Channel 9 News...

SaintSimmo · Post: # 944588Post **SaintSimmo** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 4:18pm

PJ Sainter wrote:Maybe it's about a Dick, a Ball, a Goldsack and getting their Jolly's??

saintbrat · Post: # 944589Post **saintbrat** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 4:19pm

6 years?

Mick must have really been P'd off to want that raised again this year..

MC Gusto · Post: # 944599Post **MC Gusto** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 4:39pm

saintbrat wrote:6 years?

Mick must have really been P'd off to want that raised again this year..

agreed.

the dog.

this will come back to bite em i am sure

yipper · Post: # 944600Post **yipper** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 4:42pm

MC Gusto wrote:
saintbrat wrote:6 years?

Mick must have really been P'd off to want that raised again this year..
agreed.

the dog.

this will come back to bite em i am sure

So this is about M & M from 2004???? Serious?? Eddie really does have some influence at Ch 9 doesn't he!!

SainterK · Post: # 944603Post **SainterK** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 4:45pm

Wow so it's really about the 2004 incident then....I am genuinely surprised.

Mr Magic · Post: # 944604Post **Mr Magic** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 4:52pm

Maybe Didak was asleep in the back of the car this morning as it tried to avoid the police on the Monash Freeway.

He could always claim he was running late for training!

saintly · Post: # 944607Post **saintly** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 4:54pm

MC Gusto wrote:
saintly wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:We're talking about the old 'Milne/Montagna Incident' aren't we?
no, what happened this year with one ofr 2 players.
no that is wrong

oh, that is what i assumed.

wrongly assumed. it would seem.

clarky449 · Post: # 944610Post **clarky449** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 4:58pm

If it something about the saints well F$#% that.

Eastern · Post: # 944611Post **Eastern** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 4:58pm

Does anyone have the contact details for Ch 9 and their executives? Some of us might want to give our opinions after this goes to air. Also, can someone "Youtube" the article for those of us who won't be in at 6.00pm? !!

ps. Be nice to the receptionists. It's not their fault

saintspremiers · Mon 21 Jun 2010 5:15pm

Eastern wrote: ps. Be nice to the receptionists. It's not their fault

nah, eat 'em alive, they prob only got the job because of some other sex scandal involving a senior executive!

plugger66 · Post: # 944625Post **plugger66** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 5:23pm

yipper wrote:
MC Gusto wrote:
saintbrat wrote:6 years?

Mick must have really been P'd off to want that raised again this year..
agreed.

the dog.

this will come back to bite em i am sure
So this is about M & M from 2004???? Serious?? Eddie really does have some influence at Ch 9 doesn't he!!

Why would Eddie even slightly care about telling channel 9 to run this story. And more importantly why would they listen. The conspirancies are amazing.

Quixote · Post: # 944632Post **Quixote** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 5:33pm

I have the distinct impression this 'story' will have as much relevance as the lint currently residing in my belly button.

Middo · Post: # 944633Post **Middo** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 5:36pm

plugger66 wrote:
yipper wrote:
MC Gusto wrote:
saintbrat wrote:6 years?

Mick must have really been P'd off to want that raised again this year..
agreed.

the dog.

this will come back to bite em i am sure
So this is about M & M from 2004???? Serious?? Eddie really does have some influence at Ch 9 doesn't he!!
Why would Eddie even slightly care about telling channel 9 to run this story. And more importantly why would they listen. The conspirancies are amazing.

Ha ha here we go again...the voice speaks again !! ( Conspiracies )

MC Gusto · Post: # 944634Post **MC Gusto** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 5:39pm

plugger66 wrote:
yipper wrote:
MC Gusto wrote:
saintbrat wrote:6 years?

Mick must have really been P'd off to want that raised again this year..
agreed.

the dog.

this will come back to bite em i am sure
So this is about M & M from 2004???? Serious?? Eddie really does have some influence at Ch 9 doesn't he!!
Why would Eddie even slightly care about telling channel 9 to run this story. And more importantly why would they listen. The conspirancies are amazing.

ok so you reckon if milne played for collingwood this would get redone tonight??

plugger66 · Post: # 944635Post **plugger66** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 5:39pm

Middo wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
yipper wrote:
MC Gusto wrote:
saintbrat wrote:6 years?

Mick must have really been P'd off to want that raised again this year..
agreed.

the dog.

this will come back to bite em i am sure
So this is about M & M from 2004???? Serious?? Eddie really does have some influence at Ch 9 doesn't he!!
Why would Eddie even slightly care about telling channel 9 to run this story. And more importantly why would they listen. The conspirancies are amazing.
Ha ha here we go again...the voice speaks again !! ( Conspiracies )

The man without any imput. Give us something. You are getting more boring by the minute. Do you follow the Saints or me. It impresses me that you are so interested in me but i can assure you I have no time for you so find someone else to follow around.

Do you even follow the Saints?

Middo · Post: # 944637Post **Middo** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 5:44pm

Do you even follow the Saints?

Same question I asked you a few weeks ago old boy ... ?

plugger66 · Post: # 944641Post **plugger66** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 5:50pm

Middo wrote:Do you even follow the Saints?

