What about the Ruck?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18520
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1847 times
Been thanked: 825 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1786667Post bigcarl »

older saint wrote: Mon 22 Apr 2019 12:53pm Malthouse wrote a good article this weekend about ruckmen and their influence
Yes I read that. He said we have uncovered a gem in Marshall, and I agree.

I don’t think we can bring in Longer as first ruck on the basis of him being a useful tap ruckman who contributes little else.

It would mean that if we need to drop a ruckman, Marshall - as second ruck - would be the man in the gun.

That would be ludicrous.

I think that when Carlisle comes back, he and Marshall should share ruck duties and that would give use one of the best ruck divisions in the competition.

The only spot I can find for Longer at the moment, is second ruck. In other words, if it’s between he and Marshall, he is first dropped.

But even that begs the question, what do you do with Longer when he is not competing at the rucks contests.

He just doesn’t win enough of the pill


Trixilver
Club Player
Posts: 344
Joined: Sun 02 May 2010 6:24pm
Location: Adelaide, SA
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 53 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1786668Post Trixilver »

Everyone should know by now how much hitouts are overrated. Just watch any stoppage and you'll see it's just a contested mess, only when the midfield is completely unmarked will a clean hitout ever go anywhere. That happens maybe twice a game.


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10934
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3375 times
Been thanked: 2344 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1786672Post Scollop »

freely wrote: Mon 22 Apr 2019 12:14pm There's another element to this - and I'd be interested to hear what the ruck experts out there think. When you're playing a 'help out your mates', team-style of footy - which is what it looks like to me when I see Lonie on the half-back flank and players with the courage to leave their man and help out when needed - is there actually something to be said for having random players (e.g., Long on Saturday) pinch-hit in the ruck? Does it actually help build that camaraderie and sense that they're all in it together?
The back 6 players leave their man because it's called zoning. You guard space and look to take intercept marks more than actually trying to defend one on one


takeaway
Club Player
Posts: 1795
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 5:54pm
Has thanked: 119 times
Been thanked: 377 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1786674Post takeaway »

bigcarl wrote: Mon 22 Apr 2019 2:18pm
older saint wrote: Mon 22 Apr 2019 12:53pm Malthouse wrote a good article this weekend about ruckmen and their influence
Yes I read that. He said we have uncovered a gem in Marshall, and I agree.

I don’t think we can bring in Longer as first ruck on the basis of him being a useful tap ruckman who contributes little else.

It would mean that if we need to drop a ruckman, Marshall - as second ruck - would be the man in the gun.

That would be ludicrous.

I think that when Carlisle comes back, he and Marshall should share ruck duties and that would give use one of the best ruck divisions in the competition.

The only spot I can find for Longer at the moment, is second ruck. In other words, if it’s between he and Marshall, he is first dropped.

But even that begs the question, what do you do with Longer when he is not competing at the rucks contests.

He just doesn’t win enough of the pill
Carlisle is very unlikely to play in the ruck after a back injury, not suited to the ruck anyway imo, and apparently not keen to do so.


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10934
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3375 times
Been thanked: 2344 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1786678Post Scollop »

takeaway wrote: Mon 22 Apr 2019 3:18pm
bigcarl wrote: Mon 22 Apr 2019 2:18pm
older saint wrote: Mon 22 Apr 2019 12:53pm Malthouse wrote a good article this weekend about ruckmen and their influence
Yes I read that. He said we have uncovered a gem in Marshall, and I agree.

I don’t think we can bring in Longer as first ruck on the basis of him being a useful tap ruckman who contributes little else.

It would mean that if we need to drop a ruckman, Marshall - as second ruck - would be the man in the gun.

That would be ludicrous.

I think that when Carlisle comes back, he and Marshall should share ruck duties and that would give use one of the best ruck divisions in the competition.

The only spot I can find for Longer at the moment, is second ruck. In other words, if it’s between he and Marshall, he is first dropped.

But even that begs the question, what do you do with Longer when he is not competing at the rucks contests.

