Should the team be going to Colorado again?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364727Post dragit »

WinnersOnly wrote:
dragit wrote:Pretty commonly accepted that high altitude training takes a number of years to show results… so only a complete nuffy would point to this year as a reason not to continue with it...
Yeah more common results shown from teams with stand alone VFL sides have follow on AFL success eg Geelong, Pies Swans only a complete motard would overlook that 'dragit'.
Motard I like that… not sure what it is… but it has a good ring to it… I'll bank that one…

You do realise there are only 3 sides with a standalone VFL team yeah? One forced a rule change of the F/S system, anothe has one flag after drawing with us & the other is about to be de-registered for systematic drug cheating… probably not quite a large enough sample group to conclude much, just saying.

Hawthorn. just saying.


User avatar
WinnersOnly
SS Life Member
Posts: 3059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
Location: Canberra

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364736Post WinnersOnly »

Actually there is 7 Lions, Suns, pies, cats, bombers, swans & GWS with Bulldogs, Power & crows soon to follow, then we will be the minority.


SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364741Post dragit »

WinnersOnly wrote:Actually there is 7 Lions, Suns, pies, cats, bombers, swans & GWS with Bulldogs, Power & crows soon to follow, then we will be the minority.
Okay so currently 4 in the top 8 & 3 outside the top 8... At any rate, I don't think anyone is against having our own VFL side, but as mentioned, it isn't our trip to Colorado holding us back... And suggesting that we aren't suddenly seeing results yet is going earlier than con.


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11229
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 136 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364747Post Bernard Shakey »

Colorado is a complete and utter waste of time and resources. Mt Kosi is 2,200 metres, Denver is 1,600 metres (sorry meters, it's in the USofA), much cheaper and easier to go to Thredbo. Of course the Broncos won't be there, but brumbies are the same thing.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8082
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1771 times
Been thanked: 822 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364762Post WellardSaint »

No. NO.
High altitude training has been shown to increase VO2 (oxygen take-up) due to slightly increased red blood cell production.
Typically 3-5% improvement.
After 20 days.
Upon returning to normal altitude, VO2 returns to normal levels within a few days.
To summarise: long term exposure brings quite minor short-lived improvement.
Apparently there is a caravan at the Seaford training HQ which is set up as a low oxygen sleeping facility.
Same effect as flying thousands of km with the advantage of being in the same city as your family.


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9000
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 416 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364769Post spert »

Should go up to the mountainous areas of PNG over summer for training- would be cheaper than Colorado, and would toughen up mind an body.


User avatar
busso mick
Club Player
Posts: 1212
Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2004 8:57pm
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364779Post busso mick »

WellardSaint wrote:No. NO.
High altitude training has been shown to increase VO2 (oxygen take-up) due to slightly increased red blood cell production.
Typically 3-5% improvement.
After 20 days.
Upon returning to normal altitude, VO2 returns to normal levels within a few days.
To summarise: long term exposure brings quite minor short-lived improvement.
Apparently there is a caravan at the Seaford training HQ which is set up as a low oxygen sleeping facility.
Same effect as flying thousands of km with the advantage of being in the same city as your family.
I only thought that the purpose of high altitude training was to give you a kick start to your training schedule when you come back for pre-season. In effect it will add a few weeks to your training program. I would have thought that could be a benefit, apart from the costs involved.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364782Post dragit »

I don't have a clue... So I hereby withdraw my comments and apologise to winners only... Though I will say, if it isn't costing the club much, it would a pretty good team building trip for the players at the very least... From what i gather they were pretty excited about it last time.


User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364788Post stinger »

Bernard Shakey wrote:Colorado is a complete and utter waste of time and resources. Mt Kosi is 2,200 metres, Denver is 1,600 metres (sorry meters, it's in the USofA), much cheaper and easier to go to Thredbo. Of course the Broncos won't be there, but brumbies are the same thing.
denver is the flat bit ... :roll:...before the mountains even start....


