do we need our own signs ?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Wrote for Luck
- Club Player
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 8:33am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: do we need our own signs ?
injections, I've had a few, but then again, too few to mention
Pills 'n' Thrills and Heartaches
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8574
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 525 times
- Been thanked: 1526 times
Re: do we need our own signs ?
We can't afford drugs!
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
Re: do we need our own signs ?
Scott Watters did his apprenticeship, actually went the path of learning his craft.Bernard Shakey wrote:SainterK wrote:I don't agree.
He said things like I'm looking forward to having my say etc etc.
It wasn't until he made the front page that he said 'I can't wait until clearing MY name'
Seems to me the only say he can have is his say, and the only name he can clear is his own name. If his name was Scott Watters what would you say?
Those red white and black glasses are showing your irrational bias and complete intolerance of any thing but St Kilda. Very sad!
He knows what is the 'norm' at AFL club level, because he has actually ensured he is familiar with what goes on at club level in the last decade.
Irregular practices?
Least our coach has an idea of what is regular.
None of this if it was Scott Watters business.
It isn't Scott Watters.
He didn't put papers in front of Saints players, press upon them that they weren't doing anything wrong, admit to 'pushing the boundaries' of what's deemed acceptable.
I don't particularly care if Hird employed Danks or not, you make sure that when YOU ask players to sign idemnity forms to inject things into the body intravenously and via needles, when words like borderline and WADA are used....that YOU'RE encouraging YOUR BOYS to put their trust in someone of good character.
I think Essendon are actually putting together a team and a gameplan to make them a powerhouse of the competition sooner rather than later. Think BJ is an amazing addition to their lineup. They are very strong across every line of their list. They could easily with the premiership this year. How is that for irrational bias?
More the shame that someone in their haste to get to the top, may of completely stuffed that up.
Last edited by SainterK on Wed 17 Apr 2013 12:03am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: do we need our own signs ?
Either do I, when it's our home gamebigred wrote:I don't mind if the supporters stand by their coach.
We would do the same I reckon. Hell knows we have had our share of off field drama in recent times. Very happy its not us for once.
This will come out in the wash. No hiding from this shyte.
Re: do we need our own signs ?
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
Re: do we need our own signs ?
innocent until proven guilty i say....
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: do we need our own signs ?
And there's our sign right therematrix wrote:so hird didnt know what the players were taking plugger????
pull the other one
- Dis Believer
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5083
- Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:42pm
- Location: The terraces at Moorabbin, in the pouring rain.......
- Has thanked: 250 times
- Been thanked: 270 times
Re: do we need our own signs ?
Dr Spaceman wrote:And there's our sign right therematrix wrote:so hird didnt know what the players were taking plugger????
pull the other one
Loving your work Doc.......
The heavy metal artist formerly known as True Believer!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
Re: do we need our own signs ?
With thanks to Tammy Wynette
Stand by Your Hird
Sometimes its hard to be a Bomber
Giving all your love to just one man
You'll have bad juice
And he'll have good juice
Taking things that you don't understand
But if you love him you'll forgive him
Even though he's hard to understand
And if you love him
Oh be proud of him
'Cause after all he's just a Bomber
Stand by your Hird
Give him two veins to cling to
And something warm to come to
When nights are cold and lonely
Stand by your Hird
And tell Andy D you love him
Keep giving all the love you can
Stand by your Hird
Stand by your Hird
And show the world you love him
Keep giving all the love you can
Stand by your man
Stand by Your Hird
Sometimes its hard to be a Bomber
Giving all your love to just one man
You'll have bad juice
And he'll have good juice
Taking things that you don't understand
But if you love him you'll forgive him
Even though he's hard to understand
And if you love him
Oh be proud of him
'Cause after all he's just a Bomber
Stand by your Hird
Give him two veins to cling to
And something warm to come to
When nights are cold and lonely
Stand by your Hird
And tell Andy D you love him
Keep giving all the love you can
Stand by your Hird
Stand by your Hird
And show the world you love him
Keep giving all the love you can
Stand by your man
Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
Re: do we need our own signs ?
dragit wrote:nice one… changed your tune from the Lovett case then… "Not guilty, does not mean innocent"stinger wrote:innocent until proven guilty i say....
no....not at all..this is entirely different...stand by that comment re lovett......the girl was pissed out of her mind....and asleep....if a jury acquits the prick...well lucky him...doesn't mean that he was innocent.....you can believe what you like.....
in scotland they have an alterative verdict...not proven.......doesn't mean innocent...never has...and never will.....huge gap between proven beyond all reasonable doubt and innocent.......
...anyway...you trying to have a pissing contest with me..??? if you are...i'm not interested.....your preoccupation with posts of mine made years or months ago makes you appear a bit unhinged...imhfo......i would not have noticed you at all if you hadn't been taking the odd pot shot at me...and i certainly can't recall any post of yours older than a couple of days....
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: do we need our own signs ?
That really hurts that you don't remember my posts stinger.stinger wrote:dragit wrote:nice one… changed your tune from the Lovett case then… "Not guilty, does not mean innocent"stinger wrote:innocent until proven guilty i say....
no....not at all..this is entirely different...stand by that comment re lovett......the girl was pissed out of her mind....and asleep....if a jury acquits the prick...well lucky him...doesn't mean that he was innocent.....you can believe what you like.....
in scotland they have an alterative verdict...not proven.......doesn't mean innocent...never has...and never will.....huge gap between proven beyond all reasonable doubt and innocent.......