He just doesn’t win enough of the pill
Carlisle is very unlikely to play in the ruck after a back injury, not suited to the ruck anyway imo, and apparently not keen to do so.
Terrible attitude if that is the case. I remember how petulant he was at times when his former coaches at Essendon wanted him to play in the forward line, or during that difficult period when they kept losing due to the distractions from the drugs saga and also the soft tissue injuries from piling on muscle mass in too short a time period

Needs to be a team player and just play where ever his coaches instruct him to play


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18520
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1847 times
Been thanked: 825 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1786680Post bigcarl »

Scollop wrote: Mon 22 Apr 2019 3:29pm
takeaway wrote: Mon 22 Apr 2019 3:18pm
bigcarl wrote: Mon 22 Apr 2019 2:18pm
older saint wrote: Mon 22 Apr 2019 12:53pm Malthouse wrote a good article this weekend about ruckmen and their influence
Yes I read that. He said we have uncovered a gem in Marshall, and I agree.

I don’t think we can bring in Longer as first ruck on the basis of him being a useful tap ruckman who contributes little else.

It would mean that if we need to drop a ruckman, Marshall - as second ruck - would be the man in the gun.

That would be ludicrous.

I think that when Carlisle comes back, he and Marshall should share ruck duties and that would give use one of the best ruck divisions in the competition.

The only spot I can find for Longer at the moment, is second ruck. In other words, if it’s between he and Marshall, he is first dropped.

But even that begs the question, what do you do with Longer when he is not competing at the rucks contests.

He just doesn’t win enough of the pill
Carlisle is very unlikely to play in the ruck after a back injury, not suited to the ruck anyway imo, and apparently not keen to do so.
Terrible attitude if that is the case. I remember how petulant he was at times when his former coaches at Essendon wanted him to play in the forward line, or during that difficult period when they kept losing due to the distractions from the drugs saga and also the soft tissue injuries from piling on muscle mass in too short a time period

Needs to be a team player and just play where ever his coaches instruct him to play

Exactly. If he’s fit enough to play football he’ll be fit enough to ruck.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16620
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3492 times
Been thanked: 2762 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1800488Post skeptic »

Bump.

No doubt Roma is the best ruck prospect we’ve had in years... really like the kid.

Are we still arguing that he doesn’t need help.


User avatar
HighettMan
Club Player
Posts: 499
Joined: Sat 11 May 2019 7:00pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1800621Post HighettMan »

skeptic wrote: Sat 22 Jun 2019 11:14pm Bump.

No doubt Roma is the best ruck prospect we’ve had in years... really like the kid.

Are we still arguing that he doesn’t need help.
You don't have to be a lolly pop operator to work out he needed help yesterday but putting another dedicated ruckman in that side yesterday would have made the losing margin even greater. We needed grunt at the ground level. Did you watch the game or did you just look up the hit out stats.


Have the courage to call out r ACE ism
remboy
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2130
Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
Location: Rockville
Has thanked: 565 times
Been thanked: 177 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1800624Post remboy »

There's also the question of what do we do if Marshall gets injured? At this stage it looks like Pierce will go at the end of the season and Longer would be 50-50.


Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3319
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 167 times
Been thanked: 503 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1800629Post older saint »

I would think both gone.

Need to look at an options for the next 2-3 years , perhaps why thinking Goldstein in free agency. Hopefully by then a combination of Marshall and King could be an extremely damaging ruck / forward combination in 2022


remboy
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2130
Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
Location: Rockville
Has thanked: 565 times
Been thanked: 177 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1800632Post remboy »

older saint wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 1:05pm I would think both gone.

Need to look at an options for the next 2-3 years , perhaps why thinking Goldstein in free agency. Hopefully by then a combination of Marshall and King could be an extremely damaging ruck / forward combination in 2022
Makes sense. Long won't be ready to be even a second ruck for a few years so Goldstein could be an option, as long as he's happy to spend time in the two's.


Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3319
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 167 times
Been thanked: 503 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1800639Post older saint »

remboy wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 1:12pm
older saint wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 1:05pm I would think both gone.

