do we need our own signs ?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320097Post gringo »

so I can't make a sign saying "stand in turd"


defacto
Club Player
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2010 1:47pm

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320101Post defacto »

how about a simple "say no danks to drugs"


User avatar
Wrote for Luck
Club Player
Posts: 1519
Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 8:33am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320106Post Wrote for Luck »

injections, I've had a few, but then again, too few to mention


Pills 'n' Thrills and Heartaches
User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8574
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 1526 times

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320115Post kosifantutti »

We can't afford drugs!


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320118Post SainterK »

Bernard Shakey wrote:
SainterK wrote:I don't agree.

He said things like I'm looking forward to having my say etc etc.

It wasn't until he made the front page that he said 'I can't wait until clearing MY name'

Seems to me the only say he can have is his say, and the only name he can clear is his own name. If his name was Scott Watters what would you say?

Those red white and black glasses are showing your irrational bias and complete intolerance of any thing but St Kilda. Very sad!
Scott Watters did his apprenticeship, actually went the path of learning his craft.

He knows what is the 'norm' at AFL club level, because he has actually ensured he is familiar with what goes on at club level in the last decade.

Irregular practices?

Least our coach has an idea of what is regular.

None of this if it was Scott Watters business.

It isn't Scott Watters.

He didn't put papers in front of Saints players, press upon them that they weren't doing anything wrong, admit to 'pushing the boundaries' of what's deemed acceptable.

I don't particularly care if Hird employed Danks or not, you make sure that when YOU ask players to sign idemnity forms to inject things into the body intravenously and via needles, when words like borderline and WADA are used....that YOU'RE encouraging YOUR BOYS to put their trust in someone of good character.

I think Essendon are actually putting together a team and a gameplan to make them a powerhouse of the competition sooner rather than later. Think BJ is an amazing addition to their lineup. They are very strong across every line of their list. They could easily with the premiership this year. How is that for irrational bias?

More the shame that someone in their haste to get to the top, may of completely stuffed that up.
Last edited by SainterK on Wed 17 Apr 2013 12:03am, edited 1 time in total.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320119Post SainterK »

bigred wrote:I don't mind if the supporters stand by their coach.

We would do the same I reckon. Hell knows we have had our share of off field drama in recent times. Very happy its not us for once.

This will come out in the wash. No hiding from this shyte.
Either do I, when it's our home game :)


joffaboy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 20200
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:57pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320122Post joffaboy »

Image


Image


Lance or James??

There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320188Post matrix »

so hird didnt know what the players were taking plugger????

pull the other one


User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320191Post stinger »

innocent until proven guilty i say....


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320196Post dragit »

stinger wrote:innocent until proven guilty i say....
nice one… changed your tune from the Lovett case then… "Not guilty, does not mean innocent"


User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320201Post Dr Spaceman »

matrix wrote:so hird didnt know what the players were taking plugger????

pull the other one
And there's our sign right there :P


User avatar
Dis Believer
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5083
Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:42pm
Location: The terraces at Moorabbin, in the pouring rain.......
Has thanked: 250 times
Been thanked: 270 times

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320205Post Dis Believer »

Dr Spaceman wrote:
matrix wrote:so hird didnt know what the players were taking plugger????

pull the other one
And there's our sign right there :P

Loving your work Doc....... :D


The heavy metal artist formerly known as True Believer!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
Richter
SS Life Member
Posts: 3914
Joined: Wed 30 Nov 2005 1:18pm
Location: Elwood

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320236Post Richter »

With thanks to Tammy Wynette

Stand by Your Hird

Sometimes its hard to be a Bomber
Giving all your love to just one man

You'll have bad juice
And he'll have good juice

Taking things that you don't understand
But if you love him you'll forgive him

Even though he's hard to understand

And if you love him
Oh be proud of him
'Cause after all he's just a Bomber

Stand by your Hird
Give him two veins to cling to
And something warm to come to
When nights are cold and lonely

Stand by your Hird
And tell Andy D you love him
Keep giving all the love you can
Stand by your Hird
Stand by your Hird
And show the world you love him
Keep giving all the love you can

Stand by your man


Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320241Post stinger »

dragit wrote:
stinger wrote:innocent until proven guilty i say....
nice one… changed your tune from the Lovett case then… "Not guilty, does not mean innocent"



no....not at all..this is entirely different...stand by that comment re lovett......the girl was pissed out of her mind....and asleep....if a jury acquits the prick...well lucky him...doesn't mean that he was innocent.....you can believe what you like.....





in scotland they have an alterative verdict...not proven.......doesn't mean innocent...never has...and never will.....huge gap between proven beyond all reasonable doubt and innocent.......

...anyway...you trying to have a pissing contest with me..??? if you are...i'm not interested.....your preoccupation with posts of mine made years or months ago makes you appear a bit unhinged...imhfo......i would not have noticed you at all if you hadn't been taking the odd pot shot at me...and i certainly can't recall any post of yours older than a couple of days.... :roll:


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320250Post dragit »

stinger wrote:
dragit wrote:
stinger wrote:innocent until proven guilty i say....
nice one… changed your tune from the Lovett case then… "Not guilty, does not mean innocent"



no....not at all..this is entirely different...stand by that comment re lovett......the girl was pissed out of her mind....and asleep....if a jury acquits the prick...well lucky him...doesn't mean that he was innocent.....you can believe what you like.....





in scotland they have an alterative verdict...not proven.......doesn't mean innocent...never has...and never will.....huge gap between proven beyond all reasonable doubt and innocent.......

