a democracy, which is more a term referring to a type of political system a country operates under.rodgerfox wrote:Not in reality.Sainterman wrote:IMO, like most areas, RL would have had input. I am sure it is not a call he made alone though, he would have participated in a meeting which I reckon would have had all relevant people involved. Together they would have reached a decision. Fairly normal procedure across many corporations and business across the world I would have thought.rodgerfox wrote:It seems I am naive.Sainterman wrote:
What a naive point of view to think the coach would not be involved in any way. Do you think the list manager might perhaps seek the input of the head coach when making decisions about said list? I'd be surprised and disappointed if it didn't happen that way.
So who made the call to suspend Lovett?
I'm reading on here that Lyon made the call. Does that sound right to you?
In reality, the 'boss' makes the call as it's his/her head on the line.
They will of course gather input, but then make the call themselves.
Unless of course we're now saying we have a democracy in place in the Footy Dept.?
So who overrides Ross Lyon on a List Management call?
Who delegates?
Are you now saying that Ross Lyon oversees it all - but delegates to other people ??
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
So you don't know how a 'modern footy dept' works?saintsRrising wrote:Everything and you are fishing with your agenda...which is transparent to most.rodgerfox wrote:
What does this have to with GT??
I'm asking questions about how our footy dept. runs because I keep reading conflicting reports about how it works.
No one, especially yourself, seems to be able to give me a straight answer.
And there is no conflict as to how it works.
Naturally no one on this firm knows exactly what occurs as Westaway, Lyon, Drain etc quite rightly don't waste their time reporting to members and the public with minute details.
But how it generally works is obvious to most.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am
Nope, a little Corporate 101 for you Dodgey...rodgerfox wrote:Hang on, hang on.Sainterman wrote:In reality many people will have input on a variety of decisions that would all vary in overall importance. Perhaps the word delegation is unfamiliar to you, but it is a concept that allows the "boss" to empower others to make decisions. I am not sure this equates to a democracy, which is more a term referring to a type of political system a country operates under.rodgerfox wrote:Not in reality.Sainterman wrote:IMO, like most areas, RL would have had input. I am sure it is not a call he made alone though, he would have participated in a meeting which I reckon would have had all relevant people involved. Together they would have reached a decision. Fairly normal procedure across many corporations and business across the world I would have thought.rodgerfox wrote:It seems I am naive.Sainterman wrote:
What a naive point of view to think the coach would not be involved in any way. Do you think the list manager might perhaps seek the input of the head coach when making decisions about said list? I'd be surprised and disappointed if it didn't happen that way.
So who made the call to suspend Lovett?
I'm reading on here that Lyon made the call. Does that sound right to you?
In reality, the 'boss' makes the call as it's his/her head on the line.
They will of course gather input, but then make the call themselves.
Unless of course we're now saying we have a democracy in place in the Footy Dept.?
So who overrides Ross Lyon on a List Management call?
Who delegates?
Are you now saying that Ross Lyon oversees it all - but delegates to other people ??
Businesses are generally made of up various departments. These departments usually have managers assigned to them. These departmental managers then often report in to Executive/Operational or General Management. Some decisions can be made at the departmental level, others are made at a higher level, and some, believe it or not are made by CEO's and the like. It is called a Corporate hierarchy. Have you ever heard of such a thing?
Last time I checked RL was our Head Coach, not our President, not our CEO, not the manager of marketing!
Now if RL didn't delegate, then we could save some wages and get rid of SOS and all the other assistants, he wouldn't need them.
As head coach I would imagine he would have a big say in football related matters. In some cases this would mean input into trading, drafting and contracts. These are areas that would directly affect his role and his ability to carry that role out. He would not necessarily have complete control though. The difference here is he would have input, not complete control, as our previous coach liked to have.
Clearer? Or still confused?
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30069
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 707 times
- Been thanked: 1223 times
I do and I am very happy the way things have turned out football department wise...pretty much exactly as I outlined when GT got the chop.rodgerfox wrote:
So you don't know how a 'modern footy dept' works?
I know that you do not seek to discuss but rather seek to take the piss.
That is why you posted as Violent Stool.
That is why you ask questions to provoke.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am
I have a feeling I am better off taking the dog for a walk at this point!saintsRrising wrote:I do and I am very happy the way things have turned out football department wise...pretty much exactly as I outlined when GT got the chop.rodgerfox wrote:
So you don't know how a 'modern footy dept' works?
