markp wrote:
Ok, so we're going from 'someone said' to it's a FACT?
Under the letter of contract law if there was offer and acceptance (and a text acceptance is corroborating evidence in a case like this), it is a FACT that it could be construed in a court of law as acceptance.
markp wrote:If it's a fact and in any way a legally binding one, we should sue.
Just like we should have made him see out his three months? pfft, haven't we had enough of off field, off season drama.
You really want to drag the whole club through a court case, while they are trying to get a new coach and get it up and going again, while all the time getting wonderful negative publicity?
Anyway what damages are you after? To make him honour the accepted contract?
markp wrote:And as far as integrity goes everyone is entitled to their views, I think it indicates he possibly had reason to feel justified in flipping the bird... and I'd like to hear what you think about the integrity of Mick Malthouse, and how you'd respond if he became our coach?!
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
You are entitled to that view.
As for Malthouse, I would think the way I feel about him now. He is a see you next tuesday, but would be a see you next tuesday in red, white and black.
I dont want the coach to be my friend, I never liked GT, was rude to my daughters when they asked for an autograph, never like Ross lyon, seemed like a joyless pr!ck, and wouldn't like Malthouse.
Really it doesn't bother me. I dont hate any of the above. Hate is a wasted emotion especially on people you dont know or situations you cant control.
cheers
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)