Overrated spud that has no upside and has big ???? over his kicking.
Only dominates because of his size in the juniors
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Geez, just when I was getting used to the new Leigh Matthews Jaxons shoots down the holy grail.Dave McNamara wrote:ausfatcat wrote:I think we will get McCartin with pick 1![]()
![]()
![]()
If that's the case, unload that number one pick for the deal above!
Aus, IMHO one-trick McCartin will struggle to even make in the AFL...full stop! Let alone be worth a top five pick.
Any deal for Petracca must start with Cameron on the table, then the offer made to us is built up from that starting point.
This draft is Petracca, then... daylight.
Im the last one to be a wowser or the standards police but surely you can think of a more PG and less crude rated scale/metaphor. Noone needs to be r*ped . After pick 17 in 2009 we shouldnt go there...sainter#4 wrote:Jaxons can you tell us where you believe the deal sits on a number scale; 1 being we are getting bent over and raped and 10 being we are bending them over and doing the raping?![]()
It wasn't even that funny. Listen: once you click submit, just wait. Go get a cup of tea. Watch a you tube clip. If your post still hasn't been registered, get a new computer/Internet provider/router.magnifisaint wrote:Someone on another thread said that he went for the Fagpies
It's a fair point you make, Con. Lousy metaphor.Con Gorozidis wrote:Im the last one to be a wowser or the standards police but surely you can think of a more PG and less crude rated scale/metaphor. Noone needs to be r*ped . After pick 17 in 2009 we shouldnt go there...sainter#4 wrote:Jaxons can you tell us where you believe the deal sits on a number scale; 1 being we are getting bent over and raped and 10 being we are bending them over and doing the raping?![]()
The OtherThommo wrote:It's a fair point you make, Con. Lousy metaphor.Con Gorozidis wrote:Im the last one to be a wowser or the standards police but surely you can think of a more PG and less crude rated scale/metaphor. Noone needs to be r*ped . After pick 17 in 2009 we shouldnt go there...sainter#4 wrote:Jaxons can you tell us where you believe the deal sits on a number scale; 1 being we are getting bent over and raped and 10 being we are bending them over and doing the raping?![]()
sainter#4 wrote:The OtherThommo wrote:It's a fair point you make, Con. Lousy metaphor.Con Gorozidis wrote:Im the last one to be a wowser or the standards police but surely you can think of a more PG and less crude rated scale/metaphor. Noone needs to be r*ped . After pick 17 in 2009 we shouldnt go there...sainter#4 wrote:Jaxons can you tell us where you believe the deal sits on a number scale; 1 being we are getting bent over and raped and 10 being we are bending them over and doing the raping?![]()
Sorry guys - i didn't mean to offend anyone with it.
It's a fair cop, #4.sainter#4 wrote:The OtherThommo wrote:It's a fair point you make, Con. Lousy metaphor.Con Gorozidis wrote:Im the last one to be a wowser or the standards police but surely you can think of a more PG and less crude rated scale/metaphor. Noone needs to be r*ped . After pick 17 in 2009 we shouldnt go there...sainter#4 wrote:Jaxons can you tell us where you believe the deal sits on a number scale; 1 being we are getting bent over and raped and 10 being we are bending them over and doing the raping?![]()
Sorry guys - i didn't mean to offend anyone with it.
jaxons wrote:I don't think we will have pick 1 come this time next Thursday, watch this space!
Thought we were trading Dayne Beams for a minuteCon Gorozidis wrote:sainter#4 wrote:The OtherThommo wrote:It's a fair point you make, Con. Lousy metaphor.Con Gorozidis wrote:Im the last one to be a wowser or the standards police but surely you can think of a more PG and less crude rated scale/metaphor. Noone needs to be r*ped . After pick 17 in 2009 we shouldnt go there...sainter#4 wrote:Jaxons can you tell us where you believe the deal sits on a number scale; 1 being we are getting bent over and raped and 10 being we are bending them over and doing the raping?![]()
Sorry guys - i didn't mean to offend anyone with it.![]()
I did chuckle. Was just a bit extreme for a Wednesday. Seems like a Friday Night job.
Dave McNamara wrote:Hush Pluggs!!!plugger66 wrote:Dave there maybe one or two people on this board who actually think you know what you are talking about...
I dont want those remaining one or two people to catch-on yet.
Wasnt meant to be funny. Got lost in cyberspace.Austinnn wrote:It wasn't even that funny. Listen: once you click submit, just wait. Go get a cup of tea. Watch a you tube clip. If your post still hasn't been registered, get a new computer/Internet provider/router.magnifisaint wrote:Someone on another thread said that he went for the Fagpies
I also hope we don't trade it.stinger wrote:jaxons wrote:I don't think we will have pick 1 come this time next Thursday, watch this space!
hope you are wrong...wouldn't be the first time either....
I also hope we don't trade it.stinger wrote:jaxons wrote:I don't think we will have pick 1 come this time next Thursday, watch this space!
hope you are wrong...wouldn't be the first time either....
Wasnt meant to be funny. Got lost in cyberspace.Austinnn wrote:It wasn't even that funny. Listen: once you click submit, just wait. Go get a cup of tea. Watch a you tube clip. If your post still hasn't been registered, get a new computer/Internet provider/router.magnifisaint wrote:Someone on another thread said that he went for the Fagpies
I will tell you a couple of facts.sainter#4 wrote:Jaxons can you tell us where you believe the deal sits on a number scale; 1 - 10 ?![]()
jaxons wrote:I will tell you a couple of facts.sainter#4 wrote:Jaxons can you tell us where you believe the deal sits on a number scale; 1 - 10 ?![]()
Luke Hodge, Des Headland and Drew Banfield are the only players taken at #1 by their original club to have played in a premiership since 1986 of No.1 draft picks (yes Riewoldt was close).
We will not build the list well enough by going into this draft with just picks #1 and #23 and #40.
If I told you we may have 4-5 picks inside pick 23 and/or maybe a young gun with those picks, you would think that gives us a better chance moving forward in the long run.
I would have thought so.
That'll add some pages to the thread...jaxons wrote:I will tell you a couple of facts.sainter#4 wrote:Jaxons can you tell us where you believe the deal sits on a number scale; 1 - 10 ?![]()
Luke Hodge, Des Headland and Drew Banfield are the only players taken at #1 by their original club to have played in a premiership since 1986 of No.1 draft picks (yes Riewoldt was close).
We will not build the list well enough by going into this draft with just picks #1 and #23 and #40.
If I told you we may have 4-5 picks inside pick 23 and/or maybe a young gun with those picks, you would think that gives us a better chance moving forward in the long run.
I would have thought so.
dragit wrote:Con teaching etiquette and decency standards…
It's like the twilight zone.