The MRP will have a lot to answer for

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
bigred
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11463
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 609 times

Post: # 948518Post bigred »

I'll say it again for dramatic effect, but I honestly think Baker is gonna get **** over.


"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Post: # 948519Post gringo »

The hearald sun reported the incident as Johnson "allegedly" striking Baker and Mooney "allegedly" punching but reported the Saints players incidents as fact. Nice journalism.


older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3320
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 167 times
Been thanked: 503 times

Post: # 948520Post older saint »

Chook lotto this week

As there is no precedence taken in to account SJ in trouble ( his name is not Judd and the AFL know Geelong will make finals)

SJ 4 down to 3
SB 1 for strike to head, charged with stomach punch will get off on lack of force

Mooney - Will getoff lack of force.


Fisher - 2 weeks as every week Fraser makes a ridiculous decision and this will be it.


Milan Faletic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6090
Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm

Post: # 948522Post Milan Faletic »

saint vince wrote:
saint vince wrote: Fisher is a bit different as Bartel was coming off and in the hands of the trainers. I aven't seen it but I rekon any contact in that situation deserves a week. IMO
If you go back to my original statement and not distort it I said any contact in that situation deserves a week.

I didn't say Fisher deserves a week I said any contact deserves a week. If Fisher made ANY contact then he deserves to go.
Probably better to comment on an incident if you actually saw it, Vince :wink:


saintsareprettygoodhey
Club Player
Posts: 129
Joined: Sun 21 Jun 2009 11:12am

Post: # 948581Post saintsareprettygoodhey »

http://media.theage.com.au/sport/sports ... 50563.html

Around a minute into the video he mentions some sort of introduced rule about hitting an injured player.... Have not heard of this, can anyone shed some light?


User avatar
Animal Enclosure
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2364
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005 2:37pm
Location: Saints Footy Central

Post: # 948584Post Animal Enclosure »

Milan Faletic wrote:
saint vince wrote:
saint vince wrote: Fisher is a bit different as Bartel was coming off and in the hands of the trainers. I aven't seen it but I rekon any contact in that situation deserves a week. IMO
If you go back to my original statement and not distort it I said any contact in that situation deserves a week.

I didn't say Fisher deserves a week I said any contact deserves a week. If Fisher made ANY contact then he deserves to go.
Probably better to comment on an incident if you actually saw it, Vince :wink:
Don't believe the descriptions in various press reports Vince (ranging from a push to a punch!), if you didn't take into account Bartel's response (go forth & multiply), the contact was more fitting someone saying "you ok mate?". While this was clearly not the case, the contact was so minimal that if Chips has to face any ramifications it will be farce.

The Geelong mafia in the Melbourne media are up & about this week, don't worry about that.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 948599Post SainterK »

rodgerfox wrote:
Thinline wrote:Agree RF, but I think the first bit refers to Fisher's bump on Bartel as he was being helped from the field.
Yeah, although it was so minimal that I'd be surprised and really disappointed if anything was to come from Fisher's.
Depends on the angle, the first view looks almost like he didn't make contact at all, the other angle from side on shows him punching the top of his arm and Bartel having a go at him.

Didn't like it....


User avatar
saintnick12
Club Player
Posts: 1877
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 2:08pm

Post: # 948613Post saintnick12 »

SainterK wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:
Thinline wrote:Agree RF, but I think the first bit refers to Fisher's bump on Bartel as he was being helped from the field.
Yeah, although it was so minimal that I'd be surprised and really disappointed if anything was to come from Fisher's.
Depends on the angle, the first view looks almost like he didn't make contact at all, the other angle from side on shows him punching the top of his arm and Bartel having a go at him.

Didn't like it....
I love Fisher, but didn't like it either.

