6 Chad Wingard (HAW)
5 Sebastian Ross (STK)
5 Rowan Marshall (STK)
4 Nick Coffield (STK)
3 Jack Steele (STK)
3 Bradley Hill (STK)
2 Tom Mitchell (HAW)
2 Ben Long (STK)
Leader Board
75 Lachie Neale BL
69 Travis Boak PORT
62 Christian Petracca MELB
61 Jack Steele STK
58 Taylor Adams COLL
51 Zach Merrett ESS
48 Cameron Guthrie GEEL
48 Nic Naitanui WCE
45 Marcus Bontempelli WB
43 Scott Pendlebury COLL
41 Jack Macrae WB
39 Patrick Dangerfield GEEL
38 Ollie Wines PORT
37 Zak Jones STK
One of Seb Ross and Rowan Marshall got 5 votes from the Saints coach and zero from the Hawks coach
Coaches' votes Round 16 v Hawks
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8991
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 59 times
- Been thanked: 343 times
-
Secret Kiel
- Club Player
- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2019 12:19pm
- Has thanked: 258 times
- Been thanked: 211 times
-
Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12720
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 404 times
Re: Coaches' votes Round 16 v Hawks
Given that Marshall has just been announced as Dare Sainter of the round I think it’s pretty obvious that he got the 5 votes from our coaching panel
I reckon Clarkson has taken the pi55 with his votes
I reckon Clarkson has taken the pi55 with his votes
-
ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10708
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 809 times
Re: Coaches' votes Round 16 v Hawks
Wingard 5+1
or 4+2
or 3+3
Marshall 5+0
or 4+1
or 3+2
Ross 5+0
or 4+1
or 3+2
Coffield 4+0
or 3+1
or 2+2
Steele 3+0
or 2+1
Hill 3+0
or 2+1
Mitchell 2+0
or 1+1
Long 2+0
or 1+1
or 4+2
or 3+3
Marshall 5+0
or 4+1
or 3+2
Ross 5+0
or 4+1
or 3+2
Coffield 4+0
or 3+1
or 2+2
Steele 3+0
or 2+1
Hill 3+0
or 2+1
Mitchell 2+0
or 1+1
Long 2+0
or 1+1
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10708
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 809 times
Re: Coaches' votes Round 16 v Hawks
WORK IN PROGRESS COMPLETED
Wingard, Marshall and Ross can not all receive 5, one must have missed on 5 but two must have received 5.
Four players must have received a 4 or 5. So that means Coffield got 4+0
That revises the top 4
Wingard 5+1
or 4+2
Marshall 5+0
or 4+1
Ross 5+0
or 4+1
Coffield 4+0
Both Long and Mitchell can not be 1+1 so one of them has to be 2+0 if not both
But Wingard must include at least one off either 1 or 2
That prevents both Mitchell and Long getting 2
So Long /Mitchell 1+1
The other Long /Mitchell 2+0
Still available one off 2, 2 off 3 and 1 off 4 and two off 5
There must be 2 players with a 3
So that makes
Hill 3+0
and Steele 3+0
But Wingard needs the 2 to make it to 6
Wingard must be 4+2
So that leave 5, 5
Both Marshall & Ross have to be 5+0 .
Wingard 4+2
Marshall 5+0
Ross 5+0
Coffield 4+0
Hill 3+0
Steele 3+0
Long/Mitchell 2+0
Long/Mitchell 1+1
Wingard, Marshall and Ross can not all receive 5, one must have missed on 5 but two must have received 5.
Four players must have received a 4 or 5. So that means Coffield got 4+0
That revises the top 4
Wingard 5+1
or 4+2
Marshall 5+0
or 4+1
Ross 5+0
or 4+1
Coffield 4+0
Both Long and Mitchell can not be 1+1 so one of them has to be 2+0 if not both
But Wingard must include at least one off either 1 or 2
That prevents both Mitchell and Long getting 2
So Long /Mitchell 1+1
The other Long /Mitchell 2+0
Still available one off 2, 2 off 3 and 1 off 4 and two off 5
There must be 2 players with a 3
So that makes
Hill 3+0
and Steele 3+0
But Wingard needs the 2 to make it to 6
Wingard must be 4+2
So that leave 5, 5
Both Marshall & Ross have to be 5+0 .
