We must control Harbrow
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5767
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 586 times
- Been thanked: 436 times
- Contact:
We must control Harbrow
... he's averaged close to 40 rebounding possessions against us last 2 encounters. .. I think 38 and 36 running bouncing possessions to be exact.
We can't afford to let him do that again.
I hope RL has an effective plan for Harbrow this time around... or is he just relying on being 3rd time lucky ?
We can't afford to let him do that again.
I hope RL has an effective plan for Harbrow this time around... or is he just relying on being 3rd time lucky ?
- Animal Enclosure
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2364
- Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005 2:37pm
- Location: Saints Footy Central
Griffen should be Jonesed I reckon.Animal Enclosure wrote:Time for Harbrow to be JONESED!
Harbrow is a key no doubt. Shut him down & their run off half back (with Murphy up forward) will struggle.
Perhaps Eddy (if he plays) or Mini could play a forward defensive role on Harbrow
STRENGTH THROUGH LOYALTY.
''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5767
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 586 times
- Been thanked: 436 times
- Contact:
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Thu 10 Jun 2004 6:26pm
- Location: Home
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
not as stupid as it sounds, he isnt a bad shot for goal id like to see eddy out and baker played forward. Definately an option..... He simply must be played this week he will be needed next week should we make it..samoht wrote:We know Baker is quick .. it would be strange to see him forward, but could that be a match up ?
- Unforgiven
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3258
- Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005 9:48pm
- Location: Full Forward
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: We must control Harbrow
yeah. when they have harbrow and the coon dog running rampant they really bother us. luckily coon dog is out so we can give harbrow more attention.samoht wrote:... he's averaged close to 40 rebounding possessions against us last 2 encounters. .. I think 38 and 36 running bouncing possessions to be exact.
We can't afford to let him do that again.
I hope RL has an effective plan for Harbrow this time around... or is he just relying on being 3rd time lucky ?
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11229
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 117 times
- Been thanked: 136 times
Bakes will play, but not on Harbrow. That job goes to Eddy.plugger66 wrote:Bakes was quick but any more. Chances of him playing are 1000 to 1 IMO.samoht wrote:We know Baker is quick .. it would be strange to see him forward, but could that be a match up ?
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
As always, midfield battle is huge. Lenny is a class above Boyd and Cross, and if he plays like he usually does, will obviously go a long way towards us winning. I want to see Dal rip a final to shreds as well.jonesy wrote:Stop Harbow and Griffen and the jobs done.
Or conversley,stop Boyd and Cross getting it out to Harbrow and Griffen, and the jobs done.
STRENGTH THROUGH LOYALTY.
''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
- saint patrick
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4338
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 5:20pm
- Location: mt.martha
Want a dollar on that at those odds Pluggerplugger66 wrote:Bakes was quick but any more. Chances of him playing are 1000 to 1 IMO.samoht wrote:We know Baker is quick .. it would be strange to see him forward, but could that be a match up ?
Never take a backward step even to gain momentum.....
'It's OK to have the capabilities and abilities, but you've got to get it done." Terry Daniher 05
"We have beauty in our captain and we have a true leader in our coach. Our time will come"
Thinline.Post 09 Grand final.
'It's OK to have the capabilities and abilities, but you've got to get it done." Terry Daniher 05
"We have beauty in our captain and we have a true leader in our coach. Our time will come"
Thinline.Post 09 Grand final.
- AccidentallyTim
- Club Player
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sun 10 Jan 2010 9:21pm
- Location: -41.426253°
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Who would come out for Baker?Bernard Shakey wrote:Bakes will play, but not on Harbrow. That job goes to Eddy.plugger66 wrote:Bakes was quick but any more. Chances of him playing are 1000 to 1 IMO.samoht wrote:We know Baker is quick .. it would be strange to see him forward, but could that be a match up ?
I thought Eddy would be the one because Dempster is the chosen one, I can't think of anyone else that would miss out tho
Fortius Quo Fidelius
Sorry that was supposed to be on Harbrow. Wouldnt have a clue if he will actually play but is 1000 to 1 to play on Harbrow if Harbrow plays back. BS seems to know he is playing. must be all that inside knowledge he gets.saint patrick wrote:Want a dollar on that at those odds Pluggerplugger66 wrote:Bakes was quick but any more. Chances of him playing are 1000 to 1 IMO.samoht wrote:We know Baker is quick .. it would be strange to see him forward, but could that be a match up ?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Mon 01 Sep 2008 10:46pm
Re: We must control Harbrow
samoht wrote:... he's averaged close to 40 rebounding possessions against us last 2 encounters. .. I think 38 and 36 running bouncing possessions to be exact.
