Jack Billings

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531323Post dragit »

Bluthy wrote:Look at the brilliant systems that Clarkson is putting in and the versatility he is adding to his team.
Haha!

Yes, Clarkson's brilliant system - the one that utilizes outside mids with pace and skill.


Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531325Post Bluthy »

dragit wrote:
Bluthy wrote:Look at the brilliant systems that Clarkson is putting in and the versatility he is adding to his team.
Haha!

Yes, Clarkson's brilliant system - the one that utilizes outside mids with pace and skill.
Every team wants pace in the modern game. Their system rotate these guys rotate around from wingers to on ball to pushing forward otherwise they would quickly get their supply blocked. Versatility you see, tis the key.


St Ick
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2227
Joined: Mon 16 Nov 2009 8:37pm

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531328Post St Ick »

Bluthy wrote:
St Ick wrote:Before bagging posters about commenting about their knowledge of their endurance Bluthy should probably read the OP and see the comments re this exact issue.
"He came to us obviously as a highly-rated junior, but probably got by on having a lot of skill rather than being a genuine athlete" - from article

Maybe St Ick should take a comprehensive reading class. You know its ok to say "hey this is a bit of an unknown. I'm not sure how things will pan out". I think its brilliant that Billings will be played in the midfield. But lets see how he goes with the brutal running required of an AFL mid. He's already tweaked his hammy. We just don't know how he's going to cope with an on ball role and the marathon they have to run
Get a life and stop playing the man champ. This is the next paragraph in the article...

“But he’s improved out of sight both in his running capacity and in the gym.

He was injured in his U18 year, he was injured last pre season - so didnt have that base and he subsequently got injured and got by on his pure ability.

But now he is injury free he has been able to build a reasonable fitness base as evidenced by the article - obviously will need a few full preseasons to fully develop into a bone fide midfielder but is well on the way.


Strength through Loyalty
Go those mighty Sainters!!
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7833
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 209 times
Been thanked: 561 times

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531330Post magnifisaint »

I don't care for anyone's opinion on here. I just hope Billings turns into a gun


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531332Post plugger66 »

Bluthy wrote:
dragit wrote:
Bluthy wrote:Look at the brilliant systems that Clarkson is putting in and the versatility he is adding to his team.
Haha!

Yes, Clarkson's brilliant system - the one that utilizes outside mids with pace and skill.
Every team wants pace in the modern game. Their system rotate these guys rotate around from wingers to on ball to pushing forward otherwise they would quickly get their supply blocked. Versatility you see, tis the key.

Yep but they don't try and make outside runners into inside mids. And more than anything is that Hawthorn play to their strengths. Jack has the potential to be a very good outside mid and a very good HFF when resting. That is how he will play because its natural.


Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531388Post Bluthy »

plugger66 wrote: Yep but they don't try and make outside runners into inside mids. And more than anything is that Hawthorn play to their strengths. Jack has the potential to be a very good outside mid and a very good HFF when resting. That is how he will play because its natural.
Predictable = shut down in the grand final = heart breaking Sainters loss again = suicidal supporters

Billings inside game winning own ball + and outside game + marking + goals + creative disposal + linking back to forwards = unstoppable = Norm Smith medallist = Premiership = blissful sainters supporters

You can't argue with mathematics. Anyway Thommo confirms he has a good inside game so he'd be mad not to "play to his strengths" :wink:


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531392Post plugger66 »

Bluthy wrote:
plugger66 wrote: Yep but they don't try and make outside runners into inside mids. And more than anything is that Hawthorn play to their strengths. Jack has the potential to be a very good outside mid and a very good HFF when resting. That is how he will play because its natural.
Predictable = shut down in the grand final = heart breaking Sainters loss again = suicidal supporters

Billings inside game winning own ball + and outside game + marking + goals + creative disposal + linking back to forwards = unstoppable = Norm Smith medallist = Premiership = blissful sainters supporters

You can't argue with mathematics. Anyway Thommo confirms he has a good inside game so he'd be mad not to "play to his strengths" :wink:

No depth was our reason for losing GF. Swans and Hawks are the most predictable sides in the AFL now. That second last paragraph is just emotive words. I can do that to. Outside run goals GF. Winning. Why do more players kick on their strong foot now than 15 years ago?


Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531636Post Bluthy »

http://www.saints.com.au/news/2015-03-0 ... -hamstrung

I hope we play ultra cautious with Jacks return. This is the second tweak of his hammy. It could be nothing but why not give him at least a month off if not six weeks. His future is what matters not now. I know they are keen to get games into the quality young players for their development but they should be erring on the side of caution. We've got other players we need to test out - Lonie would be a great replacement for him in the 22 or Saad who we need to see what he can deliver after his break.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531671Post saintspremiers »

Bluthy wrote:http://www.saints.com.au/news/2015-03-0 ... -hamstrung

I hope we play ultra cautious with Jacks return. This is the second tweak of his hammy. It could be nothing but why not give him at least a month off if not six weeks. His future is what matters not now. I know they are keen to get games into the quality young players for their development but they should be erring on the side of caution. We've got other players we need to test out - Lonie would be a great replacement for him in the 22 or Saad who we need to see what he can deliver after his break.
When the coach says its a bummer and isn't downplaying the injury makes me think it's significant.

The real season is 5 weeks away. Can he play in round 1 with no further nab praccy matches as warmups?


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4581
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 368 times
Been thanked: 450 times

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531685Post loris »

Reading how the lad had put on muscle over the off season, was it 4 0r 5 kilos......... I hope they haven't built him up too quickly with weights and it's going to put a strain on his legs/hammies.

IMHO got to be very careful adding too much mass to young bodies that are still developing. I'm sure (I hope) our fitness people are being very cautious with his development.


loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4581
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 368 times
Been thanked: 450 times

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531788Post loris »

At least Billings' injury should only keep him out for a few weeks or so, I hope. Not so for Liberatore (Doggies) & McKenzie (Eagles)........... their season have ended with ACL injuries.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531830Post Con Gorozidis »

I dont want to get into the outside v inside thing because I dont think it is a true black and white argument.
I dont think anyone can get away with being a purely outside player these days. A 100% outside player wont survive because there are always times in a game where a player is exposed one on one and will be at least expected by the coach to break even in those situations. Look at Brad Hill. He is predominantly 'outside' but plenty of times I have seen him exposed one on one and he wins more than he loses in those situations. He can win a contested ball and often does. At worst he breaks even and holds it up. You dont want a player who is great outside but cant even compete when its their turn.

What I do notice though is that now when a side wins a contest that 4 or 5 blokes run ahead of the ball like utter lunatics ('the spread'). In the old days this used to be called 'cheating' but these days it is considered a legitimate and sometimes the only way to move the ball fwd and attack and cause defences to be vulnerable. The difference these days is instead of the players that run fwd stopping for a breather if the ball gets turned over - now they are expected to quickly turn around and run back like lunatics the other direction to work in defence. This means the idea of 'cheating' has now been replaced by 'working hard both ways'.
Last edited by Con Gorozidis on Mon 02 Mar 2015 8:24pm, edited 2 times in total.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531832Post dragit »

Con Gorozidis wrote:I dont want to get into the outside v inside thing because I dont think it is a true black and white argument.
I dont think anyone can get away with being a purely outside player these days. A 100% outside player wont survive because there are always times in a game where a player is exposed one on one and will be at least expected by the coach to break even in those situations. Look at Brad Hill. He is predominantly 'outside' but plenty of times I have seen him exposed one on and on and he wins more than he loses in those situations. He can win a contested ball and often does. At worst he breaks even and holds it up. You dont want a player who is great outside but cant even compete when its their turn.

What I do notice though is that now when a side wins a contest that 4 or 5 blokes run ahead of the ball like utter lunatics ('the spread'). In the old days this used to be called 'cheating' but these days it is considered a legitimate and sometimes the only way to move the ball fwd and attack and cause defences to be vulnerable. The difference these days is instead of the players that run fwd stopping for a breather if the ball gets turned over - now they are expected to quickly turn around and run back like lunatics the other direction to work in defence. This means the idea of 'cheating' has now become 'working hard both ways'.
I don't think anyone said that a player will do a role 100% of the time and not deviate from the plan. Full forwards run the entire ground these days.

