Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
even lockett during his ill-fated comeback attempt at the swans.evertonfc wrote:Harvey's not the first champion to be told he's past it: plenty ripped Carey, Ricciuto...and Brereton, too.
How could I forget!bigcarl wrote:even lockett during his ill-fated comeback attempt at the swans.evertonfc wrote:Harvey's not the first champion to be told he's past it: plenty ripped Carey, Ricciuto...and Brereton, too.
Agreed.to be perfectly truthful i was less than impressed with harvs's game against the bombers ... but not in the least surprised that "old father time" stepped up to the plate when it was in the balance on saturday night.
The lesson should be, FFS it's a praccy match!bigcarl wrote:
the lesson for gt and brereton is "never write off a champion".
chook23 wrote:The other two he mentioned Carey and Ablett Snr......Teflon wrote:"Robert Harvey is in the best 3 players Ive ever seen - you dont bag champions like that...."
Archer went on to say that the guys 36 yrs old - ofcourse hes working his way into the season what else do you expect?
Seriously - ALL Thomas cr@ppola aside - the biggest dills going round right now are Dermutt and Grant. To make ANY assertions on the back of 1 game is fanciful, lazy, half @ssed comment/opinion call it what you want.
Interesting to hear Harvey was quite annoyed by the comments - so he oughta be as Lyon said "the guys got credits in the bank".
So finally someone puts banger in front of Voss/Hird/Buckley
lets throw a party haha 
exactly. the st kilda civil war ended the day that the people who removed GT ... RB and his band of men ... walked before being voted from office.The Fireman wrote:fair dinkum some people need to let go, I am probably one of Bangers biggest fans but I had no problems with what GT had to say and find it unreal that some could use this thread to further their agenda against him. The incessant GT bashing is bordering on childishness .
There's still this little matter of a legal action and impending court case by the tosser who said he's never do anything to hurt the St.Kilda Football Club.bigcarl wrote:exactly. the st kilda civil war ended the day that the people who removed GT, RB and his band of men, walked before being voted from office.The Fireman wrote:fair dinkum some people need to let go, I am probably one of Bangers biggest fans but I had no problems with what GT had to say and find it unreal that some could use this thread to further their agenda against him. The incessant GT bashing is bordering on childishness .
the war is over people
and should never have been offered in the first place.barks4eva wrote:There's still this little matter of a legal action and impending court case by the tosser who said he's never do anything to hurt the St.Kilda Football Club.bigcarl wrote:exactly. the st kilda civil war ended the day that the people who removed GT, RB and his band of men, walked before being voted from office.The Fireman wrote:fair dinkum some people need to let go, I am probably one of Bangers biggest fans but I had no problems with what GT had to say and find it unreal that some could use this thread to further their agenda against him. The incessant GT bashing is bordering on childishness .
the war is over people
You know the arsewipe who refused to settle for $100,000 + of hush money which was offered by Butterss to Thomas for doing nothing more than keeping quiet
This was rejected by big fat greedy guts, because he also wants $168,000 in holiday pay, even though he already signed a stat dec stating he wasn't owed any holiday pay and this coming from the whizz bang negotiator who insisted on doing all the player contracts.
FAIR DINKUM
Re GT , Barks i think you do a copy and paste job in your notes.barks4eva wrote:There's still this little matter of a legal action and impending court case by the tosser who said he's never do anything to hurt the St.Kilda Football Club.bigcarl wrote:exactly. the st kilda civil war ended the day that the people who removed GT, RB and his band of men, walked before being voted from office.The Fireman wrote:fair dinkum some people need to let go, I am probably one of Bangers biggest fans but I had no problems with what GT had to say and find it unreal that some could use this thread to further their agenda against him. The incessant GT bashing is bordering on childishness .
the war is over people
You know the arsewipe who refused to settle for $100,000 + of hush money which was offered by Butterss to Thomas for doing nothing more than keeping quiet
This was rejected by big fat greedy guts, because he also wants $168,000 in holiday pay, even though he already signed a stat dec stating he wasn't owed any holiday pay and this coming from the whizz bang negotiator who insisted on doing all the player contracts.