I know that you do not seek to discuss but rather seek to take the piss.
That is why you posted as Violent Stool.
That is why you ask questions to provoke.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30069
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 707 times
- Been thanked: 1223 times
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
So how does our modern footy dept work?saintsRrising wrote:I do and I am very happy the way things have turned out football department wise...pretty much exactly as I outlined when GT got the chop.rodgerfox wrote:
So you don't know how a 'modern footy dept' works?
I know that you do not seek to discuss but rather seek to take the piss.
That is why you posted as Violent Stool.
That is why you ask questions to provoke.
Please answer this question.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
thanks for the corporate world overview.Sainterman wrote:
Last time I checked RL was our Head Coach, not our President, not our CEO, not the manager of marketing!
Now if RL didn't delegate, then we could save some wages and get rid of SOS and all the other assistants, he wouldn't need them.
As head coach I would imagine he would have a big say in football related matters. In some cases this would mean input into trading, drafting and contracts. These are areas that would directly affect his role and his ability to carry that role out. He would not necessarily have complete control though. The difference here is he would have input, not complete control, as our previous coach liked to have.
Clearer? Or still confused?
Although it actually doesn't work that way. But anyway....
So what does 'has an input' mean?
Does this mean he lured Misson to the club? Did he have anything to do with it? Did he say to someone "I want that man!" and someone else went and got him?
Did he say "I want Adam Schneider" and comeone else went and got him?
Did he say "I need a better list" and someone else went and made it happen?
What if he said "I want Steven King" and someone else went off and got him, and in the process paid him too much and it meant we lost Lenny Hayes, do you think Ross Lyon would be happy with that?
Is it in his area of responsibility? If not, then stiff shiit.
Or, would the person call Lyon and say "Dude, I can get him, but it will mean we may lose Lenny Hayes. What do you reckon??"
I guess that means Lyon has control. He's the boss who's making the calls.
I've read on here a few times that Lyon took Milne off the trade table. how does that happen?
Don't we have a List Manager? How does the coach overrule the List Manager?
And on top of all this, what does the Football Manager do? I tell you what, that sounds like a decent job!
Doesn't seem to do much, but on here is the most valued position ever created in a football club!!!
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30069
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 707 times
- Been thanked: 1223 times
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30069
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 707 times
- Been thanked: 1223 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am
LOL. Is this seriously your reply?rodgerfox wrote:thanks for the corporate world overview.Sainterman wrote:
Last time I checked RL was our Head Coach, not our President, not our CEO, not the manager of marketing!
Now if RL didn't delegate, then we could save some wages and get rid of SOS and all the other assistants, he wouldn't need them.
As head coach I would imagine he would have a big say in football related matters. In some cases this would mean input into trading, drafting and contracts. These are areas that would directly affect his role and his ability to carry that role out. He would not necessarily have complete control though. The difference here is he would have input, not complete control, as our previous coach liked to have.
Clearer? Or still confused?
Although it actually doesn't work that way. But anyway....
So what does 'has an input' mean?
Does this mean he lured Misson to the club? Did he have anything to do with it? Did he say to someone "I want that man!" and someone else went and got him?
Did he say "I want Adam Schneider" and comeone else went and got him?
Did he say "I need a better list" and someone else went and made it happen?
What if he said "I want Steven King" and someone else went off and got him, and in the process paid him too much and it meant we lost Lenny Hayes, do you think Ross Lyon would be happy with that?
Is it in his area of responsibility? If not, then stiff shiit.
Or, would the person call Lyon and say "Dude, I can get him, but it will mean we may lose Lenny Hayes. What do you reckon??"
I guess that means Lyon has control. He's the boss who's making the calls.
I've read on here a few times that Lyon took Milne off the trade table. how does that happen?
Don't we have a List Manager? How does the coach overrule the List Manager?
And on top of all this, what does the Football Manager do? I tell you what, that sounds like a decent job!
Doesn't seem to do much, but on here is the most valued position ever created in a football club!!!
For one it is actually hard to understand what on earth you are saying but I will do my best to help clear your confusion.
But first, please fill me in on how a Corporation works, my 20 years of corporate life must not have been enough.
Now as for input, the dictionary defines it quite well:
contribution of information, ideas, opinions, or the like: In a sentance..."Before making a decision we need your input."