Same question I asked you a few weeks ago old boy ... ?

Just show me one post where i havent supported the Saints. Went to WA last week and it wasnt for a holiday, it was to see the Saints. Why would you suggest I dont follow the Saints. Is it that I dont whinge about the umpires, the media, the commentators, the other clubs or the AFL. Is that what a true Saints supporter does in your opinion.

Do you follow the Saints or just my posts?

Solar · Post: # 944642Post **Solar** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 5:51pm

finding it hard to read threads with the bulls*** posted by plugger66... promised the mods I would ignore him but hell it's hard when his rubbish is in every thread.

Of course those at nine and eddie would be in contact. Thats what contacts are. The herald sun and channel 9 push the gutter line of journalism because it's popular with the small minded masses, has been since the early tabloids in England and France. Add in the power of the corperation that is the collingwood football club and no wonder they focus on certain stories more then others.

Sex sells papers/audience share and if you add in football then it rockets through the roof. Be it a player from a "less glamour club" such as st.kilda right now (we used to be sexy, now we are successful) and add enemy that got the leader from the masses club in trouble then of course they will push it.

It will be full of half truths and perhaps an interview. They will use the old cliches "sources believe.... etc" so that they are legally sound.

Of course they would think second thoughts if this was a pies player. Have a look at the lack of coverage of the malthouse lie compared to other stations.....

plugger66 · Post: # 944643Post **plugger66** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 5:54pm

Solar wrote:finding it hard to read threads with the bulls*** posted by plugger66... promised the mods I would ignore him but hell it's hard when his rubbish is in every thread.

Of course those at nine and eddie would be in contact. Thats what contacts are. The herald sun and channel 9 push the gutter line of journalism because it's popular with the small minded masses, has been since the early tabloids in England and France. Add in the power of the corperation that is the collingwood football club and no wonder they focus on certain stories more then others.

Sex sells papers/audience share and if you add in football then it rockets through the roof. Be it a player from a "less glamour club" such as st.kilda right now (we used to be sexy, now we are successful) and add enemy that got the leader from the masses club in trouble then of course they will push it.

It will be full of half truths and perhaps an interview. They will use the old cliches "sources believe.... etc" so that they are legally sound.

Of course they would think second thoughts if this was a pies player. Have a look at the lack of coverage of the malthouse lie compared to other stations.....

You speak to mods about me. That impresses me that you care so much. Loved that PM you sent me kid. Very impressive language.

clarky449 · Post: # 944645Post **clarky449** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 5:56pm

Can we get back on topic
PM each other if you want to have a slanging match!

stinger · Post: # 944649Post **stinger** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 5:59pm

plugger66 wrote:
Solar wrote:finding it hard to read threads with the bulls*** posted by plugger66... promised the mods I would ignore him but hell it's hard when his rubbish is in every thread.

Of course those at nine and eddie would be in contact. Thats what contacts are. The herald sun and channel 9 push the gutter line of journalism because it's popular with the small minded masses, has been since the early tabloids in England and France. Add in the power of the corperation that is the collingwood football club and no wonder they focus on certain stories more then others.

Sex sells papers/audience share and if you add in football then it rockets through the roof. Be it a player from a "less glamour club" such as st.kilda right now (we used to be sexy, now we are successful) and add enemy that got the leader from the masses club in trouble then of course they will push it.

It will be full of half truths and perhaps an interview. They will use the old cliches "sources believe.... etc" so that they are legally sound.

Of course they would think second thoughts if this was a pies player. Have a look at the lack of coverage of the malthouse lie compared to other stations.....
You speak to mods about me. That impresses me that you care so much. Loved that PM you sent me kid. Very impressive language.

.. i know you post some crap and i have had my spats with you...but you have never posted anything i would have thought worth referring to a mod....says more about the poster that did that. than you.. ..imho.....

Solar · Post: # 944650Post **Solar** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 5:59pm

clarky449 wrote:Can we get back on topic
PM each other if you want to have a slanging match!

clarkey I was on topic, p66 was doing his usual "I know more then you... stupid" routine.

joffaboy · Post: # 944651Post **joffaboy** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 6:00pm

Unless M or M are being charged, who cares?

And if it is a beat up the club should blanket ban anything or anyone at this s.hit excuse of a TV station.

Solar · Post: # 944653Post **Solar** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 6:00pm

joffaboy wrote:Unless M or M are being charged, who cares?

And if it is a beat up the club should blanket ban anything or anyone at this s.hit excuse of a TV station.

agreed

Middo · Post: # 944654Post **Middo** » Mon 21 Jun 2010 6:01pm

plugger66 wrote:
Middo wrote:Do you even follow the Saints?

Same question I asked you a few weeks ago old boy ... ?
Just show me one post where i havent supported the Saints. Went to WA last week and it wasnt for a holiday, it was to see the Saints. Why would you suggest I dont follow the Saints. Is it that I dont whinge about the umpires, the media, the commentators, the other clubs or the AFL. Is that what a true Saints supporter does in your opinion.

Do you follow the Saints or just my posts?

You only whinge about what everybody else likes to talk about , why not add to the topic instead of pulling people down ?