FAIR DINKUM
How does that relate to what Thomas said about Harvey?spert wrote:Clearly GT didn't know what championship qualities were when he was coach..it's a bit hard to concede the excellence in others when your ego is so big. The fact is that Harvey would have walked into any premiership team in any era and would have been regarded as an all time great -he is anyway.
.saintbrat wrote:http://insidefootballonline.com/burke.html
.
Harvey responds in great fashion
I don’t want to say I told you so, but to all you Muppets out there that doubted Robert Harvey and his ability to play the game at the age of 37, suffer in your jocks. We have been told so many times to never ever knock a champion because as soon as you do they will turn around and prove you wrong. It was only eight days ago when many were criticising Harvey and his decision to play this season because his form against Essendon had been below par. “He looks like he’s running in gumbootsâ€
Fact is dodgy, if the fat pig had his way, he would have exited Harvey out two years ago, THAT SAYS IT ALL REALLY, should be enough even for apologist's such as yourself.rodgerfox wrote:
How does that relate to what Thomas said about Harvey?
Did you hear what he said?
Huh??barks4eva wrote:Fact is dodgy, if the fat pig had his way, he would have exited Harvey out two years ago, THAT SAYS IT ALL REALLY, should be enough even for apologist's such as yourself.rodgerfox wrote:
How does that relate to what Thomas said about Harvey?
Did you hear what he said?
Get it, if Thomas was still coaching, it's more than likely Harvey would be retired for a whole host of reasons.
Thankfully we have a coach who truly repsects the legend/champion that Robert Harvey is and continues to be.
The measure of Harvey's worth is not simply all about how many times he gets the ball, even though he still finds it quite a bit, but is also the spiritual high and the aura that he creates by his mere presence, these are the intangible's that are seemingly lost on the slimy, megalomaniacal, machavelian maestro, svengali snakeoil salesman, know nothing numbnutted, nuffie, buffoon and pissant, Grunt Thomarse.
It doesn't suprise me that a laterally challenged nuffie like you dodgy would not be able to connect the dots.rodgerfox wrote:Huh??barks4eva wrote:Fact is dodgy, if the fat pig had his way, he would have exited Harvey out two years ago, THAT SAYS IT ALL REALLY, should be enough even for apologist's such as yourself.rodgerfox wrote:
How does that relate to what Thomas said about Harvey?
Did you hear what he said?
Get it, if Thomas was still coaching, it's more than likely Harvey would be retired for a whole host of reasons.
Thankfully we have a coach who truly repsects the legend/champion that Robert Harvey is and continues to be.
The measure of Harvey's worth is not simply all about how many times he gets the ball, even though he still finds it quite a bit, but is also the spiritual high and the aura that he creates by his mere presence, these are the intangible's that are seemingly lost on the slimy, megalomaniacal, machavelian maestro, svengali snakeoil salesman, know nothing numbnutted, nuffie, buffoon and pissant, Grunt Thomarse.
Where did that come from?
Did you accidentally respond to the wrong post?
I don't know how any of that is relevant??
My apologies.barks4eva wrote:
It doesn't suprise me that a laterally challenged nuffie like you dodgy would not be able to connect the dots.
Let me make it simple for you, as obviously that's what is required for you to have any chance whatsoever of understanding anything.
The topic is about Thomas's opinion and assessment of Robert Harvey as an AFL footballer.
You still following, still with me?
Ok, the post I made was about how even two years ago, Thomas was trying to exit out Robert Harvey, such was his then negative opinion of Harvey's continued worth as an AFL footballer.
This getting too hard for you?
Please let me know if you're up to speed, before I bother trying to educate you any further, ok
