Sandy v Williamstown

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Saintmatt
SS Life Member
Posts: 2559
Joined: Fri 20 Jan 2012 4:57pm
Has thanked: 2029 times
Been thanked: 1148 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737150Post Saintmatt »

saintspremiers wrote: Sun 17 Jun 2018 6:28pm Farewell to Richo and all his assistants.
Yep - certainly the assistants. Thank god. And hopefully every incompetent that’s touched Development in the last 10 years.


Go you red, black & white warriors
User avatar
Linton Lodger
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2467
Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 256 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737151Post Linton Lodger »

Only watched a bit of the second, we were a couple of goals down, but it looked an even contest.

The conditions were beyond deplorable and the venue is not fit for a League of that standard. Utter suburban crap. There was a gale blowing, rain and spray off the sea, s*** you almost expected waves to break on the outer wing! What a disgrace, in all the years you would have thought those Western Suburbs clowns would have thought of putting a wall around the ground.

Kicking a goal would've have been enormously difficult and it may have been palatable if Willy had only kicked 3 or 4. However failing to kick one and allowing them to kick 9 in a half, in such conditions, is an absolue disgrace and must come down to effort.


saintbob
SS Life Member
Posts: 3541
Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
Location: Tassie
Has thanked: 459 times
Been thanked: 294 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737163Post saintbob »

Any official word on whether Freeman was rested or injured in the last quarter???


Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11300
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1296 times
Been thanked: 437 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737176Post Sainternist »

Terrible result on the scoreboard. Good to hear Hickey figured among our better players, however. So why was Hickey dropped for Longer again?


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6531
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1207 times
Been thanked: 447 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737215Post Jacks Back »

parkeysainter wrote: Sun 17 Jun 2018 7:02pm The conditions were close to the worst I have ever seen for that level of footy. Probably the worst actually. Lets not read too much into it. There was barely a clean possession the entire game.
Of course the conditions were terrible. So terrible in fact that Williamstown kicked 11 goals. :roll:


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11228
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 135 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737218Post Bernard Shakey »

The_Dud wrote: Sun 17 Jun 2018 4:07pm Conditions look good!

Why the hell would you put a footy ground right on the beach??
You've never been to Sandy's Trevor Barker Beach Oval!


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
User avatar
parkeysainter
SS Life Member
Posts: 2696
Joined: Thu 20 Jul 2017 2:59am
Location: Brighton Beach Mansion
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 177 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737221Post parkeysainter »

Jacks Back wrote: Sun 17 Jun 2018 10:45pm
parkeysainter wrote: Sun 17 Jun 2018 7:02pm The conditions were close to the worst I have ever seen for that level of footy. Probably the worst actually. Lets not read too much into it. There was barely a clean possession the entire game.
Of course the conditions were terrible. So terrible in fact that Williamstown kicked 11 goals. :roll:
Did you see the 3 quarter time score? The conditions were putrid. Apparantly the TV didn't do it justice. It was like watching local park footy div 4 level it was that bad.


Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud

In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the St Kilda FC
BringBackMadDog
Club Player
Posts: 1960
Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2004 9:29am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737225Post BringBackMadDog »

Jacks Back wrote: Sun 17 Jun 2018 10:45pm
parkeysainter wrote: Sun 17 Jun 2018 7:02pm The conditions were close to the worst I have ever seen for that level of footy. Probably the worst actually. Lets not read too much into it. There was barely a clean possession the entire game.
Of course the conditions were terrible. So terrible in fact that Williamstown kicked 11 goals. :roll:
They kicked 8 in the last qtr. the wind was literally gale force in the last qtr blowing straight down to the end williamstown were kicking to, the big difference though was the rain was gone and the ground had drained a bit so it was a lot easier to take advantage of the hurricane. When we kicked with the wind in the first qtr it hailed sideways and the ground was a flood zone. In the 3rd quarter there was still some rain and the wind wasn't as strong as the last. It was the perfect storm for Willy


User avatar
parkeysainter
SS Life Member
Posts: 2696
Joined: Thu 20 Jul 2017 2:59am
Location: Brighton Beach Mansion
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 177 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737231Post parkeysainter »

BringBackMadDog wrote: Sun 17 Jun 2018 10:58pm
Jacks Back wrote: Sun 17 Jun 2018 10:45pm
parkeysainter wrote: Sun 17 Jun 2018 7:02pm The conditions were close to the worst I have ever seen for that level of footy. Probably the worst actually. Lets not read too much into it. There was barely a clean possession the entire game.
Of course the conditions were terrible. So terrible in fact that Williamstown kicked 11 goals. :roll:
They kicked 8 in the last qtr. the wind was literally gale force in the last qtr blowing straight down to the end williamstown were kicking to, the big difference though was the rain was gone and the ground had drained a bit so it was a lot easier to take advantage of the hurricane. When we kicked with the wind in the first qtr it hailed sideways and the ground was a flood zone. In the 3rd quarter there was still some rain and the wind wasn't as strong as the last. It was the perfect storm for Willy
Good post. People on here again are looking for any chance to rip the club a new one.


Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud

In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the St Kilda FC
axcellence
Club Player
Posts: 1358
Joined: Sun 03 Oct 2004 8:45pm
Has thanked: 91 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737233Post axcellence »

I would't read too much into result. It was a bad weather day.