The argument with bluthy here is about whether an "outside mid" role even exists... Which it does.

Outside players aren't soft or scared of contests, but they have a specific role which utilised their run &/or foot skills... So they are ideally not at the bottom of packs.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531838Post Con Gorozidis »

dragit wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:I dont want to get into the outside v inside thing because I dont think it is a true black and white argument.
I dont think anyone can get away with being a purely outside player these days. A 100% outside player wont survive because there are always times in a game where a player is exposed one on one and will be at least expected by the coach to break even in those situations. Look at Brad Hill. He is predominantly 'outside' but plenty of times I have seen him exposed one on and on and he wins more than he loses in those situations. He can win a contested ball and often does. At worst he breaks even and holds it up. You dont want a player who is great outside but cant even compete when its their turn.

What I do notice though is that now when a side wins a contest that 4 or 5 blokes run ahead of the ball like utter lunatics ('the spread'). In the old days this used to be called 'cheating' but these days it is considered a legitimate and sometimes the only way to move the ball fwd and attack and cause defences to be vulnerable. The difference these days is instead of the players that run fwd stopping for a breather if the ball gets turned over - now they are expected to quickly turn around and run back like lunatics the other direction to work in defence. This means the idea of 'cheating' has now become 'working hard both ways'.
I don't think anyone said that a player will do a role 100% of the time and not deviate from the plan. Full forwards run the entire ground these days.

The argument with bluthy here is about whether an "outside mid" role even exists... Which it does.

Outside players aren't soft or scared of contests, but they have a specific role which utilised their run &/or foot skills... So they are ideally not at the bottom of packs.
Ok I dont want to get dragged into the bluthy argument but as I said I dont believe there is such thing as a pure outsider and a pure insider.
I see it as a spectrum with inside at one end and outside on the other end and each individual player fits somewhere along it. For a list manager you want a nice spread of talent across the spectrum but anyone who is 'extreme' i.e extreme 'inside' or extreme 'outside' probably wont last at AFL level.

At lower levels you will probably find some guys who literally only play outside or only play inside and thats it.

But yeah agree that if you are along the outside spectrum and mainly focus your work on the spread - you would still be expected to be competitive in the contest at AFL level when your time comes and the situation calls for it. I think Billings has shown he goes ok when he is in that situation but hes not getting in that situation 100 times a game like say Ross is.

This would be easier to present with some visual aids :D


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531847Post plugger66 »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
dragit wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:I dont want to get into the outside v inside thing because I dont think it is a true black and white argument.
I dont think anyone can get away with being a purely outside player these days. A 100% outside player wont survive because there are always times in a game where a player is exposed one on one and will be at least expected by the coach to break even in those situations. Look at Brad Hill. He is predominantly 'outside' but plenty of times I have seen him exposed one on and on and he wins more than he loses in those situations. He can win a contested ball and often does. At worst he breaks even and holds it up. You dont want a player who is great outside but cant even compete when its their turn.

What I do notice though is that now when a side wins a contest that 4 or 5 blokes run ahead of the ball like utter lunatics ('the spread'). In the old days this used to be called 'cheating' but these days it is considered a legitimate and sometimes the only way to move the ball fwd and attack and cause defences to be vulnerable. The difference these days is instead of the players that run fwd stopping for a breather if the ball gets turned over - now they are expected to quickly turn around and run back like lunatics the other direction to work in defence. This means the idea of 'cheating' has now become 'working hard both ways'.
I don't think anyone said that a player will do a role 100% of the time and not deviate from the plan. Full forwards run the entire ground these days.

The argument with bluthy here is about whether an "outside mid" role even exists... Which it does.

Outside players aren't soft or scared of contests, but they have a specific role which utilised their run &/or foot skills... So they are ideally not at the bottom of packs.
Ok I dont want to get dragged into the bluthy argument but as I said I dont believe there is such thing as a pure outsider and a pure insider.
I see it as a spectrum with inside at one end and outside on the other end and each individual player fits somewhere along it. For a list manager you want a nice spread of talent across the spectrum but anyone who is 'extreme' i.e extreme 'inside' or extreme 'outside' probably wont last at AFL level.

At lower levels you will probably find some guys who literally only play outside or only play inside and thats it.

