Flog Barrett

[kosifantutti]

He can’t have been too far off the mark on Steven. When people were talking about who would change clubs, I kept hearing “Steven may”

[rodgerfox]

Anyways, still appears some others struggle to separate not liking the message and the messager being great at their job. Pity...

What is his job?

[SaintPav]

He can’t have been too far off the mark on Steven. When people were talking about who would change clubs, I kept hearing “Steven may”

Gold!!!

[tedtheodorelogan2018]

Apparantly Barret reckons we came second last in the trade period and Sydney last in his very ordinary sliding doors segment on the afl website.

Did he even take a look at the Giants, Suns, Power or Bulldogs for example.

Yet most trade reviews had us at a B to C.

What a hack journo.

[lewdogs]

He's probably pissed off we didnt trade Steven after all the noise he made about it. Also I'd bet he would have been lauding Port last year.

He's a typical AFL journo in that he makes about 10 bad calls for every good one but has zero accountability. How tf can you say we came laat in trade week? That is hilarious.

[tedtheodorelogan2018]

The Steven rumour was complete bulls***. He kept going with it like he does with alot of stuff. Jack never wanted to leave.

[CURLY]

Barrett would have put us last no matter what we did the bloke is a Saints hater. Beams is two years older than Hannerbry with major issues that Collingwood gave two first rounders for we gave nothing up for Hannerbry yet we lose.

[degruch]

Barrett would have put us last no matter what we did the bloke is a Saints hater. Beams is two years older than Hannerbry with major issues that Collingwood gave two first rounders for we gave nothing up for Hannerbry yet we lose.

His claim that Collingwood had a great trade period in getting Beams and Roughead...

[Yorkeys]

Trying to reduce trades to a real time competitive contest is a nonsense, too many variables, outcome can take months if not years to be known and depend on individual club circumstances. Barrett byline could be a simple computer generated algorithm where Saints are rated "put something negative" and Hawks "add suck up comment". Plus writing in the royal first person is a sure sign of delusion/lack of professionalism. Anyway that's what we think.

[chico2001]

Absolute disgrace what that cockhead wrote about Beams leaving Brisbane, he should be tarred and feathered for shite like that and I don't care if it is his job and he is supposed to be the best. That was just lies.

Good post bro.

100% off the mark. But I already told you that prior to the trade going through.

Hey expert bro....how come you didn't add my second post in?

Still proclaiming it was a lie? You're not alone on this thread bagging Barrett - a lot off the mark.

Show us the post where you said Beams was going to Collingwood....."prior to the trade going through" you said

No I told you he didn't make stuff up prior to the trade and regardless of the trade.

I'm in trouble if I need to start explaining every post now to you.

Anyways, still appears some others struggle to separate not liking the message and the messager being great at their job. Pity...

No, I asked you why you didnt put my second post in your "100% off the mark" quote, did you read it ? you dont have to "explain every post" just answer the question I asked.

[saintly]

Barrett would have put us last no matter what we did the bloke is a Saints hater. Beams is two years older than Hannerbry with major issues that Collingwood gave two first rounders for we gave nothing up for Hannerbry yet we lose.

His claim that Collingwood had a great trade period in getting Beams and Roughead...

a\
Collingwood lost alot to get in Beams. roughhead was a good deal