Get rid of Fisher

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11300
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1296 times
Been thanked: 437 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1629907Post Sainternist »

The Fireman wrote:get rid of this poster
+1

OP is a total schmohawk.


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
PADDLEPOP1001
Club Player
Posts: 1223
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 1:18pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 570 times
Been thanked: 109 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1629931Post PADDLEPOP1001 »

+1


PADDLEPOP1000
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18522
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1847 times
Been thanked: 825 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1629967Post bigcarl »

Some respect please Citywest for a bloke who has been a great warrior for us over many seasons. I don't know if Fisher wants to go on. The ability is still there for sure, but his body is beginning to let him down.


supersaints
Club Player
Posts: 1701
Joined: Fri 18 May 2007 11:13am
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1629970Post supersaints »

He made s few early mistakes , kept deadbolt to 1 point. Correct selection....
Is likely his last season with Carlise comming in but at least let him go out with some respect.
His intercept play still is a grade.


And the president said " I did not have sex with that woman"
And our former president said " Football is like golf" 

Go Sainters !!!!!
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30069
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1223 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1630124Post saintsRrising »

bigcarl wrote: I don't know if Fisher wants to go on. .
Just prior to his last hammy he said in the Social Club that he wanted to play on next season, but that it was up to the club.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Zed
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2174
Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:59pm
Location: by the seaside..
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 181 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1630131Post Zed »

He would certainly be a good depth player if he was around next year , but the queries really are whether his body can hold out and whether he would be happy playing in the 2s until required.

Let's no forget we are currently at near full strength. It was only a couple of years ago when we had half our starting backline sidelined with injury. Carlisle is only 1 player and we dont know how or when Hughie will be back to full fitness. I'd be dropping Delaney off the list for Carlisle. Hurley would change the equation however.


Life is never more fun than when you're the underdog competing against the giants.
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18522
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1847 times
Been thanked: 825 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1630136Post bigcarl »

Zed wrote:He would certainly be a good depth player if he was around next year , but the queries really are whether his body can hold out and whether he would be happy playing in the 2s until required.
He's better than depth. Still a very good player, but yes, mid-30s and a recent history of hamstring problems will be the query.


To the top
SS Life Member
Posts: 3266
Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
Been thanked: 390 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1630138Post To the top »

What this season has shown is that we have improved to the level of not being too far off the mark (allowing for the Interstate results).

But we have deficiencies which are glaring, the principal among which is the reliance on Dempster, Gilbert and Roberton as our tall defensive options, confronting the range of forwards including Kennedy, Franklin, Hogan, Lynch, Cameron, Patton, Brown, Petrie et al.

We improve that area by having Carlisle available and by Goddard's eventual return, noting Goddard is developing and has only played a handful of games.

Fisher's importance was confirmed by, after a lengthy absence, his immediate recall after 1 VFL game for match conditioning - and then taking Casboult who he contained as we would expect from such a class performer.

That importance will continue into 2017 given Fisher feels he can continue to contribute as he has in 2016.

What we then have is 2 proven KPP defenders - and allow for Goddard's recovery and introduction to AFL football.

The "spread" then allows each of Dempster, Gilbert and Roberton to play in positions they are more suited to - including adding Gilbert to the mid-field rotations where hopefully Freeman and others can also be added.

If deference needs to be paid to "week in and week out" footy then that can be managed against the appropriate opposition (and Inter-state matches?) when responsibility can be again given to Dempster, Gilbert and Roberton.

To me, Fisher is a "keep" for 2017.

The other deficiency to me is the ruck role in support of Hickey - and hopefully Longer can put in a full pre season and then contribute to his full potential in 2017.


citywest

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1630139Post citywest »

Fisher has been a great player but his time has passed. He is 34 and his body is failing him. With the introduction of Carlisle we more than have the key defensive posts covered. Just have a look at how well Geelong have managed to phase out their oldies. St Kilda are on the way up and I would hope that the oldies are phased out a year early rather than a year too late.


Hemi Baxter
Club Player
Posts: 347
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2011 5:22pm
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1630142Post Hemi Baxter »

Lonergan 32
Taylor 30
Mackie 32
Enright 35

And the first and last time I'll ever bother responding to your idiocy.


User avatar
prwilkinson
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 1999
Joined: Tue 21 Sep 2010 12:17pm
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1630150Post prwilkinson »

Hemi Baxter wrote:Lonergan 32
Taylor 30
Mackie 32
Enright 35

And the first and last time I'll ever bother responding to your idiocy.
How old is Bartel as well? Not to mention Hawthorn's best players are pretty much all 30+...