But yeah agree that if you are along the outside spectrum and mainly focus your work on the spread - you would still be expected to be competitive in the contest at AFL level when your time comes and the situation calls for it. I think Billings has shown he goes ok when he is in that situation but hes not getting in that situation 100 times a game like say Ross is.

This would be easier to present with some visual aids :D

I don't think anyone is saying any player is pure inside or outside player but I would guess that a player who gets less than 30% contested ball would be classed as out side, 30 to say 45% would be classed and an in and out player and about 50% would be an inside player. No player in the AFL these days can play a game without at least getting some contested ball but they could still be an outside runner. I reckon Billings will be a great outside runner who as you say will go get his own ball when the situation presents but I don't think we need him to constantly get his own ball. We have enough of those players already.


falka
Club Player
Posts: 454
Joined: Sat 25 Oct 2008 6:03pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531894Post falka »

So any news on his hammy?


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531904Post gringo »

plugger66 wrote:
Bluthy wrote:
dragit wrote:
Bluthy wrote:Look at the brilliant systems that Clarkson is putting in and the versatility he is adding to his team.
Haha!

Yes, Clarkson's brilliant system - the one that utilizes outside mids with pace and skill.
Every team wants pace in the modern game. Their system rotate these guys rotate around from wingers to on ball to pushing forward otherwise they would quickly get their supply blocked. Versatility you see, tis the key.

Yep but they don't try and make outside runners into inside mids. And more than anything is that Hawthorn play to their strengths. Jack has the potential to be a very good outside mid and a very good HFF when resting. That is how he will play because its natural.

I hate to agree with you Plugger but I do, it seems like when ever you get a player that is good at something everyone rushes to turn him into something else. It's like a ridiculous fashion ATM. I saw on big footy someone was saying Stringer from the Dogs might move into the midfield. He's an undersized KPF like Membery. He is ridiculously good at it they want him to stop what he does well and do what aren't his strengths. Stupidity.

On Dal I think his stats were misleading somewhat. They classify a contested possession as being with in a couple of meters of an opposition player, not quite the same as Lenny diving head down to scrap a ball out when you use your clean hands and poise to manoeuvre through traffic which he is very good at.I saw Billings at training doing the mid drills and he was getting the ball off the ground cleanly and manoeuvring around the pack, he is more Dal than Lenny but still able to do more and just "Joe the goose" while running past as BM would call it.


Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11300
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1295 times
Been thanked: 437 times

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531919Post Sainternist »

falka wrote:So any news on his hammy?
He'll be sidelined for four weeks. Will hopefully be okay for Round 1.


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
Stephen Theodore
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2154
Joined: Mon 06 Aug 2007 1:53pm
Location: SE Queensland
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531931Post Stephen Theodore »

Sainternist wrote:
falka wrote:So any news on his hammy?
He'll be sidelined for four weeks. Will hopefully be okay for Round 1.
I thought it looked more than tightness as he limped off on Saturday.


User avatar
Saints94
SS Life Member
Posts: 3443
Joined: Wed 31 Jan 2007 10:47am
Location: NSW
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1531962Post Saints94 »

Struggling to be fit by round 1, I hear..

not good, maybe the bulking up has put some strain on his hamstrings etc?


SemperFidelis
SS Life Member
Posts: 3856
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 2:41pm
Has thanked: 419 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1532001Post SemperFidelis »

Interview with Jack up on the website.

http://www.saints.com.au/news/2015-03-0 ... -round-one


Always loyal
User avatar
saintbrat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 44575
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
Location: saints zone
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 188 times

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1532022Post saintbrat »



StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
Image
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1532060Post Bluthy »

gringo wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Bluthy wrote:
dragit wrote:
Bluthy wrote:Look at the brilliant systems that Clarkson is putting in and the versatility he is adding to his team.
Haha!

Yes, Clarkson's brilliant system - the one that utilizes outside mids with pace and skill.
Every team wants pace in the modern game. Their system rotate these guys rotate around from wingers to on ball to pushing forward otherwise they would quickly get their supply blocked. Versatility you see, tis the key.

Yep but they don't try and make outside runners into inside mids. And more than anything is that Hawthorn play to their strengths. Jack has the potential to be a very good outside mid and a very good HFF when resting. That is how he will play because its natural.