There other weeks where you can judge the VFL team but not today.

Maybe so much to say that there isn't a lot of depth and a few injuries. But that's nothing new from going in the game.


stonecold
SS Life Member
Posts: 3950
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
Has thanked: 372 times
Been thanked: 214 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737244Post stonecold »

Sainternist wrote: Sun 17 Jun 2018 9:22pm Terrible result on the scoreboard. Good to hear Hickey figured among our better players, however. So why was Hickey dropped for Longer again?
So we could win, Tom doesn't play in wins!!!!!

Read it and suck it up, Cause StoneCold, said so!!!!!

Don't stress though Kos, you mind get it one day!!!!!


'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!

We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!


The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving 📯📯📯📯📯
Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11300
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1296 times
Been thanked: 437 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737245Post Sainternist »

stonecold wrote: Mon 18 Jun 2018 12:03am
Sainternist wrote: Sun 17 Jun 2018 9:22pm Terrible result on the scoreboard. Good to hear Hickey figured among our better players, however. So why was Hickey dropped for Longer again?
So we could win, Tom doesn't play in wins!!!!!

Read it and suck it up, Cause StoneCold, said so!!!!!

Don't stress though Kos, you mind get it one day!!!!!
Image


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8574
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 1526 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737321Post kosifantutti »

stonecold wrote: Mon 18 Jun 2018 12:03am
Sainternist wrote: Sun 17 Jun 2018 9:22pm Terrible result on the scoreboard. Good to hear Hickey figured among our better players, however. So why was Hickey dropped for Longer again?
So we could win, Tom doesn't play in wins!!!!!

Read it and suck it up, Cause StoneCold, said so!!!!!

Don't stress though Kos, you mind get it one day!!!!!
OK. Whatever that means.

Why am I involved here?


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
chico2001
Club Player
Posts: 988
Joined: Fri 18 May 2018 10:06am
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 83 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737324Post chico2001 »

Must be a reason or reasons why they didnt kick a goal.

The wind doesnt kick the goal for you. r.e 8 in the last qtr


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8999
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 416 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737343Post spert »

Sainternist wrote: Sun 17 Jun 2018 9:22pm Terrible result on the scoreboard. Good to hear Hickey figured among our better players, however. So why was Hickey dropped for Longer again?
Richo couldn't drop himself after the Swans hiding, so Tom was next.


Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11300
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1296 times
Been thanked: 437 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737387Post Sainternist »

chico2001 wrote: Mon 18 Jun 2018 1:17pm Must be a reason or reasons why they didnt kick a goal.

The wind doesnt kick the goal for you. r.e 8 in the last qtr
Perhaps with all the excitement of the World Cup, they tried to incorporate soccer to the game plan.


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
chico2001
Club Player
Posts: 988
Joined: Fri 18 May 2018 10:06am
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 83 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737499Post chico2001 »

OK...I give up, who scored the points for Sandringham?


on the outer
Club Player
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011 9:50am
Location: Level 3
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737502Post on the outer »

Of the 9 points, 5 were rushed Bruce, Freeman , Marshall and Answerth each kicked one each.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22742
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8655 times
Been thanked: 3790 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737503Post saynta »

http://www.saints.com.au/news/2018-06-1 ... -on-return


"Two experienced Saints stood out despite Sandringham’s brutal 68-point loss to Williamstown on Sunday afternoon.

In utterly torrid conditions at Burbank Oval that saw a blustering gale and torrential rainfall all day, the Zebras failed to kick a goal for the first time in their 89-year history.

Sam Gilbert was outstanding in his return from injury with 24 disposals and six tackles, while ruckman Tom Hickey competed aggressively, finishing with 58 hit-outs and eight tackles.

Defenders Brandon White (16 disposals, three marks, two tackles) and Hugh Goddard (eight disposals, five marks) battled well in defence, restricting the opposition to three goals in the first three quarters before the Seagulls got on a run on in the last.

Conditions were some of the worst seen in years at Williamstown on Sunday.

After a grinding first three quarters and just a 15-point deficit at three-quarter time, Sandringham coach Aaron Hamill admitted the Seagulls simply wanted it more.

“It was really tough conditions in a game that was already difficult to score; we’ve never been involved in a game where we haven’t kicked a goal,” Hamill told saints.com.au.

“Williamstown adjusted to the conditions a lot better than what we did. We fought it out, but we were exposed in the contest against an opposition who just wanted it more than what we did.”

Hamill highlighted the games of ruckman Tom Hickey and the strong return of Sam Gilbert from injury.

“Gilbo (Sam Gilbert) was really solid in the middle, and Tom Hickey battled hard all day,” he said.

“It wasn’t a day for tall forwards, but Josh Bruce got through his second hit-out well and kept presenting in conditions that made it hard for him. He’ll be better for the run.”

Sandringham have the bye in Round 12 but return to face Port Melbourne at 2pm on Saturday 30 June at North Port Oval.

Williamstown 0.0 2.4 3.5 11.11 (77)

Sandringham 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.9 (9)

BEST Gilbert, Hickey, White, Goddard


User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Re: Sandy v Williamstown

Post: # 1737517Post Enrico_Misso »

58 hit outs is a fair effort!


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
Post Reply