That's a great point! Dunstan's averaging 22 in his first three games which is great. But Tyson's averaging 29 in his 14th, 15th, 16th games - that's even better.Saints94 wrote:But we do his even younger & his name is Luke Dunstanbergholt wrote:If we had a 16 game player who was in the top ten in the AFL for disposals and averaging 29 a game I think we'd be pretty excited.![]()
one to watch
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Re: one to watch
Re: one to watch
bergholt wrote:That's a great point! Dunstan's averaging 22 in his first three games which is great. But Tyson's averaging 29 in his 14th, 15th, 16th games - that's even better.Saints94 wrote:But we do his even younger & his name is Luke Dunstanbergholt wrote:If we had a 16 game player who was in the top ten in the AFL for disposals and averaging 29 a game I think we'd be pretty excited.![]()
it will be many years before the answer to who did better out of gws and the deed becomes bleeding obvious.......bit like the decision to take ball over judd.....
![Crying or Very sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
![Crying or Very sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
![Crying or Very sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
![Crying or Very sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
![Crying or Very sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
![Crying or Very sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
![Crying or Very sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
Re: one to watch
One in the bag for the Dees!Con Gorozidis wrote:I hope Melbourne can someone win 3 or 4 games ( I know it will take a miracle)
If those pricks get picks 1-3 it will just be an injustice.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: one to watch
im pretty sure i meant 'somehow' not 'someone' but anyway thats 1!bergholt wrote:One in the bag for the Dees!Con Gorozidis wrote:I hope Melbourne can someone win 3 or 4 games ( I know it will take a miracle)
If those pricks get picks 1-3 it will just be an injustice.
but i guess it doesnt change much because now it means both melb and the blues will finish below us!
at this rate we are heading for a pick 6.
Re: one to watch
To be fair, Dunstan and Kelly are first year players and Tyson is in his third season. Tyson is going to be a gun, so is Kelly, Tyson has a strong Melbourne connection so the trade was weighted in Melbournes favour. As for pick 9, who knows how good Salem will be when he gets some meat on his bones - but they could've had Dunstan!bergholt wrote:That's a great point! Dunstan's averaging 22 in his first three games which is great. But Tyson's averaging 29 in his 14th, 15th, 16th games - that's even better.Saints94 wrote:But we do his even younger & his name is Luke Dunstanbergholt wrote:If we had a 16 game player who was in the top ten in the AFL for disposals and averaging 29 a game I think we'd be pretty excited.![]()
Re original post, depending on where we finish, I think we will nab one of McCartin, Wright or Goddard this year, assuming Carlton get a wriggle on and Dees don't get the first dozen picks of the draft!
Strength through Loyalty
Go those mighty Sainters!!
Go those mighty Sainters!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: one to watch
Be nice if we could get Goddard ahead of Carlton.........for the second time!
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.