Players playing into their mid 30's is the new norm.


User avatar
desertsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10371
Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
Location: out there
Has thanked: 183 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1630151Post desertsaint »

add that right now geelong would love to have stevie J heading into finals.


"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1630168Post fugazi »

While the OP is a tactless sentiment, it is actually correct.

Been an absolute great for us, at one point, the best backman in the league, with freakish capacity to read the ball coming in.....but, father time has caughtup and even though the mind is still quick, the legs are slow....too slow.

Will announce retirement as soon as we are out of finals contention I would think


Nee!
User avatar
prwilkinson
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 1999
Joined: Tue 21 Sep 2010 12:17pm
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1630170Post prwilkinson »

fugazi wrote:While the OP is a tactless sentiment, it is actually correct.

Been an absolute great for us, at one point, the best backman in the league, with freakish capacity to read the ball coming in.....but, father time has caughtup and even though the mind is still quick, the legs are slow....too slow.

Will announce retirement as soon as we are out of finals contention I would think
Yeah, he does look a little cooked... Just don't want him to get the bums rush out the door if he still feels he can be a depth player next season. Champion player. A little more time on the sand belt courses for Chips Fisher. Work on the handicap.


saintbob
SS Life Member
Posts: 3542
Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
Location: Tassie
Has thanked: 459 times
Been thanked: 294 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1630178Post saintbob »

Sainternist wrote:
The Fireman wrote:get rid of this poster
+1

OP is a total schmohawk.
+1


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8575
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 1527 times

Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1630204Post kosifantutti »

citywest wrote:Fisher has been a great player but his time has passed. He is 34 and his body is failing him. With the introduction of Carlisle we more than have the key defensive posts covered. Just have a look at how well Geelong have managed to phase out their oldies. St Kilda are on the way up and I would hope that the oldies are phased out a year early rather than a year too late.
There's a huge difference between suggesting a veteran retire at the end of the year and posting during the first quarter that we should get rid of him right now.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
Trev from the Bush
SS Life Member
Posts: 2841
Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:24pm
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 774 times
Been thanked: 871 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1630213Post Trev from the Bush »

kosifantutti wrote:
citywest wrote:Fisher has been a great player but his time has passed. He is 34 and his body is failing him. With the introduction of Carlisle we more than have the key defensive posts covered. Just have a look at how well Geelong have managed to phase out their oldies. St Kilda are on the way up and I would hope that the oldies are phased out a year early rather than a year too late.
There's a huge difference between suggesting a veteran retire at the end of the year and posting during the first quarter that we should get rid of him right now.

Premature to say the least, Citywest. Blurt first, try to justify yourself later. You get criticized plenty on this forum but, geez mate, you certainly lead with your chin!


Saint supporter since '62
Freebird
Club Player
Posts: 919
Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2012 12:37pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1630215Post Freebird »

WhyTF do we allow this obvious non saint to post s*** like this...get rid of it


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10951
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3380 times
Been thanked: 2350 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1630240Post Scollop »

Sainternist wrote:
The Fireman wrote:get rid of this poster
+1

OP is a total schmohawk.
What is a schmohawk?

Is it like a mohawk but down around the shmo region?


st.byron
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: North
Has thanked: 1011 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1630251Post st.byron »

Trev from the Bush wrote:
kosifantutti wrote:
citywest wrote:Fisher has been a great player but his time has passed. He is 34 and his body is failing him. With the introduction of Carlisle we more than have the key defensive posts covered. Just have a look at how well Geelong have managed to phase out their oldies. St Kilda are on the way up and I would hope that the oldies are phased out a year early rather than a year too late.
There's a huge difference between suggesting a veteran retire at the end of the year and posting during the first quarter that we should get rid of him right now.

Premature to say the least, Citywest. Blurt first, try to justify yourself later. You get criticized plenty on this forum but, geez mate, you certainly lead with your chin!
Exactly. KFT is on the money Citywest.

If you post stuff with a title like the OP in this thread, how do you expect people to respond?


Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11300
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1296 times
Been thanked: 437 times

Re: Get rid of Fisher

Post: # 1630266Post Sainternist »

Scollop wrote:
Sainternist wrote:
The Fireman wrote:get rid of this poster
+1

OP is a total schmohawk.
What is a schmohawk?

Is it like a mohawk but down around the shmo region?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shmohawk


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
Post Reply