Cairnsman wrote:surprised Monty wasn't dropped.
Why would he be dropped?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Cairnsman wrote:surprised Monty wasn't dropped.
At least we're pumping games into Jones...Playon wrote:A note on that, TC wasn't used as a tagger in The Sandy game, Needs the opportunity to play as a pure mid before seasons out, without the tagging role just to see how he goes.PurpleHayes wrote:Actually thought Bruce showed something, unsure why he's been omitted.
Gwilt in then makes sense.
Stanley didn't play that well for Sandy, but bringing him into the side means Lee can play the whole game at FF and not have to pinch hit in the ruck.
For mine - Dunnel, Jones and Minchington wont play.
30 touches enough for Savage to earn a recall, but not Curren..
gringo wrote:Funny how we thought Bruce killed it forward and Lee might have his papers stamped. Thought Minchington was probably gone- I guess they are trying Dunny and minch to see if they should be retained or moved on. Both played well though so good on them.
I guess Gwilt and Bruce play the same spot and they see Gwilt as a general.
Maybe Bruce had some carryover points for his bad haircut?plugger66 wrote:gringo wrote:Funny how we thought Bruce killed it forward and Lee might have his papers stamped. Thought Minchington was probably gone- I guess they are trying Dunny and minch to see if they should be retained or moved on. Both played well though so good on them.
I guess Gwilt and Bruce play the same spot and they see Gwilt as a general.
Yep they dropped Bruce. Who do you think played better out of Bruce and Lee? Maybe it is like Webster and he did something wrong during the week. Lee is obviously going to play this week and I hope on Sunday night we are saying he may be a player for us. No one can noe say he hasnt been given a chance. If I read that on Sunday night I will spew up Terry Wallace style.
busso mick wrote:Maybe Bruce had some carryover points for his bad haircut?plugger66 wrote:gringo wrote:Funny how we thought Bruce killed it forward and Lee might have his papers stamped. Thought Minchington was probably gone- I guess they are trying Dunny and minch to see if they should be retained or moved on. Both played well though so good on them.
I guess Gwilt and Bruce play the same spot and they see Gwilt as a general.
Yep they dropped Bruce. Who do you think played better out of Bruce and Lee? Maybe it is like Webster and he did something wrong during the week. Lee is obviously going to play this week and I hope on Sunday night we are saying he may be a player for us. No one can noe say he hasnt been given a chance. If I read that on Sunday night I will spew up Terry Wallace style.
I reckon the brains trust (not being sarcastic) figure that Lee is our next key forward and the comments from AR were to fire him up, and he may have credits in the bank with them.millarsaint wrote:how can you justify keeping Lee in the team after subbing him so early with no injury?
makes you wonder what's going on just a smidge.
hopefully they'll play Simpkin down back all day long.
His haircut and beard are awesome. Sporting the same look myself. Don't mind a bit of the long on top with shaved sides.busso mick wrote:Maybe Bruce had some carryover points for his bad haircut?plugger66 wrote:gringo wrote:Funny how we thought Bruce killed it forward and Lee might have his papers stamped. Thought Minchington was probably gone- I guess they are trying Dunny and minch to see if they should be retained or moved on. Both played well though so good on them.
I guess Gwilt and Bruce play the same spot and they see Gwilt as a general.
Yep they dropped Bruce. Who do you think played better out of Bruce and Lee? Maybe it is like Webster and he did something wrong during the week. Lee is obviously going to play this week and I hope on Sunday night we are saying he may be a player for us. No one can noe say he hasnt been given a chance. If I read that on Sunday night I will spew up Terry Wallace style.
Can't be dropped... Ross and Weller.Jones, Savage, Ross, Stanley, Dunell, Minchington, Weller.
Milestone: Stanley - 50 games
Well I read that there are numerous posters suggesting Jack Billings should be dropped so by extension of that logic shouldn't we be calling for Monty to be dropped?plugger66 wrote:Cairnsman wrote:surprised Monty wasn't dropped.
Why would he be dropped?
