Match Day Thread - Coll v StK

saintbob · Post: # 957799Post **saintbob** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:07pm

Sorry I forgot another one, Peake

saintkid · Post: # 957800Post **saintkid** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:09pm

saintbob wrote:Dawson, Pattison, Gram and McQualter have got to go!!!

I'm with you. Add Peake and Kos***ske to that list. He came back again to be MIA after 2 weeks off. His body language is pathetic as is most of the time. For his size he is a poor competitor.

Dan Warna · Post: # 957801Post **Dan Warna** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:11pm

4:10, we lost the game through bad kicking.

reverse of earlier round.

irony much?

matrix · Post: # 957802Post **matrix** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:11pm

chips 14 marks

kozi lining up
has 4 touches

Moccha · Post: # 957803Post **Moccha** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:11pm

Gilbert the butcher!

matrix · Post: # 957804Post **matrix** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:11pm

misses

yup
reverse of the previous clash

matrix · Post: # 957805Post **matrix** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:12pm

three qtr time
73 to 35

ralphsmith · Post: # 957806Post **ralphsmith** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:13pm

Dog of a day.

Dan Warna · Post: # 957807Post **Dan Warna** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:13pm

4:11 to finish the quarter....

35...LEGEND · Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:14pm

need the first 6 of the last.

sainter#4 · Post: # 957810Post **sainter#4** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:14pm

we did what collingwood did in round 3. very inaccurate.

but lets not take anything away from the pies they have been the better team so far

lurker#134 · Post: # 957811Post **lurker#134** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:15pm

If we have any slim chance at all its in the 4th. I don't really think so though.

Moccha · Post: # 957812Post **Moccha** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:15pm

Ppl talk about Peake's poor disposal but F*** me Gilbert makes him look like a wizard with the ball.

fingers · Post: # 957813Post **fingers** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:15pm

Woeful. Woeful day.

saintkid · Post: # 957814Post **saintkid** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:15pm

Dan Warna wrote:4:10, we lost the game through bad kicking.

reverse of earlier round.

irony much?

It was always catch up footy today Dan.

battye · Post: # 957815Post **battye** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:15pm

Just not our day.

What it shows is that we are lacking an "attacking" plan B. RL clearly has all of the tricks for other situations, but we don't often find ourselves in the situation of being 7 goals down.

For instance, in the last few minutes of the 3rd quarter, we simply should not be trying to go backwards and switch play, etc. We need goals, they need to take risks by going through the corridor and playing on at all costs. Kicking long even, just to get the ball in our forward line.

I suspect it's too late now to start playing that way as we are just too many goals down, but we will certainly take something out of this match. We need that "attacking" plan B.

Life Long Saint · Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:15pm

1.6 to 4.0

Could've been in with a real shot had we kicked straight.

Only 38 tackles to 3/4 time. Pretty ordinary!

degruch · Post: # 957817Post **degruch** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:16pm

ralphsmith wrote:Dog of a day.

Yep, too cute, lack concentration, not putting in the effort for some reason. Hopefully we have the ability to bounce back from this slap quickly, as the Hawks will fancy themselves next week.

wasaintsfan · Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:16pm

saints 1 goal 6 behinds in the 3rd

collingwood 4 goals straight

atleast 4 of our behinds were getable
shouldve been 5 goals 2 atleast that quarter

again we are our own worst enemy

collingwoods pressure has been pretty good but our decision making has been shocking

again handballing back into play even hayes is falling to the ground
in the packs theyve been hungrier

only way we gonna win this is if we flick the switch and straighten up infront of goal

theyve only had the same amount of chances as us at goal (taking out the rushed behinds)

Finna · Post: # 957819Post **Finna** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:17pm

saintkid wrote:
saintbob wrote:Dawson, Pattison, Gram and McQualter have got to go!!!
I'm with you. Add Peake and Kos***ske to that list. He came back again to be MIA after 2 weeks off. His body language is pathetic as is most of the time. For his size he is a poor competitor.

You guys are a f****** joke. It's been a bad day.

Get over it!

degruch · Post: # 957820Post **degruch** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:17pm

battye wrote:What it shows is that we are lacking an "attacking" plan B. RL clearly has all of the tricks for other situations, but we don't often find ourselves in the situation of being 7 goals down.

Had we kicked straight we wouldn't need an attacking plan B.

battye · Post: # 957821Post **battye** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:18pm

Life Long Saint wrote:1.6 to 4.0

Could've been in with a real shot had we kicked straight.

Only 38 tackles to 3/4 time. Pretty ordinary!

Collingwood have played very well, there is no doubt about that.

Having said that, there is no way they could have had any more luck in this game. That McQualter goal that bounced at right angles after being dead straight, Leon Davis getting a toe on that ball, that ridiculous holding the ball where play on was called when clearly a free kick was there for us, etc.

battye · Post: # 957822Post **battye** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:18pm

degruch wrote:
battye wrote:What it shows is that we are lacking an "attacking" plan B. RL clearly has all of the tricks for other situations, but we don't often find ourselves in the situation of being 7 goals down.
Had we kicked straight we wouldn't need an attacking plan B.

Clearly we do need that attacking plan B because we are in the situation right now where it is needed.

Badlands · Post: # 957823Post **Badlands** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:19pm

Can imagine there will be calls for 10 heads after this one but i'm pretty prepared to write this one off as just a dirty day at the office across the board - save for BJ who has been excellent.

A win was probably more important to Collingwood and in the end that's been evident in the contrasting performances. They've wanted it more today. Not that that is acceptable.

We've had some shocking skill errors, but if you were gonna sack those who've butchered it today there would be 15 changes next week. Collingwood's pressure has been too good for us today. But we'll bounce back.

Roo is still getting match fitness. We didn't take the risk with Dal. If we meet in the first week of the finals, I'd still be confident of turning things around.

Devilhead · Post: # 957824Post **Devilhead** » Sat 17 Jul 2010 5:19pm

A loss here means jackshit - they wont get near us in the finals - loving the fact that filth will now be installed as Premiership favourites and every d**khead expert will jump on their bandwagon - all of a sudden the pressure is off us and all on their shoulders