Wingard 4+2
Marshall 5+0
Ross 5+0
Coffield 4+0
Hill 3+0
Steele 3+0
Long/Mitchell 2+0
Long/Mitchell 1+1
Last edited by ace on Mon 07 Sep 2020 8:44pm, edited 12 times in total.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13538
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1308 times
- Been thanked: 2013 times
Re: Coaches' votes Round 16 v Hawks
It’s even funnier the second time
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
saynta
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 22759
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8672 times
- Been thanked: 3793 times
Re: Coaches' votes Round 16 v Hawks
True though. Watch the f****** replay.
8 clearances.
-
Toy Saint
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2203
- Joined: Wed 19 Aug 2009 10:32pm
- Location: Del Mar, California
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
-
The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13538
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1308 times
- Been thanked: 2013 times
Re: Coaches' votes Round 16 v Hawks
Team high clangers (5) and second worst disposal efficiency for the side (65%).
There are clearances and there are clearances.
Players like Seb ‘holding our midfield together’ is why we haven’t played finals in 8 years.
No more mediocrity
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
SuperDuper
- Club Player
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 98 times
Re: Coaches' votes Round 16 v Hawks
Think you missed this alternative?ace wrote: ↑Mon 07 Sep 2020 8:07pm WORK IN PROGRESS COMPLETED
Wingard, Marshall and Ross can not all receive 5, one must have missed on 5 but two must have received 5.
Four players must have received a 4 or 5. So that means Coffield got 4+0
That revises the top 4
Wingard 5+1
or 4+2
Marshall 5+0
or 4+1
Ross 5+0
or 4+1
Coffield 4+0
Both Long and Mitchell can not be 1+1 so one of them has to be 2+0 if not both
But Wingard must include at least one off either 1 or 2
That prevents both Mitchell and Long getting 2
So Long /Mitchell 1+1
The other Long /Mitchell 2+0
Still available one off 2, 2 off 3 and 1 off 4 and two off 5
There must be 2 players with a 3
So that makes
Hill 3+0
and Steele 3+0
But Wingard needs the 2 to make it to 6
Wingard must be 4+2
So that leave 5, 5
Both Marshall & Ross have to be 5+0 .
Wingard 4+2
Marshall 5+0
Ross 5+0
Coffield 4+0
Hill 3+0
Steele 3+0
Long/Mitchell 2+0
Long/Mitchell 1+1
Wingard 5+1
Marshall 5+0
Ross 4+1
Coffield 4+0
Hill 3+0
Steele 3+0
Long 2+0
Mitchell 2+0
-
saynta
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 22759
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8672 times
- Been thanked: 3793 times
Re: Coaches' votes Round 16 v Hawks
Good guess.SuperDuper wrote: ↑Tue 08 Sep 2020 2:36amThink you missed this alternative?ace wrote: ↑Mon 07 Sep 2020 8:07pm WORK IN PROGRESS COMPLETED
Wingard, Marshall and Ross can not all receive 5, one must have missed on 5 but two must have received 5.
Four players must have received a 4 or 5. So that means Coffield got 4+0
That revises the top 4
Wingard 5+1
or 4+2
Marshall 5+0
or 4+1
Ross 5+0
or 4+1
Coffield 4+0
Both Long and Mitchell can not be 1+1 so one of them has to be 2+0 if not both
But Wingard must include at least one off either 1 or 2
That prevents both Mitchell and Long getting 2
So Long /Mitchell 1+1
The other Long /Mitchell 2+0
Still available one off 2, 2 off 3 and 1 off 4 and two off 5
There must be 2 players with a 3
So that makes
Hill 3+0
and Steele 3+0
But Wingard needs the 2 to make it to 6
Wingard must be 4+2
So that leave 5, 5
Both Marshall & Ross have to be 5+0 .
Wingard 4+2
Marshall 5+0
Ross 5+0
Coffield 4+0
Hill 3+0
Steele 3+0
Long/Mitchell 2+0
Long/Mitchell 1+1
Wingard 5+1
Marshall 5+0
Ross 4+1
Coffield 4+0
Hill 3+0
Steele 3+0
Long 2+0
Mitchell 2+0