We can't afford to let him do that again.
I hope RL has an effective plan for Harbrow this time around... or is he just relying on being 3rd time lucky ?
Can you explain this stat? Are you sayng he has had 38 and 36 bounces in our last two games or 38 and 36 posesions when he has bounced it or just 38 and 36 possesions?
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12720
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 404 times
Re: We must control Harbrow
38 and 36 disposalssaint vince wrote:samoht wrote:... he's averaged close to 40 rebounding possessions against us last 2 encounters. .. I think 38 and 36 running bouncing possessions to be exact.
We can't afford to let him do that again.
I hope RL has an effective plan for Harbrow this time around... or is he just relying on being 3rd time lucky ?
Can you explain this stat? Are you sayng he has had 38 and 36 bounces in our last two games or 38 and 36 posesions when he has bounced it or just 38 and 36 possesions?
amny of them running
some of them also bouncing the ball as he ran
- Bardon Saint
- Club Player
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Thu 27 Aug 2009 4:04pm
- Location: Cairns
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5767
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 586 times
- Been thanked: 436 times
- Contact:
Sydney recently kept Harbrow to 11 possessions - Roos had a plan to stop him - RL needs to do the same.
Maybe he should ring up his friend and get some tips ?
What concerns me is that Harbrow had 2 consecutive "blinders" against us - Why ? - as he probably "only" averages 20 possessions/game.
If we restrict him to 11 possessions (instead of 36 or 38) .. it'll be like finding another 25 plus possessions... we need to do it.
Maybe he should ring up his friend and get some tips ?
What concerns me is that Harbrow had 2 consecutive "blinders" against us - Why ? - as he probably "only" averages 20 possessions/game.
If we restrict him to 11 possessions (instead of 36 or 38) .. it'll be like finding another 25 plus possessions... we need to do it.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
I'd suggest - as some still think re Swan - that Lyon said 'well Harbrow may get 30, but something will only come of 5-10, therefore we'll focus our defensive attention elsewhere ie blokes who penetrate with accuracy forward of centre...samoht wrote:Sydney recently kept Harbrow to 11 possessions - Roos had a plan to stop him - RL needs to do the same.
Maybe he should ring up his friend and get some tips ?
What concerns me is that Harbrow had 2 consecutive "blinders" against us - Why ? - as he probably "only" averages 20 possessions/game.
If we restrict him to 11 possessions (instead of 36 or 38) .. it'll be like finding another 25 plus possessions... we need to do it.
But without Cooney, there's one less danger to quell, so Harbrow this time would get the clamps well and truly put on him. He won't like it either.
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
191 games, 34 goals. i can't remember the last time he kicked one - the stats say he hasn't kicked a goal since round 20, 2007. (though that's only 39 games because he missed 2008.)BonoRocks wrote:not as stupid as it sounds, he isnt a bad shot for goal id like to see eddy out and baker played forward.samoht wrote:We know Baker is quick .. it would be strange to see him forward, but could that be a match up ?
eddy should play and he, peake and mcqualter should rotate on harbrow, murphy and gilbee. if eddy, mcqualter or dempster are poor this week - and we get through - then bakes might have a shot for next week. but if he plays this week, he won't come up for next week - if we get through.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
v Freo in Launceston after the siren? Or was that a point?bergholt wrote:
191 games, 34 goals. i can't remember the last time he kicked one - the stats say he hasn't kicked a goal since round 20, 2007. (though that's only 39 games because he missed 2008.)
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
- ralphsmith
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2417
- Joined: Sat 25 Jul 2009 10:36pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
Re: We must control Harbrow
That's pretty staggering and also unacceptable.samoht wrote:... he's averaged close to 40 rebounding possessions against us last 2 encounters
Saints players have to be switched onto this and shut him down,
What is dead may never die, but rises again harder and stronger.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3792
- Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005 10:24pm
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5767
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 586 times
- Been thanked: 436 times
- Contact:
I reckon RL needs to play a close checking HF flanker on Harbrow (it could be Montagna or Eddy) and show him some due respect this time .. and make sure there's some close checking on Gilbee too for that matter.OneEyedSainter77 wrote:Stop him, yes. But not with Jones. If we are to win this game, Jones MUST go to Griffen. Easily their most damaging player and Jones can at least somewhat negate him. Maybe just let someone like Joey or Eddy go head to head with Harbrow.
Just restrict the rebound ! .. and prevent a leaking boat, as it undermines every other positive thing that we do.
Last edited by samoht on Fri 17 Sep 2010 2:30pm, edited 2 times in total.