some are there ,some are not,its that we have only 4,which I find frustratingThe Redeemer wrote:Poor umpiring from the overpaid fuckwits.CURLY wrote:Its just blatant rubbish 15/4.
Why oh why? Just blatant.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
bergsone
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2905
- Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2008 4:56pm
- Location: victoria
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 116 times
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
-
CURLY
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9645
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
When Ray and Milne where landed on flat in the back early and no free I thought ok there letting it go tonight . Then all of a sudden bang two soft in the backs to North.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
CURLY wrote:When Ray and Milne where landed on flat in the back early and no free I thought ok there letting it go tonight . Then all of a sudden bang two soft in the backs to North.
You start a topis every week on this and normally its because we play a bigger side and they cheat in your opinion. love to know what crap you will come up with tonight.
-
CURLY
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9645
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
New rule can't go third man up against North. Loved the treatment Riewoldt has received.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
CURLY wrote:New rule can't go third man up against North. Loved the treatment Riewoldt has received.
You dont understand the game but comedy is a strong point.
-
CURLY
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9645
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
Is that all you've got to defend that horrendous decision?plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:New rule can't go third man up against North. Loved the treatment Riewoldt has received.
You dont understand the game but comedy is a strong point.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
CURLY wrote:Is that all you've got to defend that horrendous decision?plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:New rule can't go third man up against North. Loved the treatment Riewoldt has received.
You dont understand the game but comedy is a strong point.
They arent because you dont understand the game. You actually have no idea what is happening in the game apart from with the umps.
-
CURLY
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9645
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
I am in a thread about umpires thats why i am commenting on them. Tonight again they. Have been shithiuse.. The free ti Goldstein was horrendous.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
CURLY wrote:I am in a thread about umpires thats why i am commenting on them. Tonight again they. Have been shithiuse.. The free ti Goldstein was horrendous.
And again I ask are they cheating or are they just incorrect or just maybe you dont understand the rules and also watch the game completely through one eye?
-
CURLY
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9645
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
Well i hope its cheating.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:I am in a thread about umpires thats why i am commenting on them. Tonight again they. Have been shithiuse.. The free ti Goldstein was horrendous.
And again I ask are they cheating or are they just incorrect or just maybe you dont understand the rules and also watch the game completely through one eye?
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
CURLY wrote:Well i hope its cheating.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:I am in a thread about umpires thats why i am commenting on them. Tonight again they. Have been shithiuse.. The free ti Goldstein was horrendous.
And again I ask are they cheating or are they just incorrect or just maybe you dont understand the rules and also watch the game completely through one eye?
Well I hope you have only one eye.
-
CURLY
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9645
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
24/11. No more baffling free than the free against McEvoy when he went third up. First three goals to North from free kicks and zero frees in the first to Stkilda .
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
CURLY wrote:24/11. No more baffling free than the free against McEvoy when he went third up. First three goals to North from free kicks and zero frees in the first to Stkilda .
If it's the one im thinking of the free was actually against hickey not mcevoy.
-
CURLY
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9645
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
That's the one Ray just made a rule up.Griggsy wrote:CURLY wrote:24/11. No more baffling free than the free against McEvoy when he went third up. First three goals to North from free kicks and zero frees in the first to Stkilda .
If it's the one im thinking of the free was actually against hickey not mcevoy.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
st.byron
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
Pleased to see Curly's weekly "The umpires are biased/cheating/against us" thread. Keep up the good work. It's clearly the reason we're losing so many games. And only you can see it. If only they'd listen......
-
CURLY
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9645
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
Where loosing as where no good. The umpires are poor at best tonight was rubbish.st.byron wrote:Pleased to see Curly's weekly "The umpires are biased/cheating/against us" thread. Keep up the good work. It's clearly the reason we're losing so many games. And only you can see it. If only they'd listen......
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
st.byron
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
CURLY wrote:Where loosing as where no good. The umpires are poor at best tonight was rubbish.st.byron wrote:Pleased to see Curly's weekly "The umpires are biased/cheating/against us" thread. Keep up the good work. It's clearly the reason we're losing so many games. And only you can see it. If only they'd listen......
The thing is Curly that every week you trot out the same stuff about the umpires no matter who we play. When we played the Filth or Bummers or someone you reckon is the AFL's love child then you pin their deliberate cheating on that. But when we play North for example, they're cheating why? Just for the sake of it? Does the AFL have an anti-St.Kilda agenda and they've ordered the umpires to be biased against us? How does it work exactly since every week you roll out the same stuff regardless of who we play yet sometimes you say it's because of who we're playing?
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
No it's just incompetent. And for the money they are payed we should be getting better value.plugger66 wrote:Its rigged.
I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
-
CURLY
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9645
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
st.byron wrote:CURLY wrote:Where loosing as where no good. The umpires are poor at best tonight was rubbish.st.byron wrote:Pleased to see Curly's weekly "The umpires are biased/cheating/against us" thread. Keep up the good work. It's clearly the reason we're losing so many games. And only you can see it. If only they'd listen......
The thing is Curly that every week you trot out the same stuff about the umpires no matter who we play. When we played the Filth or Bummers or someone you reckon is the AFL's love child then you pin their deliberate cheating on that. But when we play North for example, they're cheating why? Just for the sake of it? Does the AFL have an anti-St.Kilda agenda and they've ordered the umpires to be biased against us? How does it work exactly since every week. you roll out the same stuff regardless of who we play yet sometimes you say it's because of who we're playing?
Where an easy target. No team was even close to the differential in free kick numbers again this round. The frees they got today where ignored our way. The ruck free against Hickey was so poor it was amaturish.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
st.byron
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
CURLY wrote:
Where an easy target. No team was even close to the differential in free kick numbers again this round. The frees they got today where ignored our way. The ruck free against Hickey was so poor it was amaturish.
Yep. OK. Great answer. Thanks for clearing that up.
-
CURLY
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9645
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
Ok you explain how Lindsy Thomas averages nearly more frees per game than Milne has got this year. Why did North get more goals from frees in the first quarter than we got frees in the first half.st.byron wrote:CURLY wrote:
Where an easy target. No team was even close to the differential in free kick numbers again this round. The frees they got today where ignored our way. The ruck free against Hickey was so poor it was amaturish.
Yep. OK. Great answer. Thanks for clearing that up.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
8856brother
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
- Location: Twin Peaks
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
I stopped watching after Roo dropped a chest mark in the first 10 seconds and they got 4 frees in their forwars fifty in next first five minutes follopwing that.
Did we lose???
Did we lose???
_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
8856brother wrote:I stopped watching after Roo dropped a chest mark in the first 10 seconds and they got 4 frees in their forwars fifty in next first five minutes follopwing that.
Did we lose???
No.
-
gringo
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Why oh why? Just blatant.
At the ground it was so frustrating. At one point the north defender was elbowing rooey as hard as he could in his stomach Roo asked the umpire about it and the ump asked Rooey what he could do about it. I was behind the point post when Roo marked and was clearly in the field of play but two umps deliberated and f it up. I thi k they must be on the take because it was comically bad at times.