I'll make sure I remember to say " he just needs more chances" especially if he has a shocker.plugger66 wrote:gringo wrote:Funny how we thought Bruce killed it forward and Lee might have his papers stamped. Thought Minchington was probably gone- I guess they are trying Dunny and minch to see if they should be retained or moved on. Both played well though so good on them.
I guess Gwilt and Bruce play the same spot and they see Gwilt as a general.
Yep they dropped Bruce. Who do you think played better out of Bruce and Lee? Maybe it is like Webster and he did something wrong during the week. Lee is obviously going to play this week and I hope on Sunday night we are saying he may be a player for us. No one can noe say he hasnt been given a chance. If I read that on Sunday night I will spew up Terry Wallace style.
Cairnsman wrote:Well I read that there are numerous posters suggesting Jack Billings should be dropped so by extension of that logic shouldn't we be calling for Monty to be dropped?plugger66 wrote:Cairnsman wrote:surprised Monty wasn't dropped.
Why would he be dropped?
Yep, I'm in the same boat too, short sides with the gradual undercut towards the front. Lesser facial hair though (I can't deliver there).Spinner wrote:His haircut and beard are awesome. Sporting the same look myself. Don't mind a bit of the long on top with shaved sides.busso mick wrote:Maybe Bruce had some carryover points for his bad haircut?plugger66 wrote:gringo wrote:Funny how we thought Bruce killed it forward and Lee might have his papers stamped. Thought Minchington was probably gone- I guess they are trying Dunny and minch to see if they should be retained or moved on. Both played well though so good on them.
I guess Gwilt and Bruce play the same spot and they see Gwilt as a general.
Yep they dropped Bruce. Who do you think played better out of Bruce and Lee? Maybe it is like Webster and he did something wrong during the week. Lee is obviously going to play this week and I hope on Sunday night we are saying he may be a player for us. No one can noe say he hasnt been given a chance. If I read that on Sunday night I will spew up Terry Wallace style.
Yeah we should...in actual fact Monty should be dropped and have his pay docked for being a senior player and slacking on the job...apologies to you Monty if you have an injury...aka a valid excuse.plugger66 wrote:Cairnsman wrote:Well I read that there are numerous posters suggesting Jack Billings should be dropped so by extension of that logic shouldn't we be calling for Monty to be dropped?plugger66 wrote:Cairnsman wrote:surprised Monty wasn't dropped.
Why would he be dropped?
No.
I agree if he's not delivering on field at least he could have kick arse hair. He reminds me of one of those cocky's outside the toilets at a country service station that through some kind of existentialist crisis, rips it own feathers from it body.thequarry wrote:Yep, I'm in the same boat too, short sides with the gradual undercut towards the front. Lesser facial hair though (I can't deliver there).Spinner wrote:His haircut and beard are awesome. Sporting the same look myself. Don't mind a bit of the long on top with shaved sides.busso mick wrote:Maybe Bruce had some carryover points for his bad haircut?plugger66 wrote:gringo wrote:Funny how we thought Bruce killed it forward and Lee might have his papers stamped. Thought Minchington was probably gone- I guess they are trying Dunny and minch to see if they should be retained or moved on. Both played well though so good on them.
I guess Gwilt and Bruce play the same spot and they see Gwilt as a general.
Yep they dropped Bruce. Who do you think played better out of Bruce and Lee? Maybe it is like Webster and he did something wrong during the week. Lee is obviously going to play this week and I hope on Sunday night we are saying he may be a player for us. No one can noe say he hasnt been given a chance. If I read that on Sunday night I will spew up Terry Wallace style.
But enough about my hair - let's talk about Tom Lee's. Awful. It's a shapeless mass of hair at the back; purely functional. No stars.
That's a comedy show from the 90's. Like Tommy's hairstyle.kosifantutti wrote:He's full forward.terry smith rules wrote:lee not even on the extended bench!!!
skeptic wrote:Plugger..!
Clint Jones has had a good season and been selected appropriately. Good call, Bad Call?
the sad part Jiggs, is that no it's notthejiggingsaint wrote:This is the season of (perceived) "strange selection choices" at St Kilda. I'm one of those who actually believes that this is simply one part of a long-term process to re-establish the club as a power, and I'm prepared to go along with it.