Need to look at an options for the next 2-3 years , perhaps why thinking Goldstein in free agency. Hopefully by then a combination of Marshall and King could be an extremely damaging ruck / forward combination in 2022
Makes sense. Long won't be ready to be even a second ruck for a few years so Goldstein could be an option, as long as he's happy to spend time in the two's.
Guessing you mean King :D Although the ruck Acres has to play who knows HAHAHA


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16620
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3492 times
Been thanked: 2762 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1800665Post skeptic »

HighettMan wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 12:35pm
skeptic wrote: Sat 22 Jun 2019 11:14pm Bump.

No doubt Roma is the best ruck prospect we’ve had in years... really like the kid.

Are we still arguing that he doesn’t need help.
You don't have to be a lolly pop operator to work out he needed help yesterday but putting another dedicated ruckman in that side yesterday would have made the losing margin even greater. We needed grunt at the ground level. Did you watch the game or did you just look up the hit out stats.
lol... look up the word context.

no surprises that you've missed it again. I now understand why you insist on posts being small...


User avatar
HighettMan
Club Player
Posts: 499
Joined: Sat 11 May 2019 7:00pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1800674Post HighettMan »

skeptic wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 2:32pm
HighettMan wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 12:35pm
skeptic wrote: Sat 22 Jun 2019 11:14pm Bump.

No doubt Roma is the best ruck prospect we’ve had in years... really like the kid.

Are we still arguing that he doesn’t need help.
You don't have to be a lolly pop operator to work out he needed help yesterday but putting another dedicated ruckman in that side yesterday would have made the losing margin even greater. We needed grunt at the ground level. Did you watch the game or did you just look up the hit out stats.
lol... look up the word context.

no surprises that you've missed it again. I now understand why you insist on posts being small...
LoL! Stop being so factual and deep with your analysis so I can comprehend the context. LoL!


Have the courage to call out r ACE ism
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16620
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3492 times
Been thanked: 2762 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1800679Post skeptic »

HighettMan wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 3:17pm
skeptic wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 2:32pm
HighettMan wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 12:35pm
skeptic wrote: Sat 22 Jun 2019 11:14pm Bump.

No doubt Roma is the best ruck prospect we’ve had in years... really like the kid.

Are we still arguing that he doesn’t need help.
You don't have to be a lolly pop operator to work out he needed help yesterday but putting another dedicated ruckman in that side yesterday would have made the losing margin even greater. We needed grunt at the ground level. Did you watch the game or did you just look up the hit out stats.
lol... look up the word context.

no surprises that you've missed it again. I now understand why you insist on posts being small...
LoL! Stop being so factual and deep with your analysis so I can comprehend the context. LoL!
Hahaha... the defensive tone.

Poor guy, you really didn't see yesterday coming did you. I mean I thought we'd win but wasn't surprised we lost. You repeatedly posted it was an absolute certainty. Long way to come down I guess


User avatar
HighettMan
Club Player
Posts: 499
Joined: Sat 11 May 2019 7:00pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1800686Post HighettMan »

skeptic wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 3:23pm
HighettMan wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 3:17pm
skeptic wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 2:32pm
HighettMan wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 12:35pm
skeptic wrote: Sat 22 Jun 2019 11:14pm Bump.

No doubt Roma is the best ruck prospect we’ve had in years... really like the kid.

Are we still arguing that he doesn’t need help.
You don't have to be a lolly pop operator to work out he needed help yesterday but putting another dedicated ruckman in that side yesterday would have made the losing margin even greater. We needed grunt at the ground level. Did you watch the game or did you just look up the hit out stats.
lol... look up the word context.

no surprises that you've missed it again. I now understand why you insist on posts being small...
LoL! Stop being so factual and deep with your analysis so I can comprehend the context. LoL!
Hahaha... the defensive tone.

Poor guy, you really didn't see yesterday coming did you. I mean I thought we'd win but wasn't surprised we lost. You repeatedly posted it was an absolute certainty. Long way to come down I guess
I don't think I've ever seen you bask in a victory, you always go missing, but you appear like sunshine after a loss. Strange. Have you ever considered changing your nic to paranoid? LoL.


