Tom Lee

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Tom Lee

Post: # 1623643Post BigMart »

Point is

He shouldn't be on the list as a viable key defender..


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22756
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8669 times
Been thanked: 3793 times

Re: Tom Lee

Post: # 1623644Post saynta »

BigMart wrote:Point is

He shouldn't be on the list as a viable key defender..

Something he is not and never will be at AFL level.

Simpy lacks height,pace and ability.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9642
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 1232 times

Re: Tom Lee

Post: # 1623650Post CURLY »

Tom Lee would be a fine third tall in the Rivers mould. Unfair to judge him on games like yesterday when we where exposed down back even further after McCartin got injured early.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Tom Lee

Post: # 1623667Post BigMart »

How did McCartin getting injured expose us further down back?

Btw
The fact we were exposed down back actually reaffirms the fact he is not a kpd

He is a third tall back/third tall forward

At 91kg that's all he is


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16621
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3493 times
Been thanked: 2762 times

Re: Tom Lee

Post: # 1623669Post skeptic »

BigMart wrote:How did McCartin getting injured expose us further down back?

Btw
The fact we were exposed down back actually reaffirms the fact he is not a kpd

He is a third tall back/third tall forward

At 91kg that's all he is
I feel like that's obvious. How was he played?


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9642
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 1232 times

Re: Tom Lee

Post: # 1623681Post CURLY »

BigMart wrote:How did McCartin getting injured expose us further down back?

Btw
The fact we were exposed down back actually reaffirms the fact he is not a kpd

He is a third tall back/third tall forward

At 91kg that's all he is
McCartin going down meant Roo had to play majority forward robbing us of his marking down back when he plays wing. Lee is a third man up type defender. Josh Gibson the best in the game gets exposed playing on tall forwards.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
To the top
SS Life Member
Posts: 3266
Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
Been thanked: 390 times

Re: Tom Lee

Post: # 1623685Post To the top »

McCartin going down in the first quarter was significant to the structure of the side.

Simply, instead of McCartin, Bruce and Membrey stretching them in our attacking zone, and Riewoldt giving a "chop out" to a defence where Delaney and Lee were charged with the responsibilities they were (in the absence of Carlisle, Fisher and Goddard - and Dempster who has performed as a KPP defender this season), they were able to deploy to stretch us in their attacking zone.

So the loss of McCartin was significant.

That said, we really need to look for attacking, ball carrying defenders (the types who seem to carve us up) and move past the likes of Savage, Geary and Webster - and allow Montagna to return to the mids where we were also easily beaten for pace, spread and run yesterday.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22756
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8669 times
Been thanked: 3793 times

Re: Tom Lee

Post: # 1623688Post saynta »

To the top wrote:McCartin going down in the first quarter was significant to the structure of the side.

Simply, instead of McCartin, Bruce and Membrey stretching them in our attacking zone, and Riewoldt giving a "chop out" to a defence where Delaney and Lee were charged with the responsibilities they were (in the absence of Carlisle, Fisher and Goddard - and Dempster who has performed as a KPP defender this season), they were able to deploy to stretch us in their attacking zone.

So the loss of McCartin was significant.

That said, we really need to look for attacking, ball carrying defenders (the types who seem to carve us up) and move past the likes of Savage, Geary and Webster - and allow Montagna to return to the mids where we were also easily beaten for pace, spread and run yesterday.
I think you are really on the wrong tram there.

Savage and Webster are part of our future.

On the other hand, Delaney and Lee aren't.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9642
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 1232 times

Re: Tom Lee

Post: # 1623690Post CURLY »

saynta wrote:
To the top wrote:McCartin going down in the first quarter was significant to the structure of the side.

Simply, instead of McCartin, Bruce and Membrey stretching them in our attacking zone, and Riewoldt giving a "chop out" to a defence where Delaney and Lee were charged with the responsibilities they were (in the absence of Carlisle, Fisher and Goddard - and Dempster who has performed as a KPP defender this season), they were able to deploy to stretch us in their attacking zone.

So the loss of McCartin was significant.

That said, we really need to look for attacking, ball carrying defenders (the types who seem to carve us up) and move past the likes of Savage, Geary and Webster - and allow Montagna to return to the mids where we were also easily beaten for pace, spread and run yesterday.
I think you are really on the wrong tram there.

Savage and Webster are part of our future.

On the other hand, Delaney and Lee aren't.
Yeah Webster and Savage are keepers. Would like a run of games with Carlisle Roberton Lee Webster Savage Geary.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
Linton Lodger
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2467
Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 256 times

Re: Tom Lee

Post: # 1623697Post Linton Lodger »

There was nothing wrong with Lee's game yesterday nor the rest of the back six.

Quite simply we were smashed in the midfield and that's about the only reason for the loss.


ROLS-LEE
Club Player
Posts: 1205
Joined: Tue 25 Sep 2007 3:45am
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 38 times

Re: Tom Lee

Post: # 1623700Post ROLS-LEE »

Linton Lodger wrote:There was nothing wrong with Lee's game yesterday nor the rest of the back six.

Quite simply we were smashed in the midfield and that's about the only reason for the loss.
Pretty sure missing many easy goals and veteran players turning the ball over resulting in goals didn't help.


User avatar
Linton Lodger
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2467
Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 256 times

Re: Tom Lee

Post: # 1623708Post Linton Lodger »

ROLS-LEE wrote:
Linton Lodger wrote:There was nothing wrong with Lee's game yesterday nor the rest of the back six.

Quite simply we were smashed in the midfield and that's about the only reason for the loss.
Pretty sure missing many easy goals and veteran players turning the ball over resulting in goals didn't help.
True. But Gold Coast's kicking for goal was as awful as ours. It all started from the guts, where we were belted, even though we pretty much kept Ablett on a leash.


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Tom Lee

Post: # 1623710Post BigMart »

Roo took a few marks late against Geelong as all numbers were pushed behind the footy.

But how many times have you seen Roo as a third up in the D50 this year? I cannot even remember it??

He is often used as an outlet and as a connect from d50 to f50

But as a plus 1
Never seen it... Except in the last minute against Geelong to save the game


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9642
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 1232 times

Re: Tom Lee

Post: # 1623713Post CURLY »

BigMart wrote:Roo took a few marks late against Geelong as all numbers were pushed behind the footy.

But how many times have you seen Roo as a third up in the D50 this year? I cannot even remember it??

He is often used as an outlet and as a connect from d50 to f50

But as a plus 1
Never seen it... Except in the last minute against Geelong to save the game
He still pushes behind the ball which alters teams ball movement going to their forwards.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
To the top
SS Life Member
Posts: 3266
Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
Been thanked: 390 times

Re: Tom Lee

Post: # 1623742Post To the top »

If Geary, Webster and savage are "locks" for the future, why exactly are we deploying Montagna to a defensive responsibility?

Sorry, our small/medium defenders ARE a problem and a very big one.


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Tom Lee

Post: # 1623756Post BigMart »

Midfield is the problem

I reckon small back is actually the second least of the problem


wally
Club Player
Posts: 796
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 8:23am
Location: brisy
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 103 times

Re: Tom Lee

Post: # 1623765Post wally »

Bruce was originally recruited as a backman maybe a break in the backline would do him good.
Obviously with Paddy likely to miss, Roo up the ground who/how would you structure a forward line?
Could you park Hickey down forward,Holmes in ruck and rely on the smalls?


Post Reply