One or more need to go?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: One or more need to go?
I'd love to hear an explanation from the club if we sack TDL one year on.
Trading in a player that we didn't need, that the coach used to know from the wafl is pretty ordinary at this level.
Trading in a player that we didn't need, that the coach used to know from the wafl is pretty ordinary at this level.
Re: One or more need to go?
Slightly off topic but still relating to numbers and player turnover.
Didn't Pelchen? say that they want to have a 50% increase in the number of players drafted in the first 3 rounds over a 4 year period? ie - 18 picks instead of 12.
If that is the case it means that we'll just about have to trade 6 (- McEvoy) out over that timespan to get the extra picks. Lets hope that we have enough players with the currency to get those picks in future years. Hand in hand with that is that if we want higher picks we've got to be giving away better players - that will be interesting (& watch out for the supporter backlash!)
The only other ways that I can see that we can get more picks is to get a priority pick off the afl - not sure that I want us to be bad enough to earn one of them over the next few years. Or, we could trade a higher pick for more than one lower pick - no thanks.
Maybe this points to a greater liklihood of more trades now - Dal & Fisher & ?? - while these players still have trade-able value.
Didn't Pelchen? say that they want to have a 50% increase in the number of players drafted in the first 3 rounds over a 4 year period? ie - 18 picks instead of 12.
If that is the case it means that we'll just about have to trade 6 (- McEvoy) out over that timespan to get the extra picks. Lets hope that we have enough players with the currency to get those picks in future years. Hand in hand with that is that if we want higher picks we've got to be giving away better players - that will be interesting (& watch out for the supporter backlash!)
The only other ways that I can see that we can get more picks is to get a priority pick off the afl - not sure that I want us to be bad enough to earn one of them over the next few years. Or, we could trade a higher pick for more than one lower pick - no thanks.
Maybe this points to a greater liklihood of more trades now - Dal & Fisher & ?? - while these players still have trade-able value.
It's a shame ignorance isn't painful
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: One or more need to go?
Has Carlisle been completely cleared by ASADA? !!FQF wrote:Would you trade pick 3 (and Dal?) for Jake Carlsile from Essendon?
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: One or more need to go?
Absolutely no wayFQF wrote:Would you trade pick 3 (and Dal?) for Jake Carlsile from Essendon?
Good player though.
- sax
- Club Player
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Tue 29 Nov 2005 10:19pm
- Location: Barossa Valley
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: One or more need to go?
Reckon only one to delist now. Dal gone, & not to North!sax wrote:TDL & Saad in real trouble, Ahmed for obvious reasons.dragit wrote:But in order to draft 4 players in the ND, plus add Jolly & Weller… we'll need to get rid of 3 more… trade or payout contracted players…sax wrote: We will take 4 in the ND at the most, depending on delistings & trades.
We will also have 2 or 3 rookie picks.
NDS & ?
I actually don't think Dal will go now. It depends on what clarification the club can get regarding our compo pick. I think if it's end of first round he will go. From what I'm hearing the club is not happy with pick 26, & neither they should be. They definately want the Luke Delaney deal kept seperate as we can get him in the PSD, so he has no currency in regards to Dal Santo.
Fisher will go to GWS, I have no doubt.
Foundation Social Club Member No. 296
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: One or more need to go?
There are two people on this forum who seem to really know whats going on.sax wrote:
Reckon only one to delist now. Dal gone, & not to North!
One of them is jaxons and the other is sax.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Fri 18 May 2007 11:13am
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: One or more need to go?
I believe that when a player serves an infraction notice he cannot be paid any money.
That means Saad stays on the list and takes up a list spot without bring near the club, but his contract is then zero dollars, or we delist him to place someone else on the list.
I think we will delist him with a promise to redraft after his sanction is complete.
That means Saad stays on the list and takes up a list spot without bring near the club, but his contract is then zero dollars, or we delist him to place someone else on the list.
I think we will delist him with a promise to redraft after his sanction is complete.
And the president said " I did not have sex with that woman"
And our former president said " Football is like golf"
Go Sainters !!!!!
And our former president said " Football is like golf"
Go Sainters !!!!!