Once someone is in the hands of the trainers they should be left alone. Verbal spray I could cope with, but not touching them or even attempting to touch them. I didn't notice it at the game and only noticed it watching the replay after getting home. I was disappointed to see Fisher doing such a thing. Not sure if he actually did make contact but he certainly attempted to. Not a good look. We would certainly expect our players to be left alone if any of them were in the hands of the trainers. There was actually a trainer on each side of him. Clearly not participating in the game....unlike the Riewoldt example in Brisbane years ago where he had waved the trainers away.

Hopefully nothting will come of it. I will be really disappointed if he facing official sanctions for it, but I don't like to see anyone from my club acting that way.


"At the end of the day, a coach and a fitness adviser doesn't make a good football team, they're not the only ones who got us to two Grand Finals." Lenny Hayes. 27/9/2011.
StSteven
Club Player
Posts: 1169
Joined: Wed 20 Sep 2006 6:55pm

Post: # 948620Post StSteven »

Interesting that Bartel would not say what happened or what he said...lip readers could easily interpret his saying "Weak X..."

Very disappointed also. I believe our players should act in the same way we believe others should act towards them.


StSteven
Club Player
Posts: 1169
Joined: Wed 20 Sep 2006 6:55pm

Post: # 948621Post StSteven »

saintsareprettygoodhey wrote:http://media.theage.com.au/sport/sports ... 50563.html

Around a minute into the video he mentions some sort of introduced rule about hitting an injured player.... Have not heard of this, can anyone shed some light?
Came in after the Roo kerfuffle.


maverick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5011
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
Location: Bayside
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Post: # 948632Post maverick »

I can't believe what I read on here sometimes.

I don't want the players to be well liked by opposition supporters or players, I want them to be thought of the same way Scarlett is thought of, respectively a good player but a so and so of a bloke on the ground...

I want a premiership nothing else, how do you know what Fish copped earlier from Bartel, who is no angel by the way, I would back Fish's character any day...


User avatar
JacksonsGirl
Club Player
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008 7:27pm
Location: Melbourne

Post: # 948643Post JacksonsGirl »

Im hearing 8-9 for Baker.

Watch this space


User avatar
bozza1980
Club Player
Posts: 1688
Joined: Thu 27 Jan 2005 3:42pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Post: # 948662Post bozza1980 »

JacksonsGirl wrote:Im hearing 8-9 for Baker.

Watch this space
I hope you are mistaken, that would seem slightly excessive.

That said nothing the AFL does should suprise.

This is the same organisation that changed the result of the game 3 days after the event even though the laws of the game dictate that they couldn't.


Life is very short and there's no time for fussing and fighting my friends.
longtimesaint
Club Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
Location: Mentone
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 263 times

Post: # 948669Post longtimesaint »

They have to take it to the tribunal if anything like 8 is given to Baker.
That's more thah Hall got for the Staker hit!


One year will be our year
User avatar
bozza1980
Club Player
Posts: 1688
Joined: Thu 27 Jan 2005 3:42pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Post: # 948705Post bozza1980 »

bozza1980 wrote:
JacksonsGirl wrote:Im hearing 8-9 for Baker.

Watch this space
I hope you are mistaken, that would seem slightly excessive.

That said nothing the AFL does should suprise.

This is the same organisation that changed the result of the game 3 days after the event even though the laws of the game dictate that they couldn't.
I guess I should be careful what I wish for.

You were wrong, 9 with an early guilty plea, 14 with an unsuccesful challenge.

This is quite possibly one of the most ludicrous findings I've ever seen.


Life is very short and there's no time for fussing and fighting my friends.
User avatar
Solar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8144
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 12:43pm

Post: # 948741Post Solar »

The game has lost me!


FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust

2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
ozrulestrace
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2358
Joined: Mon 09 Jun 2008 6:58pm
Location: East of Bentleigh

Post: # 948769Post ozrulestrace »

You can get less for pinching a car or burging a house, and that's through a more logical form of justice.


Milan Faletic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6090
Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm

Post: # 949000Post Milan Faletic »

There is a STICKY where you can send a message to Bakes and the club.

Please make use of it and keep it clean.

http://www.saintsational.com/forum/view ... hp?t=62694


Post Reply