Did we over achieve
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
f****** underachieved imhfo...should have won in 2009.....and could have...should have won once they hit the front in gf 1 last year.....so..to answer your question.....no....
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
-
samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5767
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 586 times
- Been thanked: 436 times
- Contact:
I reckon we got the most out of our team last year.
Our side as a whole was greater than its individual parts.
While not overachieving, we achieved the maximum - whereas teams like Essendon underachieved.
Essendon as a whole was less than its individual parts.
As a side ..
We are nowhere near as skilled or as quick as we need to be and we have an average forward line. We don't have great ruckmen to give us first use of the ball.
But our backline and game plan was enough to counter our deficiencies.
This year we will need to achieve our maximum again... but we need some help from our forwards - more forward pressure.
Our forwards don't kick enough goals - but can't they at least apply some more pressure to stop the easy rebounds and help the rest of our team out - especially now that we are without Hayes.
Forward pressure is the area where we can squeeze some more improvement from.
Our side as a whole was greater than its individual parts.
While not overachieving, we achieved the maximum - whereas teams like Essendon underachieved.
Essendon as a whole was less than its individual parts.
As a side ..
We are nowhere near as skilled or as quick as we need to be and we have an average forward line. We don't have great ruckmen to give us first use of the ball.
But our backline and game plan was enough to counter our deficiencies.
This year we will need to achieve our maximum again... but we need some help from our forwards - more forward pressure.
Our forwards don't kick enough goals - but can't they at least apply some more pressure to stop the easy rebounds and help the rest of our team out - especially now that we are without Hayes.
Forward pressure is the area where we can squeeze some more improvement from.
-
spert
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9000
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 416 times
Agree- in 09 if we had a better effort from the forward line as a unit instead of a couple of flankers trying to do the work, we would have won easily. Kosi played like a schoolboy footballer, Roo got beaten on the day, Milne went missing.. But it is all history and we lost. Geelong had a better team effort on the day. Lets look forward, as again in 2010, those weaknesses let us down..too much left to too few in the biggest game of the year. No evidence in 2011 yet, that we have a good team effort going on...here's hopingTeflon wrote:we didnt lose due to a toe poke...we lost as we failed to take our chances in front of goal - see Schneiders inside the goal square FFS and missing...Behind Play wrote:NO!!!! We were the best team in 2009 and last year we worked hard to reach the GF.
Really, we lost 2009 because of a luck toe poke from Scarlet and last year was an unlucky bounce.