...anyway...you trying to have a pissing contest with me..??? if you are...i'm not interested.....your preoccupation with posts of mine made years or months ago makes you appear a bit unhinged...imhfo......i would not have noticed you at all if you hadn't been taking the odd pot shot at me...and i certainly can't recall any post of yours older than a couple of days.... :roll:
That really hurts that you don't remember my posts stinger.

Im not having a go at you, just find it interesting that with one criminal investigation you can make a call on someone, but with Hird, you will give him full benefit of the doubt & declare him innocent until proven guilty. Why is that?

Don't take everything so personally mate, I remembered your differing stance on a past criminal investigation, no big deal.

I'm not prepared to give golden boy the being it of the doubt because he won a brownlow & everyone says he is a great bloke... In with Con on this, looks to be a blatant attempt to give their players a performance by hiring a guy famous for dodgy practices. The notion that Hird was oblivious to these "high risk "practices is absolute BS.


User avatar
evertonfc
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7261
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 267 times
Contact:

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320263Post evertonfc »

Let's just win the match, get to 2-2, which puts us within reach of them at 3-1.

If we lose, we'll be 1-3, they'll be 4-0.

I refuse to bow to their levels and engage with anything drug-related. Let's show class on the field and in the stands.


Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.

Image
oh when the
Club Player
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue 07 Feb 2012 1:03pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320339Post oh when the »

Maybe we can get the #5 pig to run on the ground.


User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320343Post Enrico_Misso »

See the Bombres shoot up


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
Playon
Club Player
Posts: 1959
Joined: Sun 16 Oct 2011 11:10am

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320348Post Playon »

plugger66 wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:
plugger66 wrote:

I reckon he has said many things. He doesnt know what the players were given. he knows what he has taken.
Thats convenient! What about if Watters hires some top notch sports scientists from some NFL clubs in the US and says ok guys - do your best to get the best results for these players and just dont tell me any details of what youre doing.

Are you cool with that approach? If so LETS JUST GO NUTS SAINTS!

According to you as long as the players and coaches dont know the precise details of what they are taking its open the floodgates and JUICE UP. If that approach was allowed every single club would be jumping straight through that loophole with relish.

The Bombers players will all have been briefed to say one thing to asada.

"yes we took injections but it was just amino acids'

They will all stick to this hymn sheet hand hope that asada dont have any +ve tests.

In reality i believe they were taking aod9604. But if all the players say the same thing "amino acids" then they will try and worm their way out of this.

Con you are talking rubbish. Show me one post where I have said anything like that. You are very emotive but not making a lot of sense. And yes i do beleive the players had no idea what they were getting injected with. And I also think ASADA are a little more professional than you give them credit for.
Sorry officer I didn't realize I was speeding. What sort of load of crap world do you live in? I didn't know what I was being injected with. Dream on, are you saying there was 40 odd players THAT stupid?
It will come down to, is it a banned substance YET.

Bombers cheated and they got caught now its a matter of if there's
A `Its a banned substance
B Proof of taking it
C its not a banned substance yet


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320364Post plugger66 »

Playon wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:



Thats convenient! What about if Watters hires some top notch sports scientists from some NFL clubs in the US and says ok guys - do your best to get the best results for these players and just dont tell me any details of what youre doing.

Are you cool with that approach? If so LETS JUST GO NUTS SAINTS!

According to you as long as the players and coaches dont know the precise details of what they are taking its open the floodgates and JUICE UP. If that approach was allowed every single club would be jumping straight through that loophole with relish.

The Bombers players will all have been briefed to say one thing to asada.

"yes we took injections but it was just amino acids'

They will all stick to this hymn sheet hand hope that asada dont have any +ve tests.

In reality i believe they were taking aod9604. But if all the players say the same thing "amino acids" then they will try and worm their way out of this.

Con you are talking rubbish. Show me one post where I have said anything like that. You are very emotive but not making a lot of sense. And yes i do beleive the players had no idea what they were getting injected with. And I also think ASADA are a little more professional than you give them credit for.
Sorry officer I didn't realize I was speeding. What sort of load of crap world do you live in? I didn't know what I was being injected with. Dream on, are you saying there was 40 odd players THAT stupid?
It will come down to, is it a banned substance YET.

Bombers cheated and they got caught now its a matter of if there's
A `Its a banned substance
B Proof of taking it
C its not a banned substance yet

Did I say they shouldnt be penalised if they took something illegal? No but I stand by that they would not have known. Do you think that 40 players would cheat? I dont. They were told it was legal as was the club. Why would they then doubt it. If a player gets pain killing injection, the player doesnt test it first. he trusts the people the club have employed.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320377Post SainterK »

He trusts James Hird, and James Hird trusts Stephen Dank....oh, hang on.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: do we need our own signs ?

Post: # 1320382Post plugger66 »

SainterK wrote:He trusts James Hird, and James Hird trusts Stephen Dank....oh, hang on.

Who is he? I dont even know James Hird so it cant be me.


Post Reply