...anyway...you trying to have a pissing contest with me..??? if you are...i'm not interested.....your preoccupation with posts of mine made years or months ago makes you appear a bit unhinged...imhfo......i would not have noticed you at all if you hadn't been taking the odd pot shot at me...and i certainly can't recall any post of yours older than a couple of days....
Im not having a go at you, just find it interesting that with one criminal investigation you can make a call on someone, but with Hird, you will give him full benefit of the doubt & declare him innocent until proven guilty. Why is that?
Don't take everything so personally mate, I remembered your differing stance on a past criminal investigation, no big deal.
I'm not prepared to give golden boy the being it of the doubt because he won a brownlow & everyone says he is a great bloke... In with Con on this, looks to be a blatant attempt to give their players a performance by hiring a guy famous for dodgy practices. The notion that Hird was oblivious to these "high risk "practices is absolute BS.
- evertonfc
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7261
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
- Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
- Has thanked: 115 times
- Been thanked: 267 times
- Contact:
Re: do we need our own signs ?
Let's just win the match, get to 2-2, which puts us within reach of them at 3-1.
If we lose, we'll be 1-3, they'll be 4-0.
I refuse to bow to their levels and engage with anything drug-related. Let's show class on the field and in the stands.
If we lose, we'll be 1-3, they'll be 4-0.
I refuse to bow to their levels and engage with anything drug-related. Let's show class on the field and in the stands.
Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Tue 07 Feb 2012 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 4 times
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Re: do we need our own signs ?
See the Bombres shoot up
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
Re: do we need our own signs ?
Sorry officer I didn't realize I was speeding. What sort of load of crap world do you live in? I didn't know what I was being injected with. Dream on, are you saying there was 40 odd players THAT stupid?plugger66 wrote:Con Gorozidis wrote:Thats convenient! What about if Watters hires some top notch sports scientists from some NFL clubs in the US and says ok guys - do your best to get the best results for these players and just dont tell me any details of what youre doing.plugger66 wrote:
I reckon he has said many things. He doesnt know what the players were given. he knows what he has taken.
Are you cool with that approach? If so LETS JUST GO NUTS SAINTS!
According to you as long as the players and coaches dont know the precise details of what they are taking its open the floodgates and JUICE UP. If that approach was allowed every single club would be jumping straight through that loophole with relish.
The Bombers players will all have been briefed to say one thing to asada.
"yes we took injections but it was just amino acids'
They will all stick to this hymn sheet hand hope that asada dont have any +ve tests.
In reality i believe they were taking aod9604. But if all the players say the same thing "amino acids" then they will try and worm their way out of this.
Con you are talking rubbish. Show me one post where I have said anything like that. You are very emotive but not making a lot of sense. And yes i do beleive the players had no idea what they were getting injected with. And I also think ASADA are a little more professional than you give them credit for.
It will come down to, is it a banned substance YET.
Bombers cheated and they got caught now its a matter of if there's
A `Its a banned substance
B Proof of taking it
C its not a banned substance yet
Re: do we need our own signs ?
Playon wrote:Sorry officer I didn't realize I was speeding. What sort of load of crap world do you live in? I didn't know what I was being injected with. Dream on, are you saying there was 40 odd players THAT stupid?plugger66 wrote:Con Gorozidis wrote:
Thats convenient! What about if Watters hires some top notch sports scientists from some NFL clubs in the US and says ok guys - do your best to get the best results for these players and just dont tell me any details of what youre doing.
Are you cool with that approach? If so LETS JUST GO NUTS SAINTS!
According to you as long as the players and coaches dont know the precise details of what they are taking its open the floodgates and JUICE UP. If that approach was allowed every single club would be jumping straight through that loophole with relish.
The Bombers players will all have been briefed to say one thing to asada.
"yes we took injections but it was just amino acids'
They will all stick to this hymn sheet hand hope that asada dont have any +ve tests.
In reality i believe they were taking aod9604. But if all the players say the same thing "amino acids" then they will try and worm their way out of this.
Con you are talking rubbish. Show me one post where I have said anything like that. You are very emotive but not making a lot of sense. And yes i do beleive the players had no idea what they were getting injected with. And I also think ASADA are a little more professional than you give them credit for.
It will come down to, is it a banned substance YET.
Bombers cheated and they got caught now its a matter of if there's
A `Its a banned substance
B Proof of taking it
C its not a banned substance yet
Did I say they shouldnt be penalised if they took something illegal? No but I stand by that they would not have known. Do you think that 40 players would cheat? I dont. They were told it was legal as was the club. Why would they then doubt it. If a player gets pain killing injection, the player doesnt test it first. he trusts the people the club have employed.
Re: do we need our own signs ?
He trusts James Hird, and James Hird trusts Stephen Dank....oh, hang on.
Re: do we need our own signs ?
SainterK wrote:He trusts James Hird, and James Hird trusts Stephen Dank....oh, hang on.
Who is he? I dont even know James Hird so it cant be me.