I hate to agree with you Plugger but I do, it seems like when ever you get a player that is good at something everyone rushes to turn him into something else. It's like a ridiculous fashion ATM. I saw on big footy someone was saying Stringer from the Dogs might move into the midfield. He's an undersized KPF like Membery. He is ridiculously good at it they want him to stop what he does well and do what aren't his strengths. Stupidity.

On Dal I think his stats were misleading somewhat. They classify a contested possession as being with in a couple of meters of an opposition player, not quite the same as Lenny diving head down to scrap a ball out when you use your clean hands and poise to manoeuvre through traffic which he is very good at.I saw Billings at training doing the mid drills and he was getting the ball off the ground cleanly and manoeuvring around the pack, he is more Dal than Lenny but still able to do more and just "Joe the goose" while running past as BM would call it.
Its called variety, complexity, and multi-facaeted play Gringo and is a hallmark of the team that has just won back to back flags. Did you remember what they did to us last year? I've never seen such confused players as ours were, half the time they didn't know who they were meant to be on let alone whether to run forward or backward or chase their man or fill a hole. Hawthorn pull you in so many directions until you break because they have so many options - plan a, plan b, plan c, plan d, plan e..... They beat the brilliant hard running Port with their own run and carry and then followed it up by beating the hard ball focus of Swans at their own game and smashing them on the outside. If you are not moving forward, you are going backwards in this ruthless and relentless competition. So many people seem stuck in a way of football that is out of date. The huge increase in resources of footy clubs means they can unpack one dimensional teams and players no matter how good there are. We should have learnt that lesson the most painful way by now.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Jack Billings

Post: # 1532071Post plugger66 »

Bluthy wrote:
gringo wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Bluthy wrote:
dragit wrote:
Bluthy wrote:Look at the brilliant systems that Clarkson is putting in and the versatility he is adding to his team.
Haha!

Yes, Clarkson's brilliant system - the one that utilizes outside mids with pace and skill.
Every team wants pace in the modern game. Their system rotate these guys rotate around from wingers to on ball to pushing forward otherwise they would quickly get their supply blocked. Versatility you see, tis the key.

Yep but they don't try and make outside runners into inside mids. And more than anything is that Hawthorn play to their strengths. Jack has the potential to be a very good outside mid and a very good HFF when resting. That is how he will play because its natural.

I hate to agree with you Plugger but I do, it seems like when ever you get a player that is good at something everyone rushes to turn him into something else. It's like a ridiculous fashion ATM. I saw on big footy someone was saying Stringer from the Dogs might move into the midfield. He's an undersized KPF like Membery. He is ridiculously good at it they want him to stop what he does well and do what aren't his strengths. Stupidity.

On Dal I think his stats were misleading somewhat. They classify a contested possession as being with in a couple of meters of an opposition player, not quite the same as Lenny diving head down to scrap a ball out when you use your clean hands and poise to manoeuvre through traffic which he is very good at.I saw Billings at training doing the mid drills and he was getting the ball off the ground cleanly and manoeuvring around the pack, he is more Dal than Lenny but still able to do more and just "Joe the goose" while running past as BM would call it.
Its called variety, complexity, and multi-facaeted play Gringo and is a hallmark of the team that has just won back to back flags. Did you remember what they did to us last year? I've never seen such confused players as ours were, half the time they didn't know who they were meant to be on let alone whether to run forward or backward or chase their man or fill a hole. Hawthorn pull you in so many directions until you break because they have so many options - plan a, plan b, plan c, plan d, plan e..... They beat the brilliant hard running Port with their own run and carry and then followed it up by beating the hard ball focus of Swans at their own game and smashing them on the outside. If you are not moving forward, you are going backwards in this ruthless and relentless competition. So many people seem stuck in a way of football that is out of date. The huge increase in resources of footy clubs means they can unpack one dimensional teams and players no matter how good there are. We should have learnt that lesson the most painful way by now.
Hawthorn and Sydney play the same style of play against any side. They don't deviate at all and apart from having better players that is also a reason for their success. Billings will be played as an outside running mid and HFF who like every player in the AFL will get his own ball when required.


Post Reply