Seems pretty simple really.
I would say, in relation to all the questions you have asked in your post, that input from RL would have been part of the decision making process.
Perhaps when RL said "I really want to keep Milne" others listened, valued his opinion and agreed that this would be ok. Perhaps, just maybe, it was not a decision he had complete control over, but through meeting with relevant people, he was able to achieve what he wanted.
Oh, and please take the time to illuminate me on where you feel my rundown on Corporate Hierarchy fell over, I am interested. Your baiting may mean I get a pay rise!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Wed 23 Dec 2009 10:13pm
- Location: In Saintly Heavan. Where else?
This is all chummy and amusing.
So does anyone know if Roo was lying? Or why Ball left?
It's no wonder that people are leaving this place.
Perhaps it should be restricted to over 18's only? Lord forbid any young people come on here thinking it's a Saints "fan" site.
Oh hang on a minny, there already seems to be a bunch of kiddies here on this thread.
So does anyone know if Roo was lying? Or why Ball left?
It's no wonder that people are leaving this place.
Perhaps it should be restricted to over 18's only? Lord forbid any young people come on here thinking it's a Saints "fan" site.
Oh hang on a minny, there already seems to be a bunch of kiddies here on this thread.
Fired Up Again For 2010. Go Saints!!!
Kepp dreaming those impossible dreams. Spend every minute of everyday striving to reach your dreams.
Kepp dreaming those impossible dreams. Spend every minute of everyday striving to reach your dreams.
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
Obviously you were towards the bottom of the 'structure'.saint66au wrote:Actually it pretty much mirrored my workplace structure exactly...but anyway..thanks for the corporate world overview.
Although it actually doesn't work that way. But anyway....
Of course that's how the structure looks on paper. But no CEO or Snr Manager in their right mind would allow someone beneath them make significant judgement calls without their signoff that impact the CEO/Snr Manager directly.
Get fair dinkum.
They'll want you to think you're making calls, but the reality is you're not.
Why pay a CEO squillions if he lets some middle manager make the big calls that impact the company directly.
Been there done that, and seen it from both sides.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am
Sorry JM, I normally don't get involved but I too am sick of all the crap certain users post on here. It certainly spoils the experience of soming on here...and I really don't want to contribute to that. It would be a lovely place if we didn't have it at all but some just want to come on here and bait.JMsainter wrote:This is all chummy and amusing.
So does anyone know if Roo was lying? Or why Ball left?
It's no wonder that people are leaving this place.
Perhaps it should be restricted to over 18's only? Lord forbid any young people come on here thinking it's a Saints "fan" site.
Oh hang on a minny, there already seems to be a bunch of kiddies here on this thread.
I am done on the topic, hope this helps in some way. I actually agree with your sentiment.
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
Ok.Sainterman wrote:
Now as for input, the dictionary defines it quite well:
contribution of information, ideas, opinions, or the like: In a sentance..."Before making a decision we need your input."
Seems pretty simple really.
So Ross Lyon isn't in charge? Someone else is?
Someone else makes the calls and asks him for his input?
So really, Ross Lyon doesn't have a huge amount of pull at the footy club?
The fact that you're not the one giving the pay rises and the fact you actually believe that your boss and his/her boss 'value your opinion' means your boss is doing their job well.Sainterman wrote: Oh, and please take the time to illuminate me on where you feel my rundown on Corporate Hierarchy fell over, I am interested. Your baiting may mean I get a pay rise!
Keep slugging away and when you get above middle management you'll realise I'm spot on.
lol - RF you sound like you are out of your depth.rodgerfox wrote:Obviously you were towards the bottom of the 'structure'.saint66au wrote:Actually it pretty much mirrored my workplace structure exactly...but anyway..thanks for the corporate world overview.
Although it actually doesn't work that way. But anyway....
Of course that's how the structure looks on paper. But no CEO or Snr Manager in their right mind would allow someone beneath them make significant judgement calls without their signoff that impact the CEO/Snr Manager directly.
Get fair dinkum.
They'll want you to think you're making calls, but the reality is you're not.
Why pay a CEO squillions if he lets some middle manager make the big calls that impact the company directly.
Been there done that, and seen it from both sides.
You sound very confused RF.
Really dont dabble in issues such as corporate structures, because you are making a fool of yourself.
Really your post above is highly amusing, actually bordering on sad
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)