Have the courage to call out r ACE ism
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16620
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3492 times
Been thanked: 2762 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1800701Post skeptic »

HighettMan wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 3:37pm
skeptic wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 3:23pm
HighettMan wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 3:17pm
skeptic wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 2:32pm
HighettMan wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 12:35pm
skeptic wrote: Sat 22 Jun 2019 11:14pm Bump.

No doubt Roma is the best ruck prospect we’ve had in years... really like the kid.

Are we still arguing that he doesn’t need help.
You don't have to be a lolly pop operator to work out he needed help yesterday but putting another dedicated ruckman in that side yesterday would have made the losing margin even greater. We needed grunt at the ground level. Did you watch the game or did you just look up the hit out stats.
lol... look up the word context.

no surprises that you've missed it again. I now understand why you insist on posts being small...
LoL! Stop being so factual and deep with your analysis so I can comprehend the context. LoL!
Hahaha... the defensive tone.

Poor guy, you really didn't see yesterday coming did you. I mean I thought we'd win but wasn't surprised we lost. You repeatedly posted it was an absolute certainty. Long way to come down I guess
I don't think I've ever seen you bask in a victory, you always go missing, but you appear like sunshine after a loss. Strange. Have you ever considered changing your nic to paranoid? LoL.
I'm here all the time... unlike yourself when you disappeared post the Port game
I just wasn't prepared to extend Richo's contract again and book my finals tickets after the 4 point win against Goldcoast and the thirteen point thriller against Carlton.

Forgive for not basking in the glory and declaring that we're building something special here based on those performances


User avatar
HighettMan
Club Player
Posts: 499
Joined: Sat 11 May 2019 7:00pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1800711Post HighettMan »

skeptic wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 3:56pm
HighettMan wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 3:37pm
skeptic wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 3:23pm
HighettMan wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 3:17pm
skeptic wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 2:32pm
HighettMan wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 12:35pm
skeptic wrote: Sat 22 Jun 2019 11:14pm Bump.

No doubt Roma is the best ruck prospect we’ve had in years... really like the kid.

Are we still arguing that he doesn’t need help.
You don't have to be a lolly pop operator to work out he needed help yesterday but putting another dedicated ruckman in that side yesterday would have made the losing margin even greater. We needed grunt at the ground level. Did you watch the game or did you just look up the hit out stats.
lol... look up the word context.

no surprises that you've missed it again. I now understand why you insist on posts being small...
LoL! Stop being so factual and deep with your analysis so I can comprehend the context. LoL!
Hahaha... the defensive tone.

Poor guy, you really didn't see yesterday coming did you. I mean I thought we'd win but wasn't surprised we lost. You repeatedly posted it was an absolute certainty. Long way to come down I guess
I don't think I've ever seen you bask in a victory, you always go missing, but you appear like sunshine after a loss. Strange. Have you ever considered changing your nic to paranoid? LoL.
I'm here all the time... unlike yourself when you disappeared post the Port game
I just wasn't prepared to extend Richo's contract again and book my finals tickets after the 4 point win against Goldcoast and the thirteen point thriller against Carlton.

Forgive for not basking in the glory and declaring that we're building something special here based on those performances
Sounds good Sunshine


Have the courage to call out r ACE ism
remboy
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2130
Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
Location: Rockville
Has thanked: 565 times
Been thanked: 177 times

Re: What about the Ruck?

Post: # 1800746Post remboy »

older saint wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 1:20pm
remboy wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 1:12pm
older saint wrote: Sun 23 Jun 2019 1:05pm I would think both gone.

Need to look at an options for the next 2-3 years , perhaps why thinking Goldstein in free agency. Hopefully by then a combination of Marshall and King could be an extremely damaging ruck / forward combination in 2022
Makes sense. Long won't be ready to be even a second ruck for a few years so Goldstein could be an option, as long as he's happy to spend time in the two's.
Guessing you mean King :D Although the ruck Acres has to play who knows HAHAHA
Whoever invented Auto correct should be shot. But maybe Long will have a growth spurt over the summer lol.


Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
Post Reply