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18522
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1847 times
Been thanked: 825 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364811Post bigcarl »

Bernard Shakey wrote:Colorado is a complete and utter waste of time and resources. Mt Kosi is 2,200 metres, Denver is 1,600 metres (sorry meters, it's in the USofA), much cheaper and easier to go to Thredbo. Of course the Broncos won't be there, but brumbies are the same thing.
Good points Bernard.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364816Post dragit »

bigcarl wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:Colorado is a complete and utter waste of time and resources. Mt Kosi is 2,200 metres, Denver is 1,600 metres (sorry meters, it's in the USofA), much cheaper and easier to go to Thredbo. Of course the Broncos won't be there, but brumbies are the same thing.
Good points Bernard.
As stinger pointed out… Boulder is at the foot of the rocky's… which go right upto 4,400 metres… where the players were doing hikes. The other feature is the state of the art training facilities available… which I don't think are at thredbo?


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18522
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1847 times
Been thanked: 825 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364818Post bigcarl »

Send them to New Zealand. They have high mountains there.

And spend the money we save on something useful like goal-kicking practice.


User avatar
markp
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 15482
Joined: Mon 26 Mar 2007 4:22pm
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 81 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364820Post markp »

Or Columbia... what trouble could they possibly get into there?


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364822Post dragit »

markp wrote:Or Columbia... what trouble could they possibly get into there?
Can't think of anything at all.

Afghanistan has mountains too.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18522
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1847 times
Been thanked: 825 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364837Post bigcarl »

Actually, New Zealand is not a bad idea. Maybe the city of Wellington can chip in, given it's our second home


User avatar
markp
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 15482
Joined: Mon 26 Mar 2007 4:22pm
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 81 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364838Post markp »

dragit wrote:
markp wrote:Or Columbia... what trouble could they possibly get into there?
Can't think of anything at all.

Afghanistan has mountains too.
Think I'd prefer them tangling with coke and hookers than heroin and kalashnikovs.


User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364841Post Dr Spaceman »

markp wrote:
dragit wrote: Afghanistan has mountains too.
Think I'd prefer them tangling with coke and hookers than heroin and kalashnikovs.
Would toughen them up though.

And give new meaning to them being "in the gun" :wink:


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364843Post gringo »

The players def pay for some of it. I don't see why they don't just fill some old car tyres with lead weights and make them run laps at Moorabin. Stick em in the high altitude simulator Jayco for some elite style training results.

Nah f%$# it lets find Dank and sack the science guy after a couple of years of doping. Tell them it's just Barocca being injected in their arses.


mrkiss
Club Player
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed 05 Aug 2009 4:52pm
Location: franga
Contact:

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364860Post mrkiss »

no send them to the hills in sorrento instead


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364914Post SainterK »

Pointless to discuss it, haven't they already announced they are going?


User avatar
markp
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 15482
Joined: Mon 26 Mar 2007 4:22pm
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 81 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1364920Post markp »

SainterK wrote:Pointless to discuss it, haven't they already announced they are going?
But we haven't even added up the votes yet.


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10954
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3380 times
Been thanked: 2351 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1365032Post Scollop »

Bernard Shakey wrote:Colorado is a complete and utter waste of time and resources. Mt Kosi is 2,200 metres, Denver is 1,600 metres (sorry meters, it's in the USofA), much cheaper and easier to go to Thredbo. Of course the Broncos won't be there, but brumbies are the same thing.
spert wrote:Should go up to the mountainous areas of PNG over summer for training- would be cheaper than Colorado, and would toughen up mind an body.
Not quite sure if some are serious here. If so, proof that some posters don't have a clue. It's not just the altitude peeps. It's more the facilities on offer, especially for elite sports training.

soon as I read Shakey's and spert's posts I thought along these lines below....beat me to it guys :wink: :lol: :lol:
dragit wrote:
markp wrote:Or Columbia... what trouble could they possibly get into there?
Can't think of anything at all.

Afghanistan has mountains too.


User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8991
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 343 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1365035Post perfectionist »

YES!!!

But next year make it March to September.


User avatar
8856brother
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4374
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
Location: Twin Peaks
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1365037Post 8856brother »

I suggest they stay at Seaford and learn how to kick.


_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
thejiggingsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9357
Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
Has thanked: 634 times
Been thanked: 473 times

Re: Should the team be going to Colorado again?

Post: # 1365052Post thejiggingsaint »

NOW that's sensible!!!! YES lets see some work on BASIC SKILLS!


St Kilda forever 🔴⚪️⚫️ ( God help me)
Post Reply